The 15th edition of AIM Congress 2026, a major international investment and business platform, is set to begin in Dubai on September 7, bringing together government representatives, investors, policymakers, business leaders and innovators from across the world.

The three-day event will be held from September 7 to 9 at the Dubai World Trade Centre under the patronage of Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, Vice President and Prime Minister of the UAE and Ruler of Dubai.

Organised as an initiative of the AIM Global Foundation, the congress is designed to facilitate discussions around international investment, emerging markets, sustainable development, technology and cross-border economic cooperation.

Focus on New Investment Opportunities

The central theme of AIM Congress 2026 is “Reshaping Global Prosperity: Unlocking New Investment Pathways Towards a Sustainable and Inclusive Future.”

The programme will focus on how investors, governments and businesses can identify new opportunities amid changes in global markets and the wider economy.

The official programme includes conferences, investment destination forums, roundtables, exhibitions, workshops, pitch competitions and networking activities.

Global Investors and Policymakers to Participate

AIM Congress is expected to bring together institutional investors, investment promotion agencies, sovereign wealth funds, technology companies, government representatives and business leaders.

The event's three main pillars for 2026 are Global Markets, Future Economies and NexGen, reflecting its focus on investment flows, emerging economic sectors and the next generation of businesses and technologies.

The organisers describe AIM Congress as a platform for connecting capital providers with investment destinations and creating opportunities for international partnerships and cross-border expansion.

UAE's Investment Momentum in Focus

The 2026 edition comes as the UAE continues to report strong foreign investment and non-oil trade figures.

According to figures cited by AIM Congress from UNCTAD, the UAE attracted Dh177.3 billion in foreign direct investment in 2025, placing it ninth globally. The country's FDI stock reached Dh1.171 trillion by the end of 2025.

The UAE also attracted 1,562 new greenfield FDI projects in 2025 and maintained its position as the world's second-largest destination for such projects for the third consecutive year, according to the figures cited by the event organisers.

India-UAE Investment Dialogue

India is also expected to remain an important part of the wider investment discussions surrounding AIM Congress.

Ahead of the event, AIM Global Foundation chairman Dawood Al Shezawi visited India as part of an international roadshow and held discussions with government officials, business groups and industry representatives. The engagements focused on investment cooperation, advanced manufacturing, technology, startups, sustainable infrastructure, trade and the digital economy.

AIM Congress 2026 Dates and Venue

The event will take place at Dubai World Trade Centre from September 7 to 9, 2026. The official AIM Congress website lists the gathering as a global investment platform aimed at connecting policymakers, investors and innovators.

With investment, technology, sustainability and international economic cooperation at the centre of the programme, AIM Congress 2026 is expected to provide a platform for governments and businesses to discuss emerging investment opportunities and potential cross-border partnerships.

US President Donald Trump's administration has stepped up its campaign to isolate Iran economically, warning countries and businesses that continue to maintain financial and commercial links with Tehran that they could face American sanctions. The latest move, announced by US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on August 24, comes under "Operation Economic Outcast", a campaign aimed at cutting Iran off from the revenue and financial channels that support its economy.

The US Treasury said it has sanctioned nearly 60 individuals, entities and vessels linked to Iranian oil revenues, nuclear and missile procurement and cyber operations. Washington has also expanded the potential reach of secondary sanctions to five sectors — digital assets, technology, gold, aviation and shipping.

The pressure is not limited to Iran itself. Washington is also seeking to force countries that continue doing business with Tehran to scale back those links, creating a difficult choice for some of Iran's biggest trading partners.

China Faces The Biggest Pressure

China is arguably the most exposed country, largely because it is Iran's biggest buyer of oil. Reuters reported that Chinese purchases accounted for a major share of Iran's seaborne crude exports, with average purchases estimated at about 1.38 million barrels per day in 2025.

The US has already targeted Chinese entities involved in Iranian oil trade. However, Beijing has continued to oppose unilateral US sanctions, making China a particularly sensitive test for Washington's strategy.

Recent disruptions have nevertheless affected Iranian oil flows to China. Reuters reported that Iranian shipments had fallen sharply, while Chinese independent refineries were looking for alternative sources as supplies tightened.

UAE Has Already Taken A Major Step

The United Arab Emirates (UAE) is another crucial link in Iran's regional trade network. But unlike China, the UAE has already moved to suspend trade and financial transactions with Iran following renewed regional tensions.

The decision is significant because Dubai has traditionally served as an important commercial and financial route for Iranian businesses. The disruption could therefore affect not only Iranian companies but also businesses in other countries that have used the UAE as a transit point.

