A heated exchange erupted in the Rajya Sabha on Thursday between Leader of the Opposition Mallikarjun Kharge and Union Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju, as the Opposition intensified its demand for Home Minister Amit Shah to make a statement in Parliament over the alleged police action against student protesters.

The confrontation took place during the Monsoon Session amid repeated disruptions and sloganeering by Opposition members, leading to multiple adjournments in both Houses.

Kharge Defends Right to Speak

Responding to Rijiju's remarks, Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge asserted that it was his parliamentary right to decide what to speak and when to speak.

Kharge accused the government of attempting to dictate proceedings in the House and questioned why Amit Shah had not appeared in Parliament to respond to the Opposition's concerns.

He also referred to former Union Minister Arun Jaitley's earlier observations that disruptions were part of parliamentary democracy, arguing that the Opposition was raising legitimate issues concerning students.

Rijiju Urges Opportunity for New MPs

Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju countered that Kharge was repeatedly speaking on the same subject while preventing newly elected Opposition MPs from participating in debates.

Citing Congress leader Pawan Khera, Rijiju said the first-time Rajya Sabha member had not yet been given an opportunity to deliver his maiden speech because senior leaders continued occupying the discussion time.

Rijiju further maintained that the Leader of the Opposition could request the Chair but could not dictate which minister should appear before the House.

Opposition Continues Protest

Opposition MPs continued raising slogans demanding that Home Minister Amit Shah address Parliament over the alleged July 20 police action against student protesters.

Members repeatedly chanted slogans calling upon Shah to come to the House, while several Opposition parties also sought discussions on the alleged Ram Mandir donation theft issue.

The Rajya Sabha witnessed repeated interruptions before being adjourned for an hour.

Amit Shah Arrives in Parliament

Amid the ongoing political confrontation, Union Home Minister Amit Shah reached Parliament during the day.

Government sources indicated that Shah was expected to participate in the Lok Sabha discussion on the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Amendment Bill, although the Opposition continued demanding a separate statement specifically on the student protest issue.

Lok Sabha Passes Bill Without Debate

The Lok Sabha later passed the Taxation and Other Laws (Amendment) Bill without debate before proceedings were adjourned until 11 am on Friday.

Earlier in the day, the House also observed a tribute to the victims of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki atomic bombings, with a visiting Japanese parliamentary delegation joining the proceedings.

Parliament Remains Deadlocked

The latest confrontation reflects the continuing deadlock during the Monsoon Session, with the Opposition insisting on discussions over alleged police action against students and other issues before allowing normal legislative business to proceed.

The government, meanwhile, has maintained that Parliament should continue functioning and legislative work should not be disrupted.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi held an interaction with 36 Rajya Sabha Members of Parliament over breakfast during the ongoing Parliament session, using the informal meeting to share guidance on public life, parliamentary conduct and political responsibilities. According to people familiar with the discussions, the Prime Minister encouraged MPs to remain grounded, stay connected with their constituencies and avoid individuals seeking to influence public representatives for personal gain.

The meeting was part of the Prime Minister's ongoing practice of interacting with MPs in smaller groups during Parliament sessions.

Emphasis on Staying Connected with the Public

During the interaction, the Prime Minister reportedly reminded lawmakers that a seat in Parliament is a significant responsibility earned through public trust. He encouraged them to maintain regular contact with the people they represent and never lose touch with their grassroots connections.

He stressed that public representatives should continue listening to citizens' concerns and remain accessible throughout their tenure.

Warning Against Lobbyists and Power Brokers

A major focus of the discussion was the need to stay away from lobbyists and power brokers.

According to participants, the Prime Minister cautioned MPs against people who may appear helpful but could attempt to exploit their position for personal interests. He reportedly compared such individuals to a "spider's web," advising lawmakers to remain vigilant and avoid becoming influenced by vested interests.

He encouraged members to make decisions independently while keeping public welfare at the centre of their work.

Importance of Parliamentary Learning

The Prime Minister also encouraged newly elected and first-time Rajya Sabha members to familiarise themselves with Parliament's history, procedures and functioning.

He reportedly urged MPs to spend more time in the Parliament Library, study legislative practices and gain a deeper understanding of parliamentary traditions.

Senior members, he suggested, could guide younger lawmakers in understanding the institution's functioning and responsibilities.

Responsible Use of Technology

Another important topic discussed during the meeting was the growing role of technology in public life.

The Prime Minister advised MPs to use digital platforms to improve communication with citizens, particularly young people, while remaining cautious about misinformation and the misuse of technology.

