The Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) has ordered a temporary ban on messaging platform Telegram in India under Section 69A of the Information Technology Act, 2000, officials confirmed on Tuesday. The restriction will remain in effect until June 22, covering the NEET (UG) 2026 re-examination scheduled for June 21.

The government has also directed Telegram to disable its message editing feature in India until June 30, even after the exam lifts. This means users will not be able to edit previously sent messages during this period.

According to the National Testing Agency (NTA), the action was taken because certain individuals were using Telegram's edit function to create fake evidence of paper leaks in national-level examinations. "Some people would edit old messages and add question papers or PDFs to them. Later, it was claimed that the paper had leaked before the exam," an NTA press release stated.

Multiple channels demanding money for exam papers

The agency said several Telegram channels were operating under names like "Paper Leaked NEET", "Re-NEET 2026", "Private Mafia", and "REE NEET MAFIAA". Officials said these channels were demanding thousands to lakhs of rupees from students and parents in exchange for purported exam papers.

The Indian Cybercrime Coordination Centre (I4C), in collaboration with Bihar, Gujarat, and Rajasthan Police, has already taken action against several Telegram channels, groups, and bots. The Ahmedabad Cyber Crime Branch has arrested members of an interstate cyber fraud gang linked to the racket.

Investigations have so far revealed eight Telegram channels, transactions worth approximately ₹1.5 crore, and about 1,000 mobile numbers connected to the fraud, police sources said.

NTA: Ban last resort, inconvenience unavoidable

The NTA acknowledged the ban might inconvenience general users but defended the move as a last resort. "Prior to this, several steps were taken, including the removal of objectionable content. This decision was necessary to maintain the fairness of examinations," the agency said.

The NEET-UG examination, originally conducted on May 3, was cancelled following allegations of question paper leaks in several states. The NTA scrapped the exam on May 12 after investigation found indications of irregularities. The re-examination will now be held on June 21.

Changes made for re-exam

The NTA has increased the exam duration from 180 minutes to 195 minutes for the re-test. Space for rough work has also been expanded in the answer sheet.

NEET serves as the gateway to over 1 lakh medical seats across India, including MBBS, BDS, AYUSH, nursing, and other courses at premier institutions such as AIIMS and JIPMER.

The agency has advised students not to trust unconfirmed information circulating on social media and to rely only on official updates at neet.nta.nic.in. Further details on the ban's enforcement are awaited.

The Centre has ordered a temporary ban on access to Telegram in India until June 22 and directed the platform to disable its message‑edit feature in the country until June 30, officials said on Tuesday. The move comes days before the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET‑UG) re‑examination on June 21, which was called after a paper‑leak controversy.

The National Testing Agency (NTA) said the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) issued the order under Section 69A of the Information Technology Act, 2000. According to the NTA, the edit facility on Telegram was being misused to create forged evidence of paper leaks — users were editing old messages to insert question papers or PDFs and later claiming that leaks had occurred before exams.

“The step aims to curb circulation of fabricated evidence and ensure fairness of the re‑examination,” an NTA statement said, adding that the restriction on Telegram’s access will remain in effect through June 22 and the edit feature will be disabled until June 30. The agency acknowledged the inconvenience to ordinary users but called the measures “necessary” for exam integrity.

The NTA said it had exhausted other options before the ban, including requests to remove objectionable content and coordination with law‑enforcement agencies. The Indian Cyber Crime Coordination Centre (I4C), working with police teams in Bihar, Gujarat and Rajasthan, has already taken action against several Telegram channels, groups and bots linked to exam malpractice and extortion.

Investigations have revealed organised activity on channels using names such as “Paper Leaked NEET”, “Re‑NEET 2026”, “Private Mafia” and variations claiming to supply papers. The Ahmedabad Cyber Crime Branch has detained members of an interstate cyber‑fraud gang, and the probe has reportedly uncovered around eight Telegram channels, roughly 1.5 crore rupees in transactions and about 1,000 mobile numbers connected to the operation.

The NTA warned students against trusting unverified information on social media and urged them to rely only on official sources: the NEET portal (neet.nta.nic.in) and NTA’s verified handles. “Information related to the exam should only be taken from official channels,” the agency said.

The ban is narrowly timed to cover the re‑exam period; access will be restored after June 22, the NTA added. The temporary disabling of message editing will remain longer to prevent retrospective manipulation of threads that could be used to manufacture false evidence.

Separately, the NTA has altered the NEET‑UG re‑exam format. The duration has been extended from 180 minutes to 195 minutes, and additional space for rough work has been provided on the answer sheet, the agency confirmed. These changes come as part of efforts to accommodate logistics and ensure students are not disadvantaged.

Student groups and legal experts said they expect pushback from users and civil‑liberties advocates over a country‑wide block of an app used by millions. Some noted that blocking platforms is a blunt tool, while others accepted targeted restrictions if backed by clear evidence of criminal misuse. The government has framed the action as a limited, evidence‑driven intervention aimed at preventing large‑scale fraud that could again derail a national exam.

Law‑enforcement agencies are continuing investigations into alleged extortion and paper‑leak networks. The I4C and state police units have been asked to follow leads and identify financial trails, administrators said. Meanwhile, the NTA reiterated that students should avoid rumours and check only official updates about exam timing, centres and protocols.

The NEET-UG 2026 paper leak investigation has taken a major turn after the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) presented shocking allegations in court, claiming that a senior botany teacher appointed by the National Testing Agency (NTA) was actively involved in the conspiracy. The accused, Manisha Gurunath Mandhare, has been sent to 14 days of CBI custody by the Rouse Avenue Court in Delhi, marking a significant escalation in one of India’s most sensitive examination fraud cases.

