Fresh Israeli drone strikes in southern Lebanon on Tuesday killed at least four people, according to Lebanese media reports, hours after US President Donald Trump publicly criticised Israel's military actions and warned that continued attacks were undermining a broader regional understanding involving Iran.

The latest strikes targeted two vehicles in southern Lebanon, the Lebanese state-run National News Agency (NNA) reported. Several others were injured in the attacks. The incident has further heightened tensions in the region amid ongoing diplomatic efforts aimed at reducing conflict across West Asia.

The strikes came shortly after Trump, speaking on the sidelines of the G7 Summit in France, expressed dissatisfaction with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's handling of the conflict in Lebanon. The US President said Israel's continued military operations were casting a "negative light" on the emerging understanding with Iran and questioned the scale of destruction caused during operations against Hezbollah.

Trump indicated that the conflict had dragged on for too long and suggested that military actions should be more targeted. His remarks marked one of the strongest public criticisms of Netanyahu's Lebanon strategy from Washington in recent months.

Despite those comments, Israel proceeded with fresh operations in southern Lebanon. Lebanese authorities have accused Israel of maintaining a sustained military campaign across the country. According to figures cited by Lebanese officials, Israeli attacks since March have resulted in thousands of deaths, although independent verification of the overall casualty figures remains difficult amid the ongoing conflict.

Regional tensions have also intensified following statements from Iran. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said any future Israeli military action in Lebanon would be viewed as a violation of the understanding reached between Tehran and Washington. He argued that any lasting peace arrangement in the region must also address Israeli military presence in territories occupied during the conflict.

The Iranian position links the broader diplomatic process with developments on the ground in Lebanon, raising concerns that continued hostilities could complicate already fragile negotiations.

Meanwhile, Netanyahu has maintained that Israeli forces will continue operations for as long as necessary to address security concerns along the northern border. Israeli officials have repeatedly argued that military measures are required to counter threats posed by Hezbollah.

Israel's Defence Minister Israel Katz had earlier stated that security arrangements in southern Lebanon would remain in place until Israeli authorities are satisfied that cross-border threats have been eliminated. Israeli leaders have also indicated that military control over certain areas may continue for an extended period.

The humanitarian situation in southern Lebanon remains a major concern. Reports from Lebanese authorities indicate that hundreds of thousands of residents have been displaced since the escalation of hostilities. Large sections of infrastructure, residential buildings and public facilities have also suffered damage.

The latest strikes are likely to increase international scrutiny of Israel's military campaign at a time when diplomatic efforts are focused on reducing tensions across the region. With Washington, Tehran and regional actors publicly exchanging warnings and demands, developments in Lebanon are increasingly becoming a central factor in the wider geopolitical landscape.

Further details regarding the victims of Tuesday's strikes and the broader diplomatic response are awaited.

US helicopter incident near Strait of Hormuz raises fresh concerns amid Iran–Israel pause; investigation launched into cause

A US Army Apache attack helicopter crashed into waters near the Strait of Hormuz on Monday morning, but both crew members were rescued and reported uninjured, US officials said, in an incident that has heightened anxieties across an already tense region.

According to a brief statement from the US military and reporting by international outlets, the rescue operation took place shortly after the helicopter went down in the busy shipping corridor. President Donald Trump, speaking to reporters in New York later in the day, confirmed the crew were “safe” and said a formal report on the cause would be released “later” as investigators examine whether the aircraft suffered a technical failure or was downed by hostile action.

What happened

Initial reports said the helicopter—identified by sources as an Apache gunship—went down in the early hours near the narrow sea lane that links the Persian Gulf to the Gulf of Oman. US Navy and Coast Guard units were involved in recovery and search operations, and local authorities assisted in securing the site, officials said. No injuries beyond the two crew members have been reported and no civilian vessels were affected.

An inquiry under military protocols has been opened to determine whether the crash resulted from mechanical malfunction, pilot error, or enemy fire. “We are treating this as an active investigation,” a US defence official told reporters on the condition of anonymity. A preliminary report, officials said, is expected in the next 24 hours.

Regional context

The incident comes against the backdrop of a fragile pause between Iran and Israel after an intense period of strikes and counter-strikes earlier this month. Washington has been closely engaged in diplomatic efforts to stabilise the situation, even as Israeli officials warned they will continue operations against Hezbollah in Lebanon and Iran signalled it could resume strikes if provoked.

President Trump told reporters he was in the “final throes” of negotiating a broader West Asia peace deal and suggested a resolution could come within days. Analysts caution, however, that single incidents—especially those in or near critical maritime choke points—can quickly complicate negotiations and raise the risk of miscalculation.

Reactions and implications

US and allied naval commanders have long warned that the Strait of Hormuz is vulnerable during periods of heightened regional tension because a sizable share of the world’s seaborne oil passes through the channel. Oil markets reacted modestly on the news, with traders citing the accident and continued threats between Tehran and Tel Aviv as upside risks to supply.

In Jerusalem, Israel’s defence minister reiterated that the Israel Defense Forces would continue operations against Hezbollah if necessary, underscoring that military activity in Lebanon remains a parallel theatre in the broader confrontation with Iran. Tehran, meanwhile, has publicly warned against renewed aggression and has previously hinted that US military assets could be considered legitimate targets in a wider conflict.