Participants said lawmakers were also given feedback regarding their social media presence and were encouraged to maintain dignity and restraint while expressing opinions in public forums.

Discipline and Personal Conduct

The Prime Minister reportedly highlighted the importance of discipline in daily life and encouraged MPs to remain physically active whenever possible.

He shared that even short walks are part of his own routine and advised lawmakers not to take Parliament sessions lightly, urging them to actively participate in legislative work and debates.

Diverse Participation

The breakfast meeting was attended by a mix of senior and newly elected Rajya Sabha members, including leaders who have joined the BJP after serving in other political parties. The interaction focused primarily on strengthening parliamentary engagement, ethical public service and effective communication with citizens.

New Delhi: The Monsoon Session of Parliament entered its 14th day on Thursday with the government preparing to table several significant legislative proposals in both Houses. After repeated disruptions and protests during previous sittings, the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha are expected to deliberate on important financial and constitutional matters, including amendments to tax laws, the Appropriation Bill, the Delimitation Bill and the long-pending Women’s Reservation Bill.

In the Lok Sabha, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman is scheduled to introduce the Taxation and Other Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2026 for discussion and passage. The proposed legislation seeks amendments to the Income-Tax Act, 2025, the Finance Act, 2026, and the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007, with the objective of streamlining taxation procedures, strengthening digital payment regulations and improving financial governance.

The government is expected to present the rationale behind the proposed amendments before members debate the bill. If approved by the House, the legislation will bring several procedural and administrative changes to India's tax framework.

Meanwhile, the Rajya Sabha is scheduled to take up the Appropriation Bill, which seeks parliamentary approval for expenditure incurred beyond the originally sanctioned budget during the 2022–23 financial year. The bill has already been cleared by the Lok Sabha and now awaits consideration in the Upper House.

Apart from financial legislation, the government is making another attempt to build political consensus on two major constitutional reforms — the Delimitation Bill and the Women’s Reservation Bill.

The proposed Delimitation Bill seeks to increase the strength of the Lok Sabha from the existing 543 elected seats to 816 seats, following the next delimitation exercise. The proposed expansion is aimed at providing representation that better reflects changes in population and demographic patterns across the country.

Alongside the delimitation proposal, the government is also pushing for the Women’s Reservation Bill, which proposes 33% reservation for women in the Lok Sabha and State Legislative Assemblies from 2029 onwards. The proposal remains one of the most significant political reforms currently under discussion.

According to parliamentary sources, the Centre has intensified consultations with several political parties, including the Congress and key allies within the National Democratic Alliance (NDA), in an effort to secure sufficient support for the two bills during the ongoing Monsoon Session.

A similar effort to move these proposals earlier this year could not succeed because the government lacked adequate numbers to ensure their passage. Since then, negotiations with both allies and opposition parties have continued.

On Wednesday evening, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju clarified that there is no proposal to convene a special session of Parliament between August 16 and August 18, putting an end to speculation regarding an additional sitting to discuss the pending legislation.

The previous day of the Monsoon Session witnessed repeated disruptions, with Opposition members raising slogans over several issues, leading to interruptions in parliamentary proceedings. While the Rajya Sabha managed to conduct limited business, the Lok Sabha witnessed multiple adjournments.

With several high-profile bills listed for discussion, Thursday's proceedings are expected to be crucial for the government's legislative agenda during the remaining days of the Monsoon Session.

Parliament witnessed another day of political confrontation on Tuesday as Union Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju held discussions with Leader of the Opposition Rahul Gandhi on the proposed Delimitation Bill, while Opposition parties intensified protests over the alleged Ram Mandir donation theft case and the July 20 action against protesters.

According to Congress sources, Rijiju met Rahul Gandhi in Parliament to understand the Congress party's position on the proposed Delimitation Bill. The meeting comes amid indications that the Centre is seeking wider political consultations before moving ahead with the legislation.

The discussion took place even as both Houses of Parliament continued to face repeated disruptions during the ongoing Monsoon Session.

Opposition Continues Protest

Leaders of the INDIA bloc, including Rahul Gandhi, Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge and several Opposition MPs, marched from the Gandhi statue to Makar Dwar inside the Parliament complex, raising slogans against the government.

The Opposition demanded answers over the alleged Ram Mandir donation theft and sought a statement from Union Home Minister Amit Shah in Parliament. Opposition parties also protested over the police action against demonstrators at Jantar Mantar on July 20, alleging excessive use of force.

