The internal conflict within the All India Trinamool Congress (TMC) has intensified, with the party's rival factions now taking their battle to the Election Commission of India (ECI). The faction led by Mamata Banerjee has formally submitted a revised National Executive Committee to the poll body, seeking to reinforce its claim over the party's organisational structure. The move comes amid a growing challenge from a rebel group headed by Rittabrata Banerjee, which is also preparing to stake its claim over the party's leadership, name, and election symbol. The latest developments mark a significant escalation in the power struggle that emerged following the party's disappointing performance in the 2026 West Bengal Assembly elections. Political observers believe the dispute could become one of the most closely watched organisational battles in recent years, with implications extending beyond state politics.

The revised organisational list submitted by the Mamata Banerjee camp names her as the party chairperson and Abhishek Banerjee as national general secretary. The list also includes senior leaders such as Chandrima Bhattacharya, Derek O'Brien, Dola Sen and Subhasish Chakraborty in key organisational positions.

According to party sources, the revised committee was finalised and sent to the Election Commission while the rival faction was simultaneously holding a special convention in New Town, Kolkata. The convention reportedly focused on creating an alternative national leadership structure for the party.

Rival Claims Intensify

The Rittabrata Banerjee-led faction has claimed that it enjoys majority support within the party's legislative wing. During its convention, the group announced a separate National Executive Committee that excluded both Mamata Banerjee and Abhishek Banerjee from leadership positions.

The rebel camp elected Arup Roy as chairperson, while Rittabrata Banerjee was appointed among the party's general secretaries. The faction has indicated that it plans to formally submit its organisational structure to the Election Commission in the coming days.

Meanwhile, several leaders who were earlier associated with the party's official organisational structure have reportedly been removed from key positions. The development highlights the widening divide within the Trinamool Congress.

Election Commission's Role

The dispute now centers on which faction represents the legitimate organisational and legislative majority of the party. Under election laws, the Election Commission has the authority to examine claims related to party leadership, organisational control, and ownership of election symbols.

Political analysts note that such cases typically involve scrutiny of party constitutions, support among elected representatives, and backing within organisational units. If the Election Commission is unable to reach a definitive conclusion, the matter could eventually move to the judiciary.

The confrontation comes at a sensitive time for West Bengal politics. The Trinamool Congress has dominated the state's political landscape for over a decade, making the outcome of the leadership dispute significant for both the party and its opponents.

With both camps preparing legal and organisational arguments to support their claims, the battle over the Trinamool Congress name, symbol, and leadership is expected to intensify in the coming weeks. The Election Commission's decision could shape the future direction of the party and influence political alignments ahead of upcoming electoral contests.

A fresh political crisis appears to be unfolding within Shiv Sena (UBT) after only three of the party’s nine Lok Sabha MPs attended a crucial parliamentary party meeting in New Delhi. The development has intensified speculation about a possible split within the party, with six MPs reportedly distancing themselves from the Uddhav Thackeray-led faction and moving closer to the Shiv Sena led by Maharashtra Deputy Chief Minister Eknath Shinde.

The meeting, convened under a party whip requiring all MPs to be present, was attended only by Anil Desai, Arvind Sawant, and Rajabhau Waje. Following the meeting, party leaders indicated that disciplinary action could be initiated against those who remained absent.

Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Arvind Sawant said notices would be issued to the MPs who failed to attend the gathering. Meanwhile, Rajya Sabha MP Sanjay Raut alleged that pressure tactics were being used against party lawmakers and claimed that those absent from the meeting had chosen a path contrary to the party's interests.

The political tension escalated further after the Union Home Ministry reportedly directed Maharashtra Police to strengthen Y+ category security cover for the six MPs considered part of the rebel group. According to sources, these MPs submitted a letter to Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla seeking recognition of a separate parliamentary group and a merger with the Shinde faction.

Three Days of Political Turmoil

The controversy began on June 15 when reports surfaced suggesting that six Shiv Sena (UBT) MPs were in contact with leaders from the Shinde camp. The alleged operation, dubbed "Operation Tiger" in political circles, fueled speculation about another major split within the party.

On June 16, Sanjay Raut claimed that attempts were being made to engineer defections through financial inducements. He alleged that offers worth ₹50 crore had been made to MPs to switch allegiance, though no evidence was publicly presented to support the claim.

