A fresh political storm has emerged over the NEET-UG examination as senior Congress leader Digvijaya Singh has written to Prime Minister Narendra Modi demanding a comprehensive white paper on alleged irregularities and paper leak incidents in exams conducted by the National Testing Agency. The demand comes amid continued scrutiny of the NEET-UG process and rising concerns among students.

The issue relates to the NEET-UG 2026 examination conducted by the National Testing Agency on May 3, which was later cancelled on May 12 following allegations of a paper leak. The matter is currently under investigation by the Central Bureau of Investigation, intensifying national debate on exam transparency and system accountability.

White paper demand on NTA exams

In his letter to the Prime Minister, Digvijaya Singh has urged the government to publish a detailed white paper covering reported irregularities in examinations conducted by the National Testing Agency over the past eight years. He has also sought clarity on the action taken in each case.

Singh, who chairs the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Education, Women, Children, Youth and Sports, stated that repeated concerns over exam integrity are undermining student confidence in the examination system. He emphasized the need for transparency and accountability in high-stakes national exams.

NEET-UG cancellation and probe

The NEET-UG 2026 examination, held on May 3, was cancelled on May 12 after allegations of question paper leaks surfaced in multiple regions. The case was subsequently handed over to the CBI for investigation.

Officials have not yet released a final report on the scale or source of the alleged leak. However, the cancellation has triggered widespread concern among lakhs of medical aspirants across the country, many of whom are now awaiting clarity on future steps.

Student concerns and system trust

The controversy has once again brought the credibility of national entrance examinations under focus. Education experts note that repeated allegations of irregularities in competitive exams can significantly impact student morale and trust in recruitment systems.

Singh argued that at a time when students face immense academic pressure, it is essential to restore confidence through transparent disclosures and systematic reforms in examination processes.

Background of repeated concerns

In recent years, the National Testing Agency has faced multiple allegations related to exam conduct, including concerns over technical glitches, logistical errors, and suspected leaks. These issues have led to legal challenges and policy-level discussions on examination reforms.

The NEET-UG exam, in particular, has frequently been at the centre of public debate due to its large-scale participation and high stakes for medical admissions across India.

Official response and legal angle

While the matter is under investigation, the Supreme Court has also previously declined pleas seeking a re-test in computer-based mode, adding a judicial dimension to the ongoing controversy.

Authorities have maintained that due process is being followed and that corrective action will be taken based on investigation findings. The CBI probe is expected to determine the extent of the alleged irregularities.

Senior Congress leader Rahul Gandhi has intensified his criticism of the proposed Great Nicobar Island development project, alleging that the government is misrepresenting it as a national security initiative while it actually serves private commercial interests. In a 16-minute video shared on social media platform X, he claimed the project could lead to large-scale ecological damage and questioned its transparency and intent.

The remarks come amid ongoing political debate over one of India’s most ambitious infrastructure proposals, estimated at around ₹90,000 crore. The Centre, however, maintains that the project is aimed at strengthening India’s strategic presence in the Indo-Pacific region and boosting maritime trade through a major transshipment hub.

Video claims and allegations

In his video message, Rahul Gandhi alleged that the government has framed the Great Nicobar Island Project as a defence-linked initiative, while its actual purpose is to enable commercial development in a sensitive ecological zone. He also urged citizens to oppose the project and sign a public petition.

He further claimed that the project could impact forests, coral reefs, and indigenous tribal communities living on the island. According to him, the scale of proposed development raises serious environmental and social concerns that have not been adequately addressed.Environment and tribal concerns

The Congress leader said the project violates provisions of the Forest Rights Act and could threaten the livelihood and land rights of tribal communities in the region. He also alleged that large-scale tree felling and ecological disruption may occur if the plan is implemented in its current form.

He referred to his recent visit to the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, stating that the region’s biodiversity, including coral reefs and dense forests, must be protected from large-scale construction activities.

Strategic importance of project

The Great Nicobar Island Project is planned as a multi-component infrastructure initiative, including an international transshipment port, airport, power plant, and a new township. The government argues that it will enhance India’s maritime capabilities and strengthen its position along key global shipping routes.

Officials have previously stated that the project is designed to improve trade connectivity, support defence infrastructure, and boost economic activity in the region. The Centre has rejected allegations that the initiative is driven by private interests.

Political debate intensifies

The issue has become a point of political confrontation, with opposition leaders questioning environmental clearances and project approvals. Rahul Gandhi has been one of the most vocal critics in recent weeks, raising concerns over transparency and consultation with local communities.

The government, on the other hand, continues to defend the project as a long-term strategic investment aligned with India’s national security and economic growth priorities in the Indo-Pacific region.