Congress MP KC Venugopal accused the government of avoiding a discussion on issues raised by the Opposition and reiterated the party's demand for a debate in Parliament. Priyanka Gandhi Vadra also called for accountability over the action taken against protesting students, saying those responsible for ordering the use of force should be identified.

Lok Sabha Adjourned Amid Uproar

The Lok Sabha convened at 11 am but was adjourned within minutes due to continuous protests by Opposition members. Proceedings resumed later in the afternoon before the House was eventually adjourned for the day.

Meanwhile, the Rajya Sabha continued legislative business despite intermittent disruptions. The Upper House took up discussion on the Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill, 2026, introduced by Union Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal.

Rajya Sabha Debates Judicial Reforms

Members across party lines supported increasing the strength of Supreme Court judges, while also highlighting broader concerns relating to judicial reforms.

AAP MP Sanjay Singh drew attention to the large number of pending court cases and argued that increasing the number of judges alone would not solve delays unless judicial infrastructure was also strengthened.

DMK MP P. Wilson advocated the establishment of regional benches of the Supreme Court, arguing that litigants from southern states continue to face difficulties in accessing justice due to the court's location in New Delhi.

JMM MP Mahua Maji stressed the need for broader reforms in the justice delivery system, while BJP MP Kesridevsinh Jhala described the proposed legislation as a necessary step to improve judicial efficiency.

Political Exchanges Continue

Outside Parliament, BJP and Opposition leaders exchanged sharp criticism over multiple issues.

BJP MP Bansuri Swaraj accused Rahul Gandhi of pursuing "politics based on allegations" and questioned the Congress party's stand on student-related issues.

Congress leaders, on the other hand, maintained that the government was avoiding discussions on issues raised by the Opposition, including the alleged donation theft case and recent protests.

Centre Pushes Political Outreach

The meeting between Kiren Rijiju and Rahul Gandhi is being viewed as part of the government's outreach to Opposition parties ahead of the proposed Delimitation Bill.

While details of the discussion were not officially disclosed, Congress sources said the minister sought to understand the party's views on the legislation before any further parliamentary steps.

With both legislative business and political protests continuing simultaneously, Parliament's Monsoon Session remains marked by frequent disruptions alongside negotiations on key pending Bills.

New Delhi: The Monsoon Session of Parliament witnessed another day of repeated disruptions on Wednesday as Opposition parties intensified their protest against Union Home Minister Amit Shah, demanding a statement on the alleged police action during a recent protest march. Sloganeering, placards and protests forced both the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha to be adjourned several times before proceedings were suspended till 2 PM.

As Parliament convened for the day, Opposition members entered both Houses carrying banners reading "Amit Shah Jawab Do", demanding accountability over the alleged police action against protesters during the 'Chalo Sansad' march held on July 20. The protests disrupted Question Hour and legislative business almost immediately after proceedings began.

The Lok Sabha resumed briefly around 11 AM, but amid continued sloganeering from Opposition benches, the House was adjourned within a minute. The Rajya Sabha also witnessed similar scenes, with Opposition MPs raising slogans and demanding a discussion on various issues before it too was adjourned.

When the Rajya Sabha reconvened at noon, Chairman and Vice-President C.P. Radhakrishnan appealed to members to maintain parliamentary decorum. He warned MPs against entering the Well of the House or displaying placards during proceedings, stating that failure to follow parliamentary rules could invite disciplinary action.

"My humble request is that members should cooperate with the Chair. Do not enter the Well of the House or display placards. If these rules are violated, I may be compelled to take action," the Chairman said before the House was again disrupted by protests.

The Opposition has demanded that Union Home Minister Amit Shah make a statement in Parliament regarding the alleged use of force against demonstrators during the July 20 protest. Congress leader Pawan Khera said the Home Minister should respond to concerns raised by Opposition parties and clarify the government's position on the issue.

Khera also called upon Prime Minister Narendra Modi to address Parliament on several other matters, including the restoration of statehood to Jammu and Kashmir and allegations related to the Ayodhya Ram Temple donation controversy.

Outside Parliament, Opposition MPs, including Rahul Gandhi, Priyanka Gandhi Vadra and several leaders from INDIA bloc parties, announced a protest march from the Gandhi Statue at Prerna Sthal to Makar Dwar. The march was organised to press for answers from the government over the alleged police action and other issues raised by Opposition parties.

