The Danish prime minister said she is happy with her appearance after a plastic surgeon offered to “fix” her nose, prompting a wider discussion about scrutiny of women in public life.

Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen has rejected an unsolicited offer from a plastic surgeon to alter her nose, saying she is comfortable with her appearance and does not need a medical professional commenting on her body.

Frederiksen shared a screenshot of the exchange on Instagram after returning from an official visit to Ukraine, where she had attended diplomatic engagements as the war in the country continued. She did not identify the surgeon who contacted her.

According to Frederiksen, the doctor offered to “fix that little spot” on her nose. She responded publicly to the message, saying she was happy with her body and questioning why a male plastic surgeon felt entitled to comment on it.

Surgeon’s Unsolicited Advice

The Danish leader's post quickly attracted attention online because the interaction was not about her political work but about her physical appearance.

Rather than treating the message as a private exchange, Frederiksen used it to highlight what she described as a broader problem faced by women in prominent positions. She argued that female public figures are frequently judged not only on their professional performance but also on their hair, skin, teeth, clothing and other aspects of their appearance.

The incident has therefore moved beyond the individual exchange, prompting discussion about the boundaries of unsolicited advice and the pressure placed on women to meet particular beauty standards.

Years Of Appearance Scrutiny

Frederiksen said comments about her appearance were not new. During her time in office, she has faced observations and criticism concerning different aspects of her looks, alongside scrutiny of her political decisions.

Her response reflects a wider debate in politics about whether male and female leaders are assessed by the same standards. Women in public life have frequently faced commentary about their appearance that is unrelated to their official responsibilities.

Frederiksen's argument was that political leaders should be assessed primarily on their policies, decisions and performance rather than whether they conform to a particular idea of physical attractiveness.

Focus On Political Work

The episode comes as Frederiksen continues to be involved in European security and foreign-policy discussions. Denmark has remained a strong supporter of Ukraine, and the prime minister has been active in discussions surrounding European security and the country's national interests.

Her decision to respond publicly to the surgeon also places the issue in the context of her position as one of Europe's longer-serving female heads of government. Frederiksen has been Denmark's prime minister since 2019.

Wider Debate On Beauty Standards

The exchange has also revived a familiar question about the treatment of women in public life: how much attention should be given to their appearance when their professional responsibilities are unrelated to it?

For Frederiksen, the answer appears clear. By publicly rejecting the unsolicited cosmetic advice, she shifted attention back towards the expectation that political leaders should be judged on what they do in office rather than on whether someone believes their appearance needs to be changed.

The incident is unlikely to alter Denmark's political agenda, but it has once again highlighted the additional layer of personal scrutiny that women in senior public positions can face.

A senior Russian military officer has warned that Israel could ultimately “cease to exist as a state” as the conflict in West Asia continues to escalate, while accusing Israel of seeking to widen the confrontation and draw the United States and NATO deeper into the region. Lieutenant General Apti Alaudinov, deputy chief of the Russian Armed Forces’ Main Military-Political Department and commander of the Akhmat special forces unit, made the remarks in an interview with Russia’s state-run TASS news agency. His comments are political and military assessments, not an indication that the disappearance of Israel as a state is an established or imminent outcome. 

Alaudinov said the war in the Middle East would continue to escalate and argued that Israel’s objective was to expand the conflict by bringing both Washington and the wider NATO bloc into the confrontation. He claimed that such an approach could eventually work against Israel itself. “Ultimately, they will overestimate their strength and cease to exist as a state,” he said, according to TASS. The statement comes amid continuing tensions involving Israel, Iran and the United States, with the wider conflict creating uncertainty over the possibility of further military escalation across the region. 

The remarks also come as diplomatic efforts involving the United States and Iran remain uncertain. According to reporting cited by ANI, US President Donald Trump has asked his negotiating team to wait until Tehran is ready to reach a deal, although an American official said there was no disagreement inside the administration over the broader approach to negotiations. Trump has also maintained that a naval blockade in the region remains in force while saying the Strait of Hormuz is open and operating. These developments have added another layer to an already complicated situation involving military operations, energy routes and diplomatic efforts.

Alaudinov is a senior figure in Russia’s military structure and commands the Akhmat special forces unit, making his comments notable, although they do not necessarily represent an official Kremlin position. His assessment reflects Moscow’s broader criticism of what it sees as attempts to widen the conflict and involve additional Western powers. Russia has maintained close attention on developments involving Iran and Israel, particularly because any prolonged confrontation could affect regional security, energy markets and relations between Moscow and Western countries.

