The Lok Sabha on Tuesday witnessed a stormy debate on the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Amendment Bill, 2026, with the Opposition questioning the government's handling of paper leaks and student protests, while the Centre defended the proposed amendments as a major step toward restoring the credibility of India's examination system.

Leading the Opposition's attack, Congress MP Priyanka Gandhi Vadra questioned the government's use of pellet guns against protesting students, asking whether they were being treated as "terrorists." She urged the Centre to respond to students' concerns instead of resorting to force.

Congress deputy leader Gaurav Gogoi accused the government of failing to reform the education system despite introducing the anti-paper leak law in 2024. He pointed out that major examination leaks continued in 2026 and demanded accountability for the alleged use of force against students during protests. Gogoi also questioned why only the National Testing Agency's Director General was replaced while broader institutional accountability remained unaddressed.

Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav took a swipe at the government over former Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan's resignation. Referring to his removal, Yadav remarked that by removing one "Pradhan," the government had effectively protected the "Pradhan Mantri." He alleged that the government relied on slogans rather than meaningful reforms and claimed that students had compelled the Centre to act through sustained protests.

Trinamool Congress MP Abhishek Banerjee supported stronger legal provisions to tackle examination fraud but argued that legislation alone would not solve the problem. He described the Bill as an acknowledgment of systemic failure and called for comprehensive reforms to improve transparency and accountability in the examination process.

DMK MP Dayanidhi Maran opposed the idea of a "One India, One Exam" framework, arguing that India's diverse educational landscape required state-specific approaches. He also questioned the effectiveness of NEET, pointing out that paper leaks had continued despite the existing examination system.

Telugu Desam Party MP Lavu Sri Krishna Devarayalu proposed three key measures to strengthen the law, including regular monitoring of fast-track courts, filling vacancies in forensic departments to speed up investigations, and introducing reforms in coaching institutions by making education non-profit.

Defending the Bill, Union Minister Dr. Jitendra Singh described the amendment as a landmark piece of legislation aimed at protecting the future of students. He said the revised law significantly strengthens punishment for examination fraud, ensures time-bound investigations, and mandates speedy trials through fast-track courts. According to the minister, the amendments are designed to curb organised examination mafias and reinforce public confidence in the country's examination system.

BJP MP Bansuri Swaraj also backed the legislation, stating that organised paper leak networks had become a serious challenge and required stricter legal provisions. She said the Bill would remove jurisdictional ambiguities, establish a dedicated central task force, and ensure investigations and trials are completed within fixed timelines.

While the Opposition maintained that it supported stronger measures against paper leaks, it insisted that the government must also answer questions regarding police action against protesting students and broader failures in examination governance. The government, however, argued that the amended law would significantly strengthen India's ability to combat organised examination fraud and ensure fair, transparent, and credible public examinations.

The Monsoon Session of Parliament witnessed repeated disruptions on Wednesday as opposition parties protested the police action against supporters of the Cockroach Janata Party (CJP) during the 20 July Parliament march. Opposition MPs, dressed in black as a mark of protest, also intensified their demand for the resignation of Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan over the alleged NEET paper leak issue.

The uproar led to multiple adjournments in both Houses of Parliament, with proceedings in the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha being repeatedly suspended amid continuous sloganeering by opposition members.

Akhilesh Yadav Questions Police Action

Speaking in the Lok Sabha, Samajwadi Party president Akhilesh Yadav questioned the conduct of security personnel during the protests and asked who had authorised the police to allegedly tear the clothes of women demonstrators.

His remarks came as opposition parties accused law enforcement agencies of using excessive force during the crackdown on protesters participating in the Parliament march on 20 July.

The allegations have become one of the key issues driving the opposition's protest during the ongoing Monsoon Session.

Opposition Renews Demand for Minister's Resignation

Congress MP K.C. Venugopal reiterated that the opposition's primary demand remains the resignation of Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan.

Opposition leaders have linked their demand to the alleged NEET paper leak and have also raised concerns over the handling of student protests that followed the controversy.

The issue has united several opposition parties, which have been coordinating their protests inside and outside Parliament.

Government Offers Discussion

Responding to the opposition's allegations, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju said the government has been ready to discuss the alleged NEET paper leak issue for the past three days.

He maintained that the government was open to a structured debate in Parliament and urged opposition members to allow the House to function.

Despite the government's offer, the protests continued, resulting in repeated disruptions.

Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha Adjourned

The Lok Sabha was adjourned just one minute after it convened at 11:00 am due to continuous sloganeering by opposition members.

