Bangladesh Prime Minister Tarique Rahman arrived in China on Monday, marking the second leg of his first overseas tour since taking office in February. The visit is being closely watched across South Asia as Dhaka seeks to deepen economic and strategic engagement with Beijing while reshaping its foreign policy priorities.

Rahman landed in the Chinese city of Dalian after concluding a two-day official visit to Malaysia, where he held bilateral talks with Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim and witnessed the signing of several cooperation agreements. Upon arrival in China, he was welcomed by senior Chinese and Bangladeshi officials, including Liaoning Province Vice Governor Bai Ying, Chinese Ambassador to Bangladesh Yao Wen, and Bangladesh Ambassador to China Md. Nazmul Islam.

The Bangladeshi Prime Minister is scheduled to participate in the 17th Annual Meeting of the New Champions, commonly known as the Summer Davos Forum, organized by the World Economic Forum. During the event, Rahman is expected to address a session on climate leadership and hold meetings with global business executives, policymakers, and international organizations.

According to Bangladeshi officials, the primary focus of the visit will be strengthening bilateral cooperation in trade, investment, infrastructure, and development financing. Foreign Secretary Asad Alam Siam has indicated that the two countries are working toward signing between 15 and 17 bilateral agreements and memorandums of understanding during the visit.

Among the key issues expected to feature in discussions is the long-pending Teesta River project, which has significant implications for regional development and water management. Rahman is also scheduled to travel to Beijing, where he will meet Chinese President Xi Jinping on June 26. The meeting is expected to review the full spectrum of Bangladesh-China relations and explore opportunities for deeper strategic cooperation.

The visit comes at a time when China remains one of Bangladesh's largest trading partners and development financiers. Recently, Dhaka approved a 41.89 billion taka infrastructure project linked to the Chinese Economic and Industrial Zone in Chittagong, supported through concessional Chinese financing. Officials view such projects as critical to boosting industrial growth, exports, and employment opportunities.

Analysts say the visit carries significance beyond economics. Bangladesh and China are celebrating what both sides describe as the "Golden 50 Years" of diplomatic relations, and the current engagement is being presented as the beginning of a new phase in bilateral cooperation.

The diplomatic outreach has also attracted attention because Rahman chose Malaysia and China for his first official foreign visits after becoming Prime Minister, despite receiving an early invitation from Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Regional observers believe the move reflects Dhaka's efforts to diversify partnerships while maintaining a balanced approach toward major powers.

Officials from both countries expect the visit to produce concrete outcomes in investment, infrastructure, climate cooperation, and trade. The agreements expected during the trip could shape the trajectory of Bangladesh-China relations for years to come and provide fresh momentum to one of South Asia's most important bilateral partnerships.

A renewed diplomatic dispute between Iran and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) came to the forefront during the 16th Meeting of Heads of Security Agencies and National Security Advisers of BRICS countries in New Delhi. Iranian officials accused the UAE of facilitating US military operations against Iran, reviving tensions that had previously emerged during a BRICS foreign ministers' gathering earlier this year.

The allegations were made by Dr. Ghadir Nezamipour, Deputy Secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, during the high-level security meeting. According to statements later shared by the Iranian Embassy in India, Nezamipour rejected accusations made by the UAE delegation and instead blamed the United States and Israel for escalating regional instability.

The remarks come despite recent efforts to ease tensions in West Asia following a ceasefire agreement. Analysts view the exchange as evidence that underlying disputes between Tehran and Abu Dhabi remain unresolved and continue to influence diplomatic interactions in international forums.

According to Iranian officials, the Strait of Hormuz crisis and recent military confrontations were triggered by actions undertaken by the United States and Israel. Nezamipour claimed that some attacks targeting Iran had been launched from facilities located within the UAE, a charge that Abu Dhabi has consistently denied.

Allegations Over Military Facilities

Addressing the gathering, the Iranian official alleged that UAE territory had been used as a platform for operations targeting Iranian civilian infrastructure. He claimed that schools, hospitals and other non-military facilities were among the locations affected by the attacks.

Iran also criticized what it described as the UAE’s failure to condemn military actions against Iran. Nezamipour urged the Emirati leadership to focus on regional stability and cooperation rather than what he termed “adventurism” and “propaganda.”

To reinforce Iran’s position, the delegation reportedly displayed photographs of students from Minab who, according to Tehran, were killed during the initial phase of the conflict.

Dispute Continues

The latest exchange follows a similar confrontation during a BRICS foreign ministers’ meeting held in New Delhi in May. At that event, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi accused the UAE of being directly involved in military activities against Iran and questioned whether close security ties with the United States and Israel could guarantee regional stability.

Those remarks intensified diplomatic friction between the two countries, particularly after reports surfaced alleging Emirati involvement in operations targeting Iranian interests.

The UAE has repeatedly rejected accusations that it played any role in attacks against Iran. Emirati officials have maintained that their country supports regional dialogue and de-escalation efforts.

