The weekly public hearing at the Rewa Collectorate turned tense on Tuesday after Rewa Collector Narendra Suryavanshi strongly reprimanded several officials over delays and negligence in resolving public grievances. Hundreds of residents from different parts of the district reached the Collectorate seeking solutions to issues related to land disputes, pensions, encroachment, and government schemes.

The strict action during the hearing has once again brought the working style of the newly appointed Rewa Collector into focus. Officials present during the proceedings witnessed sharp questioning and immediate instructions from the Collector regarding pending complaints.

Large Crowd at Jan Sunwai

The public hearing, locally known as Jan Sunwai, witnessed heavy footfall from early morning. Citizens queued outside the Collectorate with written applications and complaints concerning administrative inaction and departmental irregularities. Several complainants alleged that despite repeated visits to government offices, their problems remained unresolved. According to officials, the Collector personally reviewed multiple applications and instructed departments to ensure timely action. The proceedings remained active for several hours as officials from various departments were called individually to explain delays in resolving complaints.

Woman Officer Questioned

A major moment during the hearing came when a complaint linked to the fisheries department was raised before the Collector. The complainant reportedly accused the department of negligence and poor functioning.

Collector Narendra Suryavanshi immediately summoned the concerned woman officer and sought clarification in front of other officials and members of the public. Sources present during the hearing stated that the Collector appeared dissatisfied with the explanation provided by the department. His stern response created visible tension inside the public hearing room.

Collector Warns Officials

During the proceedings, the Rewa Collector made it clear that negligence in matters related to public welfare would not be tolerated under any circumstances. He reportedly told officials that delays in solving citizens’ issues reflected administrative failure. The Collector questioned officers about their daily functioning and asked why repeated complaints were still pending despite instructions from senior authorities. Officials present during the Jan Sunwai were directed to ensure accountability and transparency in handling applications related to welfare schemes and civic issues.

Encroachment Issue Raised

The Collector also expressed displeasure over complaints regarding encroachment on public roads. Municipal Corporation officials were questioned over the delay in anti-encroachment action despite repeated public complaints. the Collector directly asked concerned officials why encroachment removal drives had not been carried out effectively and what action had been taken so far. He instructed authorities to act immediately against illegal encroachments causing inconvenience to residents and warned against administrative negligence in civic matters.

Pension Case Sparks Anger

One of the most discussed cases during the hearing involved an elderly resident, Mathura Prasad Saket, who complained about not receiving his pension benefits. When the Collector asked the concerned Chief Executive Officer about the matter, the officer reportedly claimed that the issue had already been resolved. However, the elderly complainant informed the Collector that pension payments had still not started. The response angered the Collector, who questioned how the case could be marked resolved when the beneficiary had not received payment. He directed officials to ensure immediate resolution of the matter with dignity and respect towards the elderly citizen.

Strict Action Warning Issued

Collector Narendra Suryavanshi instructed all departments to take pending complaints seriously and warned officials against providing misleading information during public hearings. He stated that any officer found delaying work, ignoring public grievances, or submitting incorrect reports would face strict administrative action. Officials were also directed to improve coordination between departments to ensure faster resolution of cases related to welfare schemes, pensions, and civic administration.

Collector’s Working Style Discussed

The firm approach adopted during Tuesday’s hearing has added to growing discussions around the working style of Rewa Collector Narendra Suryavanshi. Since assuming charge, he has been conducting surprise inspections and closely monitoring attendance and departmental performance.

Administrative sources said his emphasis on punctuality, accountability, and field-level monitoring has increased pressure on officials across departments. The latest developments during the Jan Sunwai have become a major talking point within the district administration as well as among residents following local governance issues.

------------

A land demarcation dispute in Korba turned tense after villagers allegedly stopped a revenue team, blocked their vehicle and held a Revenue Inspector (RI) and Patwari at the site for nearly two hours. The incident took place in Nonbirra village under Kartala police station limits and has triggered allegations of bribery, wrongful demarcation and misuse of authority from both sides.

Videos of the incident, showing arguments and pushing between villagers and officials, have gone viral on social media. During the confrontation, one member of the family allegedly threatened suicide by bringing a rope to the site. Following a complaint by the Patwari, police registered an FIR against four villagers. At the same time, the villagers accused the revenue officials of carrying out incorrect land measurement after allegedly accepting money from the opposing party involved in the land dispute.

