Israel Rejects US Proposal

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has publicly rejected US President Donald Trump's proposal calling for Hamas' disarmament and a phased Israeli withdrawal from the Gaza Strip, marking the sharpest public disagreement between the two leaders over the ongoing Gaza conflict.

In a video statement shared on Facebook, Netanyahu said Israel had not accepted the draft proposal presented by the United States, insisting that it did not reflect Israel's position.

"We did not agree to it. It was not our draft," Netanyahu said, adding that Israel had submitted its own comments and amendments to the proposal.

No Withdrawal From Gaza

Netanyahu also made it clear that Israel has no plans to withdraw from Gaza at this stage.

According to the Israeli prime minister, the US administration believes Hamas can be persuaded to disarm and demilitarise the Gaza Strip through negotiations. While Israel is reviewing the proposal, Netanyahu stressed that his government has not endorsed the framework presented by Washington.

His remarks represent the first public confirmation that Israel has formally objected to key elements of the American initiative.

Trump's Peace Proposal

The proposal is part of President Trump's broader Board of Peace initiative aimed at ending the Gaza conflict.

Last week, Trump announced what he described as an in-principle understanding under which Hamas would gradually surrender its weapons in exchange for a phased Israeli military withdrawal from Gaza.

The US president said the arrangement would pave the way for Gaza to be administered by a new Palestinian authority working alongside the Board of Peace, while ensuring Israel's long-term security by preventing the territory from being used for future attacks.

Growing Rift Between Allies

Netanyahu's rejection highlights an emerging policy divide between Washington and Jerusalem over the future of Gaza.

According to US officials, the proposed disarmament-and-withdrawal framework is an extension of Trump's earlier 20-point Gaza peace plan, which Israel had previously accepted in principle.

A senior US official warned last week that President Trump would be "very disappointed" if Israel blocked the latest proposal, arguing that rejecting the framework would undermine commitments already made by the Israeli government.

The disagreement is widely seen as the most significant diplomatic rupture between Trump and Netanyahu since the current conflict began.

Board of Peace Efforts Continue

Following Trump's announcement, Board of Peace Director General Nikolay Mladenov held talks with Netanyahu, urging Israel to suspend military operations in Gaza for two weeks to facilitate negotiations with Hamas.

The Board of Peace later clarified that Israel would only be required to complete its withdrawal after Hamas had fully disarmed.

It also stated that Hamas would be expected to surrender all categories of weapons, including heavy arms, tunnel infrastructure and light firearms, before any final withdrawal took place.

Despite those assurances, Netanyahu's latest remarks indicate that Israel remains unconvinced by the proposed sequence of events and is unwilling to commit to a withdrawal under the current framework.

Negotiations Face Fresh Uncertainty

The public disagreement has cast fresh uncertainty over diplomatic efforts to end the Gaza conflict.

While the United States continues to push for a negotiated settlement combining Hamas' disarmament with a phased Israeli withdrawal, Israel's leadership maintains that its security concerns remain paramount.

With both sides holding differing interpretations of the proposed agreement, negotiations are expected to continue in the coming days as international mediators seek to bridge the divide.

Prime minister’s remark on taking “first of all 70%” of Gaza appears in West Bank speech; move could push nearly 2 million Palestinians to relocate

Israeli announcement and reaction
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told an audience in the occupied West Bank on Thursday that he had instructed the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) to take control of about 70% of the Gaza Strip, a statement that drew immediate international concern and alarm among Palestinian officials. “We are now in 60% of the territory of the Gaza Strip… My directive is to move, take over step by step — first of all 70%,” Mr. Netanyahu said, according to a CNN report of the remarks.

Local and regional officials said the comment, coming amid months of fighting and a fragile ceasefire framework, risks triggering large-scale displacement in a densely populated coastal territory where roughly 2 million Palestinians live. Sources familiar with humanitarian planning note that a move to occupy such a large share of Gaza could force mass internal migration and overwhelm already-stretched aid services.

Maps and claimed control
The IDF has previously circulated operational maps to international aid agencies, officials said, and those maps — issued in late April — reportedly depicted Israeli control of roughly 64% of Gaza. Under the October 2025 ceasefire arrangement between Israel and Hamas, Israeli forces had withdrawn to a demarcation known as the “yellow line,” which encompassed about 53% of the enclave.

Humanitarian and political actors warned that shifting lines on the ground would have immediate consequences. “If the boundaries of control expand, it reduces safe space for civilians and complicates aid deliveries,” a senior aid official working in the region said on condition of anonymity. The official added that agencies were already operating under severe constraints on fuel, staff movement and secure supply routes.

Hamas and ceasefire concerns
Hamas condemned what it described as an attempt to unilaterally alter the ceasefire arrangement. In a statement on Tuesday, the group accused Israel of “an explicit and ongoing undermining of the ceasefire agreement” and warned that moving the demarcation line constituted a serious violation meant to “impose new facts on the ground.”

Diplomats in the region said the remarks could complicate international efforts to stabilise the situation and resume reconstruction planning. Western and Arab governments have repeatedly urged restraint and called for guarantees to protect civilians and humanitarian corridors.

Allegations about weapon use
Separately, reports have circulated alleging the use of so-called thermobaric or “vacuum” weapons in Gaza. Investigative outlets and some witnesses have described blasts that create intense heat and large-area effects; such weapons are controversial because of their destructive blast and incendiary characteristics. Israeli officials have repeatedly denied using internationally banned munitions; independent, verifiable confirmation of specific weapon types in many incidents remains limited.

Human toll and long-term damage
The humanitarian toll in Gaza remains severe. Local civil defence authorities have reported thousands of victims whose remains are difficult to recover after intense bombardment. Agricultural and economic damage has been extensive: aid agencies estimate that almost all of Gaza’s agricultural land has been degraded since the start of hostilities, with only small pockets remaining cultivable — a factor that will slow recovery and food security for years.

Chronology and context
The latest statements come nearly two-and-a-half years after the conflict flared on 7 October 2023, when a large-scale Hamas attack into southern Israel prompted a sustained Israeli military campaign. The October 2025 ceasefire created a temporary lull and defined lines of operation, but observers have warned that those arrangements are fragile and subject to change depending on political and military calculations.

What happens next
Officials in Jerusalem offered no immediate operational timeline beyond the prime minister’s directive. International actors — including UN agencies and donor governments — are expected to press for clarification on movement plans, protections for civilians, and guaranteed access for humanitarian relief.

Aid groups on the ground said they are preparing contingency plans for further displacement and reiterating calls for protective measures. “We’re bracing for more people on the move and for humanitarian needs to spike,” one aid coordinator said.