What officials are saying

White House and Pentagon spokespeople emphasized there was no evidence yet linking the helicopter’s loss to hostile fire, and pledged a full and transparent investigation. “We will determine what happened and make the findings public when available,” a Pentagon official said. Iranian and regional sources did not immediately claim responsibility for the incident.

Local eyewitnesses in nearby ports reported seeing search vessels and aircraft on patrol later in the morning, while shipping operators said movement through the Strait initially continued unhindered but with increased caution.

What’s next

Military investigators are expected to survey any wreckage recovered from the sea and to interview crew members and rescue personnel. Diplomatically, the episode is likely to feature in ongoing US consultations with regional partners as Washington seeks to keep the ceasefire and the wider talks on track.

For now, the safe rescue of the two crew members defuses the immediate human cost, but the crash has reminded strategists how quickly localized incidents can escalate in a volatile theatre. Officials say clarity on the cause will be crucial to avoid missteps that might imperil the fragile pause between Iran and Israel.

Israel launched strikes on military targets in western and central Iran early Monday, according to the Israeli military, after Iran fired a wave of missiles at northern Israel — a significant escalation that has reverberated across the region and pushed oil prices higher.

Strikes reported across Iran
The Israeli armed forces said the strikes hit military installations in western and central provinces. State media in Iran and local broadcasters reported explosions in Tehran, Tabriz and Isfahan in the early morning hours, and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) said Israel used air-launched ballistic missiles in the attacks, the IRNA news agency reported.

Iranian emergency services and the Iranian Red Crescent said they were on standby to deal with any fallout. “Rapid response teams, logistical, relief and medical facilities are standing by following this morning’s strikes,” the Red Crescent said on X. There were no immediate independent confirmations of casualty figures.

Why it happened
Initial reports indicate the Israeli strikes were retaliatory. Earlier on Monday Iran launched missiles at northern Israel — the first such barrage since the April ceasefire — citing repeated Israeli actions in Lebanon that Tehran said violated the truce. Iranian officials described the missile fire as a response to what they called ongoing Israeli aggression.

According to regional analysts and Western officials, the sequence of attacks marks one of the sharpest direct exchanges between Israel and Iran since the broader round of hostilities began in spring. “This is a rapid escalation in a conflict that has largely been proxied through militia groups until now,” a Western diplomat familiar with the situation said, speaking on condition of anonymity.

US and allies respond
The United States reported shooting down two Iranian drones over the Strait of Hormuz in the past 48 hours, citing threats to international shipping, and CENTCOM said those actions were taken to protect commercial vessels. US President Donald Trump, in a telephone interview with the Financial Times, said Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu would have “no choice” but to accept any deal the United States negotiates with Iran. “He won’t have any choice. I call the shots,” Trump said, adding the strikes would not derail US-Iran negotiations.

Regional disruptions
Several countries moved quickly to protect civil aviation and shipping. Iran closed western airspace until further notice; neighbouring Iraq closed its airspace for 72 hours and Syria for 12 hours. Saudi authorities issued alerts in parts of Riyadh province after reports of an explosion near Al Kharj, though Iranian state media denied firing on the Saudi base.

Markets reacted immediately. Brent crude rose about 3.6% within an hour of the strikes being reported, trading near $96–97 a barrel, while West Texas Intermediate climbed more than 3%.

Ground-level picture
Residents in Tehran and Isfahan reported hearing explosions early on Monday; social media carried video clips of shockwaves and emergency responders at sites around the affected cities. Local hospitals and civil defence agencies were placed on alert as authorities assessed damage.

Analysts warned the risk of miscalculation is high. “When both sides begin striking each other’s territory directly, there’s a narrower margin to prevent wider conflict,” said a regional security analyst in New Delhi. “Escalation can spread quickly through allied militias and third-party actors.”

What happens next
Diplomatic channels are expected to be active in coming hours and days. Western capitals and regional powers are likely to call for restraint while assessing whether the strikes were targeted at military infrastructure only or intended to undermine Iran’s wider capabilities.

Iran has long demanded guarantees over its right to enrich uranium and the release of frozen assets as part of talks with the US; Tehran also accused shifting US positions of stalling negotiations. How the strikes influence those talks remains unclear — President Trump said they would not alter his push to conclude a deal.

For ordinary people in the region the immediate concern is safety and disruption: flights, cross-border trade and oil shipments may face short-term interruptions, and any sustained exchange could compound an already fragile security situation.

Sources and attribution
Details in this report are based on statements from the Israeli military, Iranian state agencies including IRNA, the Iranian Red Crescent, CENTCOM briefings, and statements from US officials and media interviews. Local eyewitness accounts and market data on crude prices were also consulted.

Israel launched a fresh round of strikes across southern Lebanon on Tuesday, military and local sources said, even after a reportedly heated call in which US President Donald Trump berated Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu over the escalation. The strikes and cross-border exchanges marked a fragile and volatile phase in a region already teetering under days of widening hostilities.