According to the CBI, the accused was not just a passive participant but a key figure in the alleged paper leak network. Investigators claim that Mandhare, who is based in Pune, had professional expertise in biology and was directly involved in translating NEET question papers. This access, combined with her alleged association with other suspects, has raised serious concerns about internal vulnerabilities within the examination system.

The agency informed the court that Mandhare worked closely with other accused individuals, including Professor P.V. Kulkarni and consultant Manisha Waghmare. Together, they are suspected of planning and executing a coordinated strategy to access and distribute confidential examination material. The CBI argued that this was not an isolated incident but part of a structured network designed to compromise the integrity of one of India’s most competitive entrance examinations.

During the court hearing, the CBI made another startling claim: Mandhare allegedly handed over parts of the question paper to another accused named Shubham. Investigators believe this transfer played a crucial role in spreading the leaked content further through unauthorized channels. The agency has stated that the investigation is still ongoing across multiple states, and custodial interrogation is necessary to uncover the full extent of the network.

The role of the National Testing Agency (NTA), which is responsible for conducting major entrance exams in India, has also come under scrutiny. Officials appointed Mandhare as a senior subject expert in botany, which allegedly gave her access to sensitive materials. This has raised serious questions about the vetting process and internal security protocols used by exam authorities.

CBI officials emphasized in court that the accused’s specialization in translation work was a critical factor in the case. Since NEET question papers often undergo linguistic and technical processing, experts like Mandhare are given access under strict confidentiality agreements. However, investigators believe this trust may have been misused to facilitate the leak.

The Rouse Avenue Court, after hearing arguments from both sides, agreed with the CBI’s request for custody. The court stated that the seriousness of the allegations and the need for deeper investigation justified granting 14 days of remand. The accused will now be interrogated further to determine her exact role and connections within the alleged network.

Sources from the investigation suggest that the CBI is examining digital evidence, financial transactions, and communication records linked to multiple suspects. The agency is also tracking whether the leaked material was distributed through coaching networks, private tutoring groups, or online platforms.

The NEET paper leak case has once again brought attention to the recurring issue of examination security in India. Over the past few years, several high-profile exam leaks have raised concerns among students and parents about fairness and transparency in competitive testing systems. The latest allegations have intensified demands for stronger safeguards and technological upgrades.

Education experts say that if internal experts involved in exam preparation are found guilty, it could point to systemic weaknesses rather than isolated wrongdoing. The alleged involvement of a subject specialist in such a sensitive role highlights the need for stricter background verification and monitoring mechanisms.

Meanwhile, student communities across the country have expressed frustration and anxiety over the ongoing investigation. For many aspirants, NEET represents a critical gateway to medical education, and any compromise in its integrity directly affects thousands of futures.

As the investigation continues, the CBI is expected to expand its probe into multiple states and examine whether a larger syndicate is involved. Officials have indicated that more arrests could follow as digital and financial trails are analyzed in detail.

---------------

A pharmacy exam paper leak case has surfaced in Gwalior after a video showing an alleged agent selling a question paper minutes before the start of a Diploma in Pharmacy examination went viral, prompting swift police action. Gwalior Police have arrested three persons, including the main accused Ankesh Dhakad, in connection with the case.

The incident relates to the Diploma in Pharmacy examination conducted by Rajiv Gandhi Proudyogiki Vishwavidyalaya (RGPV) on April 6 at RNS Institute of Pharmacy in Gwalior’s Jhansi Road area. The paper for “Hospital and Clinical Pharmacy” was scheduled from 11 am to 2 pm.

Sale Claim Before Exam

According to the police, the accused was seen outside the examination centre around 10.45 am, nearly 15 minutes before the paper began, claiming he had access to the question paper and offering it to students in exchange for money.

In the viral video, the accused, seen wearing a blue shirt, allegedly approached students and claimed he could provide the exam paper before the test. Investigators said the video became the key basis for identifying the suspects and launching a formal probe.

Three Accused Arrested

Jhansi Road police station officials said a case was registered after the centre superintendent filed a complaint and submitted video evidence. Based on the footage, police identified Ankesh Dhakad as the alleged main accused and detained him along with two associates for questioning. All three were later arrested.

Police said several other suspects remain absconding and search operations are underway. Officials indicated that more arrests are likely as the investigation expands.

Four Students Identified

The matter first came to light after a person identified as Jitendra Mishra sent the video to the examination controller on WhatsApp. During the preliminary inquiry, four students seen in the footage were identified as Sohel Malik, Virendra Singh Dhakad, Kishan Dhakad and Deepak Dhakad.

Police are examining whether the students were only present at the spot or had any direct role in the attempted pharmacy exam paper leak. Their statements are expected to form a key part of the ongoing investigation.

Sealed Papers Opened Later

The examination centre administration has maintained that the question papers remained secure inside sealed packets until shortly before the exam. Centre superintendent Bhupendra Kushwaha told police that the sealed packet was opened at 10.54 am in the presence of the flying squad and invigilators.

He also said the process was videographed as per protocol. This timeline has led investigators to suspect that the accused may have attempted to mislead students by showing fake or unauthorised material to make illegal gains rather than accessing the original paper from the centre.

Probe Expands Further

Police are now investigating whether this was an organised attempt to cheat students by falsely claiming access to confidential exam material or part of a larger exam fraud network. Investigators are also checking call records, mobile phones and message trails of those arrested.

According to officials, the role of each accused is being verified, including whether money changed hands and whether similar attempts were made in earlier examinations. Sources indicated that digital evidence recovered from the accused may provide more clarity.

Exam Security Under Focus

The case has raised fresh concerns over exam security and the vulnerability of students to fraud outside examination centres. While officials have ruled out any breach inside the centre so far, the pharmacy exam paper leak allegation has triggered scrutiny of security arrangements around professional examinations.