Why India Is Also Vulnerable

India's exposure is smaller than China's but significant for specific sectors. Indian exporters of rice, tea and pharmaceuticals have traditionally relied heavily on Dubai for shipments and financial transactions connected to Iran.

According to Reuters, India's exports to Iran are expected to face further disruption following the UAE's suspension of trade and the latest US sanctions. India exported around $383 million worth of rice and $14 million of tea to Iran in early 2026. Indian exporters are now considering alternative routes, including Turkey.

India's broader trade relationship with Iran has already declined sharply. Bilateral trade fell from around $17 billion in 2018-19 to $1.63 billion in 2025-26, with current trade largely focused on humanitarian goods.

The latest restrictions could increase shipping, insurance and payment costs for Indian exporters. The impact could be particularly relevant for India's basmati rice industry, which has traditionally supplied the Iranian market.

Turkey, Iraq And Other Partners Also At Risk

Turkey remains another important Iranian trading partner, with bilateral commerce estimated at around $5-6 billion annually. Unlike the UAE, Turkey has not indicated that it intends to completely halt trade with Tehran.

Iraq also has substantial economic ties with Iran and depends on Iranian gas for part of its electricity requirements. Pakistan, Oman, Armenia and Azerbaijan have smaller but significant economic connections with Tehran as well.

The US Treasury has warned that entities facilitating money laundering or sanctions evasion for Iran could lose access to the American financial system. Washington has also given countries timelines to shut down activities it considers to be supporting Tehran.

Iran, meanwhile, has vowed to retaliate against the expanded US sanctions. The latest confrontation therefore goes beyond Washington and Tehran, with the pressure increasingly affecting the countries and businesses that form part of Iran's international trade network.

Differences are emerging between the United States and some of its Gulf allies over President Donald Trump’s approach to negotiations with Iran, with regional governments reportedly concerned that prolonged talks have yet to produce a firm agreement.

According to a report cited from The Washington Post, some Gulf countries are disappointed with Washington’s efforts to reach a settlement with Tehran. The report said these governments believe the negotiations have failed to deliver a meaningful outcome despite continuing diplomatic engagement.

The White House has rejected suggestions that Gulf leaders are unhappy with Trump, saying the US president maintains strong relationships with leaders across the region and that Washington has remained in close contact with its allies since the conflict began.

Trump Rules Out Immediate Attack

Trump has also indicated that the United States is not currently preparing for another military strike against Iran.

According to Axios, Trump said last week that Washington was engaged in what he described as “half-hearted talks” with Tehran while closely watching Iran’s worsening economic situation.

The US president had previously cancelled a planned military operation against Iran, saying that a diplomatic agreement could make further military action unnecessary.

The uncertainty surrounding the negotiations has nevertheless kept military escalation as a possibility, particularly if discussions fail to resolve the major issues separating Washington and Tehran.

Hormuz Becomes Key Dispute

One of the biggest obstacles in the negotiations is the Strait of Hormuz, a strategically important waterway between Iran and Oman through which a significant share of global oil and gas shipments passes.

Trump has demanded that the strait be reopened fully and immediately. Iran, however, has linked the reopening to the lifting of what it describes as a US naval blockade and the withdrawal of American forces positioned near Iranian territory.

The dispute has broader implications because any prolonged disruption in the waterway could affect global energy supplies and push up international oil prices.

Iran and Oman Hold Separate Talks

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has said that Tehran is separately holding discussions with Oman regarding the Strait of Hormuz.

The talks reportedly involve practical and technical questions, including the establishment of safe routes for commercial vessels using the waterway.

Araghchi has stressed that these discussions are separate from the wider negotiations between Iran and the United States.

Oman has previously played an important role in facilitating communication between Washington and Tehran, making its involvement particularly significant as both sides seek a way through the current impasse.

Gulf States Take Different Positions

Despite being close US partners, Gulf countries are not taking a uniform position on how Washington should deal with Iran.

The United Arab Emirates is reportedly more supportive of increased military pressure on Tehran. The UAE's position is based on the assessment that Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps could be forced to make concessions if Washington increases pressure and establishes greater control over the Strait of Hormuz.

Saudi Arabia, by contrast, has favoured dialogue and de-escalation. Riyadh had previously opposed a US plan to use military force to reopen the waterway.

Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman also reportedly urged Trump by telephone not to pursue further military action.

Qatar Pushes Mediation

Qatar has emerged as one of the key regional mediators in discussions involving Iran, the United States and Oman.