Early strikes, warnings

Israeli warplanes and drones struck towns in the Nabatieh and Tyre districts in the early hours, hitting residential areas and reportedly damaging homes, Lebanese state media and local correspondents said. The Israeli army issued evacuation orders for parts of Nabatieh city, urging civilians to move north of the Zahrani River ahead of planned operations. Lebanese health officials reported casualties from multiple incidents, including a drone strike that killed a dentist and two children on the Nabatieh-Khardali road.

According to Israeli military briefings, air defences also intercepted projectiles that crossed into northern Israel overnight, while a “suspicious aerial target” later fell inside Israeli territory near the border. No Israeli injuries were reported in those incidents.

US-Israel phone clash

The escalation came despite, and in some accounts because of, an intense phone call between Trump and Netanyahu, Reuters and Axios reported. The US president was said to have angrily questioned Israeli actions, warning they risked undermining sensitive diplomacy with Iran. Axios quoted Trump as asking, in expletive-laced language, “What the f are you doing?”

Israeli officials declined to comment directly on the tone of the call but Prime Minister Netanyahu told supporters late Monday that operations in southern Lebanon would continue “as planned.” The New York Times and Israeli media said that while Washington had sought to limit a wider assault—particularly on Beirut’s southern suburbs—Netanyahu maintained Israel would press on against Hezbollah positions in the south.

Diplomatic ripple effects

The strikes have already produced diplomatic fallout. Iran’s negotiating team briefly paused indirect talks with the US, Tehran’s semi-official Mehr News reported, warning that continued Israeli attacks in Lebanon could scuttle any memorandum of understanding in the works. Iran’s parliamentary speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf told Lebanon’s Nabih Berri that Tehran would halt dialogue with Washington if the “crimes” in Lebanon persisted.

The situation has prompted regional measures: Bahrain barred citizens from travel to Iran and Iraq citing security concerns, while France publicly criticised Israel’s deep operations inside Lebanese territory. On the ground in Lebanon, Finance Minister Yassine Jaber warned that economic losses from the conflict could top $25 billion if hostilities continue.

Hezbollah, US proposal

Meanwhile, diplomatic channels have shown glimmers of possible de-escalation. Sources earlier said Hezbollah had agreed in principle to a US-backed ceasefire proposal that would pause airstrikes on southern Beirut suburbs in exchange for an end to rocket and drone attacks into Israel. Officials in Beirut told correspondents that Lebanese authorities were reviewing the offer and awaiting clearer guarantees from both sides.

Still, uncertainty remains. Israeli leaders have repeatedly said they reserve the right to strike “terror targets” in Beirut if Hezbollah attacks on Israeli civilians continue, comments that have raised alarm among Lebanese officials and neighbours.

Human cost, displacement

On the ground in southern Lebanon, residents described disrupted nights and mounting fear. Hospitals in Tyre and Nabatieh reported treating wounded from air raids and artillery strikes; local aid groups have warned that displacement is increasing as families flee to the north or seek shelter in larger towns. Humanitarian agencies are pressing for safe corridors but say the security environment and damaged infrastructure complicate relief efforts.

What happens next

Diplomats in Washington and regional capitals said negotiations and shuttling will intensify in the coming days, aiming to lock in any stopgap understandings that can prevent a wider confrontation. Officials close to the US administration told reporters they expect talks with Tehran could resume if attacks on Lebanon are contained, but Iranian sources cautioned that final texts were still under review.

For now, the conflict’s trajectory hinges on two immediate variables: whether Israel follows through on broader plans against Hezbollah strongholds beyond the south, and whether Tehran will link any US-Iran diplomatic progress to a halt in Israeli operations. As both sides weigh military steps against political calculations, civilians across northern Israel and southern Lebanon remain exposed to renewed strikes and displacement.

US plan aims to halt Hezbollah attacks in exchange for no further Israeli escalation; Iran says talks with Washington are ongoing but outcome uncertain

The United States has submitted a diplomatic proposal aiming to curb the widening hostilities in Lebanon, a senior US official told Al Jazeera on Sunday, even as Tehran said its communications with Washington continue and the final outcome remains uncertain.

Under the US “roadmap”, outlined to Lebanese and Israeli leaders over the past 48 hours, Hezbollah would suspend attacks on Israeli territory in return for Israel refraining from further military escalation in Beirut and other Lebanese population centres, the official said. Secretary of State Marco Rubio held separate calls with Lebanese President Joseph Aoun and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to press the idea, the official added.

Lebanese politics complicate push

President Aoun sought to advance the US proposal, according to the official, but Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri — a key Shia political figure closely aligned with Hezbollah — described his response as “evasive and disappointing”. Berri, speaking to Lebanon’s National News Agency, said he could guarantee Hezbollah’s commitment to a ceasefire, but questioned who would force Israel to stop its strikes and incursions.

Lebanon’s Health Ministry reported that the death toll from Israel’s military campaign since March 2 has reached 3,412, with 10,269 wounded as of May 31. The ministry’s figures cover casualties recorded between March 2 and May 31 and underscore the heavy civilian impact of the expanding campaign, particularly in southern Lebanon and areas around Tyre and Nabatieh.

Regional and international reactions

The proposed US initiative comes amid growing international concern over Israeli offensives in Lebanon. France, Britain and Germany have publicly called for an end to escalation. UK Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper urged Israel to stop operations that, she said, have “eroded space for diplomacy.” France requested an emergency UN Security Council meeting.