Dispute During Demarcation

According to officials, the incident occurred on May 8 when Patwari Bharat Chauhan and Revenue Inspector Jaipal Singh reached Baniyapara in Nonbirra village for land demarcation work. The measurement was reportedly being conducted on the instructions of the Kartala Naib Tehsildar regarding land belonging to applicant Santaram. Officials stated that the land survey and demarcation process was completed after prior notice and the information was shared with the concerned applicant. However, shortly after the measurement process, objections were raised by the applicant’s family regarding the boundary markings.

Villagers Stop Officials

Officials alleged that Santaram, along with family members Liladhar Patel, Hariram and Hukumchand Patel, started protesting against the demarcation and accused the officials of conducting incorrect measurement. During the argument, the villagers allegedly parked a motorcycle behind the officials’ vehicle, preventing them from leaving the spot.

The revenue team claimed they were forced to remain at the location for nearly two hours as tensions escalated. According to the complaint, villagers insisted that the officials would not be allowed to leave until senior administrative officers, including the Collector, Naib Tehsildar or local police officials, arrived at the scene.

Allegations Of Bribery

The protesting family accused the revenue officials of conducting biased demarcation after allegedly accepting bribes from the opposing side involved in the land dispute. Villagers claimed the land that actually required measurement was ignored and another section was measured instead.

According to the family, illegal construction and encroachment were taking place on their land for a long time, but repeated complaints to revenue officials had not resulted in any action. The family alleged that the May 8 demarcation process was conducted in favour of the opposing party through collusion and corruption.

Tension At The Spot

The dispute reportedly intensified during the confrontation between villagers and officials. Videos circulating online showed heated arguments and physical pushing between some villagers and the Patwari during the incident.

Officials claimed abusive language was used against them and threats were issued during the standoff. During the protest, one family member allegedly brought a rope and threatened to commit suicide, increasing tension at the site and forcing local authorities to intervene carefully.

FIR Registered Against Four

Based on the complaint submitted by Patwari Bharat Chauhan, Kartala police registered a case against four villagers identified as Santaram, Liladhar Patel, Hariram and Hukumchand Patel. Police said the accused are residents of Baniyapara in Nonbirra village.

The FIR has been registered under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), including charges related to obstructing government work, threatening officials and unlawful behaviour. Police officials stated that an investigation into the matter is currently underway.

Family Denies Allegations

Meanwhile, the villagers denied accusations of intentionally obstructing government officials and claimed they were only demanding fair demarcation of their land. Family members alleged that incorrect measurements were repeatedly being carried out despite their objections. According to them, the dispute over land boundaries has continued for years and authorities failed to provide a proper resolution despite multiple complaints. The family also accused officials of filing a false police case to suppress their protest against alleged corruption.

Complaint Submitted To Collector

On Monday, members of the family visited the district administration office during the public grievance hearing and submitted an application to the Collector demanding an impartial investigation. In their complaint, the villagers requested a fresh technical demarcation of the land and action against officials if any irregularities are found. They alleged that revenue officials ignored their concerns and acted under influence from the opposite party. The family further demanded cancellation of the FIR, claiming the case was one-sided and filed without proper inquiry.

--------------

MP High Court issues bailable warrants against three officials

The Madhya Pradesh High Court has issued bailable warrants of Rs 25,000 each against three senior officers, including the principal secretary of the MSME department, in a contempt matter linked to delayed action on a promotion case in Rewa. The court also directed the police chiefs of Bhopal and Rewa to ensure service of the warrants, and fixed the matter for hearing after a week.

Promotion dispute in Rewa

The contempt petition concerns Jayaprakash Tiwari, an assistant manager posted at the District Industries Centre in Rewa, who had sought promotion to the post of manager. According to the petition, he was eligible for the promotion, but the department did not take a decision within the time the court had earlier prescribed.

The single bench of Justice Vishal Mishra was told that the High Court had already passed an order on November 4, 2024, directing the concerned officers to decide the promotion issue within 90 days. When that order was not followed, the petitioner moved the contempt court.

Court notes non-appearance

During the hearing, the court found that notices had been duly served on the three officials, but none of them appeared before it. Taking a serious view of the absence, the bench ordered bailable warrants against principal secretary Raghvendra Singh, commissioner Dilip Kumar Singh and general manager Rahul Dubey.

The court also asked the SPs of Bhopal and Rewa to ensure that the warrants are served. The matter now moves forward as a contempt proceeding, with the next hearing scheduled for about a week later.

