The Chhattisgarh High Court has declined to grant relief to former Chief Minister and Patan MLA Bhupesh Baghel in an election dispute case, clearing the way for a detailed hearing on a petition challenging his 2023 Assembly election victory. The court rejected Baghel's application seeking dismissal of the election petition and ruled that the matter warrants consideration on its merits.

The petition, filed by Durg MP Vijay Baghel, alleges that Bhupesh Baghel violated provisions of election law during the 2023 Chhattisgarh Assembly elections. The petitioner has sought to have Baghel's election declared void on the grounds of alleged violations during the campaign period.

With the High Court refusing to dismiss the case at the preliminary stage, regular hearings on the merits of the petition are scheduled to begin on June 23.

Allegations of Model Code Violation

According to the petition, Bhupesh Baghel allegedly participated in a rally and roadshow in the Patan constituency during the silence period immediately before polling, when election campaigning is prohibited under the Representation of the People Act.

The petitioner claims that election slogans were raised and votes were solicited during the event, constituting a violation of Section 126 of the Act. The allegations are reportedly supported by video recordings and other electronic material submitted before the court.

The petition argues that these actions amounted to a breach of election regulations and therefore justify a challenge to the validity of the election result.

Court Finds Petition Maintainable

During the proceedings, Bhupesh Baghel's legal team argued that the petition lacked sufficient particulars and should be dismissed without a trial. The defense contended that the allegations were vague and unsupported by conclusive evidence.

Counsel for Baghel also raised questions regarding the admissibility of electronic evidence, arguing that the petition did not include the required certification under Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act for digital records.

The defense further maintained that the petitioner had failed to establish the identity of individuals involved in the alleged roadshow or provide clear proof linking the events directly to Baghel's consent and participation.

However, the High Court observed that the facts presented in the petition were sufficient to allow the case to proceed. The court held that issues relating to the authenticity and evidentiary value of documents and electronic records would be examined during the trial stage.

Previous Legal Efforts

This is not the first attempt by Bhupesh Baghel to challenge the maintainability of the election petition. Earlier applications seeking dismissal of the case had also failed before the High Court.

Subsequently, Baghel approached the Supreme Court, which permitted him to file a fresh application before the High Court on the issue of maintainability. Acting on that liberty, he filed the latest plea, which has now been rejected.

The High Court clarified that the former Chief Minister remains free to challenge the authenticity of evidence and electronic records during the course of the trial.

Political and Legal Significance

The case carries political significance as it involves one of Chhattisgarh's most prominent political leaders. Legal experts note that election petitions are governed by a high evidentiary threshold, and courts typically require detailed examination of facts before arriving at a final conclusion.

The court's latest order does not determine the truth of the allegations but only confirms that the petition contains sufficient grounds for a full hearing.

Congress in West Bengal has entered the Assembly election battle with a cautious but calculated strategy, seeking to revive its shrinking political base while avoiding a direct confrontation with Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee’s Trinamool Congress (TMC). The party’s approach reflects a delicate balancing act as it attempts to regain organisational relevance in the state without damaging broader opposition equations.

Limited Seat Focus

Congress is contesting 292 seats in West Bengal, but party leaders have made it clear that the campaign is not spread evenly across the state. Instead, the focus remains on a limited set of constituencies where the party believes it still has organisational presence, identifiable voter support and realistic electoral prospects.

According to party sources, Congress expects that even a modest seat tally, combined with an improved vote share, would help re-establish its political relevance in the state. The party has concentrated resources on select districts rather than pursuing an expansive state-wide campaign.

Core Congress Pockets

The party’s campaign has largely centred around Malda, Murshidabad, Kolkata, Hooghly, Raiganj, North Dinajpur and Birbhum. These regions have historically formed the backbone of Congress support in West Bengal and continue to offer some residual social and political capital.

Congress is particularly attempting to consolidate its traditional voter base among minorities and rural communities in these districts. Party strategists believe these constituencies offer the best chance to rebuild grassroots structures and recover lost political space, as per reports from state leaders.

Rahul’s Measured Messaging

Congress leader Rahul Gandhi’s campaign stops in West Bengal reflected this selective strategy. He addressed rallies in Srirampur, represented by state Congress president Subhankar Sarkar, and in Murshidabad, the home district of senior leader Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury.

His messaging remained measured. While Rahul Gandhi mentioned Mamata Banerjee only briefly, his speeches were largely directed at Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). The calibrated tone suggested Congress was attempting to protect its own leadership space in Bengal without escalating tensions with the TMC.

Avoiding Direct Clash

Congress has been notably restrained in constituencies where the principal contest is between the TMC and BJP. Party leaders appear reluctant to adopt an aggressive posture in these seats, mindful of the larger opposition landscape beyond West Bengal.

Sources indicated that Congress does not want its state-level campaign to undermine the possibility of future cooperation with the TMC at the national level. This explains the party’s selective aggression assertive where it sees room for revival, cautious where direct attacks could complicate national opposition politics.

Identity Crisis Persists

The strategy, however, carries clear risks. Congress faces a persistent identity challenge in West Bengal, where its political space has been squeezed by both the TMC and BJP over the past decade. By avoiding a sharper line against the ruling party, Congress risks appearing politically ambiguous to voters.

The central question before the electorate remains whether Congress is positioning itself as an independent challenger or as a tacit ally in the state’s larger anti-BJP framework. That lack of clarity could weaken the party’s attempt to rebuild an independent political identity, according to political observers.

What Lies Ahead

For Congress, the immediate objective in West Bengal is less about sweeping gains and more about organisational survival. The party is using this election to test whether its old support base can still be mobilised and whether selective interventions can translate into electoral relevance.

Its performance in these targeted pockets will determine whether Congress can rebuild a durable state unit or remain a marginal player in Bengal politics. For now, Congress in West Bengal is betting on restraint, regional strength and careful messaging to stay politically afloat in a complex electoral contest.