Qatari officials have reportedly been communicating with Trump and conveyed that Iran had accepted a proposal concerning the Strait of Hormuz.

Qatar's role reflects the wider Gulf concern that a prolonged confrontation between Washington and Tehran could have serious consequences for regional security, trade and energy markets.

Iran Accuses US and Israel

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian has meanwhile accused the United States and Israel of attempting to turn Gulf countries against Tehran.

Speaking to Iranian state television, Pezeshkian said Washington and Tel Aviv were exploiting Iran's internal difficulties and attempting to weaken its relationships with neighbouring countries.

At the same time, he stressed the importance of improving ties with Gulf states, signalling Tehran's interest in preventing the current tensions from developing into a broader regional confrontation.

Energy Markets Remain at Risk

The disagreement over the Strait of Hormuz remains particularly sensitive because of its importance to global energy trade.

A prolonged closure or restricted movement through the waterway could disrupt oil and gas supplies from Gulf producers and create additional volatility in international markets.

For Washington's Gulf allies, the priority is therefore not limited to the outcome of the US-Iran negotiations. The security of the waterway, avoidance of a wider war and stability in regional energy markets are also major concerns.

With Washington and Tehran still divided over the terms of a possible agreement, Gulf governments are likely to continue balancing their security relationship with the United States against the economic and geopolitical risks of further confrontation with Iran.

The United States has approved the sale of 5,250 Patriot missile interceptors to Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates as demand for the advanced air-defence system rises amid escalating tensions in West Asia and a global shortage of interceptors.

The proposed sales are aimed at replenishing and strengthening the missile stockpiles of the four Gulf countries at a time when Patriot interceptors are in high demand because of conflicts in the Middle East and Europe.

According to sources cited by Reuters, the United States is also holding discussions on allowing Ukraine to manufacture some Patriot interceptor components, despite President Donald Trump previously saying that he had not approved such an arrangement.

Gulf States Seek More Missiles

The planned sale comes as Gulf countries seek to reinforce their air-defence capabilities amid heightened regional tensions. Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar and the UAE are among the countries that rely on US-made Patriot systems to defend against ballistic missiles, aircraft and other aerial threats.

The demand for interceptors has increased significantly this year, putting additional pressure on global supplies.

The United States has also been trying to expand production capacity. Last month, the US Army awarded Lockheed Martin a contract worth up to $58.6 billion for the production of Patriot interceptor missiles.

The Patriot system, first used operationally during the 1991 Gulf War, has since become one of the most widely deployed advanced air-defence platforms in the world.

Ukraine Adds to Global Demand

Ukraine remains one of the biggest sources of demand for Patriot interceptors. Kyiv has been seeking additional missiles to defend against Russian ballistic missile attacks, which have intensified during the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war.

The conflict involving Iran has also placed pressure on US and Gulf inventories, while some European countries have been reluctant to release missiles from their own reserves because of concerns about maintaining adequate stocks for national defence.

The resulting supply constraints have made additional production and international procurement increasingly important for countries operating the Patriot system.

How Patriot Interceptors Work

The Patriot system can use different types of interceptors depending on the threat being addressed.

The earlier PAC-2 interceptor uses a blast-fragmentation warhead designed to destroy or disable a target through an explosive blast and fragments.

The PAC-3 family uses a different approach known as hit-to-kill technology, in which the interceptor directly collides with an incoming target to destroy it.

The system is capable of engaging a range of threats, including short-range ballistic missiles, aircraft and cruise missiles.

New PAC-3 ACE Interceptor

Lockheed Martin introduced the PAC-3 Missile Segment Enhancement Adapted Capability Effector (PAC-3 MSE ACE) in July, describing it as a lower-cost interceptor designed to maintain significant defensive capabilities.

The company has said the new interceptor could cost roughly half as much as existing alternatives while retaining the ability to engage short-range ballistic missiles, aircraft and cruise missiles.

The Patriot system's radar is also designed to track multiple potential threats simultaneously. NATO has previously stated that the system's radar can have a range of more than 150 kilometres and track up to 100 potential targets.

Patriot Comes at High Cost

Patriot air-defence systems are among the most expensive conventional defence platforms.

According to estimates cited by the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), a newly produced Patriot battery can cost more than $1 billion, including approximately $400 million for the system itself and around $690 million for its missiles.

Individual PAC-3 interceptors are estimated to cost approximately $4 million to $5 million each, making large-scale stockpile replenishment a major financial commitment.