Earlier order ignored

The case has drawn attention because it stems from alleged non-compliance with a prior judicial direction rather than a fresh service dispute. Court records in the matter show that the earlier order was meant to settle the promotion question within a fixed deadline, but the petitioner says the administration did not act even after that window closed.

That alleged delay is what prompted the contempt plea. In such cases, courts often focus not only on the original claim but also on whether officials obeyed the earlier order in time and in full.

Wider signal for administration

The warrant order is likely to be read as another reminder that government departments must respond within the timelines set by courts, especially in service matters involving promotions, pay or seniority. For employees, these cases often turn less on the merits alone and more on whether the administration has complied with a binding judicial direction.

The petitioner's counsel, Shrey Diwan, argued the matter on behalf of Tiwari, the order notes.

Next hearing ahead

For now, the immediate focus is on securing the presence of the three officers before the court. What happens at the next hearing will likely depend on whether they appear and explain why the earlier direction was not implemented, or whether the court decides to press the contempt proceedings further.

Rewa Collector Orders Suspension of Revenue Official Over Bribery Allegation

Officials crack down on corruption in land transfer, PM housing scheme cases

Rewa district administration has taken swift action against corrupt officials following complaints of extortion in government schemes. Collector Narendra Kumar Suryavanshi suspended a revenue assistant on Wednesday for allegedly demanding bribes to process land inheritance transfers, while simultaneously issuing a show-cause notice to another official over separate corruption charges linked to the Prime Minister's Housing Scheme.

Tahasil Officer Held for Extortion

The suspended official, Prashant Tiwari, a Class-3 assistant posted at Semeriya tahasil, had allegedly stalled inheritance mutation cases for four applicants—Maan Singh, Kabil Singh, Umesh Singh, and Babli Singh—demanding payment to process their documents. The collector's office confirmed that Tiwari deliberately delayed the applications to extract bribes from the landowners seeking to transfer property rights through legal channels.

Collector Suryavanshi did not conduct an extended inquiry before taking action. Instead, based on preliminary examination of documents and complaint records, he issued suspension orders immediately, signalling zero tolerance for misconduct within the district administration.

Rapid Administrative Response

The decisive move reflects growing pressure on district authorities to curb corruption at the ground level. Officials familiar with the matter said the collector prioritized swift action over lengthy bureaucratic procedures, sending a strong message to revenue staff that misconduct would invite immediate consequences. As of Thursday, the suspended official had not filed any formal response or appeal against the suspension order.

Housing Scheme Bribery Case

In a parallel case, district authorities have turned their attention to allegations of extortion within the Prime Minister's Housing Scheme implementation. The collector issued a show-cause notice to the Chief Executive Officer of Gangev gram panchayat, directing the official to respond within three days.

The complaint was filed by Ramlakhan, a resident of Badokhar village under Sirmaur tahasil. According to his account, a gram rozgar sahayak—a village employment assistant—demanded Rs 20,000 as bribe to process his housing scheme survey. When Ramlakhan refused to pay, he was allegedly stripped of scheme benefits entirely.

Three-Day Response Deadline

The collector's directive to the CEO carries an implicit threat of action if the officer fails to provide satisfactory clarification. Officials said the three-day window allows for preliminary investigation before further steps are considered. The matter underscores systemic vulnerabilities in centrally sponsored schemes, where junior officials at the village level wield considerable discretion over beneficiary selection.

Ground-Level Corruption Pattern

These cases reflect a broader pattern of extortion at block and village administration levels, where officials exploit citizens' dependence on government services. Land mutations and housing scheme benefits are critical for vulnerable populations, making them easy targets for corrupt functionaries seeking quick money.

District authorities have faced mounting public complaints about such practices over recent months. The collector's intervention in both cases—suspension in one, notice in another—suggests a shift toward addressing corruption more seriously, though observers note that sustained monitoring and follow-up action will be necessary to prevent recurrence.

Next Steps Unclear

The administration has not yet announced whether the suspended official will face departmental inquiry or police action. Similarly, the outcome of the show-cause notice to Gangev's CEO remains uncertain. Officials indicated that depending on responses received, further measures could follow.

The Rewa administration's quick action comes amid broader state and national scrutiny of corruption within government schemes. The collector's office is expected to submit a compliance report to higher authorities detailing the cases and actions taken.