When the House reconvened at 12:00 noon, proceedings lasted only about five minutes before another adjournment until 2:00 pm.

The Rajya Sabha also witnessed similar disruptions and was adjourned until the afternoon amid the ongoing protests.

Opposition MPs Wear Black

Congress leader Rahul Gandhi and several opposition MPs arrived in Parliament wearing black attire as a symbolic protest against the police action and the government's handling of the controversy.

The demonstration followed Tuesday's protests outside the Prime Minister's residence, where opposition leaders raised slogans demanding the resignation of both Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan.

According to reports, Rahul Gandhi was later detained during the protest and released the same night.

Political Tensions Continue

The opposition has announced that it will continue raising the issues of the alleged NEET paper leak, police action against protesters, and accountability in Parliament.

Meanwhile, the government has maintained that it is prepared for a discussion but has urged opposition parties to allow normal parliamentary business to continue.

With both sides holding firm to their positions, the Monsoon Session is expected to witness further political confrontation in the coming days.

Both parties have begun sharpening their social outreach strategies, signalling that Dalit voters could play a decisive role in determining the electoral outcome in India's most politically significant state. Political observers believe the contest is no longer limited to traditional caste equations, as every major party is attempting to expand its social base ahead of the election.

The BJP is focusing on consolidating its support among Dalits alongside non-Yadav Other Backward Classes (OBCs), a strategy that has contributed to its electoral success in recent years. The party has also undertaken organisational changes in Uttar Pradesh aimed at balancing caste representation within its leadership structure before the election campaign gathers momentum.

On the other hand, the Samajwadi Party is attempting to strengthen its PDA (Pichhda, Dalit, Alpsankhyak) strategy under party chief Akhilesh Yadav. As part of that effort, the SP is planning to field a significantly higher number of Dalit candidates in the 2027 Assembly election, including candidates in several general constituencies, in an effort to broaden its support beyond its traditional Muslim-Yadav voter base.

Political analysts say the contest has become more competitive because the Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP), which has historically been the principal political force representing Dalit voters in Uttar Pradesh, is facing renewed challenges in retaining its traditional support base. This has encouraged rival parties to step up their outreach to Scheduled Caste communities through organisational changes, public campaigns and candidate selection strategies.

The BJP continues to project governance, welfare schemes and representation of marginalised communities as central themes of its campaign, while the Samajwadi Party is seeking to build a broader social coalition through its PDA narrative. The differing approaches highlight how both parties are attempting to appeal to voters whose support could influence dozens of Assembly constituencies across the state.

Dalit voters account for a substantial share of Uttar Pradesh's electorate and have traditionally played a decisive role in state elections. Their voting pattern has undergone notable changes over the past decade, making them one of the most closely watched electoral groups as political parties recalibrate their strategies.

The Congress has also stepped up its efforts by appointing Dalit leader Rajendra Pal Gautam as its Uttar Pradesh in-charge, while reaffirming support for the PDA political framework in coordination with its alliance strategy. The move reflects the wider competition among political parties to increase their presence among Dalit communities ahead of the election.

Although formal campaigning is yet to begin, organisational restructuring, candidate planning and community outreach programmes indicate that preparations are already well underway.

With the Assembly election expected next year, political observers believe the fight for Dalit votes will remain one of the most significant factors shaping Uttar Pradesh's electoral landscape. As parties continue refining their caste and social equations, the coming months are likely to witness intensified grassroots mobilisation across the state.

The BJP has continued to project Hindutva as one of the central pillars of its political campaign. Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath and other senior party leaders have accused the opposition of adopting what they describe as "soft Hindutva" only because of the approaching elections. BJP leaders argue that the opposition's recent emphasis on Sanatan traditions lacks consistency and is driven by electoral considerations rather than ideology.

At the same time, Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav has noticeably altered his political messaging in recent months. While continuing to champion the party's PDA (Pichhda, Dalit and Alpsankhyak) social coalition, he has increasingly linked socialism with Sanatan values. Speaking at public events, Akhilesh has asserted that "Samajwad" represents the true spirit of Sanatan by promoting equality and welfare for every section of society.

The Samajwadi Party's outreach has also included visits to religious figures and temples, with the party preparing to launch a statewide PDA Rath Yatra from a prominent religious location later this year. Political observers view these moves as an attempt to expand the party's support base beyond its traditional caste coalition while countering the BJP's dominance over religious narratives.