Officials familiar with regional developments say the dispute reflects broader geopolitical rivalries in West Asia, where security concerns, maritime routes and strategic alliances continue to shape diplomatic relations.

The latest developments at the BRICS security meeting highlight how regional conflicts are increasingly influencing discussions within multilateral organizations. While BRICS members have often emphasized cooperation and dialogue, disagreements among participating countries continue to emerge on issues related to security and foreign policy.

Observers believe that unless direct diplomatic engagement between Tehran and Abu Dhabi resumes, such confrontations may continue to surface at international forums. For now, the accusations exchanged in New Delhi underscore the persistent mistrust between the two regional powers and the challenges facing efforts to achieve long-term stability in West Asia.

Fresh Israeli drone strikes in southern Lebanon on Tuesday killed at least four people, according to Lebanese media reports, hours after US President Donald Trump publicly criticised Israel's military actions and warned that continued attacks were undermining a broader regional understanding involving Iran.

The latest strikes targeted two vehicles in southern Lebanon, the Lebanese state-run National News Agency (NNA) reported. Several others were injured in the attacks. The incident has further heightened tensions in the region amid ongoing diplomatic efforts aimed at reducing conflict across West Asia.

The strikes came shortly after Trump, speaking on the sidelines of the G7 Summit in France, expressed dissatisfaction with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's handling of the conflict in Lebanon. The US President said Israel's continued military operations were casting a "negative light" on the emerging understanding with Iran and questioned the scale of destruction caused during operations against Hezbollah.

Trump indicated that the conflict had dragged on for too long and suggested that military actions should be more targeted. His remarks marked one of the strongest public criticisms of Netanyahu's Lebanon strategy from Washington in recent months.

Despite those comments, Israel proceeded with fresh operations in southern Lebanon. Lebanese authorities have accused Israel of maintaining a sustained military campaign across the country. According to figures cited by Lebanese officials, Israeli attacks since March have resulted in thousands of deaths, although independent verification of the overall casualty figures remains difficult amid the ongoing conflict.

Regional tensions have also intensified following statements from Iran. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said any future Israeli military action in Lebanon would be viewed as a violation of the understanding reached between Tehran and Washington. He argued that any lasting peace arrangement in the region must also address Israeli military presence in territories occupied during the conflict.

The Iranian position links the broader diplomatic process with developments on the ground in Lebanon, raising concerns that continued hostilities could complicate already fragile negotiations.

Meanwhile, Netanyahu has maintained that Israeli forces will continue operations for as long as necessary to address security concerns along the northern border. Israeli officials have repeatedly argued that military measures are required to counter threats posed by Hezbollah.

Israel's Defence Minister Israel Katz had earlier stated that security arrangements in southern Lebanon would remain in place until Israeli authorities are satisfied that cross-border threats have been eliminated. Israeli leaders have also indicated that military control over certain areas may continue for an extended period.

The humanitarian situation in southern Lebanon remains a major concern. Reports from Lebanese authorities indicate that hundreds of thousands of residents have been displaced since the escalation of hostilities. Large sections of infrastructure, residential buildings and public facilities have also suffered damage.

The latest strikes are likely to increase international scrutiny of Israel's military campaign at a time when diplomatic efforts are focused on reducing tensions across the region. With Washington, Tehran and regional actors publicly exchanging warnings and demands, developments in Lebanon are increasingly becoming a central factor in the wider geopolitical landscape.

Further details regarding the victims of Tuesday's strikes and the broader diplomatic response are awaited.

Pakistan has unexpectedly found itself at the center of a major diplomatic development after Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif publicly announced progress in negotiations between the United States and Iran before any formal declaration from Washington. The move has drawn international attention and fueled debate about whether Islamabad is emerging as a more influential diplomatic player in global affairs.

Sharif announced on June 12 that a final text of a peace agreement between the United States and Iran had been agreed upon and that Pakistan was working closely with both sides to finalize the next steps. Subsequent statements from U.S. and Iranian officials indicated that a framework agreement had indeed been reached, confirming Islamabad's involvement in the mediation effort.

The development is particularly notable because major diplomatic breakthroughs involving Washington are often announced directly by U.S. leaders. In this case, Pakistan's leadership became the first to publicly signal that negotiations had reached a critical stage.

Pakistan's Mediation Role

According to reports, Pakistan has been involved in facilitating communication between Washington and Tehran for several months. The country leveraged its diplomatic relationships across multiple regions, including the United States, Iran, Gulf states, and China, to help maintain dialogue between the two sides.

Reuters reported that Pakistan played a mediating role in helping both countries reach a preliminary agreement aimed at ending hostilities and reopening channels for broader negotiations.

The proposed framework reportedly includes a halt to military operations, reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, and a 60-day period of negotiations on Iran's nuclear program and sanctions-related issues. However, several complex matters remain unresolved and will require further discussions.