The following day, leaders from the Shinde faction publicly asserted that six MPs had signed documents seeking to form a separate bloc. Later, Raut, Sawant and Desai met Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla and urged him not to recognize any merger or separate group without first hearing the Uddhav Thackeray faction.

Anti-Defection Law in Focus

The reported rebellion carries significant legal implications because Shiv Sena (UBT) currently has nine MPs in the Lok Sabha. Under the anti-defection provisions, at least two-thirds of legislators or MPs must support a split to avoid disqualification.

With six MPs constituting exactly two-thirds of the parliamentary party, the rebel group could potentially seek protection under the merger provisions of the law if procedural requirements are fulfilled. Political observers say this legal threshold makes the current developments particularly significant.

The situation has drawn comparisons with the dramatic split of 2022, when Eknath Shinde led a rebellion involving 39 MLAs and eventually formed a separate Shiv Sena faction.

Wider Political Implications

The latest developments come ahead of the upcoming Monsoon Session of Parliament, where political alignments are expected to play a crucial role. Opposition parties have accused the BJP of encouraging defections to strengthen the National Democratic Alliance's numbers in the Lok Sabha.

Congress leader Jairam Ramesh alleged that efforts were being made to weaken opposition parties and move closer to a two-thirds majority required for major constitutional amendments. The BJP has not officially responded to these allegations.

Political analysts believe the outcome of the Shiv Sena (UBT) crisis could influence broader opposition dynamics, particularly as parties prepare for future legislative battles and electoral contests.

For now, all eyes remain on the six absent MPs and the Lok Sabha Speaker's response, which could determine the next chapter in Maharashtra's evolving political landscape.

A fresh political storm appears to be brewing in Maharashtra. Shiv Sena (UBT) has issued a whip to all its Lok Sabha MPs, making attendance mandatory at a parliamentary party meeting scheduled in New Delhi on Thursday. The move comes amid reports that six of the party's nine MPs may be preparing to align with the Eknath Shinde-led Shiv Sena faction, potentially triggering another major split within the party.

The meeting has been convened to discuss organizational and political developments at a time when speculation about internal dissent has intensified. According to party sources, the gathering will take place at 11 a.m. at the parliamentary party office within the Parliament House complex.

Reports suggest that a group of six MPs may have submitted a letter to Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla seeking recognition for a merger with the Shinde faction. However, neither the Speaker’s Office nor the MPs concerned have officially confirmed these claims.

The development has raised concerns within the Uddhav Thackeray-led camp, which has already witnessed a significant split in 2022 when Eknath Shinde led a rebellion involving 39 MLAs, eventually forming a separate faction and taking control of the original Shiv Sena name and symbol.

Political Tensions Escalate

Among the MPs reportedly linked to the rebellion are Nagesh Patil Ashtikar and Sanjay Dina Patil. Earlier on Wednesday, Sanjay Dina Patil publicly dismissed reports of leaving the party, adding further uncertainty to the situation.

Meanwhile, Shiv Sena (UBT) Rajya Sabha MP Sanjay Raut launched a sharp attack on the rebel lawmakers during a press conference in Delhi. Raut accused the MPs of betraying the party and questioned their political loyalty.

Only three of the party’s nine Lok Sabha MPs — Anil Desai, Rajabhau Waje, and Arvind Sawant — were present alongside Raut during the media interaction. He challenged the remaining MPs to publicly clarify their position and reject the speculation surrounding the reported split.

Anti-Defection Law in Focus

The reported rebellion has gained significance due to provisions under India's anti-defection law. Shiv Sena (UBT) currently has nine MPs in the Lok Sabha. Under the Tenth Schedule of the Constitution, at least two-thirds of a party's legislators must support a split or merger to avoid disqualification.

If six MPs move together, they would meet the required threshold, potentially strengthening their legal position. Political analysts, however, note that merely forming a separate group may not be sufficient. A formal merger with another recognized political party or faction could be necessary to secure protection under the law.

The situation is being closely watched as it could alter political equations in Maharashtra and influence opposition unity efforts ahead of future electoral contests.

Congress has also entered the debate. Senior Congress leader Jairam Ramesh alleged that the BJP leadership was attempting to weaken opposition parties by encouraging defections. He claimed such efforts were aimed at strengthening the ruling party’s position in Parliament.