The Congress has adopted a similar approach in Uttar Pradesh. State Congress president Ajay Rai has repeatedly highlighted his religious identity and has participated in temple visits and public religious events. Party leaders believe that emphasising Sanatan traditions could help counter the BJP's allegations that the opposition is anti-Hindu while allowing the Congress to reconnect with sections of the electorate that have drifted away in recent elections.

Political analysts believe the shift reflects a broader transformation in Uttar Pradesh's electoral landscape since 2014. With the BJP consistently consolidating a large section of Hindu voters, opposition parties appear to be balancing their traditional social justice and secular narratives with greater emphasis on religious and cultural symbolism.

The BJP, however, remains unconvinced by the opposition's strategy. Party leaders continue to accuse both the SP and Congress of pursuing "appeasement politics" in the past while adopting religious symbolism only in the run-up to elections. The party has intensified its criticism through public campaigns and protests, arguing that its commitment to Hindutva has remained consistent over the years.

As political activity gathers pace ahead of the 2027 Assembly elections, Sanatan politics is expected to remain a key campaign theme alongside governance, economic development and social welfare. Whether the opposition's evolving strategy succeeds in broadening its electoral appeal or the BJP retains its advantage on the Hindutva plank is likely to become one of the defining questions of the upcoming election battle.

According to party insiders, the proposed Rath Yatra will travel across different regions of Uttar Pradesh, focusing on strengthening the Samajwadi Party's support base among the PDA (Pichhda, Dalit and Alpsankhyak) social coalition while also reaching out to other sections of society ahead of the elections. The route and schedule are expected to be finalised in the coming weeks.

The decision to begin the yatra from a religious location is being viewed as part of Akhilesh Yadav's evolving political strategy. In recent weeks, the SP chief has made several appearances linked to religious and cultural issues, including his meeting with Shankaracharya Swami Avimukteshwaranand and his remarks on Ayodhya and Sanatan traditions. Political observers believe these moves reflect an attempt to counter the BJP's dominance over religious narratives while retaining the party's traditional social justice agenda.

The proposed campaign is expected to highlight issues such as unemployment, inflation, farmers' concerns, education and law and order. At the same time, party leaders are likely to use the yatra to mobilise workers at the grassroots level and prepare district units for the upcoming Assembly election battle.

Although the Samajwadi Party has not officially announced the exact starting point, sources suggest that a major religious centre is under consideration. The choice is expected to carry symbolic significance and could become one of the key talking points of the party's campaign launch.

The Rath Yatra will also provide Akhilesh Yadav with an opportunity to interact directly with voters across the state through public meetings and roadshows. Similar statewide campaigns have previously formed an important part of the Samajwadi Party's election strategy, helping the leadership connect with local workers and communicate the party's agenda before polling.

With less than a year remaining before Uttar Pradesh heads to the polls, political parties have begun intensifying their preparations. While the BJP is expected to focus on governance and welfare initiatives, the Samajwadi Party is positioning its PDA campaign as the centrepiece of its election strategy.

The launch of the proposed Rath Yatra is expected to mark the beginning of an aggressive campaign season in Uttar Pradesh, with political activity likely to intensify across the state in the months leading up to the Assembly elections.

The interaction comes at a time when political parties across the spectrum are attempting to recalibrate their social coalitions and broaden their appeal ahead of future electoral contests. For the Samajwadi Party (SP), the meeting has renewed debate over whether the party is trying to connect its traditional socialist politics with a more visible engagement with Sanatan and religious institutions.

Photographs and details of the meeting quickly gained attention on social media and in political circles. While neither side presented the interaction as a political alliance, the symbolism of the engagement drew interest because of the changing nature of political messaging in Uttar Pradesh.

For decades, the Samajwadi Party has largely been identified with social justice politics, backward caste mobilisation and secular political positioning. However, the political landscape in the state has evolved significantly over the past decade, with religious identity and cultural narratives becoming increasingly central to electoral discourse.

Political analysts say Akhilesh Yadav has, in recent years, attempted to strike a balance between the party’s traditional ideological roots and the growing importance of religious symbolism in public life. Visits to temples, participation in religious events and statements emphasising respect for faith have become more visible in the SP’s political outreach.

The latest meeting with Swami Avimukteshwaranand is being viewed in that broader context. The Shankaracharya has been vocal on a range of religious and social issues and often commands attention beyond conventional political boundaries. Any public engagement with such a figure naturally attracts scrutiny in a politically significant state like Uttar Pradesh.

Supporters of the Samajwadi Party argue that there is no contradiction between socialism and Sanatan traditions. They point out that many socialist leaders in India historically maintained close connections with religious and cultural institutions while advocating social equality and welfare-oriented politics.

