<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>        <rss version="2.0"
            xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
            xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
            xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
            <channel>
                <atom:link href="https://english.dainikjagranmpcg.com/health-technology/tag-25390" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
                <generator>Dainik Jagran English RSS Feed Generator</generator>
                <title>Health Technology - Dainik Jagran English</title>
                <link>https://english.dainikjagranmpcg.com/tag/25390/rss</link>
                <description>Health Technology RSS Feed</description>
                
                            <item>
                <title>Human Embryo DNA Editing Breakthrough Revives ‘Designer Baby’ Debate</title>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>Scientists at Columbia University have achieved precise human embryo DNA editing, offering hope for preventing genetic diseases while reigniting concerns over designer babies.</p>]]></description>
                
                                    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="https://english.dainikjagranmpcg.com/international/human-embryo-dna-editing-breakthrough-revives-%E2%80%98designer-baby%E2%80%99-debate/article-19728"><img src="https://english.dainikjagranmpcg.com/media/400/2026-06/dna.jpg" alt=""></a><br /><p>A major breakthrough in human gene-editing research has brought the possibility of preventing inherited diseases a step closer to reality. Scientists at Columbia University have successfully edited the DNA of early-stage human embryos with an accuracy level not previously achieved. While researchers say the technology could one day help eliminate certain genetic disorders, the development has also reignited global ethical concerns about the future creation of so-called “designer babies.”</p>
<p>The study was led by geneticist Dieter Egli and focused on a newer gene-editing technique known as base editing. Unlike traditional CRISPR technology, which cuts DNA strands, base editing makes highly targeted changes to individual genetic letters. Researchers say this approach significantly reduces the risk of unintended genetic damage, a major challenge that has limited embryo-editing research in the past.</p>
<p>According to the research team, the technology is still experimental and not ready for clinical use. However, the findings mark an important step toward understanding whether inherited diseases could one day be corrected before birth.</p>
<p>More Precise Than Earlier Methods</p>
<p>The researchers targeted two genes during the experiment. One of them, PCSK9, is associated with cholesterol levels and the risk of heart disease, while the HBG gene plays a role in the production of fetal haemoglobin.</p>
<p>Using donated fertilised eggs and two-cell embryos, scientists introduced base-editing molecules and successfully modified both genes. In several cases, they were able to edit both targets simultaneously without causing the large-scale DNA damage that had been observed in earlier CRISPR-based experiments.</p>
<p>The achievement is particularly significant because previous attempts at editing human embryos often resulted in serious genetic disruptions, including chromosome loss and unintended mutations. Researchers say the latest results suggest base editing may offer a safer alternative.</p>
<p>Ethical Questions Return</p>
<p>The breakthrough has once again raised questions about how far gene-editing technology should be allowed to go. While scientists involved in the project emphasise that the goal is to prevent serious inherited diseases, critics warn that the same technology could eventually be used to select or enhance traits such as intelligence, height, appearance, or athletic ability.</p>
<p>The debate over human embryo editing intensified in 2018 when Chinese scientist He Jiankui claimed to have created genetically modified babies resistant to HIV. The experiment was widely condemned by the international scientific community, and He was later sentenced to prison by Chinese authorities.</p>
<p>Since then, many experts have argued that embryo editing remains too risky for clinical use due to concerns about safety, unintended mutations, and long-term health effects.</p>
<p>Potential Benefits for IVF Patients</p>
<p>Researchers believe the technology could eventually benefit couples undergoing IVF treatment. In some cases, embryos carrying disease-causing mutations are discarded because they are unsuitable for implantation. Gene editing may one day allow doctors to repair those mutations, increasing the number of viable embryos available to prospective parents.</p>
<p>Scientists involved in the study say future research will focus on reducing a problem known as mosaicism, where some cells within an embryo are edited while others remain unchanged. This remains one of the biggest barriers to clinical application.</p>
<p>Experts have also stressed that extensive testing, regulatory review, and public debate will be required before any human embryo gene-editing technology could be used in fertility clinics.</p>]]></content:encoded>
                
                                                            <category>International</category>
                                    

                <link>https://english.dainikjagranmpcg.com/international/human-embryo-dna-editing-breakthrough-revives-%E2%80%98designer-baby%E2%80%99-debate/article-19728</link>
                <guid>https://english.dainikjagranmpcg.com/international/human-embryo-dna-editing-breakthrough-revives-%E2%80%98designer-baby%E2%80%99-debate/article-19728</guid>
                <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 15:23:39 +0530</pubDate>
                                    <enclosure
                        url="https://english.dainikjagranmpcg.com/media/2026-06/dna.jpg"                         length="170621"                         type="image/jpeg"  />
                
                                    <dc:creator><![CDATA[Rishita ]]></dc:creator>
                            </item>

            </channel>
        </rss>
        