For Shiv Sena (UBT), the coming days are likely to be crucial. The outcome of Thursday’s parliamentary party meeting may determine whether the party can contain internal dissent or faces another significant organizational setback. Political observers believe the developments could have a lasting impact on Maharashtra's political landscape and the broader opposition bloc at the national level.

Fresh political uncertainty has surfaced within the Trinamool Congress (TMC), with reports indicating that a group of 18 party MPs may meet Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla on June 8. The development has triggered speculation about a possible split within the party's parliamentary wing, just weeks after a rebellion in the West Bengal Assembly exposed internal divisions in the ruling outfit.

Sources familiar with the matter claim that the group is being led by Kakoli Ghosh Dastidar, who has emerged as one of the most vocal critics within the party in recent months. While there has been no official confirmation from the TMC leadership regarding the reported meeting, the developments have intensified discussions over the party's future political direction following recent setbacks in the state.

The speculation comes at a sensitive time for the party, which has been dealing with organisational challenges since the change of government in West Bengal. Political observers believe any significant movement within the parliamentary party could have wider implications for the opposition landscape at the national level.

Assembly Rebellion Sparks Concern

The latest reports follow a major political development in the West Bengal Assembly earlier this year. After the Assembly election results, a section of TMC legislators reportedly distanced themselves from the party leadership and formed a separate platform called the "Naba Trinamool Manch."

The group was led by Ritabrata Banerjee and Sandipan Saha, who demanded changes in the party's legislative leadership. The episode raised questions about growing dissatisfaction among certain sections of the party.

Political analysts suggest that the emergence of a similar pattern within the Lok Sabha could create fresh challenges for the TMC leadership as it attempts to maintain unity among its elected representatives.

Numbers Under Scrutiny

The TMC currently has 28 members in the Lok Sabha after the death of MP Sheikh Hazi Nurul Islam, whose constituency remains vacant pending a by-election. The party had secured 29 seats from West Bengal in the 2024 Lok Sabha elections.

The reported figure of 18 MPs has attracted attention because it approaches the threshold required under anti-defection provisions. Constitutional experts note that any move involving a substantial portion of the parliamentary party could potentially alter the legal and political dynamics surrounding party recognition and legislative status.

Kakoli Ghosh Dastidar's name has featured prominently in recent political discussions after she was removed from the post of the party's chief whip in the Lok Sabha. Since then, she has publicly expressed disagreements with the leadership of Mamata Banerjee on multiple occasions.

BJP Reacts to Reports

Reacting to the reports, Rahul Sinha claimed that the Trinamool Congress was facing increasing organisational challenges. He argued that internal conflicts were weakening the party's structure and diverting attention from broader political issues.

However, Sinha also stated that the BJP was not actively looking to induct leaders from the rival camp at present, indicating that the party was closely observing the situation rather than intervening directly.

For now, the reports remain unconfirmed. Neither the TMC leadership nor the MPs concerned have publicly announced plans for a breakaway group. Political attention will remain focused on the proposed June 8 meeting, which could provide greater clarity on whether the developments represent routine internal dissent or the beginning of a larger realignment within the party.

In a major jolt to the Trinamool Congress, 58 rebel MLAs have formally split from the party in the West Bengal Assembly, announcing a separate legislative faction on Wednesday. The group elected recently expelled MLA Ritabrata Banerjee as its legislature party leader, escalating the internal crisis that has been brewing for weeks.

The development marks one of the largest recorded splits in the TMC since its formation. The rebel MLAs met Assembly Speaker Rathindra Bose and submitted a formal letter of support for the new faction. They have also named Javed Khan, Sandipan Saha, and Siuli Saha as deputy leaders, with Akhruzzaman appointed as chief whip.

Rebels Reject Abhishek's Authority

While the breakaway group has reiterated its recognition of Mamata Banerjee as the party president, it has categorically rejected the leadership of her nephew Abhishek Banerjee and any decisions taken by him regarding the legislative party. Sources familiar with the matter said the rebels were particularly upset over what they claimed was high-handedness in handling Assembly affairs.

The immediate trigger for the rebellion was a letter sent on Abhishek Banerjee’s letterhead to the Speaker, proposing senior TMC leader Shovandev Chattopadhyay’s name as Leader of the Opposition. MLAs Sandipan Saha and Ritabrata Banerjee alleged that their signatures were forged on the document.

Mamata Banerjee expelled both legislators from the party on Monday following their complaint. The expulsions appear to have backfired, triggering wider discontent within the ranks.