Critics, however, contend that such engagements may be driven more by electoral considerations than ideological evolution. Opposition leaders have suggested that several political parties are increasingly trying to appeal to religious sentiments because of the changing voter landscape.

The meeting also comes amid continued efforts by opposition parties to expand their support base beyond traditional vote banks. In Uttar Pradesh, where caste equations, welfare politics and religious identity often intersect, parties are constantly looking for ways to connect with new sections of voters without alienating their existing supporters.

For Akhilesh Yadav, the challenge is particularly significant. While retaining the Samajwadi Party’s core social justice narrative, he must also address perceptions created by political rivals regarding the party’s relationship with issues of faith and religious identity.

So far, neither the Samajwadi Party nor the Shankaracharya has indicated that the meeting was part of any larger political initiative. Yet its political significance lies less in what was formally discussed and more in the message it sends to different sections of society.

As Uttar Pradesh politics continues to evolve, symbolic interactions between political leaders and influential religious figures are likely to attract increasing attention. Whether Akhilesh Yadav’s engagement with Swami Avimukteshwaranand helps bridge the space between socialist politics and a broader cultural appeal remains a question that only future political developments can answer.

The investigation into the alleged theft of donations from the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Temple Trust has intensified, with Uttar Pradesh Police claiming that a portion of the misappropriated funds was invested in the stock market and routed through the bank accounts of relatives and close associates.

Investigators on Thursday took one of the accused, Anukalp Mishra, to his residence in Ayodhya as part of the ongoing probe. Police searched the premises for around 20 minutes and questioned family members, though officials have not disclosed whether any additional evidence was recovered during the operation.

According to police sources, Anukalp allegedly admitted during interrogation that he and co-accused Avinash Shukla invested a significant portion of the stolen donation money in the stock market. The accused are also alleged to have lent money on interest and transferred funds through the bank accounts of relatives before routing the money back into their own accounts in an attempt to conceal the financial trail.

Thirty Bank Accounts Frozen

The Special Investigation Team (SIT) has frozen 30 bank accounts linked to the accused and their family members after investigators found financial transactions that were allegedly disproportionate to their known sources of income.

The move is part of a broader effort to trace the movement of funds and identify the complete money trail. Police officials are examining banking records and digital transactions to determine the total amount allegedly diverted from temple donations.

On Wednesday, police had similarly taken co-accused Lavkush Mishra and Karunesh Pandey to their residences for searches. All three accused were subsequently placed on 40-hour police remand for further questioning.

Investigators also recovered forged donation receipts during the searches, which are expected to play a key role in establishing how the alleged fraud was carried out.

Political Reactions Intensify

The case has sparked a fresh political confrontation in Uttar Pradesh.

Samajwadi Party president Akhilesh Yadav termed the alleged theft of temple donations a "grave sin" and accused the Special Investigation Team of attempting to cover up the matter.

Addressing reporters, Yadav claimed that questions had also been raised over the SIT itself, alleging that one of its members was facing a cheating case under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code. He further alleged that complaints raised by the Opposition were not being taken seriously.

Yadav also demanded a detailed examination of call detail records (CDRs) linked to individuals associated with the temple's donation management system.

BJP Defends Investigation

The Bharatiya Janata Party rejected the Opposition's allegations, asserting that the state government had acted swiftly after the irregularities surfaced.

Uttar Pradesh Cabinet Minister Manoj Pandey said the government had ordered an investigation immediately and assured that those found guilty would face strict action.

BJP Rajya Sabha MP Manan Kumar Mishra also criticised the Opposition for politicising the issue, stating that an SIT had already been constituted, FIRs had been registered and arrests had been made. He said the law would take its course regardless of the stature of those involved.

Congress Seeks Greater Accountability

Congress leaders also demanded greater transparency in the management of temple donations.

MP Imran Masood suggested that the Ram Temple Trust should be administered on the lines of the Vaishno Devi Shrine Board if financial irregularities were established. Congress leader Pramod Tiwari questioned how senior officials associated with the Trust could escape scrutiny if the allegations proved true.

Meanwhile, Trust member Mahant Dinendra Das expressed confidence in the state administration and said those responsible would not be spared.

Trust Treasurer Swami Govind Dev Giri said new safeguards had already been introduced in the donation counting process and expressed confidence that similar incidents would not recur.

Investigation Continues

Police officials continue to examine financial records, electronic evidence and recovered documents as the investigation expands. Authorities have indicated that further arrests or financial action could follow if additional links emerge during the probe.

