Shiv Sena (UBT) chief Uddhav Thackeray has drawn a comparison between today's Gen Z and Maratha warrior Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj, arguing that young people should not be underestimated or dismissed because of the labels used against them. Speaking at a book launch event in Mumbai on Wednesday, Thackeray referred to the term “cockroaches” being used for sections of the younger generation amid the recent political debate around student protests. He said even Shivaji Maharaj had faced insulting descriptions from his opponents, referring to the Mughals calling him a “chuha”, or rat. Thackeray said the young people being described as “cockroaches” today largely belong to Generation Z, which he broadly placed between the ages of 13-14 and 27-28. Drawing a historical parallel, the former Maharashtra chief minister pointed out that Shivaji Maharaj was only around 17 when he captured Torna Fort, an early milestone in his political and military journey. He also referred to Sant Dnyaneshwar, saying he too was very young when he wrote the Dnyaneshwari despite facing considerable opposition during his lifetime.

Thackeray's remarks came at a time when Gen Z has increasingly entered India's political vocabulary following recent student protests and the debate surrounding examination reforms. His argument was that age should not become a reason to dismiss the political concerns or abilities of younger citizens. By invoking Shivaji Maharaj and Sant Dnyaneshwar, Thackeray sought to underline that people who went on to have a major historical impact had themselves faced resistance and criticism while still young. The comments also fit into the Shiv Sena (UBT) leader's recent outreach towards young protesters. Over the past few days, Thackeray and MNS chief Raj Thackeray have publicly supported the student movement and participated in political messaging around the agitation. The use of “cockroach” as a political reference has meanwhile moved beyond protest sites and social media, finding its way into speeches and exchanges involving politicians from different parties.

The Gen Z language has also surfaced inside Parliament during the ongoing Monsoon Session, particularly during discussions surrounding the government's examination reform legislation and the NEET controversy. BJP MP Bansuri Swaraj, while supporting the proposed legislation, borrowed the popular Gen Z expression “clock it” to praise Prime Minister Narendra Modi's approach to providing a legislative solution. On the Opposition side, Congress MP Priyanka Gandhi Vadra also brought Gen Z into her criticism of the Prime Minister's public outreach. She argued that changing camera angles in videos would not be enough to connect with young Indians and said the government instead needed to address what she described as injustice faced by the youth. Against this backdrop, Uddhav Thackeray's comparison with Shivaji Maharaj adds another dimension to the political battle over who speaks for India's younger generation. His message was essentially that young people who are mocked or dismissed today could still emerge as important agents of change, just as prominent historical figures faced opposition at a young age. With student issues continuing to dominate political debate, Gen Z and its language have now become part of the wider contest between the government and Opposition.

Speaking in his trademark style, Raj Thackeray said the younger generation had forced the government to acknowledge public sentiment.

"Gen Z has shaken the government and brought it down to the ground," he remarked, describing the protests as a defining moment for young people across the country.

According to Thackeray, the resignation of the Education Minister reflects the impact of sustained public pressure and the determination shown by students and youth protesting against the alleged irregularities in the NEET examination.

Calls It a Victory for Youth

Raj Thackeray congratulated the protesters and said the movement had achieved a significant milestone.

He credited the youth for maintaining pressure on the government despite repeated challenges and said leaders who had initially dismissed the protests were eventually forced to respond.

Thackeray also acknowledged the role of protest leader Abhijeet Deepke, saying his contribution had been crucial in mobilizing students and keeping the movement alive.

Support for Protest to Continue

Although Dharmendra Pradhan has resigned, Raj Thackeray made it clear that support for the protest movement would continue.

He said any future decisions taken by protest leaders, including Abhijeet Deepke, would receive his party's full backing. According to him, the public anger has now gone beyond a single minister and reflects broader concerns over accountability in governance.

Joint Rally With Uddhav Thackeray to Proceed

Raj Thackeray also confirmed that the planned joint march with Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Uddhav Thackeray would go ahead despite the minister's resignation.