Meanwhile, BJP leaders accused the Opposition of deliberately disrupting Parliament instead of allowing legislative business to proceed. BJP MP Jagdambika Pal criticised the Opposition for remaining silent on the alleged paper leak protests in Jharkhand while repeatedly disrupting Parliament over other issues.

According to Pal, the Centre has already addressed concerns raised by students on several occasions, and the continued protests inside Parliament are politically motivated. He questioned why Opposition leaders had not shown similar urgency regarding student demonstrations in Jharkhand.

The Monsoon Session also saw political exchanges over Article 370. On the seventh anniversary of its abrogation, AIMIM MP Asaduddin Owaisi described the removal of Article 370 as "unconstitutional" and criticised the delay in restoring full statehood to Jammu and Kashmir. While acknowledging the Supreme Court's verdict on the matter, Owaisi maintained that he personally disagreed with the manner in which the constitutional provision was revoked.

Congress leader and Telangana minister Mohammad Azharuddin also supported the Opposition's protest, saying Parliament is the appropriate forum for discussing such issues and that all senior ministers, including the Home Minister, should participate in the debate.

Despite repeated adjournments, the government is expected to take up several important legislative items during the day. In the Rajya Sabha, the Supreme Court (Judges) Amendment Bill, 2026, proposing an increase in the sanctioned strength of Supreme Court judges to 38, is likely to be introduced for consideration after having already been cleared by the Lok Sabha.

The Lok Sabha's agenda also includes discussion on key legislative business, including the Bankers' Books Evidence Bill and the Taxation Amendment Bill, subject to normal functioning of the House.

With only a few sittings remaining in the Monsoon Session, continued disruptions have raised concerns over the limited time available for debate on pending legislation, even as both the government and Opposition remain firm on their respective positions.

The alleged Ram Mandir donation misappropriation issue triggered a storm in Parliament on Tuesday, leading to repeated disruptions in both the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha before proceedings were adjourned for the day. The controversy dominated the 12th day of the Monsoon Session as the Opposition demanded accountability, while the government accused its rivals of politicising the issue.

The sharpest exchange took place in the Rajya Sabha, where Leader of the Opposition Mallikarjun Kharge questioned the Centre over the allegations involving the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra Trust. Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju responded by accusing the Congress and its allies of hypocrisy, resulting in heated exchanges between the treasury and Opposition benches.

Kharge Questions Centre Over Allegations

Raising the issue during the proceedings, Kharge referred to allegations of embezzlement involving cash donations, jewellery and land linked to the Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra Trust.

He argued that the trust was constituted by the Central Government and entrusted with more than 70 acres of land for the construction and management of the Ram Mandir. He also noted that the Prime Minister and the Union Government had been associated with every major milestone of the temple project.

Questioning the role of central investigative agencies, Kharge asked where the Enforcement Directorate (ED), Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and other agencies were, and demanded that the government respond to the allegations in Parliament.

Government Launches Counterattack

Responding to the Opposition's charges, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju strongly rejected the allegations and accused the Congress and the Samajwadi Party of attempting to mislead the country.

Rijiju alleged that parties now raising questions had opposed the Ram Mandir movement for years and had criticised the temple even after its construction.

He said those who had opposed Lord Ram could not now claim to be concerned about the temple's affairs and accused the Opposition of shedding "crocodile tears" for political gain. He also demanded that they apologise to the nation before seeking answers from the government.

Repeated Disruptions in Both Houses

The issue sparked loud sloganeering and protests from members of both the ruling alliance and the Opposition.

Opposition MPs from the Congress, Samajwadi Party (SP), Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) and other INDIA bloc parties staged protests inside and outside Parliament over the alleged donation irregularities.

The continued disruptions forced the Lok Sabha to adjourn shortly after reconvening in the afternoon, while the Rajya Sabha also witnessed repeated interruptions before being adjourned for the day.

Other Business Amid Protests

Despite the protests, the government managed to conduct limited legislative business.

The Lok Sabha passed the Appropriation (No. 3) Bill, 2026 by voice vote and Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharamanintroduced the Taxation and Other Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2026.

In the Rajya Sabha, Minister of State for Home Nityanand Rai introduced the Registration of Births and Deaths (Amendment) Bill, 2026, which proposes stricter rules for delayed registration of births and deaths by requiring approval from a Judicial Magistrate First Class if registration is sought more than two years after the event.

Meanwhile, outside Parliament, DMK MPs protested over the Cauvery water dispute, while Congress MPs led by Deepender Hooda demanded that Haryana be considered to host the 2030 Commonwealth Games.