A Shift in Regional Diplomacy?

For decades, countries such as Qatar, Oman, and, at times, Turkey have often served as intermediaries in sensitive Middle East negotiations. Pakistan has generally remained on the margins of such diplomatic initiatives despite its strategic location and historical ties with key regional actors.

Analysts suggest that Islamabad's involvement in the U.S.-Iran talks could signal a broader effort to reposition itself as a facilitator of dialogue and conflict resolution. Successfully contributing to a breakthrough between two long-standing adversaries could enhance Pakistan's diplomatic credibility and strengthen its international profile.

The development also highlights Islamabad's ability to maintain working relationships with countries that often find themselves on opposite sides of geopolitical disputes.

Challenges Remain

Despite the positive momentum, experts caution against viewing the agreement as a final settlement. The framework is still subject to additional negotiations, and contentious issues such as Iran's nuclear activities, missile capabilities, sanctions relief, and regional security concerns remain unresolved.

Diplomatic observers note that mediators often receive recognition during the negotiation phase but can also face criticism if agreements later collapse. As a result, Pakistan's long-term diplomatic gains may depend on whether the current framework evolves into a durable and enforceable peace arrangement.

Symbolism Beyond the Agreement

Beyond the substance of the negotiations, the optics of the announcement have attracted attention. The fact that Pakistan's prime minister publicly disclosed the breakthrough before Washington underscored Islamabad's visible role in the process and generated discussion about changing diplomatic dynamics in the region.

For Pakistan, the moment represents an opportunity to showcase its diplomatic capabilities on a global stage. Whether it marks the beginning of a sustained role as a regional mediator or remains an isolated success will depend on future developments.

US plan aims to halt Hezbollah attacks in exchange for no further Israeli escalation; Iran says talks with Washington are ongoing but outcome uncertain

The United States has submitted a diplomatic proposal aiming to curb the widening hostilities in Lebanon, a senior US official told Al Jazeera on Sunday, even as Tehran said its communications with Washington continue and the final outcome remains uncertain.

Under the US “roadmap”, outlined to Lebanese and Israeli leaders over the past 48 hours, Hezbollah would suspend attacks on Israeli territory in return for Israel refraining from further military escalation in Beirut and other Lebanese population centres, the official said. Secretary of State Marco Rubio held separate calls with Lebanese President Joseph Aoun and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to press the idea, the official added.

Lebanese politics complicate push

President Aoun sought to advance the US proposal, according to the official, but Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri — a key Shia political figure closely aligned with Hezbollah — described his response as “evasive and disappointing”. Berri, speaking to Lebanon’s National News Agency, said he could guarantee Hezbollah’s commitment to a ceasefire, but questioned who would force Israel to stop its strikes and incursions.

Lebanon’s Health Ministry reported that the death toll from Israel’s military campaign since March 2 has reached 3,412, with 10,269 wounded as of May 31. The ministry’s figures cover casualties recorded between March 2 and May 31 and underscore the heavy civilian impact of the expanding campaign, particularly in southern Lebanon and areas around Tyre and Nabatieh.

Regional and international reactions

The proposed US initiative comes amid growing international concern over Israeli offensives in Lebanon. France, Britain and Germany have publicly called for an end to escalation. UK Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper urged Israel to stop operations that, she said, have “eroded space for diplomacy.” France requested an emergency UN Security Council meeting.

Qatar, Egypt and the UAE joined the chorus, condemning the expansion of hostilities and warning that further military action risks wider regional destabilisation. The proposal is intended, the US official said, to “create a conducive environment” for step‑by‑step de‑escalation and a comprehensive cessation of hostilities.

Ground developments and recent strikes

The ceasefire push arrives as Israeli forces have renewed a series of strikes and ground movements in southern Lebanon. Lebanon’s official National News Agency and the health ministry reported multiple air strikes at dawn on Sunday in towns including Deir Zahrani, Dbeibine and Burj Qalawiya, with some incidents causing civilian casualties.

Hezbollah has continued to retaliate with drones, rocket salvoes and targeted strikes against Israeli positions; Israeli military statements claim more than 900 Hezbollah fighters have been killed since the start of the conflict in early March. Both sides reported missile launches and interceptions overnight, and sirens sounded in northern Israel after reports of incoming projectiles.

Iran‑US communications continue

In Tehran, Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi told state media that dialogue and message exchanges between Iran and the United States are ongoing but cautioned it is too soon to judge any final outcome. “Everything that is being said now is speculation,” he said, according to IRNA, asking that reports be treated cautiously until talks reach a clear conclusion.

The Iranian government meanwhile has been active on multiple fronts: restoring limited gas production at South Pars platforms after March damage, and asserting a legal rationale for collecting environmental fees from ships transiting the Strait of Hormuz, officials said.