Qatar, Egypt and the UAE joined the chorus, condemning the expansion of hostilities and warning that further military action risks wider regional destabilisation. The proposal is intended, the US official said, to “create a conducive environment” for step‑by‑step de‑escalation and a comprehensive cessation of hostilities.

Ground developments and recent strikes

The ceasefire push arrives as Israeli forces have renewed a series of strikes and ground movements in southern Lebanon. Lebanon’s official National News Agency and the health ministry reported multiple air strikes at dawn on Sunday in towns including Deir Zahrani, Dbeibine and Burj Qalawiya, with some incidents causing civilian casualties.

Hezbollah has continued to retaliate with drones, rocket salvoes and targeted strikes against Israeli positions; Israeli military statements claim more than 900 Hezbollah fighters have been killed since the start of the conflict in early March. Both sides reported missile launches and interceptions overnight, and sirens sounded in northern Israel after reports of incoming projectiles.

Iran‑US communications continue

In Tehran, Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi told state media that dialogue and message exchanges between Iran and the United States are ongoing but cautioned it is too soon to judge any final outcome. “Everything that is being said now is speculation,” he said, according to IRNA, asking that reports be treated cautiously until talks reach a clear conclusion.

The Iranian government meanwhile has been active on multiple fronts: restoring limited gas production at South Pars platforms after March damage, and asserting a legal rationale for collecting environmental fees from ships transiting the Strait of Hormuz, officials said.

What comes next

Diplomats say the US plan faces steep political obstacles inside Lebanon, where key figures linked to Hezbollah demand reciprocal Israeli restraint as an initial step. Washington will reportedly continue shuttle diplomacy, and international pressure is likely to intensify at the UN and through regional interlocutors.

On the ground, the immediate prospects for a halt in violence appear fragile. Military movements, air strikes and cross‑border incidents persisted on Monday morning, with civilian casualties mounting. Observers in Beirut said any agreement will require robust verification mechanisms and guarantees acceptable to both Lebanese political factions and Israeli security planners.

For now, officials in Washington, Beirut and Tehran emphasise talks rather than imminent resolution. “Negotiations are ongoing,” Araghchi said — a caveat that may mean diplomatic gains are possible but far from certain.

US President Donald Trump has struck a patient posture on negotiations with Iran, saying he is in “no hurry” to finalise any agreement, even as Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps claimed it shot down a US military drone that allegedly entered Iranian territory.

The downing claim, reported by Iran’s Tasnim news agency on Sunday, adds a fresh layer of tension to already fragile diplomacy.

Drone Downing Claim

The IRGC said its air defence unit identified and targeted a US MQ-1 drone that intruded into Iranian airspace. According to the statement, the drone was shot down using advanced missile systems. Iran alleged the unmanned aircraft belonged to the US military and was attempting a “hostile operation”.

There was no immediate confirmation or response from US Central Command on the claim.

Trump’s Patient Stance

Speaking to Fox News, Trump made it clear he is not rushing toward a deal. He said the US would either make a “great deal” or “just go back and finish it off military”. He expressed preference for a negotiated outcome, saying it would “save a lot of lives” and allow the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz “immediately upon signing”.

“It takes a long time. I’m in no hurry,” Trump said. “If you’re gonna be in a hurry, you’re not gonna make a good deal. And slowly but surely, we’re getting, I think, what we want.”

He described Iran’s leadership as “very tough negotiators”.

Three Sticking Points

Diplomatic efforts continue through Pakistani mediators and other regional actors. But Iranian officials say several major hurdles remain before any agreement can be finalised.

First, Tehran wants its frozen assets returned immediately upon any deal announcement. Washington prefers a gradual, performance-based process.

Second, Iran has reframed its demand for financial compensation into what it calls a “construction fund” worth approximately $300 billion. The US has not committed to this.

Third, Iran is seeking sanctions relief, particularly on its oil and petrochemicals sector, while negotiations are still underway. Again, Washington has given no indication of agreement on this front.

Iran maintains the deal is not yet finalised, contrary to what the US has been signalling publicly.

Revised Conditions

According to a New York Times report, Trump has sent a revised proposal to Tehran with further tightened conditions. The report did not specify the changes, but sources indicate stricter terms related to Iran’s nuclear programme, enriched uranium stockpiles, and the strategic Strait of Hormuz.

Trump separately claimed that Iran has agreed not to make or buy nuclear weapons. “First, Iran agreed not to make nuclear weapons. Then I asked them if they would buy them, and they also agreed,” he said in an interview.

Regional Tensions Escalate

Meanwhile, violence has intensified along Israel’s northern front. Israeli forces have launched what they described as a “large-scale operation” in southern Lebanon’s Shebaa Heights and Wadi al-Salouqi area. Several people have been killed in Israeli air attacks on the town of Deir ez-Zahrani, according to Lebanon’s National News Agency.

An Israeli soldier was also killed in battle in southern Lebanon on Saturday, the Israeli military confirmed.

As diplomacy drags on in the Iran case, the wider region remains on edge. Trump’s patient approach may buy time for negotiations, but with military posturing on both sides and a drone downing claim now on the table, the margin for error appears slim.