The situation remains fluid, with military activity and diplomatic signals continuing to change. The Russian general’s warning is therefore best understood as a strongly worded assessment of the possible consequences of further escalation rather than a prediction with a fixed timeline. Whether the conflict expands further will depend on decisions taken by Israel, Iran, the United States and other regional and international actors. For now, Alaudinov’s remarks add to the increasingly sharp rhetoric surrounding the West Asia conflict and underline concerns that a wider confrontation could have consequences well beyond the immediate battlefield.

Russia has reportedly established or expanded at least 10 secret drone bases near its borders with Belarus and Ukraine, with the new infrastructure potentially allowing advanced long-range attack drones to reach parts of NATO territory, according to an investigation by The Telegraph. (Telegraph)

The investigation, based on satellite imagery, leaked documents and analysis by drone intelligence company DroneSec, identified at least 59 newly constructed launch rails across the sites. Around 20 of these rails are reportedly longer designs that could accommodate Russia's newer long-range, jet-powered drones. (Censor.NET)

59 New Launch Rails Identified

The reported facilities are located along Russia's western borders with Belarus and Ukraine. Some have been established at former military bases or airfields, while others are located in more remote areas.

According to the satellite-image analysis, around 20 launch rails appear to have an extended design. Analysts say their dimensions could indicate that they are intended for newer long-range unmanned aircraft rather than smaller drones.

The development points to an expansion of Russia's infrastructure for launching large numbers of drones against Ukraine.

NATO Countries Within Potential Range

The location of the reported bases has raised concerns because Belarus borders Poland, Lithuania and Latvia, all NATO members. Ukraine also borders NATO countries including Romania, Hungary and Slovakia.

Some analysts believe Russia's newest long-range drones could potentially reach Warsaw. However, there is currently no evidence that Russia is preparing a direct attack on Poland, according to reporting surrounding the investigation. (Censor.NET)

The potential range of these systems has nevertheless added to concerns among European governments over the possibility of drones being used beyond the current battlefield in Ukraine.

Bases Could Store Thousands of Drones

The reported expansion is not limited to launch infrastructure. Satellite imagery indicates that some facilities have significant storage capacity.

One of the sites reportedly has enough space to accommodate more than 1,000 drones at a time, highlighting the potential scale of Russia's drone operations.

The expansion comes as Moscow has increasingly relied on unmanned aircraft alongside missiles in attacks on Ukrainian cities and infrastructure.

Russia Expands Jet-Powered Drone Use

Russia has increasingly developed and deployed faster, longer-range variants of drones based on the Iranian-designed Shahed platform.

Recent reports have pointed to a growing use of jet-powered attack drones, which are harder to intercept because of their higher speed. Ukrainian officials and analysts have also reported a sharp increase in the number of such drones being used in Russian attacks. (Межа. Новини України.)

The construction of additional launch facilities could allow Russia to increase the number of drones deployed during individual attacks while reducing dependence on a smaller number of known launch locations.

Drone Network Raises European Security Concerns

DroneSec founder Mike Monnik said the expansion demonstrated how Russia was increasing its ability to launch larger numbers of unmanned aircraft while making some newer drone designs more difficult to intercept.

The development is being watched closely in Europe because of wider concerns over Russia's military and hybrid activities. Western intelligence assessments have previously warned about the possibility of sabotage, cyberattacks and other forms of pressure against European countries.

At the same time, NATO has repeatedly maintained that it is prepared to defend all member states and has been strengthening its counter-drone capabilities.

Ukraine Remains Primary Battlefield

Despite concerns about their potential range into NATO territory, the newly identified bases are currently primarily associated with Russia's war against Ukraine.

Reports indicate that several of the sites have already been used to support attacks against Ukrainian targets. The growing network would allow Russia to launch drones from multiple locations, potentially making Ukrainian air-defence planning more difficult. (RBC Ukraine)

The reported construction therefore represents not only a potential challenge for NATO but also another sign of how drone warfare is evolving in the Russia-Ukraine conflict.

For European governments, the expansion has added urgency to efforts to improve early-warning systems, air defence and counter-drone technology as Russia continues to develop longer-range unmanned weapons.

Pakistan Army chief Field Marshal Asim Munir could take a prominent role in the emerging defence alliance between Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Turkey after Ankara said the military chiefs of the three countries would be part of the alliance's proposed governing structure.

The development follows the signing of the Makkah Joint Defence Agreement by Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Turkey on August 7. The agreement is aimed at strengthening defence cooperation and establishing a more structured security partnership among the three countries.

Military Chiefs to Join Governing Body

Turkey's Defence Ministry said on Thursday that the mechanisms created under the agreement would involve the defence ministers, foreign ministers and chiefs of general staff or armed forces commanders of the three countries.

According to the ministry, coordination among Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Turkey would take place at the highest level.

The announcement potentially gives Munir a significant role in the alliance's military decision-making structure. However, there has been no official announcement naming him as commander of the proposed alliance.