What comes next

Diplomats say the US plan faces steep political obstacles inside Lebanon, where key figures linked to Hezbollah demand reciprocal Israeli restraint as an initial step. Washington will reportedly continue shuttle diplomacy, and international pressure is likely to intensify at the UN and through regional interlocutors.

On the ground, the immediate prospects for a halt in violence appear fragile. Military movements, air strikes and cross‑border incidents persisted on Monday morning, with civilian casualties mounting. Observers in Beirut said any agreement will require robust verification mechanisms and guarantees acceptable to both Lebanese political factions and Israeli security planners.

For now, officials in Washington, Beirut and Tehran emphasise talks rather than imminent resolution. “Negotiations are ongoing,” Araghchi said — a caveat that may mean diplomatic gains are possible but far from certain.

US President Donald Trump has struck a patient posture on negotiations with Iran, saying he is in “no hurry” to finalise any agreement, even as Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps claimed it shot down a US military drone that allegedly entered Iranian territory.

The downing claim, reported by Iran’s Tasnim news agency on Sunday, adds a fresh layer of tension to already fragile diplomacy.

Drone Downing Claim

The IRGC said its air defence unit identified and targeted a US MQ-1 drone that intruded into Iranian airspace. According to the statement, the drone was shot down using advanced missile systems. Iran alleged the unmanned aircraft belonged to the US military and was attempting a “hostile operation”.

There was no immediate confirmation or response from US Central Command on the claim.

Trump’s Patient Stance

Speaking to Fox News, Trump made it clear he is not rushing toward a deal. He said the US would either make a “great deal” or “just go back and finish it off military”. He expressed preference for a negotiated outcome, saying it would “save a lot of lives” and allow the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz “immediately upon signing”.

“It takes a long time. I’m in no hurry,” Trump said. “If you’re gonna be in a hurry, you’re not gonna make a good deal. And slowly but surely, we’re getting, I think, what we want.”

He described Iran’s leadership as “very tough negotiators”.

Three Sticking Points

Diplomatic efforts continue through Pakistani mediators and other regional actors. But Iranian officials say several major hurdles remain before any agreement can be finalised.

First, Tehran wants its frozen assets returned immediately upon any deal announcement. Washington prefers a gradual, performance-based process.

Second, Iran has reframed its demand for financial compensation into what it calls a “construction fund” worth approximately $300 billion. The US has not committed to this.

Third, Iran is seeking sanctions relief, particularly on its oil and petrochemicals sector, while negotiations are still underway. Again, Washington has given no indication of agreement on this front.

Iran maintains the deal is not yet finalised, contrary to what the US has been signalling publicly.

Revised Conditions

According to a New York Times report, Trump has sent a revised proposal to Tehran with further tightened conditions. The report did not specify the changes, but sources indicate stricter terms related to Iran’s nuclear programme, enriched uranium stockpiles, and the strategic Strait of Hormuz.

Trump separately claimed that Iran has agreed not to make or buy nuclear weapons. “First, Iran agreed not to make nuclear weapons. Then I asked them if they would buy them, and they also agreed,” he said in an interview.

Regional Tensions Escalate

Meanwhile, violence has intensified along Israel’s northern front. Israeli forces have launched what they described as a “large-scale operation” in southern Lebanon’s Shebaa Heights and Wadi al-Salouqi area. Several people have been killed in Israeli air attacks on the town of Deir ez-Zahrani, according to Lebanon’s National News Agency.

An Israeli soldier was also killed in battle in southern Lebanon on Saturday, the Israeli military confirmed.

As diplomacy drags on in the Iran case, the wider region remains on edge. Trump’s patient approach may buy time for negotiations, but with military posturing on both sides and a drone downing claim now on the table, the margin for error appears slim.

Modi warns of “decade of crises”, urges global action during Hague address

Prime Minister Narendra Modi said the world risks sliding into poverty if COVID, war and energy shocks persist.

The Hague — Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Saturday warned that the world is entering a “decade of crises” and urged collective global action to prevent large-scale reversals in development, during an address to the Indian community in The Hague as part of his Netherlands visit.

A stark opening

Speaking before a packed community event in the early afternoon, Mr Modi said the sequence of shocks — the COVID-19 pandemic, subsequent wars and now an energy crisis — has created conditions that could push millions back into poverty if not checked. According to officials, he used the phrase “decade of disasters” to underscore the scale of the challenge.

He delivered the warning roughly three hours after landing in the Netherlands late Friday night and ahead of scheduled bilateral meetings with King Willem-Alexander, Queen Máxima and Dutch leaders. Local sources said the address lasted over 40 minutes and drew applause and chants from the diaspora.

Key policy points

Modi highlighted India's domestic achievements as part of his argument for resilience. He noted that India recorded more than 20 billion UPI transactions in a year and touted the country’s rapid startup growth, saying the nation now hosts over 200,000 startups and 125 unicorns. He also referred to advances in semiconductor manufacturing, saying work is underway on 12 plants, with two already producing chips.

