A Bench of the Supreme Court sought detailed responses within four weeks, noting that the issues raised directly affect consumer rights and transparency in airline pricing. The petition contends that airlines frequently revise fares without clear justification, often adding hidden charges that significantly raise the final cost for passengers.
One of the key concerns highlighted in the plea is the reduction of free check-in baggage allowance in economy class from 25 kg to 15 kg by most private carriers. The petitioner described the move as “arbitrary and discriminatory,” arguing that passengers are now being charged for a service that was earlier provided without additional cost. The plea urges the court to direct airlines to restore the 25-kg minimum baggage limit or implement alternative measures that protect passenger interests.
The PIL also seeks a ban on dynamic pricing systems, particularly during festivals, adverse weather conditions and emergencies, claiming that ticket rates often double or triple at short notice. Such practices, the petition says, disproportionately impact last-minute travellers from economically weaker sections.
Arguing that unchecked fare policies violate the fundamental rights to equality and dignified life under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution, the petitioner has called for the creation of an independent regulator with the authority to monitor airline pricing and enforce consumer protections.
The Supreme Court will take up the matter again after receiving responses from all concerned authorities.
.jpg)