Accused Nageshwar Singh Baghel picked up from Purwa Kalyanpur village in joint operation; cyber cell investigating social media post and possible foreign link

A man was arrested from Rewa district on Sunday for allegedly posting obscene and derogatory comments on social media against Aditi Yadav, the daughter of former Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister and Samajwadi Party national president Akhilesh Yadav.

The Uttar Pradesh Special Task Force (STF), along with the Kanpur Commissionerate Cyber Crime Police and Rewa police, conducted a joint operation to apprehend the accused. Nageshwar Singh Baghel (32), a resident of Purwa Kalyanpur village under Panwar police station limits in Rewa district, was taken into custody from his village.

The case originated from a complaint filed by the National Secretary of the Samajwadi Party Advocates' Wing at the Cyber Crime Police Station in Kanpur Commissionerate. The complaint alleged that a Facebook user had shared an altered image of Akhilesh Yadav's daughter along with vulgar and derogatory remarks.

Following the complaint, police registered Case No. 38/2026 at the Cyber Crime Police Station under multiple sections: Section 79 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), which deals with words or acts intended to insult a woman's modesty; Section 336(4) of the BNS, relating to forgery intended to damage a person's reputation; and Section 66E of the Information Technology Act, which addresses privacy violations in cyberspace.

The Cyber Crime Police launched an investigation, examining technical data obtained from the social media platform along with digital evidence and electronic records. The investigation led them to Rewa in Madhya Pradesh.

An STF team from Uttar Pradesh reached Madhya Pradesh and, with the help of local police, traced the accused. Panwar police station in-charge Praveen Upadhyay led the local team that conducted the joint operation and took Baghel into custody. After completing necessary legal formalities, the accused was handed over to the Uttar Pradesh STF and taken to Uttar Pradesh for further questioning.

Police officials said the investigation is ongoing. Authorities are also looking into whether any other individuals or digital platforms are linked to the case. Investigators have found that one of the social media accounts linked to the controversy was allegedly being operated from the United States.

Kanpur Commissioner of Police Raghubir Lal said the police are committed to protecting the dignity, respect and safety of women. "Sharing edited images, false information, offensive comments or any content on social media that damages a woman's reputation is a punishable offence, and strict legal action will be taken against those involved," he said.

Earlier, on June 17, FIRs were registered against multiple individuals accused of making objectionable comments about Akhilesh Yadav's daughter. The controversy had drawn widespread condemnation, with Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath publicly defending Aditi Yadav and directing police to register an FIR against those responsible.

Following his arrest, Baghel was produced before a court, which later granted him bail.

Police officials have made it clear that social media platforms are being continuously monitored for objectionable and offensive content, and strict legal action will be taken in such cases. Further investigation is underway.

The Special Investigation Team has identified around 150 suspects in the alleged donation theft case, with nearly 25 individuals likely to face action.

The Special Investigation Team probing the alleged theft of donations from the Ram Mandir in Ayodhya is expected to submit its findings to Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath on Monday, with sources indicating that top temple trust officials could face removal.

The SIT, which completed its sixth day of investigation on Saturday, has questioned around 150 suspects in connection with the case. Nearly 25 individuals may face action based on the evidence gathered so far, according to sources familiar with the probe.

SIT Wraps Probe, Heads to Lucknow

The three-member panel, comprising Lucknow Commissioner Vijay Vishwas Pant, IG Range Kiran S., and Finance Department Special Secretary Neelratan, is expected to return to Lucknow on Saturday evening after a week-long investigation in Ayodhya.

Sources said the team spent nearly six hours inside the temple complex on Friday, questioning Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra Trust General Secretary Champat Rai, trustee Dr Anil Mishra, and construction in-charge Gopal Rao separately. Investigators also interrogated State Bank of India officials, including the branch manager and cashier.

Action on the Cards

According to sources, action against Champat Rai and Dr Anil Mishra is being actively considered. Both could be removed from their positions on the trust. Gopal Rao may also face similar action.

Investigators also attempted to question Anand, Gopal Rao's nephew, and temple employee Somesh Anand, but both were reportedly unavailable, with their phones switched off.

Recovery So Far

The SIT has recovered approximately ₹2 crore based on information provided by five accused — Lavkush, Avneesh, Anukalp, Karune and Ramshankar alias Tinnu. All five were associated with counting donations collected at the temple.

Gold was recovered from Tinnu's residence on June 13, though officials have not yet disclosed the quantity or value of the recovered items.