Dissolution of Party Committees

On the same day, Mamata Banerjee dissolved all state-level committees and frontal organisations of the TMC with immediate effect. Party leaders described the move as a step towards complete organisational restructuring. Fresh committees are expected to be announced soon.

Key Developments That Led to the Crisis

The current turmoil comes against the backdrop of several setbacks and internal rumblings in recent weeks.

On May 31, as many as 60 of the 80 TMC MLAs skipped a crucial meeting called by Mamata Banerjee. The meeting had to be postponed. Party spokesperson Kunal Ghosh had then said the absent legislators were busy preparing protests against alleged attacks on Abhishek Banerjee.

The same day, TMC MP Kalyan Banerjee claimed he was attacked by BJP supporters outside a police station in Hooghly. He alleged that around 10-15 men in saffron clothes pelted stones and abused him.

A day earlier, on May 30, Abhishek Banerjee himself was allegedly assaulted in South Sonarpur, with eggs and slippers thrown at him. The party claimed there was an attempt on his life and five persons were later arrested.

Earlier, on May 27, TMC MP Kakoli Ghosh Dastidar resigned from all party posts. Her resignation came after she attended a meeting chaired by BJP leader Suvendu Adhikari.

On May 20, only 35 MLAs turned up for the party’s first major protest after the Assembly election defeat. The protest was held near the Ambedkar statue in the Assembly complex against post-poll violence and anti-encroachment drives.

Photo from June 1 Shows Early Signs of Rebellion

A photograph from June 1 showed Ritabrata Banerjee and Sandipan Saha in a meeting with other MLAs, signalling the early stages of the brewing discontent.

What Lies Ahead

The formation of the breakaway faction has raised questions about the future strength of the TMC in the Assembly and the stability of Mamata Banerjee’s hold over the party. Political observers note that while the rebels have stopped short of fully severing ties with Mamata, the open rejection of Abhishek Banerjee’s authority points to deep fissures within the organisation.

The Speaker’s office is yet to take a final call on the recognition of the new faction. The coming days are likely to see further political manoeuvring as both sides attempt to consolidate support.

The split comes at a time when the TMC is still recovering from its Assembly election performance and facing pressure from opposition parties, particularly the BJP.

A fresh controversy has emerged in Pakistan’s political discourse after a media report alleged that the removal of former Prime Minister Imran Khan in 2022 was not merely the result of a parliamentary no-confidence motion, but part of a broader geopolitical strategy involving the United States and the Pakistan military establishment.

The report, published by an international media outlet, claims that tensions between Washington and Islamabad escalated after Imran Khan’s visit to Moscow on 24 February 2022, the same day Russia launched its military operation in Ukraine. According to the report, the visit angered the United States, which expected Pakistan to take a clear anti-Russia stance on the conflict. Imran Khan’s government, however, maintained a neutral position on the Russia-Ukraine war, refusing to directly condemn Moscow. This, according to the report, marked a turning point in US-Pakistan diplomatic relations.

The allegations further claim that on 7 March 2022, a key meeting took place in Washington between Pakistan’s then ambassador Asad Majeed Khan and US Assistant Secretary of State Donald Lu. During this interaction, Lu reportedly conveyed that if Imran Khan were removed through a no-confidence vote, the United States would “forgive everything” and restore normal relations. This alleged communication later became central to Pakistan’s domestic political debate and formed the basis of the so-called “Cypher case,” which Imran Khan repeatedly cited as evidence of foreign interference in his removal.

According to the report, a lunch meeting in Washington further intensified pressure, where concerns were raised about Pakistan’s foreign policy direction under Imran Khan. The US side reportedly expressed dissatisfaction with Pakistan’s stance on Russia and warned of diplomatic isolation if policy alignment did not change. The timeline presented in the report suggests that just 33 days after the alleged diplomatic exchange, on 9 April 2022, Imran Khan lost power following a successful no-confidence motion in Pakistan’s parliament. Shortly after, Shehbaz Sharif became the new Prime Minister.

The report also highlights subsequent political developments in Pakistan, suggesting that the country’s internal power structure underwent significant changes after Imran Khan’s removal. These include leadership transitions within the military establishment and increased political instability, including mass protests and legal cases against PTI leadership. In November 2022, Pakistan’s army leadership changed when General Asim Munir replaced General Qamar Javed Bajwa as Chief of Army Staff. Imran Khan has previously alleged that this appointment was politically influenced, though no official confirmation has supported the claim.