The latest US approval therefore highlights not only the growing demand for advanced air defence in West Asia but also the increasing pressure on global Patriot missile supplies as conflicts in multiple regions continue to drive procurement.

The Asian Cricket Council (ACC) has officially unveiled the schedule for the Women's Asia Cup 2026, with the tournament set to be played in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) from August 28 to September 13. One of the biggest highlights of the competition will be the highly anticipated India vs Pakistan clash, scheduled for September 5 at the Dubai International Stadium.

The tournament will feature eight teams competing in the T20 format, serving as an important preparation event ahead of the upcoming Asian Games.

Eight Teams Divided into Two Groups

The participating teams have been split into two groups:

Group A

• India

• Pakistan

• Thailand

• Hong Kong

Group B

• Sri Lanka

• Bangladesh

• UAE

• Indonesia

Each team will play league-stage matches before the top teams advance to the knockout rounds.

India's Campaign

India will kick off its Women's Asia Cup campaign against Thailand on August 30 before facing Hong Kong on September 3.

The biggest league-stage fixture will be the blockbuster encounter against Pakistan on September 5, expected to be one of the most-watched matches of the tournament.

Sri Lanka Enter as Defending Champions

Sri Lanka will begin the tournament as the defending champions after defeating India in the previous Women's Asia Cup final. The Lankan side will look to retain the title, while India will aim to reclaim the championship.

Knockout Stage

The top teams from each group will qualify for the semifinals.

• Semi-final 1: September 10

• Semi-final 2: September 11

• Final: September 13

All matches are scheduled to begin at 8:00 PM (IST).

South Africa Tour Schedule Revised

Separately, Cricket South Africa has revised the schedule for India's women's tour later this year.

In addition to the previously announced ODI series and one-off Test, a three-match T20I series has now been included.

The updated schedule is:

• One-off Test: December 9–12

• ODI Series: December 16–22

• T20I Series: December 26–30

The additional T20Is will provide valuable match practice ahead of future international assignments.

Women's Asia Cup 2026 – Full Schedule

More than 1,340 Indian nationals died by suicide in Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries between 2023 and 2025, accounting for over 70% of all reported suicides involving Indians abroad during the three-year period, according to data presented by the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) in Parliament.

The figures were shared by Minister of State for External Affairs Kirti Vardhan Singh in a written reply during the ongoing Monsoon Session, highlighting growing concerns over the mental health and welfare of Indian migrant workers overseas.

UAE Reports Highest Number of Cases

Among the Gulf nations, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) recorded the highest number of suicides involving Indian citizens, with 511 cases reported between 2023 and 2025.

The remaining GCC figures include:

• Saudi Arabia: 354 cases

• Kuwait: 162 cases

• Oman: 146 cases

• Bahrain: 101 cases

• Qatar: 66 cases

Outside the Gulf region, Malaysia reported 131 cases, while the United States recorded 62 suicides involving Indian nationals during the same period. Countries including Italy, Canada and the United Kingdom each reported more than 30 cases.

Migrant Welfare Concerns Resurface

While the government did not specify the reasons behind the deaths, the data has renewed focus on the challenges faced by millions of Indians working abroad, particularly in Gulf countries.

Nearly 10 million Indians and people of Indian origin live and work across GCC nations, many employed in sectors such as construction, domestic services, transportation, healthcare and hospitality.

Labour rights organisations have consistently raised concerns over delayed wages, poor working conditions, excessive workloads, denial of employment benefits and workplace exploitation. In some cases, migrant workers have also reported restrictions on changing jobs or returning to India due to passport confiscation or employer-related disputes.

Mental health experts say financial pressure, social isolation, separation from family members and limited access to counselling services often contribute to emotional distress among migrant workers.

Government Highlights Existing Support Mechanisms

Responding to concerns over the welfare of Indian citizens overseas, the Ministry of External Affairs said several support systems are already in place.

The government highlighted the Pravasi Bharatiya Bima Yojana (PBBY), a mandatory insurance scheme for workers falling under the Emigration Check Required (ECR) category. The scheme provides insurance coverage for medical emergencies, permanent disability and repatriation in case of death.

In addition, Indian embassies and consulates in Gulf countries operate 24-hour emergency helplines, provide legal assistance and address grievances through the MADAD online portal, which enables overseas Indians to seek official support.

Calls for Stronger Mental Health Support

Despite these initiatives, migrant welfare organisations have urged the government to strengthen mental health services for overseas workers.