Strait of Hormuz Tensions

US President Donald Trump has triggered fresh geopolitical tensions after warning Oman against any move that could affect access through the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world’s most critical oil shipping routes.

Speaking on Wednesday, Trump said the United States would respond forcefully if Oman aligned with Iran in efforts to control or restrict movement through the strategic waterway. The remarks quickly drew international attention, especially across West Asia, where concerns over regional security and energy trade remain high.

The Strait of Hormuz handles a significant portion of global crude oil shipments, and any threat to navigation there typically raises fears of economic disruption and military escalation.

Sharp Remarks From Trump

According to reports circulating in Washington, Trump warned that if Oman joined Iran in exerting pressure over the strait, the US would “blow it up”. While the statement has not yet been accompanied by any formal military announcement, it has added to concerns over the increasingly aggressive rhetoric emerging from the White House.

Oman has traditionally maintained balanced ties with both the United States and Iran and has often acted as a regional mediator during periods of tension. Diplomats familiar with Gulf affairs said Muscat has generally avoided direct confrontation and preferred quiet negotiations over public escalation.

Trump’s latest comments have nevertheless pushed Oman into the centre of a wider debate about Washington’s military posture under his current presidency.

Claims Around Military Action

Political observers and several international commentators have pointed out that Trump has repeatedly used strong military language against both allies and adversaries. Reports and public statements over recent months have included warnings directed at multiple countries, alongside threats related to territorial control and strategic waterways.

The US has also continued military operations in conflict zones including Yemen, Iraq and Syria, largely targeting armed groups linked to Iran or extremist organisations operating in the region.

In Yemen, American strikes intensified after attacks on commercial shipping routes in the Red Sea. In Syria and Iraq, US operations have focused on militia networks accused of targeting American military facilities.

However, some claims circulating online regarding direct US attacks or regime-change operations in countries such as Venezuela remain disputed or lack official confirmation.

Campaign Promises Revisited

Before returning to office, Trump frequently projected himself during the 2024 campaign as a leader who could avoid large-scale wars while using negotiation and economic pressure to secure American interests.

At rallies across the United States, he criticised previous administrations for prolonged military engagements in Iraq and Afghanistan and argued that global conflicts would have been handled differently under his leadership.

Trump also repeatedly claimed the Russia-Ukraine conflict would not have erupted had he remained president after 2020.

Critics, however, argue that his second term has seen rising military tensions rather than diplomatic stabilisation. Foreign policy analysts say the administration’s language toward Iran and other rivals has become more confrontational in recent months.

‘Madman Theory’ Discussion

Several experts have compared Trump’s approach to what political scientists describe as the “Madman Theory” — a strategy associated with former US President Richard Nixon during the Cold War era.

The theory involves projecting unpredictability so that rivals fear extreme retaliation and become more willing to compromise.

Trump has often used abrupt warnings, tariff threats and public pressure tactics during negotiations with both allies and opponents. Analysts say this style has produced mixed outcomes internationally.

According to recent assessments by Western policy experts, NATO allies have responded by increasing defence preparedness, while countries such as Iran and Russia have largely maintained their positions despite repeated warnings from Washington.

Concerns Over Iran

The renewed pressure campaign against Iran has also revived debate around Tehran’s nuclear ambitions. Some foreign policy specialists believe sustained military threats could push Iran toward accelerating its nuclear programme instead of restraining it.

Former diplomats and strategic analysts have argued that examples from Iraq and Libya continue to shape Iran’s security calculations. They note that governments without nuclear deterrence faced collapse, while nuclear-armed states like North Korea have remained insulated from direct foreign intervention.

For now, no official response has been issued by Oman regarding Trump’s latest remarks. But the statement has once again highlighted how rapidly tensions surrounding the Gulf region and the Strait of Hormuz can escalate, particularly during periods of heightened confrontation between Washington and Tehran.

Tehran views Strait of Hormuz as its biggest strategic weapon; Israeli attacks kill 31 in southern Lebanon as ground offensive deepens

Iran is bracing for a potential new war with the United States, with senior officials describing the Strait of Hormuz as Tehran's most formidable strategic asset. According to an Al Jazeera report published Wednesday, Iranian authorities have "zero trust" in Washington, prompting a three-pronged approach focusing on military readiness, domestic support, and diplomatic manoeuvring.

The Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) remains on high alert. While officials maintain that dialogue channels technically remain open, the military posture suggests otherwise.

Strait of Hormuz leverage

Iran considers the strategic waterway its greatest bargaining chip. A significant portion of global oil shipments transits through the strait, giving Tehran substantial leverage over the United States and its allies. Any disruption would send shockwaves through international energy markets, officials familiar with the strategy said.

Israeli strikes pound southern Lebanon

Meanwhile, Israel intensified its military campaign across the northern border, with strikes in southern Lebanon killing 31 people and injuring 40 others. The Israeli military issued dozens of forced displacement orders for towns and villages in Lebanon's south and east, triggering panic among residents.

Ground forces pushed deeper into Lebanese territory as families fled northward. The Israeli army warned residents of approximately 50 towns and villages to evacuate, including Nabatiyeh, a major southern town.

Trump criticises US media

US President Donald Trump lashed out at major American news outlets over their coverage of the Iran conflict. Speaking to reporters, Trump claimed that even a complete American military victory would be portrayed by the media as an Iranian win. The remarks drew mixed reactions from political observers.