In May 2023, Imran Khan was arrested in a corruption case, triggering widespread protests and unrest across the country. The political situation further intensified when his party, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), faced restrictions and internal fragmentation ahead of the 2024 general elections. Despite electoral setbacks, PTI-backed independent candidates reportedly performed strongly in the polls, but a coalition government was eventually formed by rival parties Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) and Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP).

The report also suggests that Pakistan’s relations with the United States improved significantly after Imran Khan’s removal. Bilateral cooperation reportedly expanded into strategic, economic and defense-related areas, marking a shift from the earlier strained ties. However, these claims remain politically sensitive and highly contested. The United States has consistently denied allegations of orchestrating regime change in Pakistan, maintaining that the 2022 political transition was an internal constitutional process.

Imran Khan, on his part, has repeatedly maintained that his government was removed due to a foreign-backed conspiracy. He has linked the alleged “Cypher” diplomatic communication to his claim that external pressure played a decisive role in the no-confidence vote. The new report has reignited debate within Pakistan’s political landscape, particularly among supporters of PTI, who argue that the allegations validate long-standing claims of foreign interference. PTI leaders have described the report as further proof supporting their stance on the Cypher controversy.

Imran Khan, who has been in prison since August 2023, continues to face multiple legal cases. He has been convicted in several cases, including the Al-Qadir Trust case and earlier Cypher-related charges, though some convictions have been overturned or suspended by higher courts. As political tensions continue, the narrative surrounding Imran Khan’s ouster remains deeply polarised, reflecting broader divisions within Pakistan’s politics and its complex relationship with global powers.

Wes Streeting quits cabinet, says he has “lost confidence” in Keir Starmer

Health Secretary Wes Streeting resigned from the UK government on Thursday, saying he had “lost confidence” in Prime Minister Keir Starmer and adding fresh momentum to a growing leadership crisis within Labour after the party’s poor showing in last week’s local and regional elections. The resignation, posted on X in a letter to Starmer, is the second by a minister in as many days and fuels speculation about whether a formal leadership contest could follow.

Resignation published online

Streeting, 43, published a short letter on his social feed in the late afternoon saying it was “now clear that you will not lead the Labour Party into the next general election.” He urged a broader discussion about Labour’s future and signalled he might consider standing himself, though he did not confirm whether he had the backing of the 81 MPs needed to trigger a formal contest under party rules.

Officials and sources familiar with the situation said Streeting’s move reflects wider unease among centrist and centre-left figures who worry the government has failed to respond to last week’s electoral setback quickly enough. Initial reports indicate Streeting informed a small number of colleagues before going public.

Second high-profile departure

The resignation follows that of Miatta Fahnbulleh, who on Wednesday became the first serving minister to publicly step down over concerns about Starmer’s leadership. Fahnbulleh, a backbencher-turned-junior minister who entered Parliament in 2024, said the government had not delivered the “vision, pace and ambition” it had promised and called for an orderly transition. Her letter was widely read inside Westminster as a major escalation.

In recent days four junior ministers have resigned, and media outlets report more than 80 Labour MPs have privately urged Starmer to consider his position. At the same time, more than 100 Labour lawmakers have publicly rallied to the prime minister’s defence, creating a sharply divided parliamentary party.

Starmer resists pressure

Keir Starmer, who led Labour to victory in the 2024 general election and ended 14 years of Conservative rule, has publicly said he will remain in office. According to Downing Street briefings, he spoke to senior colleagues on Thursday evening and reiterated his intent to press on with the government’s agenda. A spokesman said Starmer thanked Streeting for his service and acknowledged the “right of colleagues to express their views.”

Labour aides say the prime minister is betting that a clear programme of government — set out at the upcoming King’s Speech — and progress on key diplomacy, notably the planned UK-EU summit, can steady nerves in the parliamentary party.

Parliamentary arithmetic and rules

Under Labour’s rules, a leadership contest can be triggered if 20 per cent of Labour MPs (currently 81) back a challenger. Streeting stopped short of saying he had reached that threshold and has so far avoided an explicit call for Starmer to step down immediately. Sources close to him said discussions are ongoing and that other senior figures are weighing whether to join a potential leadership bid.