The rally is scheduled to assemble at Shivaji Park in Mumbai, where both leaders are expected to address supporters and express solidarity with students demanding education reforms and greater transparency in examinations.

Responds to Speculation on New Education Minister

Asked about speculation that Maharashtra could produce the next Union Education Minister, Raj Thackeray declined to comment on reports linking Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis to the post.

He said such discussions remain speculative and that any decision would only become clear after the central leadership makes an official announcement.

Thackeray also remarked that political developments in New Delhi have gathered pace, but said there was little value in commenting until the government formally reveals its plans.

Political Significance

Raj Thackeray's remarks come at a time when the NEET paper leak protests have evolved into a nationwide youth movement, prompting multiple rounds of dialogue between protest leaders and the Centre. With the resignation of the Education Minister, attention has now shifted to the remaining demands of the protesters and the government's next course of action.

Addressing party workers during the ongoing Ram Raksha Andolan in Maharashtra, Aaditya Thackeray alleged that the controversy had shaken the faith of devotees and said those responsible for the alleged misappropriation of offerings must be brought to justice. He accused the BJP of remaining silent on an issue involving one of the country's most revered temples.

The protest forms part of the Shiv Sena (UBT)'s statewide Ram Raksha Andolan, launched by party chief Uddhav Thackeray after allegations surfaced that cash and valuables offered by devotees at the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Temple had been stolen by individuals involved in counting donations. The campaign has sought to project the party as defending the sanctity of the temple while questioning the functioning of the trust responsible for its administration.

Speaking during the programme, Aaditya Thackeray questioned why action had not been taken swiftly despite the seriousness of the allegations. He maintained that the issue was not political but related to protecting the trust of millions of devotees who contribute offerings at the temple. According to the party, the movement is aimed at demanding transparency rather than targeting any religion or place of worship.

The controversy erupted after police arrested several individuals allegedly linked to the theft of donations from the Ram Mandir. Investigators recovered a substantial amount of cash during the probe, following which the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra Trust initiated internal changes in its administration. The trust accepted the resignations of General Secretary Champat Rai and trustee Anil Mishra, appointed an interim secretary and began the process of selecting a chief executive officer.

The trust has described the alleged theft as a matter of deep concern but has appealed against politicising the issue. Trust president Nritya Gopal Das said the incident had caused pain to everyone associated with the temple and expressed confidence that appropriate action would be taken by the authorities.

The BJP, meanwhile, has accused opposition parties of attempting to derive political mileage from the controversy. Party leaders have maintained that law enforcement agencies are investigating the matter and that those found guilty will face legal consequences. The Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) has also appealed to devotees to remain patient and not allow the incident to be used to create divisions in society.

The donation controversy has become a significant political issue ahead of the Uttar Pradesh Assembly election, with several opposition parties questioning the governance of the temple trust. The Congress has demanded greater transparency and called for an independent investigation, while Shiv Sena (UBT) has continued to organise public programmes highlighting the issue.

Political observers believe the episode has broadened beyond a criminal investigation, evolving into a debate over accountability in the management of religious institutions. While the police investigation into the alleged theft is continuing, the issue is expected to remain part of the political discourse in the coming months as parties sharpen their campaigns ahead of future elections.

Mumbai was politically charged on Friday as both factions of Shiv Sena marked the party's 60th foundation day with separate rallies — and Uddhav Thackeray used the occasion to address the most serious internal crisis his group has faced since the 2022 split that cost him the Maharashtra government.

Speaking at Shanmukhananda Hall in Sion, Uddhav struck a combative tone. "If you do not trust or believe in me, I am ready to step down as party chief," he told party workers, even as he sought to project confidence. He insisted Shiv Sainiks were not disheartened by the rebellion of six MPs and remained full of enthusiasm. In a pointed remark that drew attention, he said Congress — his current alliance partner — had never tried to destroy Shiv Sena, unlike the BJP. He also warned that the country was drifting toward a "one party, no elections" system, calling it a threat to democracy.