Four major developments in 24 hours

The past day saw several significant escalations. Iran claimed its forces targeted US MQ-9B and RQ-4 drones and fired on an F-35 fighter jet that allegedly entered Iranian airspace. The Pentagon has not issued an official response.

Internet services were partially restored in Iran after 88 days. NetBlocks described this as the longest national internet blackout in modern history, severely affecting businesses and digital services across the country.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu convened a security meeting with defence officials, focusing on the northern border and Lebanon operations, while intensifying attacks on Hezbollah targets. The US also attacked Iranian mine-laying boats near the Strait of Hormuz and missile bases in Bandar Abbas. Centcom described the operation as an act of self-defence.

Diplomatic channel remains alive

Despite the escalating tensions, US and Iranian officials continue talks through mediators. People in Tehran appear hopeful about a potential understanding—the Iranian currency has appreciated more than five per cent this week, reflecting cautious optimism.

Large numbers of US military aircraft remain stationed at Israeli airports, including Ben Gurion and Ramon, where dozens of fighter jets and refuelling planes have reportedly affected normal flight operations.

Trump Says Iran Talks in 'Final Stages' as Tehran Defines Hormuz Boundaries, Mandates Vessel Permits

US President Donald Trump has said negotiations with Iran are in their "final stages", even as Tehran moved to assert tighter control over the strategic Strait of Hormuz by defining its supervisory boundaries and mandating permits for all vessels passing through the waterway.

Speaking to reporters on Wednesday, Trump said he was willing to give diplomacy "one shot" but warned that Washington could take "nasty" action if talks fail. "Ideally I'd like to see few people killed, as opposed to a lot," he said, adding that the situation was "right on the borderline."

Warning from Washington

The US President's comments come weeks after a ceasefire paused the US-Iran conflict. White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller has delivered a blunt ultimatum to Tehran's leadership, though Trump suggested Washington could wait a few days to "get the right answers" from Iranian officials.

Trump also claimed that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu "will do whatever I want him to do," signalling tight US control over its ally's posture in the ongoing tensions.

Tehran defines Hormuz boundaries

In a move that could escalate maritime tensions, Iran's newly-launched Persian Gulf Strait Authority (PGSA) has formally defined the management supervision area of the Strait of Hormuz. According to a post on X, the supervision area stretches from the line connecting Kuh Mobarak in Iran and the south of Fujairah in the UAE in the east, to the line connecting the end of Qeshm Island in Iran and Umm al-Qaiwain in the UAE in the west.

The management body has made it clear that "frequencies in this range for passing through the Strait of Hormuz require coordination with the Persian Gulf Waterway Management and a permit from this entity."

Economic shockwaves widen

The blockade of the Strait of Hormuz has already disrupted more than 20 per cent of global fuel supplies, and the economic fallout is being felt far beyond West Asia. In Kenya, deadly protests over soaring fuel prices have claimed at least four lives so far, with demonstrators taking to the streets across the East African nation as petrol and diesel costs have surged.

Sri Lanka's tea industry is also under mounting pressure. Tea workers in the central hill region say rising living costs are making survival increasingly difficult. "We don't know whether we can cope. If this war continues, many people will face hardship," tea estate worker Jacintha Malar told Reuters from Hatton.

Saudi Arabia turns to fuel oil

Saudi Arabia is expected to rely more heavily on fuel oil to meet soaring summer electricity demand after disruptions linked to the Iran conflict reduced natural gas supplies. The kingdom has reportedly increased imports of fuel oil for power generation as extreme summer heat pushes up air-conditioning use. Saudi Aramco boosted fuel oil imports to around 1.7 million tonnes in April, an 86 per cent increase compared with the same period last year, according to analysts cited by Reuters.

Military posturing in Tehran

As threats of renewed conflict persist, Iran has intensified public displays of military strength in the capital. Members of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps are now frequently seen training civilians to use Kalashnikov-style assault rifles, while military parades featuring armoured vehicles have become increasingly common. A ballistic missile similar to those used in recent attacks on Israel was showcased during a mass wedding ceremony in Tehran.

Iran has also claimed it possesses advanced domestically developed weapons that have not yet been combat-tested. Meanwhile, officials confirmed that Tehran is "reviewing" the US response to its latest proposal, with Pakistan acting as mediator for message exchanges between the two sides.

Trump says Iran conflict will end “very quickly”; Senate moves to curb war powers

President reiterates goal to block Iran’s nuclear capability as Senate advances resolution limiting military action

President Donald Trump said on Tuesday the United States will bring the conflict with Iran to a swift close, while the Republican-led Senate took the rare step of advancing a War Powers Resolution designed to prevent prolonged military operations without explicit congressional approval.

Speaking at a White House event attended by lawmakers and aides in the late morning, Trump portrayed Tehran as anxious for a deal and said US forces would stop Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon. “They want to make a deal so badly; they’re tired of this,” he said, adding that US pressure would continue until objectives were met. “We’ve done a hell of a good job… we’re going to be finished with that very quickly,” he said.

