The Chhattisgarh High Court has rejected the bail application of businessman Anwar Dhebar in connection with the alleged manpower supply scam linked to irregularities in overtime payments at the Chhattisgarh State Marketing Corporation Limited (CSMCL).

The court observed that economic offences cannot be treated as ordinary crimes because they affect the country’s financial system and weaken public trust in governance. The development has become a major India News Update due to the political and financial implications associated with the case. While dismissing the plea, the High Court stated that large-scale economic crimes are often part of carefully planned conspiracies aimed at misusing public money and causing damage to the economic structure of the country.

According to the prosecution, the case is related to alleged corruption and irregularities in overtime payments made to employees through manpower supply agencies associated with CSMCL. Investigating agencies claimed that private manpower agencies supplying employees to the corporation were allegedly forced to pay commissions before their bills were cleared. The alleged illegal payments were reportedly linked to officials and influential individuals connected to the system.

The Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) registered a case of fraud and corruption after evidence collected during investigations by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) indicated irregular financial transactions. Officials alleged that Anwar Dhebar used political influence to interfere in the functioning and financial decisions of CSMCL. Investigators claimed he played a key role in controlling payments linked to manpower supply contracts.

According to the investigation report presented before the court, the commission amount initially collected from agencies was allegedly fixed at a specific percentage. However, investigators claimed that later the demanded amount increased significantly on Dhebar’s instructions. The probe reportedly revealed that some agencies were allegedly asked to pay nearly one-third or even more of the total bill amount as commission before receiving payments. Investigating agencies also alleged that additional illegal collections were sought in the name of elections and political expenditure.

The court was informed that some former officials of the corporation and private individuals allegedly acted as intermediaries in collecting money from agencies and transferring it further. The Enforcement Directorate had earlier conducted a trap operation on November 29, 2023, during which employees linked to Eagle Hunter Solutions agency were allegedly caught while delivering Rs 28.80 lakh in cash as bribe money. Officials stated that evidence recovered during that operation later formed the basis for further investigation against Anwar Dhebar. He was subsequently arrested on February 23, 2026.

During the bail hearing, Dhebar’s legal team argued that the case was politically motivated and claimed that he was being targeted due to political rivalry. The defence also alleged misuse of the legal process by registering multiple FIRs related to the same matter. His lawyers argued before the court that repeated cases were being filed to prevent him from securing release from jail. They also referred to the matter as “evergreening of custody” while seeking bail.

The state government strongly opposed the bail plea during the hearing and argued that the allegations involved large-scale corruption connected to public funds and misuse of official systems. After hearing both sides, the High Court observed that relief cannot be granted merely because an accused person is influential or because illegal money was not recovered directly from him.

The court stated that cases involving alleged misuse of public funds and corruption within government systems require careful judicial scrutiny. It further observed that such crimes damage not only the economy but also public confidence in administrative institutions. The High Court reportedly described Anwar Dhebar as the alleged main conspirator and primary beneficiary in the case. According to the court’s observations, the investigation had produced sufficient prima facie material against him at the current stage. Legal experts said the order reflects the judiciary’s increasingly strict approach towards economic offences and corruption-related cases involving public money.

The manpower supply scam case has attracted significant public and political attention in Chhattisgarh because of its alleged links to government departments, contract systems and financial irregularities. Observers believe the rejection of the bail plea may intensify scrutiny of similar manpower and outsourcing arrangements within public sector organisations.

The case continues to be monitored closely as investigating agencies pursue further evidence and examine the role of other accused persons allegedly connected to the network. The High Court’s remarks on economic offences have also sparked wider debate regarding corruption in government-linked contracts and the need for stronger accountability mechanisms.

--------