Experts have recommended expanding counselling support, improving awareness about mental health, ensuring quicker grievance redressal and enhancing labour protections to reduce stress among vulnerable migrant communities.

The latest parliamentary data has once again brought attention to the human cost behind overseas employment and the need for stronger institutional support for Indians working abroad.

India has announced enhanced monitoring of its merchant navy personnel operating in the Strait of Hormuz and the Gulf of Oman after an Indian sailor was killed and ten others were injured in a missile attack on two UAE-flagged commercial tankers. The move comes amid escalating security concerns in one of the world's busiest maritime trade routes.

The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) has also taken up the matter with Iran following the attack, while authorities are preparing to introduce a real-time monitoring system to track Indian seafarers working in the conflict-prone region.

Indian Sailor Killed in Tanker Attack

According to official information, two UAE-linked tankers—MT Mombasa and MT Al Bahiyah—were struck by missiles while transiting waters near the Strait of Hormuz.

The attack caused extensive damage to both vessels and triggered onboard fires. Around 30 Indian nationals were among the crew members on the ships.

Indian authorities identified the deceased as Sonu Kumar Gupta, a marine engineer from Bihar, who had resumed duty only three weeks before the incident.

Ten other Indian crew members sustained injuries in the attack, with two reported to be in critical condition.

MEA Raises Issue With Iran

Following the incident, the Ministry of External Affairs formally raised concerns with the Iranian government over the safety of Indian nationals working aboard commercial vessels in the region.

The government is now working on a real-time dashboard that will allow authorities to monitor the movement and safety status of Indian seafarers navigating the Persian Gulf and Gulf of Oman, enabling quicker response during emergencies.

Officials said the system is intended to improve coordination between shipping companies, Indian missions abroad and maritime authorities during periods of heightened regional tension.

Iran Claims Responsibility

Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) later claimed responsibility for the missile strikes, stating that the vessels had ignored maritime warnings before entering the operational area.

However, the claim has been rejected by the United Arab Emirates, while India has expressed concern over attacks targeting civilian commercial shipping.

The incident has renewed fears about the safety of international maritime trade through the Strait of Hormuz, a strategic waterway that carries a significant share of the world's crude oil exports.

Security Concerns Intensify

The latest attack comes amid continuing tensions in West Asia, where repeated military confrontations have increased risks for merchant vessels and international shipping routes.

Indian authorities are expected to remain in close contact with shipping operators and foreign governments as they monitor the evolving security situation in the region.

The government has not yet announced any evacuation or advisory for Indian merchant navy personnel but is expected to review maritime safety measures as developments unfold.

The warning came hours after the IRGC Navy declared the strait closed, saying it had fired warning shots at a vessel attempting to cross using an unauthorized route. Iran's statement said any ship failing to comply with its designated navigation routes would face an "immediate and forceful response" from its armed forces, and separately cautioned that US military involvement in the strait would draw its own swift retaliation. The US, for its part, has repeatedly called on Iran to keep the strait open to international shipping and ensure vessel safety, arguing the waterway falls outside any single country's control.

The latest exchange is the newest flashpoint in a war that has run since February 28, when the US and Israel launched an air campaign against Iran, and which has repeatedly spilled into the Gulf's shipping lanes. The strait, through which roughly a quarter of the world's seaborne oil trade normally passes, has seen traffic collapse since the conflict began, with tens of thousands of stranded mariners and vessels reported at points during the crisis.

The immediate trigger for Saturday's warning traces back to a rapid escalation earlier in the week. On July 7, Iranian forces struck two tankers in the strait — the Qatari-owned Al Rekayat and the Saudi-flagged Wedyan — prompting the US Treasury to reimpose sanctions on Iranian oil exports that had briefly been lifted under an earlier ceasefire framework. A third vessel was hit within 24 hours, and CENTCOM responded with a wave of strikes on Iranian military sites near the strait, which Iran's military vowed to answer with a "crushing response." Iran's negotiating team was defiant in the aftermath, with negotiator Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf writing online that Tehran would not back down under pressure.

By Sunday, the US had launched a fresh round of strikes after an Iranian attack set a Cyprus-flagged container ship ablaze in the strait, leaving one crew member missing. Iran responded with strikes on Bahrain, Qatar and the UAE, triggering missile alerts across the Gulf; Qatar's military said it intercepted the incoming fire. Oman, which shares territorial waters around the strait with Iran, has been attempting to mediate, with the two countries' foreign ministers meeting Saturday to discuss de-escalation.