Political impact and public reaction

The flurry of resignations and public expressions of doubt have unsettled markets and drawn fresh media attention to Labour’s internal tensions. On the streets of central London on Thursday evening, voters and party activists interviewed by local reporters described confusion and frustration — some blaming last week’s local losses on broken promises, others urging unity to avoid handing an advantage back to the Conservatives.

Analysts warn the party risks prolonged paralysis if contestation drags into a prolonged internal fight. “Labour needs to show it can govern coherently,” said one political commentator. “If the King’s Speech and the summit don’t restore confidence, the pressure will only grow.”

What comes next

Key dates now carry extra weight. The King’s Speech — the first major parliamentary statement since the local elections — will be treated as a test of Labour’s policy clarity and political direction. The UK-EU summit scheduled shortly afterwards is another opportunity for the government to score a tangible win, particularly on trade or mobility arrangements.

For now, Starmer remains defiant and has broad public backing in some polls; inside Westminster, however, the calculus is shifting. If more ministers follow Streeting and Fahnbulleh out the door, or if the 81-MP threshold is met, a formal contest could be unavoidable. Until then, the party faces a tense period of jockeying and uncertainty.

‘Compromised PM no longer capable’: Rahul says ‘don’t buy gold’ advice is proof of Modi govt’s failure

 Congress leader Rahul Gandhi launched a sharp counterattack on Monday against Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s recent “seven appeals” to the public, arguing that asking citizens to cut back on gold, travel, and cooking oil was not sound advice but an admission of the government’s own economic mismanagement.

In a post on X, Gandhi said the Prime Minister appeared “compromised” and no longer capable of running the country.

“Yesterday, Modi ji asked the public to make sacrifices—don’t buy gold, don’t travel abroad, use less petrol, reduce consumption of fertilisers and cooking oil, take the metro, work from home. These are not suggestions. These are failures,” Gandhi wrote.

He added that after 12 years in power, the government had reached a point where the Prime Minister had to tell people what to buy, what not to buy, where to go, and where not to go.

PM’s Secunderabad pitch

The exchange began on Sunday. Speaking at a rally in Secunderabad, PM Modi had stressed the need to reduce dependence on imports to save foreign exchange. He listed seven specific asks: reduce petrol and diesel use, promote work-from-home models, cut down on edible oil consumption, halve chemical fertiliser use, postpone non-essential foreign travel, and avoid buying or donating gold for one year.

Officials said the appeals were prompted by rising global prices due to conflicts in West Asia. India, which does not have large domestic oil reserves, remains vulnerable.

Opposition piles on

But opposition parties quickly rejected the narrative. Congress general secretary Jairam Ramesh claimed the economic situation was far more serious than official figures suggested. Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav said the BJP had failed on both the economy and foreign policy.

“As soon as elections ended, the government suddenly remembered a ‘crisis’. In reality, there is only one crisis for the country, and its name is BJP,” Yadav said.

Trinamool Congress MP Saket Gokhale questioned why ordinary citizens were being asked to make sacrifices while ministers continued using Air Force aircraft and large convoys. He also asked why the announcements came only after several state elections had concluded.

The numbers behind the appeal

Government data and industry reports show why foreign exchange outflows have become a concern.

Annual gold expenditure has crossed ₹6 lakh crore, up from ₹4.89 lakh crore in 2024–25. The World Gold Council noted that in the first quarter of 2026, investment demand for gold in India surpassed jewellery demand for the first time.

Indians spent ₹3.65 lakh crore on foreign travel in 2025–26, a sharp rise from ₹2.72 lakh crore in 2023–24.

Fertiliser imports touched ₹1.50 lakh crore this year, a 76 per cent jump. A significant portion comes from Qatar, making supplies vulnerable to regional instability. Prices have remained elevated as a result.

Crude oil, however, remains the biggest drain. India imports nearly 70 per cent of its requirements. While the oil import bill declined to ₹10.35 lakh crore in 2025–26 from ₹11.66 lakh crore the previous year, crude prices have surged nearly 50 per cent in the past two months. Sources familiar with the matter said the bill could climb to ₹17 lakh crore if the conflict widens.

What happens now

For now, the political battle lines are clear. The government argues it is preparing the public for hard choices in the national interest. The opposition sees an administration struggling to shield the economy from global shocks.