How the Controversy Unfolded

The issue first came to light on June 7 when former Uttar Pradesh minister Pawan Pandey alleged that between ₹5 crore and ₹7.5 crore had been stolen from the Ram Mandir. Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav also questioned the government's silence, calling for judicial scrutiny.

Trust General Secretary Champat Rai initially rejected the allegations, stating that no evidence of theft had surfaced. As the controversy escalated, BJP leader Dr Rajneesh Singh wrote to the Prime Minister on June 9 seeking a CBI investigation. A day later, the Prime Minister's Office sought a report from the trust.

Mahakumbh Donations Under Scrutiny

The SIT has widened its probe to examine donation records from the Prayagraj Mahakumbh period, when more than five crore devotees visited the Ram Mandir over 66 days. Investigators are questioning how donations collected through temple donation boxes remained below ₹100 crore despite the massive footfall.

The probe has expanded to Somesh Anand, a relative of Gopal Rao and head of the temple's wheelchair service. Investigators are examining his role in temple operations.

On June 18, the SIT questioned temple employees Mayank, Shivam Pandey, Ashish Dubey and Ratnesh. Ashish Agnihotri, who assisted in managing gold, silver and other valuables offered to Ram Lalla, has also been questioned. Employee Phoolkant Mishra, involved in the custody of donated jewellery, has come under scrutiny.

Claim of Missing Consecrated Stones

Fresh questions have emerged with Dharm Sena founder Santosh Dubey alleging that 1,250 consecrated Shri Ram stones made of gold, silver, diamonds, gemstones and ashtadhatu have gone missing. According to Dubey, the stones were brought to Ayodhya in 1989 after being worshipped across India and abroad, remaining at Karsevakpuram until 2002.

While the consecrated clay stones are still preserved, the metal stones are no longer visible, Dubey claimed, questioning the responsibility of Champat Rai for their upkeep.

Public Reactions

VHP leader Surendra Jain said allegations against the temple trust are not new and none have been proven so far. "At first, we felt these were routine political allegations, but when they started coming from other sources, we treated them with utmost seriousness," he said.

Hanumangarhi chief priest Mahant Sanjay Das stated that the SIT investigation would expose the truth. "The truth will come out, and whoever is found responsible will face the strictest action, no matter how influential they may be," he said.

Political Responses

Union Minister B.L. Verma backed the SIT probe, accusing critics of politicising the issue. "Some people are trying to politicise this. Those raising questions are the same people who opposed the Ram Mandir movement in the past," he said.

Uttar Pradesh Deputy Chief Minister Keshav Prasad Maurya urged political leaders to avoid premature conclusions. "Making allegations is one thing; proving them is another. If any wrongdoing has taken place, those responsible will certainly be punished," he said.

Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav renewed his demand for a detailed accounting of valuables offered at the temple, saying the public now wants "gold separated from gold and silver from silver."

CEO Appointment on the Cards

Sources said the Uttar Pradesh government is considering appointing a Chief Executive Officer for the Ram Mandir, modelled on the administrative structure at Kashi Vishwanath Temple. A senior IAS officer could oversee the trust's administrative and financial affairs, strengthening transparency and accountability. Discussions are underway between the government and the trust, though no final decision has been taken.

As the investigation into alleged irregularities involving Ram Mandir donations gathers momentum, Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath is scheduled to visit Ayodhya on Friday. The visit comes against the backdrop of a high-profile probe into claims of theft and mismanagement of offerings at the temple, a matter that has triggered political debate and intensified administrative scrutiny.

According to sources, the Chief Minister will offer prayers at the Ram Mandir during his visit. However, a specific point in the administrative protocol issued for the programme has drawn attention. Sources familiar with the arrangements said Ram Mandir Trust General Secretary Champat Rai has been asked to nominate another representative in his place for the event. The details of the nominated individual are reportedly required to be submitted to the designated duty magistrate before the visit.

The development comes as the Special Investigation Team (SIT) continues its inquiry into allegations surrounding the handling of temple donations. On Thursday, investigators visited the Ram Mandir premises for the fourth consecutive day as part of the ongoing probe. Sources indicated that temple trustee Dr. Anil Mishra may be questioned regarding certain procedural and financial aspects linked to donation management.

SIT Investigation Expands

Investigators are reportedly examining the process used for counting donations as well as the appointment of personnel associated with the handling of temple funds. Sources suggest that several individuals connected to the counting process have already come under scrutiny.