The agreement also provides for joint military exercises involving the three countries.

Similarities With NATO Article 5

Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan had earlier described the Makkah agreement as technically similar to NATO's Article 5, which establishes the principle of collective defence among NATO members.

Fidan had also said that a committee of ministers would be established to oversee the alliance, along with a general secretariat based in Saudi Arabia.

The latest statement from Turkey indicates that the proposed institutional framework could be broader, incorporating both political and military leadership.

The Turkish Defence Ministry said the fundamental objective was to place defence and military cooperation between the three countries on a more institutional and sustainable footing.

Joint Military Exercises Planned

Under the agreement, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Turkey are expected to expand cooperation across multiple military domains.

The Turkish Defence Ministry said planned exercises would involve land, naval and air forces, as well as air defence and unmanned systems.

The three countries also intend to deepen cooperation in the defence industry. This could include joint development and production, technology cooperation and maintenance and logistics support.

Unmanned and autonomous systems, electronic warfare and artificial intelligence capabilities are expected to receive particular attention.

Is It Really an ‘Islamic NATO’?

Despite comparisons with NATO, analysts caution against describing the three-country alliance as an established “Islamic NATO” at this stage.

Aishwaria Sonavane, who heads the Pakistan programme at the Takshashila Institution, has previously argued that the three countries do not yet possess the institutional foundations and interoperability required for a NATO-style alliance.

Turkey has extensive experience as a NATO member, while Pakistan's military ecosystem is heavily reliant on Chinese technology. Saudi Arabia, meanwhile, continues to depend significantly on US-origin defence systems.

These differences could make the creation of common military standards and integrated operational capabilities a long-term process.

Strategic Defence Partnership

The agreement nevertheless marks a significant step in defence cooperation among Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Turkey.

The three countries have different strategic interests and defence relationships, but their proposed framework could provide a platform for greater coordination in military exercises, defence production, technology and security planning.

The inclusion of military chiefs in the governing structure could also give the alliance a stronger operational dimension.

For now, however, Munir's designation as an “Islamic NATO” commander remains speculative. The formal structure, leadership arrangements and decision-making mechanisms of the alliance will determine how far the Makkah agreement develops beyond a defence cooperation pact.

U.S. President Donald Trump has said he secretly switched aircraft in Turkey last month after the U.S. Secret Service directed him to leave Air Force One following a security threat. The unusual move took place after the NATO summit in Ankara and was reportedly linked to concerns over a possible Iranian assassination threat.

Trump made the comments on Tuesday, August 11, as questions continued to emerge over why he was moved from the aircraft that had been publicly identified as carrying him from Turkey to Britain.

Secret aircraft switch in Ankara

According to reports, Trump was initially scheduled to leave Turkey aboard Air Force One. However, shortly after boarding, he reportedly exited the aircraft through a catering truck and was transferred to another military aircraft.

The operation was kept secret, with the White House initially maintaining that Trump was travelling aboard Air Force One.

The unusual transfer was first reported publicly by The Washington Post on August 10, citing unnamed sources familiar with the episode.

Trump later confirmed that the aircraft change had taken place but said the decision was made by the Secret Service and military officials responsible for his security.

Trump says alternate plane was also at risk

Speaking to reporters, Trump said the aircraft he ultimately used may actually have presented a greater security risk because adversaries could have been more likely to target it.

“I think actually the plane that I flew on was at greater risk,” Trump said.

He added that he did not seek extensive details about the threat and generally follows instructions from the Secret Service and military when it comes to his personal security.

Trump said he receives many threats and indicated that the security concern was serious enough for officials to alter his travel arrangements.

Catering truck operation draws attention

The aircraft transfer has attracted considerable attention because of the unusual method used to move the President.

Trump reportedly travelled from Air Force One to the replacement aircraft using a catering truck, apparently as part of an effort to prevent the movement from being detected.

The episode subsequently became the subject of social media memes, with images and jokes portraying Trump as hiding inside the catering vehicle.

Trump, who frequently engages with online memes and has cultivated a strong public image around his personal toughness, appeared to acknowledge the attention while stressing that the decision was made by security officials.

Iran threat concerns during NATO summit

The incident occurred against the backdrop of heightened tensions between the United States and Iran.

Trump had travelled to Ankara for the NATO summit aboard a newly renovated aircraft donated by Qatar. The aircraft's first international trip had already attracted scrutiny over its cost, security and modifications.

The situation was particularly sensitive because Turkey shares a border with Iran and tensions in the region had intensified at the time.

U.S. officials reportedly feared that the aircraft publicly associated with Trump could become a potential target if an attack was being planned.