“Chips will also be Made in India,” he said, according to an official readout, linking economic self-reliance to broader global stability.

Cultural outreach and community ties

The Prime Minister praised the Indian diaspora in the Netherlands as a “trusted bridge” for Indian businesses seeking entry into Europe and highlighted the Surinamese-Indian community’s role in preserving Indian culture. Around 200,000 people of Surinamese-Hindustani origin live in the Netherlands; many trace their roots to Bihar, Uttar Pradesh and Bengal and speak Sarnami, a language linked to Bhojpuri and Awadhi.

Ground reports from The Hague described a warm reception: Dutch musicians performed a rendition based on raga Durga, Indian classical instruments were played, and cultural dances such as Kathak and Garba featured in the programme. A young Dutch-Indian presented the Prime Minister with a painting of the Ram Temple, attendees said.

Historic restitution announced

In another notable development during the visit, the Dutch government returned the 11th-century Anaimangalam copper plates — known in the Netherlands as the Leiden Plates — to India. Officials said the plates, thought to date from Raja Raja Chola I’s reign, contain inscriptions about land and tax grants to a Buddhist monastery in Nagapattinam and weigh about 30 kg in total. The return was described in New Delhi as an important cultural moment in bilateral ties.

Diplomacy and next steps

Mr Modi held talks with Dutch officials upon arrival and is slated for further discussions with Prime Minister Dick Schoof, focusing on supply chains, green energy cooperation and joint international projects. In his speech he described the Netherlands as a “natural gateway” for Indian firms entering Europe and compared India–Netherlands ties to a lotus and a tulip — rooted differently but growing strong when supported.

Local authorities confirmed the Prime Minister’s schedule includes a state-level reception and meetings on trade and technology. Sources familiar with the delegation said climate-resilient infrastructure and semiconductor cooperation will be priorities in formal talks.

Impact and public relevance

Analysts say Modi’s emphasis on the risk of global impoverishment frames India’s development push as not just national but globally stabilising. “The pitch is two-fold: showcase India’s resilience and mobilise partners to prevent a global backslide,” said a policy analyst in New Delhi who declined to be named. For diaspora audiences, the visit reinforced cultural connections at a time of wider geopolitical uncertainty.

What to watch

Observers will be watching for joint statements after Modi’s meetings with Dutch leadership and for any new agreements on energy, semiconductors or cultural restitution beyond the copper plates. Back in India, officials will closely monitor whether the visit yields concrete trade and technology commitments that can be translated into on-ground projects.

Tensions High as IRGC Threatens US Assets; Russia Offers Uranium Storage Deal

Tehran warns of 'decisive response' as Strait of Hormuz conflict escalates; Britain deploys HMS Dragon to support regional security.

The situation in the Persian Gulf has reached a boiling point today, with Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) issuing a direct warning to the United States. Following fresh hostilities, the IRGC naval command declared via social media that any further attacks on Iranian merchant vessels or tankers would be met with strikes against US military bases and ships. This comes as international navies, including the British Royal Navy, scramble to bolster presence in the Strait of Hormuz to protect vital trade routes.

Britain deploys warship to region

The British government has confirmed the deployment of the HMS Dragon to West Asia, marking a significant escalation in Western efforts to secure the waterway. Sources familiar with the matter indicate that the warship will join a multinational coalition aimed at ensuring the safe passage of merchant vessels through the strait. The French military has also confirmed that its nuclear-powered aircraft carrier, the Charles de Gaulle, is currently en route to the region, highlighting the global stakes involved in the crisis.

Diplomatic efforts remain stalled

Despite ongoing shuttle diplomacy, the path to a ceasefire remains treacherous. While the US and Iran have been working through mediators to draft a 30-day cessation of hostilities, the nuclear issue continues to serve as a major roadblock. Iran has signaled it will not compromise on its uranium enrichment program, a stance that has frustrated Washington.

Putin steps into nuclear fray

Adding a new layer to the complex negotiations, Russian President Vladimir Putin announced yesterday that Moscow is prepared to transport and store Iran’s stockpile of enriched uranium. Drawing on historical precedent from 2015, the Kremlin suggested this move could bridge the gap in the stalled US-Iran talks. However, the proposal faces significant hurdles, as previous US administrations have been wary of Moscow acting as the primary custodian for Iranian nuclear material.

Crisis hits global markets

The economic ripple effects of the Hormuz crisis are becoming increasingly visible on the ground. Brent crude has climbed to $103 per barrel, reflecting market anxiety over the potential for a prolonged blockade of one of the world’s most critical oil transit arteries. Simultaneously, digital infrastructure remains a point of contention, with Iranian officials recently discussing the potential to monetize submarine fiber-optic cables that carry over $10 trillion in daily global financial transactions through the strait.