Across the city, Eknath Shinde's faction held its rally at NESCO Center in Goregaon, with large hoardings of Balasaheb Thackeray, Anand Dighe, Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj and Shinde himself lining the approach roads. The central question hanging over the Shinde event was whether the six rebel MPs would make a public appearance there — sources within the ruling camp suggested they might attend, though no official confirmation had come through by Friday morning.

The rebellion had been building through the week. On June 15, reports of an "Operation Tiger" — an alleged effort to peel away Uddhav's MPs — began circulating, with the Uddhav faction initially dismissing them. By June 16, the MPs had reportedly been brought to Delhi. Sanjay Raut alleged that inducements of up to Rs 50 crore had been offered to MPs to switch sides. On June 17, Shinde faction leaders claimed six MPs had agreed to form a separate group, prompting Raut, Anil Desai and Arvind Sawant to rush to meet Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla. The rebels then formally skipped the parliamentary party meeting on June 18 and submitted a letter to the Speaker explaining their position.

In that letter, the six MPs alleged that senior leaders in the Uddhav camp were working toward merging Shiv Sena (UBT) with Congress, and that the party had strayed from its foundational ideology. Senior Sena leader Chandrakant Khaire described the episode as part of the ongoing Operation Tiger exercise in Maharashtra.

The arithmetic matters here. Shiv Sena (UBT) has nine Lok Sabha MPs. Six of them breaking away crosses the two-thirds threshold stipulated under the Tenth Schedule of the Constitution — the provision that governs disqualification for defection. Legal experts note this could shield the rebels from immediate disqualification and bolster their claim to recognition as a separate group, though they may eventually need to merge with a recognised political party to consolidate their standing.

This is the second major fracture in Shiv Sena in under four years. In June 2022, Eknath Shinde's rebellion involving 39 MLAs brought down Uddhav's government. The Election Commission subsequently recognised the Shinde faction as the official Shiv Sena and awarded it the party's bow-and-arrow symbol. The current parliamentary revolt threatens to further erode what remains of Uddhav's political organisation.

Further developments are expected as the foundation day events conclude and the rebels' next move becomes clearer.

A fresh political crisis appears to be unfolding within Shiv Sena (UBT) after only three of the party’s nine Lok Sabha MPs attended a crucial parliamentary party meeting in New Delhi. The development has intensified speculation about a possible split within the party, with six MPs reportedly distancing themselves from the Uddhav Thackeray-led faction and moving closer to the Shiv Sena led by Maharashtra Deputy Chief Minister Eknath Shinde.

The meeting, convened under a party whip requiring all MPs to be present, was attended only by Anil Desai, Arvind Sawant, and Rajabhau Waje. Following the meeting, party leaders indicated that disciplinary action could be initiated against those who remained absent.

Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Arvind Sawant said notices would be issued to the MPs who failed to attend the gathering. Meanwhile, Rajya Sabha MP Sanjay Raut alleged that pressure tactics were being used against party lawmakers and claimed that those absent from the meeting had chosen a path contrary to the party's interests.

The political tension escalated further after the Union Home Ministry reportedly directed Maharashtra Police to strengthen Y+ category security cover for the six MPs considered part of the rebel group. According to sources, these MPs submitted a letter to Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla seeking recognition of a separate parliamentary group and a merger with the Shinde faction.

Three Days of Political Turmoil

The controversy began on June 15 when reports surfaced suggesting that six Shiv Sena (UBT) MPs were in contact with leaders from the Shinde camp. The alleged operation, dubbed "Operation Tiger" in political circles, fueled speculation about another major split within the party.

On June 16, Sanjay Raut claimed that attempts were being made to engineer defections through financial inducements. He alleged that offers worth ₹50 crore had been made to MPs to switch allegiance, though no evidence was publicly presented to support the claim.

The following day, leaders from the Shinde faction publicly asserted that six MPs had signed documents seeking to form a separate bloc. Later, Raut, Sawant and Desai met Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla and urged him not to recognize any merger or separate group without first hearing the Uddhav Thackeray faction.