According to information emerging from the investigation, five individuals allegedly linked to the case have been identified. Authorities have reportedly recovered approximately ₹2 crore based on information provided during the inquiry. All five individuals were associated with the donation-counting process at the temple, sources said.

Officials have not yet publicly disclosed the full findings of the investigation, and the probe remains ongoing.

Administrative Reforms Under Discussion

Amid the controversy, discussions are reportedly underway regarding the introduction of a Chief Executive Officer (CEO)-style administrative framework for the Ram Mandir, similar to the management structure followed at the Kashi Vishwanath Temple.

Sources said the proposal is aimed at strengthening transparency in financial management, donation accounting, and overall administrative operations. Government officials and representatives of the temple trust are believed to be holding consultations before any final decision is made.

The possibility of structural reforms has gained attention as authorities seek to address concerns raised during the investigation and improve oversight mechanisms.

Political Reactions Intensify

The controversy has also triggered strong political reactions. Uttar Pradesh Congress President Ajay Rai visited Ayodhya and criticized the BJP over the allegations, demanding strict action and an independent investigation into the matter.

The issue first surfaced on June 7 when former Samajwadi Party minister Pawan Pandey alleged that between ₹5 crore and ₹7.5 crore in temple offerings had gone missing. Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav later questioned the government's response and called for a thorough examination of the allegations.

Champat Rai had previously rejected the claims, maintaining that no evidence supporting the allegations had emerged.

Demand for Wider Probe

As the controversy expanded, BJP leader Dr. Rajneesh Singh reportedly wrote to the Prime Minister seeking a Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) inquiry. Sources indicated that the Prime Minister's Office subsequently sought a report from the Ram Mandir Trust regarding the allegations.

With the SIT investigation continuing and administrative reforms under consideration, the developments surrounding the Ram Mandir donation controversy are expected to remain under close public and political scrutiny in the coming days.

The seventh meeting of the INDIA bloc concluded at the Constitution Club here on Monday, with top opposition leaders reaching a five-point consensus on key national issues ranging from electoral reforms to economic distress. Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge announced the decisions after hours of deliberations, signalling an attempt by the alliance to regroup ahead of the Monsoon Session of Parliament.

Leaders including Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi, Mamata Banerjee, Akhilesh Yadav, and several others attended the meeting in person, while Uddhav Thackeray and Hemant Soren joined virtually. Kharge later told reporters that 23 to 25 parties participated and a broad agreement was reached despite differing regional concerns.

Leaders Gather After Two-Year Gap

The meeting comes nearly two years after the last formal INDIA bloc gathering in Delhi in June 2024. In the interim, the alliance navigated multiple state polls with mixed results — fighting united in some states like Jammu and Kashmir and Jharkhand, but separately in others including Kerala and West Bengal.

Senior leaders described the Monday huddle as an opportunity to address common challenges posed by the ruling NDA. Kharge highlighted issues such as alleged misuse of central agencies, economic slowdown, and youth unemployment.

Five Key Decisions Announced

After the meeting, Kharge outlined the consensus points. The alliance decided to send a letter to the Chief Justice of India raising concerns over the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls and alleged irregularities in the electoral process. 

The bloc also unanimously demanded the immediate resignation of the Union Education Minister, citing lapses in the conduct of NEET and CBSE examinations that affected lakhs of students. 

A third point called upon the Centre to convene an all-party meeting to discuss the “precarious” economic situation, rising prices, unemployment, and farmers’ issues. 

Also Read: Internal rumblings surface as INDIA bloc convenes in national capital

Regular Coordination Planned

In a bid to strengthen unity, parties agreed to meet physically every two months. The next meeting is scheduled for Hyderabad in August. Additionally, parliamentary floor coordination will continue during the upcoming Monsoon Session, with daily morning meetings at the office of Leader of Opposition Mallikarjun Kharge.

Kharge emphasised that all parties shared their views freely and consensus emerged on fighting together on people-centric issues.

UnderCurrents of Tension

The meeting took place against a backdrop of visible strains within the alliance. Posters targeting Rahul Gandhi and the Congress appeared on Akbar Road earlier in the day, which Youth Congress workers later removed. Several leaders dismissed the posters as “cheap tactics” possibly aimed at creating divisions. 

Regional frictions were also evident. Parties from Kerala and Jharkhand have expressed unhappiness over recent Congress decisions, while seat-sharing talks for future polls remain delicate. Mamata Banerjee’s attendance drew attention amid reports of some Trinamool Congress MPs exploring other options. Despite these challenges, leaders projected a show of unity, with Sonia Gandhi and Mamata seen sharing warm moments.