Military posturing remains intense

On the ground, the military posture is becoming more aggressive. Iranian Navy Commander Shahram Irani confirmed Sunday that light, indigenously built submarines have been deployed to the seabed in a "trigger-ready" state. Meanwhile, the US Central Command reported that it has successfully prevented over 70 vessels linked to Iranian ports from transiting the area, effectively putting a chokehold on $13 billion in oil cargo. As regional powers continue to trade threats, the prospect of a lasting peace appears slim unless a breakthrough is achieved in the coming weeks.

US Accuses China of Funding Iran Amid Hormuz Tensions

US-China tensions rise as Washington links Beijing’s Iran oil imports to terrorism financing, urges support to reopen Strait of Hormuz ahead of Trump visit

Sharp remarks from US

In a pointed escalation of rhetoric, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has accused China of effectively financing Iran by continuing to import large volumes of its oil, describing Tehran as the “largest state sponsor of terrorism”. The comments come at a sensitive moment, just days before US President Donald Trump is scheduled to visit Beijing for high-level talks with Chinese President Xi Jinping.

According to officials familiar with the matter, the remarks were made during a media interaction on Monday and reflect growing unease within Washington over Beijing’s energy ties with Tehran.

Oil trade under scrutiny

Bessent alleged that China has been purchasing nearly 90 per cent of Iran’s energy exports, a claim that underscores longstanding US concerns over sanctions enforcement. “Iran is the largest state sponsor of terrorism, and China has been buying most of their energy,” he said, suggesting that such transactions were helping sustain the Iranian regime despite Western pressure.

The US has, since 2018, attempted to restrict Iran’s oil revenues under its “maximum pressure” campaign, following its exit from the nuclear agreement known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA).

Hormuz crisis deepens

The criticism comes amid rising tensions in the Strait of Hormuz, a critical maritime corridor through which a significant portion of the world’s oil supply passes. Recent disruptions, which Washington attributes to Iranian actions, have affected shipping movement in the region.

Bessent said the US was working to reopen the waterway through an initiative dubbed “Project Freedom”, aimed at ensuring safe passage for vessels currently stranded or rerouted due to the situation.

Call for China’s support

Despite the sharp tone, the US has urged Beijing to play a constructive role. Bessent called on China to back international efforts to secure the Strait of Hormuz and to use its diplomatic leverage with Iran.

“I would urge the Chinese to join us in supporting this international operation,” he said, adding that Beijing’s influence could prove critical in persuading Tehran to ease tensions and restore normalcy in the shipping lane.

Sources indicated that Washington sees China’s involvement as key, given its deep economic engagement with Iran, particularly in the energy sector.

Diplomatic pressure on Tehran

Alongside operational support, the US is also pushing for diplomatic intervention. Officials suggested that China could help de-escalate the crisis by encouraging Iran to reopen the strait and avoid further confrontation.

Bessent reiterated that the US had made it clear Iran does not have unilateral control over the strategic passage and that international cooperation would be necessary to maintain maritime security.

UN stalemate continues

Efforts to build a global consensus, however, have faced hurdles. At the United Nations, a proposed resolution condemning Iran’s alleged blockade of the Strait of Hormuz was recently vetoed by China and Russia, leading to a diplomatic impasse.

Defending Beijing’s position, Chinese envoy Fu Cong said the draft lacked balance and did not adequately reflect the broader geopolitical context, including actions by the US and its allies.

Beijing pushes back

China has also pushed back against US sanctions targeting its firms engaged in Iranian trade. Responding to recent measures, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian criticised what he described as “illicit unilateral sanctions” and cautioned Washington against overreach.

Analysts note that China’s continued engagement with Iran reflects both strategic and economic considerations, including energy security and regional influence.

Focus on upcoming summit

The developments come ahead of the anticipated Trump–Xi meeting, which is expected to cover a wide range of issues including trade, security, and regional stability. While tensions remain high, there are indications that both sides may seek to stabilise ties through dialogue.

Bessent suggested that leader-level engagement could help ease friction, noting that mutual respect between the two countries’ leadership has previously contributed to stability.

As the situation unfolds, the US-China-Iran dynamic is likely to remain a focal point in global diplomacy, particularly with the Strait of Hormuz tensions continuing to impact energy markets and international shipping.

Israeli Airstrike Kills 9 in Southern Lebanon as Iran Mocks US Ceasefire Push

Fresh attacks in the Sidon region mark a deadly escalation, even as Washington pushes a 15-point peace proposal reportedly sent via Islamabad.

An Israeli airstrike in southern Lebanon has killed at least nine people, local media reports confirmed on Wednesday, marking a significant escalation in the border conflict. The attacks came just hours after reports emerged that the Trump administration had sent a 15-point ceasefire proposal to Tehran through Pakistani intermediaries, a move that Iranian military officials have publicly dismissed.