Political Flashpoint Continues

The Ram Mandir donation controversy has emerged as one of the most contentious issues of the ongoing Monsoon Session, with both the government and the Opposition refusing to soften their positions.

While the Opposition has demanded a detailed explanation from the Centre regarding the allegations linked to the temple trust, the government maintains that the issue is being used to create political controversy around a matter of faith.

With Parliament set to reconvene on Wednesday, the issue is expected to remain at the centre of political debate.

Parliament is expected to witness another week of heated exchanges as the Monsoon Session resumes on Monday, with the Centre preparing to push several important legislations while the Opposition gears up to intensify its attack over multiple political issues inside and outside both Houses.

The government is expected to seek the passage of at least six key Bills, while Opposition parties have planned coordinated protests over issues ranging from the alleged "Chanda Chori" controversy to demands for statements from Union Home Minister Amit Shah.

Government to Push Key Legislation

The Centre is expected to take up several important Bills in both the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha during the week.

Among the Bills likely to be considered are:

• Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (Amendment) Bill

• Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill

• Registration of Births and Deaths (Amendment) Bill

• Indian Statistical Institution Bill

• Bankers' Books Evidence Bill

• Appropriation Bill for Demands for Excess Grants (2022-23)

The Foreign Contribution Regulation (Amendment) Bill, though not part of the official legislative agenda, is also expected to be introduced in the Lok Sabha later this week after being deferred during the Budget Session.

However, there is no indication that the proposed Delimitation Bill will be introduced during the ongoing session.

Opposition Plans Coordinated Protest

Opposition parties have finalised a joint strategy to keep pressure on the government by raising different issues both inside Parliament and through demonstrations outside the House.

Leaders are expected to continue targeting Union Home Minister Amit Shah, while also highlighting the alleged "Chanda Chori" issue related to donations linked to the Ayodhya Ram Temple.

The Opposition is also expected to renew its demand for a statement from Shah over the reported police action against protesting students, including allegations regarding the use of pellet guns.

BJP Prepares Counterattack

The ruling BJP has also stepped up its political response.

Senior BJP MP Anurag Thakur has written to Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla, seeking breach of privilege proceedings against Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi over remarks made in the House.

The BJP has also criticised the Opposition's demonstration near Parliament's Makar Dwar, where Independent MP Pappu Yadav staged a symbolic protest portraying a priest allegedly stealing donation money while Rahul Gandhi joined the demonstration.

Opposition leaders have defended the protest, saying they will continue using "creative" methods to raise public issues.

More Bills May Come Up

Apart from the listed Bills, the Taxation and Other Laws (Amendment) Bill has reportedly been circulated among Members of Parliament, indicating it could also be taken up during the week.

Meanwhile, the Public Examination (Prevention of Unfair Means) Bill has already been passed by Parliament and has received the President's assent.

The Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill and the Registration of Births and Deaths (Amendment) Bill have already been cleared by one House and are awaiting further legislative process.

High Political Stakes

With the government pushing ahead with its legislative agenda and the Opposition determined to keep politically sensitive issues in focus, both Houses are expected to witness frequent disruptions and sharp exchanges throughout the week.

The developments are likely to shape the remainder of the Monsoon Session, which is scheduled to continue until August 21.

New Delhi: Parliament witnessed heated exchanges and Opposition protests on Thursday as key legislation, including the Vande Mataram Bill and the amended anti-paper leak law, moved ahead amid continuing political tension over the NEET controversy and alleged police action against protesting students. The Lok Sabha passed the Prevention of Insults to National Honour (Amendment) Bill, 2026 by voice vote, extending legal protection to the national song Vande Mataram. Under the proposed provisions, intentionally preventing the singing of Vande Mataram or disrupting a gathering where it is being sung could attract imprisonment of up to three years, a fine, or both. Repeat offenders could face a minimum jail term of one year. Soon after the Bill was passed, sloganeering broke out in the Lok Sabha and the House was adjourned for the day. The legislation became the first Bill to clear both Houses during the ongoing Monsoon Session.

The debate also saw sharp political differences over the legislation. Minister of State for Home Nityananda Rai accused the Congress of failing to give Vande Mataram the respect it deserved during its years in power. Opposition members questioned the need for the law, with DMK MP Kanimozhi describing it as a political move presented in the name of nationalism. BJP MP Sambit Patra countered the criticism and accused previous governments of failing to properly honour the national song. At the same time, the political temperature remained high in the Rajya Sabha, where Congress president and Leader of the Opposition Mallikarjun Kharge raised the issue of alleged police excesses against students protesting over the NEET paper leak. Kharge demanded Union Home Minister Amit Shah's resignation and questioned who had authorised the alleged use of lathis, tear gas and pellet guns against protesters. He claimed that more than 100 students were injured. Leader of the House J P Nadda hit back at the Opposition, accusing it of repeatedly disrupting Parliament despite the government's willingness to discuss issues.