As of Sunday, neither side has signalled a shift in position. Iran has said the strait will remain closed "until further notice," while the US continues to insist on unrestricted passage for international shipping — leaving the waterway, and the fragile ceasefire framework built around it, in continued jeopardy.

In a rare bipartisan rebuke, the US Senate on Wednesday passed a resolution calling on President Donald Trump to stop further military action against Iran, marking the first such congressional intervention under the 1973 War Powers Act.

The measure cleared the Senate by a narrow 50-48 vote, with four Republican senators joining Democrats in support. It had already received approval in the House of Representatives earlier. The resolution seeks to require congressional approval for any additional military operations against Iran.

This development comes amid ongoing diplomatic efforts following the recent US-Iran agreement. The White House, however, quickly dismissed the resolution's impact, stating it has no legal binding and that major military operations related to the conflict have already concluded. Administration officials asserted that the President retains broad authority on national security matters.

The vote highlighted deepening divisions within the Republican Party during Trump's second term, with the support from four GOP lawmakers seen as the first major internal break on a key foreign policy issue.

Rubio in Gulf for Damage Control

Meanwhile, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio is in the United Arab Emirates as part of a regional tour that also includes Bahrain and Kuwait. The visit aims to reassure Gulf allies worried about the implications of the US-Iran deal, particularly its potential to boost Iran's regional influence around the Strait of Hormuz.

Gulf partners have expressed concerns over the absence of firm restrictions on Iran's missile programme and reports of a possible $300 billion reconstruction package for Tehran. Rubio, received by the US Ambassador to the UAE in Abu Dhabi, is expected to address these issues directly and seek broader backing for the agreement.

Shipping activity through the Strait of Hormuz has shown signs of recovery, with vessel crossings nearly tripling week-on-week. Several Indian-linked ships have successfully transited the waterway since the June 17 agreement, while crude oil prices eased slightly on hopes of normalised energy flows.

Trump's Mixed Signals

President Trump, meanwhile, continued to strike a tough tone. He warned Iran against violating the agreement and claimed Tehran has agreed to international inspections of its nuclear sites. "If they back down, I will cancel the conversation now," Trump said during remarks in Pennsylvania. He also suggested the US could "finish the job" in less than a week if Iran is not "reasonable."

On the other hand, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian ruled out including the missile programme in any future talks, calling it a key pillar of national security. He made the remarks during a visit to Pakistan, where Russian President Vladimir Putin was also present for discussions on regional security.

Broader Regional Ripples

The Senate vote comes as other developments continue to unfold. A UN commission of inquiry released a report alleging that Israeli actions against Palestinian children in Gaza may amount to genocide and war crimes, prompting strong reactions from Palestinian authorities. Separately, Syrians pushed back against suggestions of involving their country in confronting Hezbollah in Lebanon.

In the energy sector, Qatar said LNG production would resume within weeks after earlier disruptions.

The Senate resolution, though largely symbolic according to the White House, is being watched closely for its political message. It reflects growing congressional unease over potential escalation in West Asia even as diplomacy takes centre stage.

As trading and diplomatic engagements continue, further clarity is expected on how the US administration balances domestic political pushback with its strategic goals in the region. Market participants and regional players will be tracking the next steps closely.

A renewed diplomatic dispute between Iran and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) came to the forefront during the 16th Meeting of Heads of Security Agencies and National Security Advisers of BRICS countries in New Delhi. Iranian officials accused the UAE of facilitating US military operations against Iran, reviving tensions that had previously emerged during a BRICS foreign ministers' gathering earlier this year.

The allegations were made by Dr. Ghadir Nezamipour, Deputy Secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, during the high-level security meeting. According to statements later shared by the Iranian Embassy in India, Nezamipour rejected accusations made by the UAE delegation and instead blamed the United States and Israel for escalating regional instability.

The remarks come despite recent efforts to ease tensions in West Asia following a ceasefire agreement. Analysts view the exchange as evidence that underlying disputes between Tehran and Abu Dhabi remain unresolved and continue to influence diplomatic interactions in international forums.

According to Iranian officials, the Strait of Hormuz crisis and recent military confrontations were triggered by actions undertaken by the United States and Israel. Nezamipour claimed that some attacks targeting Iran had been launched from facilities located within the UAE, a charge that Abu Dhabi has consistently denied.

Allegations Over Military Facilities

Addressing the gathering, the Iranian official alleged that UAE territory had been used as a platform for operations targeting Iranian civilian infrastructure. He claimed that schools, hospitals and other non-military facilities were among the locations affected by the attacks.