Senate moves

In Congress, senators voted to advance a measure that would curtail the president’s ability to conduct sustained military action against Iran without congressional authorisation. The procedural vote marked an unusual assertion of legislative oversight at a time of heightened tensions between Washington and Tehran.

According to Capitol Hill aides, the resolution could still face amendments and is likely to be the subject of tough partisan debate as supporters frame it as a defence of constitutional checks and balances, while opponents argue it could constrain rapid response options for commanders in the field.

Iran’s response

In Tehran, Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi warned that any renewed conflict would “feature many more surprises,” posting on X (formerly Twitter) that Iran was prepared for escalation. Araghchi cited reporting he said showed dozens of US aircraft damaged or lost since strikes began in February and claimed Iranian forces were the first to down an F-35 — an assertion that has not been independently verified by third-party military analysts.

“Months after initiation of war on Iran, US Congress acknowledges loss of dozens of aircraft worth billions,” he wrote, invoking a Congressional Research Service document. Iranian state media amplified the remarks, underscoring Tehran’s effort to project resilience amid growing international concern.

Regional flare-ups

The broader region saw several security flashpoints overnight. Israeli aircraft struck towns in southern Lebanon, local media reported, while Israel said it intercepted a Gaza-bound flotilla and transferred 430 activists to Israeli vessels after an interception at sea. The US also announced a fresh round of sanctions targeting Iranian-linked currency exchange houses, front companies and a fleet of vessels accused of enabling Tehran to skirt restrictions and fund regional activities.

South Korea, meanwhile, said it held “serious discussions” after a South Korean-operated ship, the HMM Namu, was attacked in the Strait of Hormuz on May 4. Seoul is analysing recovered debris to determine what struck the vessel and who was responsible.

White House posture

The Trump administration has combined diplomacy with military readiness. Vice-President JD Vance said Washington remains “locked and loaded” should negotiations fail to produce a nuclear deal, while administration officials said sanctions and targeted strikes would remain tools to deter Tehran.

State Department spokesperson Tommy Pigott described the latest sanctions as part of an “economic fury campaign.” US officials have also been engaged in shuttle diplomacy with regional partners and consultations at NATO and with allies to prevent the conflict from widening.

What happens next

The Senate will continue to consider the War Powers Resolution, and a vote on final passage could come in the coming days. Diplomacy remains active in parallel: negotiators in Europe and the Gulf are reported to be pressing for renewed talks aimed at de-escalation and a framework to limit Iran’s nuclear activities.

On the ground, militaries in the Gulf and eastern Mediterranean are on heightened alert, diplomats said, while commercial shipping firms rerouted vessels after recent incidents in the Strait of Hormuz. Analysts warn that even if Washington and Tehran step back from direct confrontation, proxy incidents and third-party strikes could sustain instability.

For now, Washington’s mix of public warnings, sanctions and a pending congressional rebuke underscores a delicate moment: officials say they seek a quick, decisive outcome, but lawmakers and regional actors are preparing for a longer, risk-filled period if diplomacy falters.

Tensions in the Middle East have escalated sharply after reports emerged that Iran’s Parliament is preparing a controversial bill that could offer a reward of more than ₹500 crore to anyone involved in the assassination of US President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

According to reports, Iran’s National Security Commission is drafting legislation titled “Retaliatory Action of the Islamic Republic’s Military and Security Forces.” The proposed bill reportedly comes amid heightened tensions following the deaths of several Iranian military and political figures, including close associates of Iran’s top leadership. Iranian lawmaker Mahmoud Nabavian reportedly stated that the Parliament may soon vote on the proposal, which would reward individuals responsible for targeting Trump and Netanyahu. The remarks have intensified global concerns over the rapidly deteriorating situation in the region.

The development comes at a time when President Trump claimed he had postponed a military strike on Iran that was reportedly expected on Tuesday. Trump said leaders from Gulf nations including Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates requested additional time to allow diplomatic talks and de-escalation efforts to continue. Trump shared the update through a post on his social media platform Truth Social, saying that discussions were still ongoing and that there remained a narrow window for negotiations. However, he also warned Iran to reach an agreement quickly or face severe consequences.

In one of the strongest statements issued so far, Trump reportedly told Iran that “time is running out” and warned that if a deal is not reached soon, “nothing will be left.” The comments have further fueled speculation about possible US-Israel coordinated military action against Iran. Reports also suggest that dozens of cargo aircraft carrying weapons and military equipment have arrived in Israel from American military bases in Germany. Sources claim that Trump and Netanyahu have held discussions regarding possible future military operations targeting Iranian positions.

Meanwhile, tensions in the strategically crucial Strait of Hormuz have continued to rise. Reports indicate that nearly 1,500 commercial ships are currently stranded in the region amid fears of maritime blockades, missile attacks and drone strikes. More than 20,000 sailors are believed to be onboard these vessels, raising concerns over global oil supply disruptions and international shipping security. The regional situation worsened further after Saudi Arabia claimed its air defence systems intercepted and destroyed three drones that allegedly entered its airspace from the direction of Iraq. Both Kuwait and Qatar condemned the incident and described it as a threat to regional stability and national sovereignty.