Anti-Defection Law in Focus

The reported rebellion carries significant legal implications because Shiv Sena (UBT) currently has nine MPs in the Lok Sabha. Under the anti-defection provisions, at least two-thirds of legislators or MPs must support a split to avoid disqualification.

With six MPs constituting exactly two-thirds of the parliamentary party, the rebel group could potentially seek protection under the merger provisions of the law if procedural requirements are fulfilled. Political observers say this legal threshold makes the current developments particularly significant.

The situation has drawn comparisons with the dramatic split of 2022, when Eknath Shinde led a rebellion involving 39 MLAs and eventually formed a separate Shiv Sena faction.

Wider Political Implications

The latest developments come ahead of the upcoming Monsoon Session of Parliament, where political alignments are expected to play a crucial role. Opposition parties have accused the BJP of encouraging defections to strengthen the National Democratic Alliance's numbers in the Lok Sabha.

Congress leader Jairam Ramesh alleged that efforts were being made to weaken opposition parties and move closer to a two-thirds majority required for major constitutional amendments. The BJP has not officially responded to these allegations.

Political analysts believe the outcome of the Shiv Sena (UBT) crisis could influence broader opposition dynamics, particularly as parties prepare for future legislative battles and electoral contests.

For now, all eyes remain on the six absent MPs and the Lok Sabha Speaker's response, which could determine the next chapter in Maharashtra's evolving political landscape.

A fresh political storm appears to be brewing in Maharashtra. Shiv Sena (UBT) has issued a whip to all its Lok Sabha MPs, making attendance mandatory at a parliamentary party meeting scheduled in New Delhi on Thursday. The move comes amid reports that six of the party's nine MPs may be preparing to align with the Eknath Shinde-led Shiv Sena faction, potentially triggering another major split within the party.

The meeting has been convened to discuss organizational and political developments at a time when speculation about internal dissent has intensified. According to party sources, the gathering will take place at 11 a.m. at the parliamentary party office within the Parliament House complex.

Reports suggest that a group of six MPs may have submitted a letter to Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla seeking recognition for a merger with the Shinde faction. However, neither the Speaker’s Office nor the MPs concerned have officially confirmed these claims.

The development has raised concerns within the Uddhav Thackeray-led camp, which has already witnessed a significant split in 2022 when Eknath Shinde led a rebellion involving 39 MLAs, eventually forming a separate faction and taking control of the original Shiv Sena name and symbol.

Political Tensions Escalate

Among the MPs reportedly linked to the rebellion are Nagesh Patil Ashtikar and Sanjay Dina Patil. Earlier on Wednesday, Sanjay Dina Patil publicly dismissed reports of leaving the party, adding further uncertainty to the situation.

Meanwhile, Shiv Sena (UBT) Rajya Sabha MP Sanjay Raut launched a sharp attack on the rebel lawmakers during a press conference in Delhi. Raut accused the MPs of betraying the party and questioned their political loyalty.

Only three of the party’s nine Lok Sabha MPs — Anil Desai, Rajabhau Waje, and Arvind Sawant — were present alongside Raut during the media interaction. He challenged the remaining MPs to publicly clarify their position and reject the speculation surrounding the reported split.

Anti-Defection Law in Focus

The reported rebellion has gained significance due to provisions under India's anti-defection law. Shiv Sena (UBT) currently has nine MPs in the Lok Sabha. Under the Tenth Schedule of the Constitution, at least two-thirds of a party's legislators must support a split or merger to avoid disqualification.

If six MPs move together, they would meet the required threshold, potentially strengthening their legal position. Political analysts, however, note that merely forming a separate group may not be sufficient. A formal merger with another recognized political party or faction could be necessary to secure protection under the law.

The situation is being closely watched as it could alter political equations in Maharashtra and influence opposition unity efforts ahead of future electoral contests.

Congress has also entered the debate. Senior Congress leader Jairam Ramesh alleged that the BJP leadership was attempting to weaken opposition parties by encouraging defections. He claimed such efforts were aimed at strengthening the ruling party’s position in Parliament.