Iran also criticized what it described as the UAE’s failure to condemn military actions against Iran. Nezamipour urged the Emirati leadership to focus on regional stability and cooperation rather than what he termed “adventurism” and “propaganda.”

To reinforce Iran’s position, the delegation reportedly displayed photographs of students from Minab who, according to Tehran, were killed during the initial phase of the conflict.

Dispute Continues

The latest exchange follows a similar confrontation during a BRICS foreign ministers’ meeting held in New Delhi in May. At that event, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi accused the UAE of being directly involved in military activities against Iran and questioned whether close security ties with the United States and Israel could guarantee regional stability.

Those remarks intensified diplomatic friction between the two countries, particularly after reports surfaced alleging Emirati involvement in operations targeting Iranian interests.

The UAE has repeatedly rejected accusations that it played any role in attacks against Iran. Emirati officials have maintained that their country supports regional dialogue and de-escalation efforts.

Officials familiar with regional developments say the dispute reflects broader geopolitical rivalries in West Asia, where security concerns, maritime routes and strategic alliances continue to shape diplomatic relations.

The latest developments at the BRICS security meeting highlight how regional conflicts are increasingly influencing discussions within multilateral organizations. While BRICS members have often emphasized cooperation and dialogue, disagreements among participating countries continue to emerge on issues related to security and foreign policy.

Observers believe that unless direct diplomatic engagement between Tehran and Abu Dhabi resumes, such confrontations may continue to surface at international forums. For now, the accusations exchanged in New Delhi underscore the persistent mistrust between the two regional powers and the challenges facing efforts to achieve long-term stability in West Asia.

The United Arab Emirates (UAE) has unveiled a long-term strategy aimed at ending its dependence on the Strait of Hormuz, a key global shipping route that handles a significant share of the world's oil and gas exports.

The announcement comes at a time when the Strait of Hormuz is expected to reopen following a recent agreement between the United States and Iran. However, concerns over future disruptions and potential transit restrictions have prompted the UAE to accelerate efforts to establish alternative trade and energy corridors.

Speaking about the country's plans, UAE Foreign Trade Minister Thani Al Zeyoudi said the objective is to reduce dependence on the Strait to zero through major investments in infrastructure.

Eastern Ports at the Core

Unlike several Gulf nations whose exports must pass through the Strait of Hormuz, the UAE possesses strategically located ports on its eastern coastline outside the strait. These include Fujairah, Dibba and Khor Fakkan, which continued to facilitate energy exports during periods of regional conflict.

The UAE now plans to significantly expand these facilities and transform them into major hubs for international trade and energy shipments. Officials believe these ports can provide a secure alternative route for exports while reducing exposure to geopolitical risks in the Gulf.

New Pipelines and Rail Links

A key component of the strategy involves the construction of at least two additional oil and gas pipelines connecting production facilities to eastern ports.

The UAE already operates a pipeline that transports crude oil directly to Fujairah, allowing exports to bypass the Strait of Hormuz. The proposed expansion would increase capacity and strengthen the country's energy security.

Authorities are also studying the development of railway infrastructure to support the transportation of energy products and commercial cargo between inland production centers and eastern ports.

Lessons from Regional Conflict

Recent tensions in West Asia highlighted vulnerabilities in regional energy supply chains. Although the UAE managed to maintain exports through its eastern facilities, attacks on infrastructure and growing uncertainty over maritime security accelerated discussions about long-term alternatives.

Officials say the experience exposed logistical gaps and reinforced the need for diversified transport routes. As a result, infrastructure planning has become a strategic priority for the country.

Challenges Remain

Despite progress on the export side, challenges remain for imports. The UAE continues to rely heavily on Jebel Ali Port, one of the world's largest commercial ports located inside the Persian Gulf.

Shifting a substantial portion of import traffic to eastern ports would require major investments and extensive logistical restructuring. Experts note that while the strategy is achievable, it will likely take several years to implement fully.

Strategic Economic Shift

The UAE's plan reflects a broader effort to strengthen economic resilience and safeguard its role as a global trade and energy hub. By expanding alternative transportation corridors and reducing reliance on a single maritime chokepoint, the country aims to protect supply chains, attract investment and maintain stable export operations regardless of future regional developments.

The initiative is expected to play a significant role in shaping the UAE's energy and trade strategy over the coming decade.

Amid rapidly escalating tensions in the Middle East, reports have emerged claiming that Pakistan has deployed nearly 8,000 troops along with fighter jets and advanced air defence systems to Saudi Arabia under a long-standing defence cooperation agreement. The development comes at a time when the region is witnessing heightened military activity due to the ongoing confrontation involving Iran, Israel and the United States.

