India Slams Pakistan’s ‘Genocidal Record’ at UNSC After Kashmir Remark

India delivered a sharp rebuttal to Pakistan at the United Nations Security Council on Wednesday, accusing Islamabad of deflecting from its own troubled history by raising the Jammu and Kashmir issue during a debate on the protection of civilians in armed conflicts.

India’s Permanent Representative to the UN, Harish Parvathaneni, described it as ironic that a country with a “long-tainted record of genocidal acts” had chosen to comment on matters strictly internal to India. The strong remarks came shortly after Pakistan’s representative brought up Kashmir in the open debate.

Sharp Exchange at the Council

Parvathaneni stated that Pakistan’s approach reflected decades of attempts to externalise its internal failures through violence both within and beyond its borders. He accused Islamabad of using aggression as a cover for its shortcomings, a line that underscored India’s long-standing position on cross-border issues.

The Indian envoy did not limit his response to rhetoric. He pointed to specific incidents to highlight what New Delhi sees as Pakistan’s pattern of civilian harm.

Afghanistan Airstrike in Spotlight

Parvathaneni drew the Council’s attention to a Pakistani airstrike on the Omid Addiction Treatment Hospital in Kabul during the holy month of Ramadan in March this year. According to the United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA), the late-night attack killed 269 civilians and injured 122 others.

“The world has not forgotten that it was during the holy month of Ramadan... at a time of peace, reflection, and mercy, that Pakistan conducted a barbaric airstrike,” he said. Officials noted the facility could not be justified as a military target. UNAMA data further indicated that over 94,000 people were displaced due to cross-border violence linked to Pakistan, with the vast majority of civilian casualties attributed to Pakistani security forces.

Local reports from Kabul at the time described chaos as emergency responders rushed to the scene, with many patients and staff among the victims in the crowded rehabilitation centre.

Historical References Surface

The Indian diplomat also referenced Pakistan’s actions in 1971 during Operation Searchlight in what was then East Pakistan, now Bangladesh. He alleged that the Pakistani army carried out a systematic campaign of mass rape against around 400,000 women, describing it as part of a broader pattern of genocidal violence.

Historians widely document the 1971 events as a dark chapter, with estimates of sexual violence ranging between 200,000 and 400,000 women. The operation triggered a massive refugee crisis and eventually led to the creation of Bangladesh following Indian military intervention.

Broader Context of the Debate

The UNSC open debate focused on safeguarding civilians amid ongoing global conflicts. Pakistan’s intervention on Kashmir appeared aimed at internationalising the bilateral dispute, a move India has consistently opposed, maintaining that the region is an integral part of the country and that issues should be resolved bilaterally.

Sources familiar with the proceedings said India’s response was calibrated to shift focus back to accountability and the protection of civilians—core themes of the debate—while exposing what New Delhi views as Pakistan’s selective outrage.

In Bhopal and other parts of India, reactions on social media and among analysts reflected strong support for the firm diplomatic stance. Many saw it as a necessary pushback against repeated attempts to drag internal matters onto the global stage.

Implications and Way Forward

Diplomats in New York noted that such exchanges, while routine in India-Pakistan interactions at the UN, come at a time when the international community is increasingly focused on civilian protection norms. India has repeatedly called for Pakistan to dismantle terror infrastructure and address its domestic challenges rather than project them outward.

As the debate concluded, observers suggested the sharp exchange may prompt further discussions in informal corridors. For now, it reinforces India’s consistent message: Jammu and Kashmir remains off-limits for multilateral intervention, while Pakistan’s own record invites greater scrutiny.

The incident serves as a reminder of enduring tensions in South Asia and the challenges of addressing civilian protection when historical grievances and current disputes collide at the world’s highest diplomatic forum.

‘Operation Sindoor was stopped voluntarily’: Rajnath rules out nuclear fear  

Defence Minister says India called off Operation Sindoor on its own terms, asserts readiness for long conflict if needed.  

Defence Minister Rajnath Singh on Thursday said India voluntarily halted Operation Sindoor and was not forced into the decision by Pakistan’s nuclear threats. Speaking at the ANI National Security Summit 2.0 in the capital, Singh described the operation as a deliberate, measured response — not a sign of hesitation.  

No pressure from nuclear threats  

Singh rejected suggestions that Islamabad’s nuclear brinkmanship influenced the government’s calculus. “Pakistan had threatened a nuclear attack, but India was not afraid of it,” he said. The Minister added that the Indian Army’s surge capacity — its ability to rapidly escalate troop and firepower strength — is now stronger than ever before.  

Operation timeline and scale  

India launched Operation Sindoor on May 7 last year, hours after a terrorist attack in Pahalgam killed several tourists. According to military assessments shared by officials, the operation struck nine major terrorist launchpads across Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir. Over 100 militants were reportedly killed in the cross-border strikes.  

“This was a turning point,” Singh said. “It showed the world that India is no longer a country that only makes statements, but one that takes direct action.”  

‘Long conflict’ readiness  

Without naming specific scenarios, the Defence Minister said India is fully prepared for a protracted engagement against Pakistan if circumstances demand. “We stopped on our terms, voluntarily,” he reiterated. “If needed, we are ready for a long conflict.”  

Sources familiar with the matter told reporters that the decision to end the operation was based on achieving tactical objectives — not external pressure.  

Terrorism’s root cause  

Singh drew a sharp contrast between the two neighbours. “India is known today for Information Technology. Pakistan is seen as the centre of ‘IT’ — International Terrorism,” he said.  

The Defence Minister stressed that terrorism cannot be eliminated without uprooting its ideology and political patronage. “The root lies in its ideology and political support. Without removing this, terrorism cannot be fully wiped out,” he added.  

Clear policy under PM  

Singh said the government’s post-Uri and post-Pulwama doctrine remains unchanged: no terrorist attack will go unanswered. Under the Prime Minister’s leadership, he added, direct action will follow if needed — without seeking permission or signalling intent beforehand.  

What next  

While cross-border calm has largely held since the operation wound down early this summer, officials indicate surveillance along the Line of Control remains heightened. Intelligence inputs suggest Pakistan has not fully vacated forward launchpads, though no fresh mobilisation has been detected in recent weeks.