Sharad Pawar, who attended with daughter Supriya Sule, noted that no immediate major decisions were expected but discussions would continue. He spoke of evolving a “formula” to prevent rigidity and maintain alliance cohesion, especially with no major national polls for the next few years.

Opposition Eyes United Front

The INDIA bloc, formed in 2023, had tasted success in the 2024 Lok Sabha polls, restricting the BJP from a majority on its own. Since then, it has seen both victories and setbacks in state elections. Monday’s meeting is seen as an effort to recalibrate strategy ahead of the 2029 general elections and upcoming state polls in states like Uttar Pradesh.

Congress leaders expressed confidence that the alliance remained united at the national level despite local differences. RJD’s Manoj Kumar Jha and others called for addressing internal issues on appropriate platforms rather than through public posturing.

As the Monsoon Session approaches, the opposition is expected to press the government on economic concerns, education reforms, and electoral integrity. The decisions taken today are likely to shape their parliamentary strategy in the coming weeks. 

The development comes at a time when opposition parties are seeking to counter what they describe as “misgovernance” on multiple fronts. How effectively they translate today’s consensus into coordinated action will be watched closely in the days ahead.

Prateek Yadav’s last rites today in Lucknow; postmortem points to cardiac arrest

Late SP patriarch Mulayam Singh Yadav’s younger son Prateek Yadav will be cremated at Baikunth Dham; doctors preserve viscera for further probe.

The final journey of Prateek Yadav, the younger brother of Samajwadi Party president Akhilesh Yadav, is set to take place at Lucknow’s Baikunth Dham on Thursday afternoon. Prateek, the son of the late Mulayam Singh Yadav and his second wife Sadhana Gupta, passed away on Wednesday morning. He was 38.

The sudden demise has sent shockwaves through Uttar Pradesh’s political circles, drawing leaders across party lines to the Yadav residence to pay their final respects. Prateek, who largely steered clear of the active political life pursued by his brothers and father, was a well-known figure in the real estate and fitness industry in the state capital.

Postmortem reveals cardiac arrest

Medical authorities at King George’s Medical University (KGMU), where the autopsy was conducted, confirmed on Thursday that the primary cause of death was cardiac arrest. However, the report has added layers to the investigation, noting six injury marks on Prateek's body.

According to hospital sources, three of these injuries appeared to be approximately a week old, while the other three were sustained within 24 hours of his passing. Given the high-profile nature of the case, officials have preserved the viscera for further histopathological examination to rule out any underlying complications.

A family in mourning

The atmosphere at the family's Lucknow residence remained somber throughout the night. Prateek’s wife and BJP leader, Aparna Yadav, who was in Assam at the time of the tragedy, rushed back to Lucknow late Wednesday. Witnesses described an emotional scene as she reached the house, breaking down while embracing her two daughters.

Aparna reportedly stayed beside the body throughout the night. SP chief Akhilesh Yadav, along with his wife and MP Dimple Yadav, were among the first to reach the civil hospital and later the postmortem house on Wednesday. Akhilesh, who shared a complex but private bond with his younger brother, appeared visibly shaken during the morning's rituals.

Medical history and complications

While the postmortem cited cardiac arrest, doctors who had been monitoring Prateek’s health indicated he had been battling a serious lung condition. Sources at the hospital stated he was suffering from pulmonary embolism—a condition where blood clots block the arteries in the lungs. This condition often leads to sudden respiratory distress and can put immense pressure on the heart, eventually triggering the fatal arrest.

Life away from the spotlight

Born in 1987 to Sadhana Gupta and later legally adopted by Mulayam Singh Yadav, Prateek’s upbringing was distinctly different from the rest of the Saifai clan. An alumnus of the University of Leeds in the UK, he chose to invest his energy into his passion for luxury automobiles and high-end fitness centers rather than the rigors of election campaigning.

Despite his wife Aparna Yadav joining the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) in 2022, Prateek maintained a neutral public stance, often seen as the bridge between the family’s differing political leanings. His presence was a constant at family gatherings, even as the internal dynamics of the Yadav family shifted over the years.

Preparations for final journey

Security has been tightened around the Vikramaditya Marg area and the route leading to Baikunth Dham. Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath was among the dignitaries who visited the family to offer condolences, briefly interacting with Aparna Yadav and her children.

The funeral procession is expected to begin shortly, with a large number of Samajwadi Party workers and family well-wishers gathering to bid farewell to the 38-year-old.