The Rajya Sabha also passed the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Amendment Bill, 2026, a day after it cleared the Lok Sabha. The legislation proposes tougher punishment for people involved in examination fraud and paper leaks. The minimum jail term for unfair means would rise from three years to five years, while the maximum punishment could extend to 10 years. The maximum fine would increase to Rs 50 lakh. Organised examination-related crimes could attract a minimum seven-year prison term and fines of up to Rs 10 crore. The Bill also provides for Special Fast Track Courts and a Special Task Force to investigate such offences. Union Minister Jitendra Singh defended the changes, saying they reflected the government's commitment to protecting students and ensuring zero tolerance towards paper leaks. Kharge, however, argued that harsher punishment alone would not fix problems in the examination system and called for wider reforms, including a fixed examination calendar and an independent investigation into the police action against protesters.

Outside Parliament, Congress and other INDIA bloc MPs continued their protests, demanding answers from the government over the alleged use of excessive force against students. Inside the Rajya Sabha, Opposition MPs sought a statement from Amit Shah, but Chairman C P Radhakrishnan rejected the demand and continued with House proceedings. Opposition members later staged a walkout. Away from the confrontation in Parliament, Prime Minister Narendra Modi chaired a nearly two-hour high-level meeting with senior ministers and officials to review India's preparedness amid the ongoing West Asia crisis. The government said there was no shortage of petrol, diesel, LPG or fertilisers and maintained that adequate urea stocks were available for the coming crop seasons. The meeting was attended by senior ministers and officials including Amit Shah, Rajnath Singh, S Jaishankar, Nirmala Sitharaman, Hardeep Singh Puri, Piyush Goyal and National Security Adviser Ajit Doval.

The Centre has acknowledged that the use of E20 petrol, which contains 20% ethanol blended with petrol, may require replacement of certain rubber components and gaskets in some older vehicles. Union Road Transport and Highways Minister Nitin Gadkari, in a written reply in the Rajya Sabha on Wednesday, said some vehicles built to BS3 standards may need such components replaced when using E20 fuel. These vehicles were largely manufactured between 2005 and 2016. Gadkari, however, made it clear that the issue does not mean engines need to be replaced or modified. According to the government's response, the affected rubber parts can generally be checked and replaced during routine servicing. The clarification is significant amid an ongoing debate over the impact of ethanol-blended petrol on older vehicles and concerns among motorists about mileage, maintenance and compatibility.

Gadkari cited studies conducted by Indian Oil, the Indian Institute of Petroleum, the Society of Indian Automobile Manufacturers (SIAM) and the Automotive Research Association of India (ARAI) on two-wheelers and four-wheelers using E20 fuel. According to him, these studies did not find any major impact on the overall performance or durability of vehicles. He also said fuel economy cannot be attributed to the type of fuel alone, as mileage depends on several factors including driving style, road conditions and vehicle maintenance. The components that could potentially require attention in older vehicles include pipes, O-rings, rubber seals, fuel hoses, gaskets, rubber components in fuel pumps and injector seals. Most of these are part of the fuel delivery system rather than the engine itself. Older rubber materials were not necessarily designed for prolonged exposure to higher concentrations of ethanol, which can over time cause some materials to harden, soften or swell.

Vehicles below Euro 4 standards, including many BS3 two-wheelers and four-wheelers manufactured before 2016, could require greater attention to these components. The actual replacement cost will depend on the vehicle and model. According to the details provided, replacement could cost roughly ₹500 to ₹1,500 for two-wheelers and around ₹2,000 to ₹8,000 for four-wheelers, though premium vehicles may cost more. There is also no fixed period or kilometre interval after which these parts must necessarily be replaced. Instead, owners may need to get them inspected during routine servicing and replace them if signs of wear, leakage or deterioration appear. The information provided also indicates that while rubber components are the main area of concern, some effects on metal components in older Euro 4 and below vehicles may also be possible. The government's position is that vehicles will not suddenly stop functioning simply because E20 petrol is used, but owners of older models may need to pay closer attention to maintenance. For motorists with BS3 vehicles, the key message from the Rajya Sabha response is therefore not that an engine replacement is required, but that certain fuel-system components may need inspection and replacement depending on their condition.

