The twelfth day of Chhattisgarh's budget session on Monday turned into one of its most turbulent yet, with the Opposition walking out of the House not once but twice — first over the government's evasive answers on illegal land plotting in Dhamtari and Kanker, and then in protest after their adjournment motion against the renaming of MGNREGA was rejected. Uproar, sloganeering, and a five-minute suspension of proceedings marked a day that laid bare the deepening hostility between the ruling BJP and the Congress benches.

Illegal Plotting: Vague Answers, Furious Opposition

The session opened with Congress MLA Ambika Markam directing pointed questions at Revenue Minister Tankram Verma about illegal land plotting in Dhamtari and Kanker districts. She asked how many complaints had been received between 2024 and January 31, 2026, how many survey numbers had been investigated, and what concrete action had been taken against the guilty.

Verma's response was thin. He told the House that three complaints had been received in Dhamtari and five in Kanker, that eight out of a total 175 survey numbers had been investigated, and that action was still in process. Three patwaris had had their salary increments stopped, and 67 individuals had been served notices.

Former Chief Minister Bhupesh Baghel was quick to expose the hollowness of these answers. He pointed out that this very question comes up every session, yet the government has never been able to clearly say how many illegal colonies have been built across the state, how many people have actually been prosecuted, or when the patwari action was taken. For twenty-five minutes, he noted, the minister had been unable to give a direct reply — answering questions about Dhamtari with Kanker's data and vice versa.

Even BJP MLA Ajay Chandrakar pressed the minister, asking him to specify exactly when these colonies were built and when action would follow. Verma's response — that a timeline could not be given and that the revenue department itself was capable of investigating — only added to the frustration. Baghel accused the minister's own department of actively patronising illegal colonies rather than acting against them. The Opposition demanded an EOW investigation and, when that was rejected, walked out of the House in protest.

Nursery and Plantation Row: Question Itself Disputed

The session then moved to a question raised by Congress MLA Chaturi Nand about nursery and plantation work in the Jangalbeda village of Saraipali forest range in Mahasamund. Nand alleged that the original question put to the government had been altered before being taken up in the House — a serious procedural charge.

Baghel backed him up, calling it a grave matter and demanding action against the departmental officials responsible for the change. Forest Minister Kedar Kashyap responded that the question before him related to 2025, and he had answered accordingly. Nand flatly said his original question had nothing to do with 2025. The Speaker intervened to explain that because no specific time period had been mentioned in the original question, a period was fixed to make it answerable — without which the question could not have been admitted at all. The clarification did not fully satisfy the Opposition, but the matter was moved past.

'Ji Ram Ji' Row: Congress Brings Adjournment Motion, House Erupts

The most dramatic moments of the day came during Zero Hour, when Congress brought an adjournment motion opposing the central government's decision to rename MGNREGA — referred to in political shorthand as the 'Ji Ram Ji' controversy, in reference to the new name being proposed. Baghel moved the motion, called the original MGNREGA a far superior scheme in its original form, and demanded that the House admit the motion and hold a full discussion on the issue.

BJP MLA Ajay Chandrakar hit back hard, declaring that the Assembly is not a platform for Opposition politics and not a stage for Congress to run its campaigns. He said the House belongs to the people and its time is too precious to be spent on political theatre. The exchange between both sides quickly escalated — sharp arguments turned to sloganeering, the noise level in the chamber rose sharply, and the Speaker was forced to suspend proceedings for five minutes to restore order.

When the adjournment motion was formally rejected, the Opposition refused to return. Leader of Opposition Dr Charandas Mahant declared that if the people's issues were being raised, then politics would be done — and the Congress benches walked out of the House for the second time in a single day, boycotting the remainder of the session's proceedings.

What It Signals

With just three sitting days remaining before the budget session concludes on March 20, the government faces the task of passing the Appropriation Bill and other pending legislation through a House where the Opposition has now made clear it will disrupt, walk out, and refuse to cooperate at every opportunity. The back-to-back walkouts on Day 12 are not just procedural protests — they are a signal that the Congress intends to carry the energy from the street protests of the morning's assembly gherao straight into the legislative chamber, keeping maximum pressure on the Vishnu Deo Sai government through every available platform until the session's final gavel.

Today's parliamentary session was one of the most action-packed days of the Budget Session 2026 — with major financial business, charged political confrontations, a crucial election, and a deepening LPG crisis all colliding inside the walls of Parliament at the same time.

Appropriation Bill 2026 Moves in Rajya Sabha — The Key Financial Business of the Day

The most significant legislative development of the day came when Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman formally moved the Appropriation Bill 2026 in the Rajya Sabha. The Bill authorises the payment and appropriation of further sums from the Consolidated Fund of India for the services of the financial year 2025–26, and its passage in the Upper House marks a critical step in completing India's budget cycle.