Nine Dead in Sidon

According to security sources, the strikes targeted multiple locations near the Sidon area. In the Adaloun region, four individuals were killed in an initial attack. A separate strike on a building in the Miyeh Miyeh refugee camp resulted in two fatalities and left four others wounded. The deadliest incident occurred in the Habbush area, where three people were killed and 18 others sustained injuries. The coordinated attacks represent one of the higher casualty counts in southern Lebanon in recent weeks.

Hezbollah Retaliates

Following the airstrikes, the Lebanese militant group Hezbollah launched approximately 30 rockets toward northern Israel. Sirens were reported across several Israeli communities near the border. While there were no immediate reports of casualties on the Israeli side, the exchange of fire signals a breakdown of the fragile understanding that had previously contained the conflict to limited engagements.

Iran Mocks Ceasefire Plan

Simultaneously, a political standoff unfolded in Tehran. Lieutenant Colonel Ibrahim Zolfaghari, spokesperson for Iran’s Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters, appeared on state television to reject claims of diplomatic progress. He accused Washington of “negotiating with itself” regarding the purported 15-point proposal.

“Has the level of your internal conflicts reached the point where you are negotiating with yourselves?” Zolfaghari said, questioning the legitimacy of the US outreach. His comments were the first official confirmation from Tehran that, despite being approached, Iran’s stance remains unchanged and that it will not engage in what it perceives as one-sided compromises.

Pakistan’s Mediation Effort

Reports from Pakistani media, including Dawn, indicated that the 15-point plan was delivered with the assistance of Islamabad. The development placed Pakistan at the center of diplomatic efforts to de-escalate tensions that have threatened to engulf the region. While US officials have hinted at progress, Tehran’s public response suggests the initiative has stalled, with Iran’s military brass portraying the American offer as a sign of weakness rather than a genuine path to peace.

Regional Energy Crisis

The ongoing conflict continued to impact global energy markets. The Philippines declared a national energy emergency, citing threats to oil supplies caused by the closure of the Strait of Hormuz. President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. announced financial aid for transport workers and strict measures against hoarding as fuel prices surged. Separately, Jetstar New Zealand canceled flights between Australia and New Zealand, blaming rising jet fuel costs linked directly to the Middle East crisis.

What Next

With the Israeli military continuing to pound targets in Lebanon and Gaza, and Iran rejecting US overtures, the window for a ceasefire appears narrow. Diplomatic efforts led by Pakistan, Egypt, and Turkiye remain ongoing, but the situation on the ground—marked by rocket fire and retaliatory airstrikes—suggests that military action is outpacing diplomacy. The coming days will determine whether the Trump administration proceeds with its threatened attacks on Iranian infrastructure or renews efforts to enforce the 15-point plan rejected by Tehran.

Gulf Crisis: Back-Channel Diplomacy Intensifies as White House Responds to Mediation Reports

Regional powers including Pakistan and Turkiye push for de-escalation between Washington and Tehran amid rising energy security concerns.

The Gulf crisis has entered a critical phase as back-channel diplomatic efforts intensify to prevent a full-scale regional conflagration. With the conflict entering its fourth week, Pakistan, Egypt, and Turkiye have emerged as key intermediaries attempting to broker a ceasefire between the United States and Iran.

The White House, however, has maintained a cautious stance regarding these developments. While reports suggested high-level meetings between US officials and Iranian representatives in Islamabad, the Biden-Trump transition framework continues to keep formal confirmations under wraps.

White House Maintains Strategic Silence

During a press briefing on March 23, Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt addressed the speculation surrounding potential talks in the Pakistani capital. She emphasized that the United States would not "negotiate through the press" given the sensitive nature of the discussions.

While the administration has not confirmed if Vice President JD Vance or special envoy Steve Witkoff are headed to Islamabad, officials noted that the situation remains fluid. The statement comes as President Trump indicated a desire for a "complete restoration" of hostilities via social media.

Pakistan Positions as Lead Mediator

Islamabad is leveraging its unique position as a non-base-hosting US ally with a significant Shi'ite population to facilitate dialogue. Reports indicate that Pakistan’s Army Chief, General Asim Munir, and Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif have been in active contact with both Washington and Tehran.

Pakistan has formally offered its capital as a neutral venue for diplomatic engagement. A recent readout from the Prime Minister’s Office confirmed that Pakistan remains committed to playing a "constructive role" in regional stability.

Regional Players Join Peace Push

Turkiye and Egypt are also ramping up their diplomatic machinery to prevent a global economic shock. Turkish officials have been relaying messages between Steve Witkoff and Iranian counterparts, focusing on a temporary humanitarian ceasefire.

Simultaneously, Egypt’s Foreign Ministry has engaged in a flurry of calls with Qatar and Iran. These collective efforts aim to secure the Strait of Hormuz, a vital artery for global energy through which one-fifth of the world's oil flows.

Global Energy Markets Under Strain

The urgency for diplomacy is driven by the severe impact on global geoeconomics. With Iran selectively blocking transit through the Strait of Hormuz, Brent crude prices have surged past the $100 per barrel mark.