Parliament is set for another politically charged day on Thursday as the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Amendment Bill, 2026 moves to the Rajya Sabha, a day after it was passed by the Lok Sabha following a heated debate over paper leaks and recent student protests. The Upper House is expected to take up the legislation around 2 pm, with nearly seven hours reportedly set aside for discussion. Congress leaders Mallikarjun Kharge and Mukul Wasnik are among those expected to participate. The proposed law seeks to strengthen action against examination malpractices through tougher penalties for paper leaks, Special Task Forces and Fast Track Courts. The Lok Sabha cleared the legislation by voice vote on Wednesday after a marathon discussion that began Tuesday afternoon and continued until late in the evening before resuming the following day. The debate, however, was dominated as much by the political confrontation over the treatment of protesting students as by the provisions of the bill itself.

The political fight continued outside the House after BJP leaders rejected Rahul Gandhi's allegations concerning the July 20 student protest. BJP MP and national spokesperson Sambit Patra said no shots were fired at students and rejected Gandhi's allegation that Union Home Minister Amit Shah had ordered firing. Patra argued that Gandhi had produced no evidence to support the charge and said decisions involving firing are taken by a magistrate rather than a Union minister. Union Minister Jitendra Singh also targeted the Leader of Opposition during his reply to the debate, accusing him of using unparliamentary language and failing to follow basic parliamentary norms. Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju and Gandhi had earlier exchanged sharp words in the Lok Sabha after a remark made by the Congress leader while recounting a conversation with a student drew objections from the treasury benches. Speaker Om Birla subsequently expunged the expression. BJP MP Rahul Sinha, meanwhile, defended the government's handling of the student agitation, saying Prime Minister Narendra Modi had understood the concerns of students and arguing that Congress had no right to lecture the government on paper leaks given similar incidents in Congress-ruled states.
Thursday's parliamentary agenda extends beyond the exam reforms bill. The Lok Sabha is scheduled to consider the Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill, 2026, which seeks to amend the Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Act, 1956. Before taking up the legislation, the House is expected to discuss a statutory resolution moved by Opposition MPs seeking disapproval of the related ordinance promulgated earlier this year. Congress MP Manish Tewari has separately submitted an Adjournment Motion Notice seeking a discussion on a new anti-defection framework aimed at curbing mass political defections while preserving space for legitimate dissent. In the Rajya Sabha, Congress MP Randeep Singh Surjewala has sought suspension of business to discuss alleged misuse of donations connected with the Ram Mandir. The Upper House is also scheduled to consider the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development (Amendment) Bill, 2026. With the Opposition continuing to raise questions over student protests and examination irregularities while the government pushes ahead with its legislative agenda, another stormy day is expected in both Houses of Parliament.

 Proceedings in the Lok Sabha remained disrupted on Monday as the Opposition stalled the discussion on the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Amendment Bill, 2026, demanding an immediate debate on the alleged police action against students protesting the NEET paper leak issue in Bihar.

The amendment bill, aimed at further strengthening India's anti-paper leak law, was listed for discussion after being introduced by Union Minister Jitendra Singh. However, when the House reconvened at 2 pm, Opposition members entered the Well of the House, raising slogans and insisting that Parliament first discuss the alleged assault on students during recent protests.

With repeated disruptions, Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla urged members to allow the House to function and participate in the scheduled debate. He said six hours had been allocated for discussion on the legislation and appealed to both the government and Opposition to arrive at a consensus before proceedings resumed later in the evening.

"I give you time until 5 pm. The government and Opposition members should come to a consensus," Birla said before adjourning the House.

The Lok Sabha witnessed multiple adjournments during the day, first at noon, then at 2 pm and later until 5 pm due to the continued uproar. Similar scenes were witnessed in the Rajya Sabha, where proceedings were also repeatedly adjourned.

Government Pushes Tougher Anti-Paper Leak Law

The proposed amendment seeks to tighten the 2024 Public Examinations Act, which was enacted to curb examination malpractices.

Under the proposed changes, punishment for those involved in paper leaks and organised cheating rackets will be enhanced. The Bill also empowers states and Union Territories to establish special fast-track courts for day-to-day hearings of examination-related offences.

The legislation covers examinations conducted by central agencies, including the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC), Staff Selection Commission (SSC), National Testing Agency (NTA), Railway recruitment bodies and banking recruitment agencies.

