Agency tells Supreme Court it has ordered CCTV audits, forensic reviews and new posts for 2026 re-exam as part of wider reforms

The National Testing Agency (NTA) has told the Supreme Court it has launched a package of structural and security reforms after the NEET-UG 2026 paper leak controversy, saying CCTV audits, mock drills, forensic checks and new senior posts have been introduced ahead of the re-examination.

According to the affidavit filed in court on Friday, a High-Powered Steering Committee (HPSC) reviewed NEET-UG preparations at a meeting on April 17 and recommended a suite of measures to plug gaps before, during and after the test. The NTA said many of the recommendations are already in place or at an advanced stage of implementation for the re-exam scheduled later this year.

Tighter centre-level checks

The reforms include mandatory CCTV checks at all examination centres, with footage to be preserved for at least 90 days. The agency has also ordered detailed physical inspections of centres in the week leading up to exams, verification of power-backup systems and weather-based contingency plans, the affidavit said.

“Initial reports indicate the focus is on strengthening real-time monitoring and post-event forensic review,” a source familiar with the matter said, on condition of anonymity. The NTA also said emergency medical facilities will be required at identified larger centres, and that mock drills will be carried out to test readiness.

Forensic and post-exam reviews

In a notable change, the HPSC recommended routine forensic analysis of CCTV footage after examinations to identify anomalies or suspicious conduct that may not be apparent during live monitoring. The affidavit states the committee will reconvene after the re-examination to decide, in consultation with the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, whether future NEET tests should move to a computer-based test (CBT) format or remain paper-and-pen (PPT).

Officials said the forensic audits aim to catch patterns — such as repeated camera blind spots, simultaneous irregular behaviour across centres or suspicious movement near exam halls — that would otherwise surface only after complaints. “These are additional layers of checks intended to create both deterrence and investigative capability,” an NTA official involved in operations told reporters.

Administrative restructuring

As part of broader governance reforms, the NTA has created 16 senior posts, adding director and joint-director level positions, and appointed two joint secretary-level officers as additional director generals to oversee technology operations and test security. A secretary-level officer assumed charge as director general of the NTA in March 2026, the affidavit added.

The agency said it has brought in experts from academic and administrative bodies — including IITs, the University Grants Commission (UGC), CBSE, Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan (KVS) and IGNOU — to strengthen examination management and technical resilience.

State and district coordination

To tighten on-ground coordination, State-Level Coordination Committees (SLCCs) and District-Level Coordination Committees (DLCCs) were formed across the country. The NTA told the court that 18 SLCCs and 621 DLCCs were operational before the May 3 exam and comprise officials from local administration, police, intelligence agencies, the National Informatics Centre (NIC) and the testing agency.

The committees are intended to improve surveillance, logistics and rapid response during examinations, the NTA said. Local police and district administrations will oversee centre security while NIC teams assist with technical links and timely transfer of CCTV data.

Public reaction and significance

The NEET-UG 2026 leak and subsequent cancellation sparked widespread public concern and legal scrutiny, prompting petitions by groups including the Federation of All India Medical Association (FAIMA) and the United Doctors Front (UDF) seeking a structural overhaul of the examination body. Petitioners had argued that systemic lapses, not isolated incidents, were to blame.

Education experts said the NTA’s moves are aimed at restoring confidence but warned implementation will be key. “Policy changes matter only if executed consistently across thousands of centres,” said an education administrator who declined to be named. “Mock drills, forensic audits and state coordination can help, but transparency about findings will be crucial.”

What’s next

The HPSC is due to meet again after the re-examination to assess the effectiveness of the measures and recommend whether a permanent shift to a CBT model is warranted. The Supreme Court will continue to monitor progress through affidavits and hearings, according to registry filings.

With the re-exam looming, the NTA faces the twin task of demonstrating operational readiness on the ground and convincing students and stakeholders that the safeguards will prevent a repeat of the disruption that upended this year’s admission cycle.