For Shiv Sena (UBT), the coming days are likely to be crucial. The outcome of Thursday’s parliamentary party meeting may determine whether the party can contain internal dissent or faces another significant organizational setback. Political observers believe the developments could have a lasting impact on Maharashtra's political landscape and the broader opposition bloc at the national level.

Fresh speculation of another split in the Shiv Sena has surfaced after the Shinde faction claimed that seven MPs from Uddhav Thackeray’s Shiv Sena (UBT) are in touch with them and may switch sides soon.

Shiv Sena (Shinde) MLC Krupal Tumane told ANI that quiet discussions have been going on for the past month under what he called “Operation Tiger”. He said the process is now in its final stage and the MPs could join the Shinde group before the Monsoon Session of Parliament begins.

The claim has triggered a fresh round of political activity in Maharashtra, where the Thackeray family’s control over the party has been under strain ever since the 2022 rebellion led by Eknath Shinde.

Uddhav Thackeray, during a meeting with party MPs on June 14, reportedly took a calm but firm stand. According to those familiar with the meeting, he told leaders that anyone who wants to leave the party is free to do so and would not be stopped. He referred to the 2022 split, saying he had known about the rebellion then but chose not to pressure anyone to stay.

Meanwhile, Shiv Sena (UBT) MP Sanjay Deshmukh met Union Minister Prataprao Jadhav in Delhi on Monday. Deshmukh had skipped the Sunday party meeting, citing family reasons. His meeting with the minister has added to the buzz, though no official confirmation of any switch has come yet.

Sanjay Raut, the sharp-tongued UBT MP, quickly dismissed the claims as baseless. He asserted that all party MPs remain loyal to Uddhav Thackeray and described the reports of another split as false propaganda. Raut questioned Krupal Tumane’s relevance, asking, “Who is Kripal Tumane?” and calling him not a major name in Maharashtra politics.

Raut pointed out that all MPs had attended Uddhav’s meeting four days ago and expressed full confidence in his leadership. Some even swore on their family members to stay with Thackeray, he added. However, media reports suggested that only four MPs attended the meeting in person, one joined virtually, and four were absent, raising questions about the actual strength of the group.

This development comes nearly four years after the original split that changed Maharashtra politics. On June 20, 2022, 40 of Shiv Sena’s 55 MLAs sided with Eknath Shinde while Uddhav Thackeray was Chief Minister. After a dramatic few days involving a Supreme Court approach and a floor test, Thackeray resigned. Shinde took oath as Chief Minister with BJP support on June 30, 2022.

The battle for the party’s identity continued in courts and the Election Commission. In January 2024, Maharashtra Assembly Speaker Rahul Narwekar recognised the Shinde faction as the real Shiv Sena, citing majority support. The Election Commission later awarded the traditional bow-and-arrow symbol to Shinde’s group, forcing Uddhav’s faction to contest as Shiv Sena (UBT).

The current claims of seven MPs crossing over, if true, could further weaken Uddhav Thackeray’s position in national politics, where numbers matter in Parliament. The Shinde faction, already in power in the state with BJP, sees this as another opportunity to consolidate its hold over the original Shiv Sena legacy.

For now, both sides are digging in. The Shinde camp is projecting confidence, while the UBT side is playing down the reports and stressing unity. Political observers in Mumbai say such claims often surface ahead of important sessions to create pressure and test loyalties.

The coming days will be crucial. If even a couple of MPs do switch, it could trigger more movement. Maharashtra’s politics has rarely been stable since 2022, with multiple smaller shifts and realignments keeping the state in constant churn.

Uddhav Thackeray’s “they are free to leave” remark is being seen by some as a sign of quiet confidence and by others as acceptance of ground realities. The party that once dominated Mumbai and much of Maharashtra remains divided, with both factions claiming to be the true inheritors of Balasaheb Thackeray’s ideology.

As the Monsoon Session approaches, all eyes are on the seven names doing the rounds. Whether Tumane’s claims materialise or remain political posturing will soon become clear. For now, the speculation itself has added fresh heat to an already volatile political summer in the state.