The Appropriation Bill had already been moved in the Lok Sabha on March 13, alongside the Supplementary Demands for Grants for 2025–26. Today's Rajya Sabha proceedings brought it one step closer to becoming law.

In the Lok Sabha, discussions and voting on the Demands for Grants under the Ministry of Railways for the financial year 2026–27 were taken up today — with Railway Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw and his ministry under scrutiny over infrastructure allocations, train safety, and the pace of modernisation projects.

Railways and Agriculture Grants: What Parliament Approved

Today's voting on Railway Demands for Grants 2026–27 took centre stage in the Lok Sabha. Railways received one of the largest allocations in this year's Union Budget — a figure that reflects the government's continued push to expand freight corridors, modernise stations, and accelerate the Vande Bharat and Amrit Bharat train networks.

The Agriculture Ministry Demands for Grants were also slated for discussion — a politically sensitive allocation given that farmer distress, MSP guarantees, and rural income have remained flashpoints throughout this entire budget session.

Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal also made a statement on the floor outlining the government's legislative agenda for the week beginning March 16, signalling more heavy-duty parliamentary business ahead before the session closes on April 2.

Rajya Sabha Elections 2026: BJP-NDA Plays Strategy in Bihar, Haryana and Odisha

Off the floor but all over Parliament's corridors today was the Rajya Sabha by-election drama. Polling was held today for Rajya Sabha seats in Bihar, Haryana, and Odisha — and the BJP-led NDA made a calculated move by backing independent candidates linked to the saffron party, including RLM chief Upendra Kushwaha, to maximise its seat count in the Upper House.

The opposition INDIA bloc pushed back hard, fielding its own candidates and attempting to consolidate its strength in the Rajya Sabha ahead of what promises to be a combative second half of the Budget Session. Results are expected later today.

LPG Crisis: Opposition Turns Up the Heat

If there is one issue dominating the political atmosphere outside the formal budget business, it is the LPG shortage. Opposition MPs across the INDIA bloc, led by Rahul Gandhi, have submitted notices in both Houses demanding an urgent discussion on nationwide reports of LPG cylinder shortages and price pressures linked directly to the escalating West Asia war.

The opposition's argument is blunt: common Indian households — particularly in smaller cities and rural India — are struggling to get cooking gas cylinders, and the government must answer for it in Parliament, not deflect with procedural objections.

The government has pushed back sharply. Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman was involved in direct exchanges with MPs over grant discussions, stating that crude oil supplies remain secure. The government insists the shortage reports are exaggerated and that supply chains are intact. The Opposition remains unconvinced — and is likely to intensify this campaign on the floor of both Houses in the coming days.

CEC Gyanesh Kumar Removal Notice: A Constitutional Confrontation

Adding another layer of political tension to today's session, the INDIA bloc had already filed notices in both Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha on March 13 seeking the removal of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar — with 180 opposition MPs reportedly signing the notice, comprising 120 Lok Sabha members and 60 Rajya Sabha members.

The Trinamool Congress has been at the forefront of this move, alleging misuse of constitutional authority and questioning the independence of the Election Commission. The BJP and NDA have dismissed the move as political theatre. Speaker Om Birla's handling of these notices — and whether they will be admitted for debate — is being watched closely as a test of parliamentary procedure.

This confrontation follows directly on the heels of the failed Opposition resolution last week seeking the removal of Om Birla as Lok Sabha Speaker, which was defeated by a voice vote. That defeat has not dampened the INDIA bloc's appetite for constitutional confrontation — if anything, it has sharpened it.

Private Members' Bills: A Packed Agenda With Significant Proposals

Later in the day, the Lok Sabha was scheduled to take up Private Members' Business — and the list of proposed Bills makes for significant reading. MPs were expected to introduce legislative proposals on a wide range of issues including a guaranteed minimum support price for farmers, prevention of mob lynching, welfare of fishermen, regulation of tour operators, rehabilitation of Kashmiri Pandits, and reservation for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in the private sector.

These are not government bills and most will not progress to become law in this session. But they serve as important signals of what is on the minds of Members of Parliament — and what the public wants debated at the national level.

What Is Left Before April 2: The Road Ahead

The Budget Session 2026 runs until April 2 and includes 30 sittings spread across 65 days. The second phase, which resumed on March 9 after a recess, has already produced enormous political drama — the Om Birla no-confidence vote, the CEC removal notices, and the LPG crisis confrontation — alongside significant financial legislation.

What remains on the agenda includes the Finance Bill 2026 — the most consequential piece of legislation of the session, which formally implements the budget tax proposals — along with departmental Demands for Grants across all major ministries and further legislative business that the government has outlined for the coming weeks.

If today's intensity is any guide, the final two weeks of the Budget Session promise to be some of the most turbulent — and consequential — days in India's parliamentary calendar this year.