Rahul Gandhi ended his post with a pointed remark: “A compromised PM cannot fix this. A failed govt cannot ask for more sacrifices.” The Prime Minister’s Office has not issued a direct response.

Clash breaks out between Congress, DMK workers in Mayiladuthurai

A physical altercation broke out between supporters of the Congress and the DMK in Tamil Nadu’s Mayiladuthurai town on Friday morning, adding a volatile edge to an already fluid political situation in the state. The scuffle, which lasted nearly 15 minutes, reportedly began over sloganeering outside a local party office. Police personnel intervened and dispersed the crowds. No formal complaints had been filed by late afternoon.

The clash comes at a time when the state capital Chennai is witnessing intense political realignments following an inconclusive assembly election verdict.

TVK threatens mass resignation over rival alliance

Suspense continues over whether actor-politician Vijay’s Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK) will be able to form the government. TVK has now issued a sharp warning: if the DMK and AIADMK — traditional rivals — come together to stake a claim, all TVK MLAs will resign from the House.

“Both Dravidian parties are attempting to sideline the single largest party. This is a conspiracy against public mandate,” a TVK functionary told reporters outside the party headquarters in Chennai.

According to sources aware of the developments, two meetings between DMK and AIADMK camps over the past 48 hours have fuelled speculation that a joint bid for power is being explored.

Governor’s stand, protests outside Raj Bhavan

Governor Rajendra Arlekar on Thursday rejected TVK chief Vijay’s claim to form the government for the second time, asking him to return with signatures of 118 MLAs to prove majority. However, the Governor has assured Vijay that no other party would be invited to form the government in the meantime.

On Friday morning, TVK supporters demonstrated outside Lok Bhavan, the Governor’s residence, raising slogans accusing the Governor of delaying the formation process. Police detained several protesters, who were released later in the day.

28 AIADMK MLAs shifted to Puducherry resort

In a significant development, 28 AIADMK MLAs — believed to be supporters of senior leader C.V. Shanmugam — have been lodged at a resort in Puducherry. The move is seen as an effort to prevent poaching attempts.

TVK chief Vijay currently needs six more MLAs to reach the majority mark. Sources indicate that talks are underway between TVK and the rebel AIADMK faction over portfolio allocations, including the deputy chief minister’s post. AIADMK general secretary Edappadi Palaniswami, however, is said to be opposed to any such understanding.

DMK passes four resolutions, targets Congress

At its legislative party meeting, the DMK passed four resolutions: thanking the people and allies, praising party president MK Stalin, authorising Stalin to take all necessary decisions, and — notably — criticising the Congress for breaking away from the Secular Progressive Alliance.

“Despite receiving one Rajya Sabha seat and 28 assembly seats under the DMK alliance, the Congress chose to part ways within days. This reveals their old political character,” a DMK resolution stated.

Public reactions, political uncertainty continues

Outside Vijay’s residence in Chennai, a young fan told reporters, “I want to see Vijay become Chief Minister.” Meanwhile, AIADMK MP M Thambidurai said public sentiment was in favour of his party returning to power.

CPI MP P Sandosh Kumar maintained that the single largest party must be invited to form the government. Former Jammu and Kashmir chief minister Omar Abdullah also backed Vijay’s claim.

With the Governor yet to take a final call, and no party crossing the majority mark on its own, Tamil Nadu remains in a political limbo. All eyes are now on whether the DMK-AIADMK alliance materialises — and whether TVK follows through on its resignation threat.

Bina MLA Nirmala Sapre Claims Loyalty to Congress Amid Defection Row

Court Seeks BJP Switch Proof

Bina MLA Nirmala Sapre asserted in the Madhya Pradesh High Court that she remains loyal to Congress, even as Leader of Opposition Umang Singhar pressed for evidence of her alleged BJP defection. The court recorded her statement and directed Singhar to submit party whip copies by April 9. Next hearing fixes for April 20.

Singhar Files Termination Petition

Singhar, a senior Congress leader, petitioned the High Court in November 2024 to disqualify Sapre under the 10th Schedule of the Constitution. He claims her membership ended automatically upon switching parties. The move follows her no-show on a Congress whip during key votes.

Sapre Attends BJP Event

Sapre won the Bina seat in Sagar district on a Congress ticket in 2023. Tensions peaked on May 5, 2024, when she joined a BJP rally with Chief Minister Mohan Yadav amid Lok Sabha polls. Social media posts of her with BJP leaders soon went viral, fuelling defection charges.