The government decided to strengthen the law following the nationwide outrage over the NEET paper leak controversy. Prime Minister Narendra Modi had recently announced that stricter legal provisions would be introduced and also constituted a high-powered task force on examination reforms under Infosys co-founder Nandan Nilekani.

Opposition Seeks Discussion on Student Protest

The Opposition maintained that Parliament should first discuss the alleged police action against students protesting the NEET paper leak.

Congress leader Rahul Gandhi alleged that protesting students in Bihar faced excessive force and claimed hundreds had been detained. He demanded accountability for those responsible.

RJD Rajya Sabha MP Manoj Kumar Jha has also approached the Supreme Court seeking registration of an FIR against officials over the alleged police action during the protests.

Congress MP Manish Tewari criticised the reported use of force, calling it "inhuman," and argued that the proposed amendment alone would not address deeper issues affecting the country's examination system.

BJP Accuses Opposition of Blocking Debate

The ruling BJP accused Opposition parties of preventing Parliament from discussing legislation meant to protect students.

Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju appealed to Congress leaders to allow the debate, saying the Bill directly concerns the future of India's youth. He questioned why parties demanding discussion since the beginning of the session were now disrupting the House.

BJP MPs Tarun Chugh, Vivek Thakur, and Kangana Ranaut also criticised the Opposition, accusing it of politicising an important education reform measure.

Dharmendra Pradhan Returns to Parliament

The day also marked the first appearance of former Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan in Parliament after his resignation over the NEET paper leak controversy. NDA MPs welcomed him with a traditional Mithila pag and shawl before accompanying him into Parliament.

Meanwhile, the NDA Parliamentary Party is scheduled to meet on Tuesday morning, where the government's legislative strategy and the ongoing confrontation over the anti-paper leak Bill are expected to be discussed.

The Central government has said it is holding regular consultations with farmers, agricultural exporters, industry representatives, and state governments to assess the impact of tariffs imposed by the United States and to safeguard India's trade interests.

Responding to a question in the Rajya Sabha on Friday, Minister of State for Commerce and Industry Jitin Prasada said the government is closely monitoring recent developments while continuing negotiations with the US on a proposed Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA).

Government Consulting Key Stakeholders

In a written reply to Parliament, Prasada stated that the Centre remains in continuous dialogue with stakeholders affected by US import tariffs.

According to the minister, consultations are being held with:

• Farmers and farmer organisations
• Agricultural exporters
• Industry associations
• Export promotion councils
• Concerned ministries and departments
• State governments

He said inputs received from these groups are being considered to ensure India's commercial and agricultural interests are protected during trade negotiations.

India-US Trade Talks Continue

The minister informed Parliament that discussions on the proposed India-US Bilateral Trade Agreement remain active.

Negotiations began after the meeting between Indian and US leaders in February 2025, when both countries announced the "Mission 500" initiative, aiming to increase bilateral trade to $500 billion by 2030.

Since then, both sides have held multiple rounds of negotiations.

Key meetings have taken place in:

• Washington, DC (April 20–22, 2026)
• New Delhi (June 1–4, 2026)
• New Delhi during the visit of the US Trade Representative (June 22–24, 2026)

Prasada said the government continues to engage with US officials to move the negotiations forward.

Interim Trade Framework Already Announced

The two countries announced a framework for an interim trade arrangement on February 2, 2026, as part of ongoing efforts to strengthen economic ties.

The minister noted that the proposed Bilateral Trade Agreement is expected to deepen cooperation across several sectors while addressing market access concerns for both countries.

US Tariff Developments

Prasada also referred to recent developments in US trade policy.

He noted that a US Supreme Court judgment dated February 20, 2026, invalidated the reciprocal tariffs that had previously been imposed, meaning those measures are no longer in effect.

However, the US administration has continued to impose tariffs under separate legal provisions.

According to the government, the United States has issued Executive Orders imposing 10% tariffs on certain imported products under Section 122 of the US Trade Act of 1974.

Separately, the Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR) announced an additional 10% tariff on certain imports from India following an investigation under Section 301 of the US Trade Act of 1974. The US administration said the action was part of a broader initiative targeting products allegedly linked to forced labour concerns.

Government Monitoring Impact

The Centre said it is carefully studying the implications of these measures on Indian exports and domestic industries.

Officials indicated that protecting farmers, exporters, and businesses remains a priority while negotiations with Washington continue.

The government reiterated that it will continue engaging with stakeholders and pursue a balanced trade agreement that safeguards India's economic interests while expanding bilateral trade with the United States.