Another development drawing international attention is the emergence of videos from Iran allegedly showing young girls receiving AK-47 rifle training. The footage reportedly shows participants learning to assemble and disassemble assault rifles amid growing fears of a wider regional conflict involving the United States and Israel. Security analysts believe the latest rhetoric and military movements indicate one of the most dangerous phases in Middle East geopolitics in recent years. Experts warn that any direct confrontation involving Iran, the United States and Israel could have serious consequences for global oil markets, maritime trade and regional stability.

Diplomatic channels remain active, but international observers say the situation remains highly volatile. Gulf nations are reportedly pushing for urgent negotiations to avoid a broader war that could destabilize the entire region.

Amid rapidly escalating tensions in the Middle East, reports have emerged claiming that Pakistan has deployed nearly 8,000 troops along with fighter jets and advanced air defence systems to Saudi Arabia under a long-standing defence cooperation agreement. The development comes at a time when the region is witnessing heightened military activity due to the ongoing confrontation involving Iran, Israel and the United States.

According to international media reports, Pakistan has reportedly sent around 16 JF-17 Thunder fighter aircraft, drone squadrons and Chinese-origin HQ-9 air defence missile systems to Saudi Arabia. The report further stated that Pakistani military personnel are currently operating these systems, while the Saudi government is bearing the deployment expenses.

Though neither Pakistan nor Saudi Arabia has officially confirmed the deployment, the reports have triggered fresh debate over Islamabad’s strategic role in the evolving Gulf crisis. The alleged deployment is being viewed as a significant move considering the fragile geopolitical situation in the Middle East. Iran’s growing tensions with the United States and Israel have already pushed Gulf nations to strengthen their military preparedness. Saudi Arabia, which has historically maintained close defence ties with Pakistan, is reportedly taking precautionary steps amid fears of wider regional instability.

Military analysts believe the presence of Pakistani troops and fighter jets could be aimed at protecting key Saudi installations, including oil facilities, strategic ports and airbases. Saudi Arabia has previously relied on Pakistani military support during periods of regional uncertainty. Meanwhile, tensions surrounding the Strait of Hormuz continue to intensify. Iran has reportedly warned the United States against interfering in the region and demanded an end to pressure tactics related to maritime routes. Iranian officials also issued strong statements threatening retaliation if military pressure increases further.

The Strait of Hormuz remains one of the world’s most critical shipping routes, handling a significant portion of global oil and gas transportation. Any disruption in the area could severely impact international energy markets, including India’s fuel imports. In another major development, reports claimed that a drone attack took place near the Barakah nuclear power facility in the United Arab Emirates. A fire reportedly broke out outside the plant premises after the incident. Though no official confirmation has been issued regarding responsibility for the attack, preliminary suspicions reportedly point toward Iran-backed elements.

The incident has added to fears that Gulf countries could increasingly become targets as regional hostilities grow sharper. At the same time, commercial shipping through the Strait of Hormuz remains under pressure. Despite security concerns, multiple LPG tankers have continued to reach India through the route. Reports suggest that at least 15 LPG ships have arrived safely in Indian ports since the recent escalation began.

One of the vessels, identified as “Simi,” reportedly carried nearly 20,000 tonnes of LPG to Kandla Port. Indian authorities are closely monitoring developments in the Gulf region due to concerns that any prolonged disruption could lead to sharp increases in fuel prices and supply chain instability. India has also expressed concern at the international level regarding the security of maritime trade routes. India’s Permanent Representative to the United Nations reportedly stated that halting commercial shipping in the Strait of Hormuz would be unacceptable and could create serious consequences for global trade and energy security.

The United States has also continued diplomatic and military consultations regarding Iran. Former US President Donald Trump reportedly proposed a new arrangement under which Iran would suspend its nuclear programme for 20 years instead of permanently dismantling it. Trump also warned Tehran that time for negotiations was running out. His remarks came amid reports that Gulf countries, including Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the UAE, requested Washington to delay any direct military action against Iran in order to give diplomacy another chance.

Meanwhile, Israel’s military operations in southern Lebanon have reportedly continued despite ongoing ceasefire discussions. Reports indicate that dozens of strikes were carried out in border areas, forcing thousands of civilians to flee their homes. The continued violence has raised fears that the conflict may spread further across the region. Security experts believe Pakistan’s reported military deployment reflects the broader anxiety among Gulf allies over the possibility of a wider regional war. Pakistan and Saudi Arabia have maintained deep military cooperation for decades, including training programmes, intelligence sharing and joint security arrangements.

In the past, Pakistan has also deployed troops in Saudi Arabia for defensive purposes, particularly during periods of heightened tension involving Iran or regional militant threats. However, Islamabad has traditionally tried to maintain balanced relations with both Saudi Arabia and Iran due to geographical, political and sectarian considerations. The latest developments are expected to have global economic and diplomatic implications, especially for countries dependent on Middle East energy supplies. Rising tensions have already affected crude oil prices in international markets, creating concerns about inflation and fuel costs worldwide.

As diplomatic efforts continue alongside military preparations, the situation in the Gulf remains highly volatile. Global powers are closely watching the developments, while countries across Asia and Europe remain concerned about the possibility of disruptions in energy supplies and international trade routes. With military deployments increasing and diplomatic tensions deepening, the coming days are likely to play a crucial role in determining whether the region moves toward de-escalation or a broader conflict.