Market analysts warn that if back-channel talks fail to yield a concrete de-escalation, oil prices could realistically test the $150 per barrel threshold. This spike has already begun to disrupt global supply chains and heighten inflation concerns across Asia.

Impact and Outlook for India

For New Delhi, the crisis presents a complex diplomatic tightrope. While US Ambassador Sergio Gor confirmed that President Trump and Prime Minister Modi discussed the importance of keeping trade routes open, India faces pressure to balance its Western partnerships with its interests in the Global South.

Experts suggest that India’s role as a leader of developing nations necessitates a more proactive stance. Leveraging the BRICS platform could be a potential avenue for New Delhi to enhance its stature while advocating for regional sovereignty and maritime security.

Uncertain Path to De-escalation

Despite the diplomatic flurry, Iran has officially denied engaging in direct talks with the US, labeling such reports as "fake news" intended to manipulate markets. The chasm between Tehran's public rhetoric and the reported back-channel activity remains wide.

The coming 48 hours are viewed as a "make-or-break" period for regional stability. As the international community watches Islamabad and Ankara, the success of these secret parleys will determine if the Gulf moves toward a truce or further escalation. This remains a significant Public Interest Story for the global economy.

In a case that has sent ripples through India's security establishment, the National Investigation Agency (NIA) has arrested seven foreign nationals—six from Ukraine and one from the United States—on charges of conspiring to train insurgent groups along the volatile India-Myanmar border.

The arrests, confirmed by public radio broadcaster AIR and other media reports on Tuesday, point to a sophisticated operation involving illegal border crossings, weapons training, and the smuggling of a "huge consignment of drones from Europe." The development underscores India's growing anxiety over the spillover effects of Myanmar's civil war, now entering its fifth year.

The Alleged Plot: Training Camps and European Drones

According to official sources, the accused first illegally entered India's sensitive northeastern state of Mizoram without the required permits. From there, they allegedly crossed the porous jungle border into Myanmar, where they are suspected of training "ethnic war groups... associated with insurgent groups in India."

But the plot thickens. Investigators believe the network was not just about training rebels. The seven are also accused of orchestrating the illegal transport of a significant number of drones from Europe into India, with the ultimate goal of using them in Myanmar's conflict zones. The specific type of drones and their exact European country of origin have not been officially disclosed, but the revelation raises serious questions about transnational supply chains feeding into regional insurgencies.

Legal Proceedings and National Security Charges

A closed court in New Delhi has remanded the seven accused to 11 days of NIA custody for intense interrogation. The Ukrainians were picked up from Delhi and Lucknow, while the American national was arrested in Kolkata.

The charges against them are grave. Citing official sources, The Indian Express reported that the foreigners have been charged with conspiring to commit terrorist acts against the Indian state. If convicted, the offence carries a maximum penalty of life imprisonment. This charge indicates that the NIA believes the alleged training of Myanmar rebels was not a standalone operation, but one with potential links to, or consequences for, insurgent activity on Indian soil.

Why This Matters: The Volatile India-Myanmar Border

This case cannot be viewed in isolation. It is the latest flashpoint in a region under immense strain.

• A 1,643-Kilometre Challenge: India shares a long, largely unfenced border with Myanmar, running through remote mountains and dense forests. While a fencing project is underway, the terrain makes it notoriously difficult to police.

• Fear of Spillover: New Delhi has long feared that armed groups operating in Myanmar, some of which share ethnic ties with populations in India's northeast, could drag the conflict across the border.

• A History of Warnings: Last year, Mizoram's chief minister made the explosive—and hard-to-verify—claim that "thousands" of Western mercenaries had passed through the state en route to Myanmar. This week's arrests suggest those warnings may have had some basis in reality.

The Bigger Picture: India's Delicate Balancing Act

For India, the Myanmar crisis is a diplomatic and security nightmare. On one hand, it maintains a cautious line of communication with the junta in Naypyidaw. On the other, it is sympathetic to the ethnic groups, particularly the Chin, who have fled violence into Mizoram by the thousands.

The presence of Ukrainian and American nationals allegedly training anti-junta forces adds a geopolitical layer. While Ukraine is officially preoccupied with its own war with Russia, the involvement of its citizens in a faraway conflict in Southeast Asia is puzzling. The NIA's interrogation will likely focus on who exactly these individuals were working for and how the drone smuggling network was financed.

What Happens Next?

For the next 11 days, the seven accused will face detailed questioning. The NIA will be looking to map the entire network: who recruited them, who funded the drone purchases, and most critically, which specific insurgent groups they were training.

For the residents of India's northeast, the case is a stark reminder that the civil war next door is not a distant conflict. It is knocking on India's door. And as this investigation unfolds, it may reveal just how deep the foreign involvement in Myanmar's battlefields truly runs.