According to international media reports, Pakistan has reportedly sent around 16 JF-17 Thunder fighter aircraft, drone squadrons and Chinese-origin HQ-9 air defence missile systems to Saudi Arabia. The report further stated that Pakistani military personnel are currently operating these systems, while the Saudi government is bearing the deployment expenses.

Though neither Pakistan nor Saudi Arabia has officially confirmed the deployment, the reports have triggered fresh debate over Islamabad’s strategic role in the evolving Gulf crisis. The alleged deployment is being viewed as a significant move considering the fragile geopolitical situation in the Middle East. Iran’s growing tensions with the United States and Israel have already pushed Gulf nations to strengthen their military preparedness. Saudi Arabia, which has historically maintained close defence ties with Pakistan, is reportedly taking precautionary steps amid fears of wider regional instability.

Military analysts believe the presence of Pakistani troops and fighter jets could be aimed at protecting key Saudi installations, including oil facilities, strategic ports and airbases. Saudi Arabia has previously relied on Pakistani military support during periods of regional uncertainty. Meanwhile, tensions surrounding the Strait of Hormuz continue to intensify. Iran has reportedly warned the United States against interfering in the region and demanded an end to pressure tactics related to maritime routes. Iranian officials also issued strong statements threatening retaliation if military pressure increases further.

The Strait of Hormuz remains one of the world’s most critical shipping routes, handling a significant portion of global oil and gas transportation. Any disruption in the area could severely impact international energy markets, including India’s fuel imports. In another major development, reports claimed that a drone attack took place near the Barakah nuclear power facility in the United Arab Emirates. A fire reportedly broke out outside the plant premises after the incident. Though no official confirmation has been issued regarding responsibility for the attack, preliminary suspicions reportedly point toward Iran-backed elements.

The incident has added to fears that Gulf countries could increasingly become targets as regional hostilities grow sharper. At the same time, commercial shipping through the Strait of Hormuz remains under pressure. Despite security concerns, multiple LPG tankers have continued to reach India through the route. Reports suggest that at least 15 LPG ships have arrived safely in Indian ports since the recent escalation began.

One of the vessels, identified as “Simi,” reportedly carried nearly 20,000 tonnes of LPG to Kandla Port. Indian authorities are closely monitoring developments in the Gulf region due to concerns that any prolonged disruption could lead to sharp increases in fuel prices and supply chain instability. India has also expressed concern at the international level regarding the security of maritime trade routes. India’s Permanent Representative to the United Nations reportedly stated that halting commercial shipping in the Strait of Hormuz would be unacceptable and could create serious consequences for global trade and energy security.

The United States has also continued diplomatic and military consultations regarding Iran. Former US President Donald Trump reportedly proposed a new arrangement under which Iran would suspend its nuclear programme for 20 years instead of permanently dismantling it. Trump also warned Tehran that time for negotiations was running out. His remarks came amid reports that Gulf countries, including Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the UAE, requested Washington to delay any direct military action against Iran in order to give diplomacy another chance.

Meanwhile, Israel’s military operations in southern Lebanon have reportedly continued despite ongoing ceasefire discussions. Reports indicate that dozens of strikes were carried out in border areas, forcing thousands of civilians to flee their homes. The continued violence has raised fears that the conflict may spread further across the region. Security experts believe Pakistan’s reported military deployment reflects the broader anxiety among Gulf allies over the possibility of a wider regional war. Pakistan and Saudi Arabia have maintained deep military cooperation for decades, including training programmes, intelligence sharing and joint security arrangements.

In the past, Pakistan has also deployed troops in Saudi Arabia for defensive purposes, particularly during periods of heightened tension involving Iran or regional militant threats. However, Islamabad has traditionally tried to maintain balanced relations with both Saudi Arabia and Iran due to geographical, political and sectarian considerations. The latest developments are expected to have global economic and diplomatic implications, especially for countries dependent on Middle East energy supplies. Rising tensions have already affected crude oil prices in international markets, creating concerns about inflation and fuel costs worldwide.

As diplomatic efforts continue alongside military preparations, the situation in the Gulf remains highly volatile. Global powers are closely watching the developments, while countries across Asia and Europe remain concerned about the possibility of disruptions in energy supplies and international trade routes. With military deployments increasing and diplomatic tensions deepening, the coming days are likely to play a crucial role in determining whether the region moves toward de-escalation or a broader conflict.