High Court Division Bench Hears Case

A Division Bench led by Chief Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva and Justice Vinay Saraf heard arguments on Tuesday. Sapre's counsel Sanjay Agarwal insisted no party switch occurred. Advocate General Prashant Singh noted the matter pends before the Assembly Speaker, with her statements already recorded.

Whip Copies as Key Evidence

Singhar's advocate Vibhor Khandelwal, appearing via video, promised party whip evidence by April 9. Viral images show Sapre alongside Yadav, but the court cautioned against relying solely on social media. "Present solid proof before the Speaker," the bench directed.

Background of Defection Dispute

Singhar first approached Speaker Raman Singh on July 5, 2024, citing anti-defection law violations. With no decision after months, he escalated to court. Officials indicate Sapre skipped Congress directives, raising questions over her allegiance in the opposition camp.

Assembly Speaker Hearing Looms

A parallel hearing awaits before the Speaker on April 20, aligning with the High Court's schedule. Sources say Singhar's evidence could sway proceedings. Sapre maintains her Congress ties, denying any formal BJP entry.

Political Fallout in Madhya Pradesh

The row exposes rifts in state politics, testing anti-defection norms post-2023 polls. Congress accuses BJP of poaching, while ruling side calls it internal discord. Public eyes the outcome amid ongoing National and International News on similar cases.

Future Course of Action

Singhar must file whip documents soon. Courts stress authentic evidence over online buzz. This Bina MLA defection saga could redefine loyalty tests in Madhya Pradesh assembly, with implications for India News Update on political stability.

Bangladesh plunges into crisis as the death of opposition leader Osman Hadi triggers violent protests in Dhaka, arson attacks on major newspapers, and widespread political unrest.

The political crisis in Bangladesh has escalated into violent unrest following the death of a key opposition figure, casting a shadow over the nation's fragile transition to democracy just weeks before critical elections.

Sharif Osman Hadi, a 32-year-old student leader and prominent voice in the 2024 uprising that ousted former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, died on December 19 from injuries sustained in a shooting a week prior. His death has ignited fury among his supporters, leading to a night of arson, attacks on media houses, and violent protests across Dhaka.

Media Under Attack: Journalists Trapped in Burning Buildings

The violence took a severe turn as protesters targeted the offices of two of the country's largest and most respected newspapers, The Daily Star and Prothom Alo.

· Trapped Staff: Dozens of journalists were trapped for hours inside the Daily Star building after a mob set the lower floors ablaze. Staff reported "gasping for air" as smoke filled the building, with one journalist pleading for help on social media.

· Rescue and Aftermath: Firefighters struggled to reach the building as the crowd blocked their path. At least 25 journalists were ultimately rescued from the rooftop. The attacks have forced The Daily Star to halt its print edition for the first time in 35 years, dealing a major blow to independent journalism in the country.

A Nation on Edge Ahead of Crucial Elections

Hadi’s death and the subsequent chaos strike at a critical juncture for Bangladesh. The nation is scheduled to hold its first parliamentary elections since the 2024 uprising on February 12, 2026.

· Political Tensions: Hadi was an outspoken critic of India and was planning to run as an independent candidate in the upcoming vote. His assassination is widely seen as an attempt to destabilize the electoral process.

· Government Response: The interim government, led by Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus, condemned the violence and declared a day of national mourning. Authorities have launched a manhunt, offering a reward for the arrest of the shooters.

International Concern and Communal Violence

The unrest has drawn sharp international concern and taken a disturbing communal turn.

· Global Reaction: The UN human rights chief called for a swift and impartial investigation into Hadi's killing. China expressed hope for "safe, stable and smooth elections," while Indian authorities have heightened security around diplomatic missions in Bangladesh.

· Targeted Communal Attack: In a separate incident reported from the Bhaluka area, a Hindu youth named Deepu Chandra Das was allegedly beaten to death by a mob. Congress leader Priyanka Gandhi described the murder as "extremely disturbing" and called on the Indian government to raise the issue of minority safety with Dhaka.

As the body of Sharif Osman Hadi returns to a nation in turmoil, Bangladesh faces a profound test. The interim government's ability to deliver justice, ensure security, and guide the country to peaceful elections will determine whether this violent chapter derails the democratic aspirations of millions.