White House did not disclose change

The White House did not publicly reveal the aircraft switch at the time. Officials had initially indicated that Trump was flying aboard Air Force One from Turkey to Britain.

The secrecy surrounding the operation has raised questions about the risks faced by Trump's aides, journalists and other personnel who remained aboard the aircraft that was believed to be carrying the President.

Trump, however, defended the decision by saying presidential security is ultimately determined by the Secret Service and military authorities.

Security remains a key concern

The incident highlights the extraordinary security measures surrounding presidential travel, particularly when the U.S. President visits regions experiencing heightened geopolitical tensions.

While Trump did not provide specific details about the alleged threat, his remarks confirmed that security officials considered the aircraft switch necessary.

The episode also comes as Washington and Tehran remain locked in a period of heightened tensions, making presidential travel arrangements a significant security concern.

For now, U.S. authorities have not publicly disclosed the specific intelligence behind the decision to move Trump from Air Force One to another aircraft.

The defence agreement signed by Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan in Mecca on August 7 has added a new layer to the security landscape of West Asia and the wider Muslim world. The pact says an armed attack against any one of the three countries will be treated as an attack against all, drawing comparisons with NATO's collective-defence principle.

However, the agreement does not specify what military assistance would be required if one member came under attack. Analysts therefore see the arrangement less as a fully integrated military alliance and more as a strategic hedge against growing regional uncertainty.

Three Countries, Different Interests

The three countries bring different strategic strengths to the agreement. Saudi Arabia offers financial resources, energy importance and a crucial geographical position. Pakistan brings a large and experienced military as well as longstanding defence ties with both Riyadh and Ankara. Turkey contributes a major conventional military and an expanding indigenous defence industry.

Their reasons for joining the arrangement, however, are not identical.

For Saudi Arabia, the pact provides another layer of security at a time when Riyadh is seeking to diversify its strategic partnerships. The United States remains a major security partner, but Saudi Arabia has increasingly shown an interest in maintaining multiple options.

Pakistan, meanwhile, could gain greater importance in the emerging regional security architecture. The agreement gives Islamabad another avenue to strengthen its diplomatic and military relevance beyond its traditional security concerns involving India, Afghanistan and terrorism.

Pakistan Faces Strategic Dilemma

The agreement could also create difficult choices for Pakistan. Iran maintains important geographical, economic and political relevance for Islamabad.

If Iran were to attack Saudi Arabia, for example, Pakistan could face pressure to respond under the collective-defence provision. At the same time, Islamabad would have to consider the consequences of directly entering a conflict with Tehran.

The pact therefore provides Pakistan with strategic elevation while potentially increasing the number of regional commitments it must balance.

Turkey Faces Complex Choices

Turkey's position is particularly complicated because it is already a member of NATO and maintains relationships with several competing powers, including Russia and Iran.

Ankara has also developed strategic interests in Syria, Iraq and the Caucasus. Its relationship with Tehran involves both competition and cooperation.

A conflict involving Saudi Arabia and Iran could therefore test the practical meaning of the new agreement. While the pact establishes a collective-security principle, it does not clarify whether assistance would involve intelligence sharing, air defence, naval support, military equipment or direct combat operations.

Is It an Alliance Against Iran?

The agreement has inevitably prompted speculation about whether it represents a Sunni security bloc aimed at countering Iran, the region's most prominent Shia power.

Such a description, however, would oversimplify the arrangement. The three signatories have presented the pact as defensive and have not formally identified Iran as its target.

Saudi Arabia has also pursued efforts to improve relations with Tehran. As a result, the agreement could be viewed as an additional security mechanism rather than an explicit declaration of confrontation.

Nevertheless, Iran is likely to closely monitor how the arrangement develops and whether its collective-defence provision acquires a more specific military meaning.

Impact on US and Gulf

The pact does not necessarily indicate that Saudi Arabia is moving away from Washington. Instead, it could reflect Riyadh's effort to maintain several security relationships simultaneously.

The development also adds complexity to the Gulf's already diverse strategic environment. Countries such as the UAE, Qatar and Oman have their own relationships with Iran, Turkey, Israel, China and the United States and may prefer strategic flexibility over membership in a rigid military bloc.

The agreement could consequently become one part of a broader network of overlapping regional partnerships rather than the foundation of a single unified alliance.

Deterrence or Strategic Risk?

The collective-defence clause could strengthen deterrence by forcing any potential aggressor to consider the possibility of confronting three countries instead of one.

At the same time, the lack of clarity over the nature of military assistance could become a weakness during an actual crisis. The arrangement may face its biggest test if one member expects the others to participate in a conflict they would prefer to avoid.

For now, describing the pact as a "Muslim NATO" may be premature. Unlike NATO, the agreement does not yet have the same institutional structure, integrated military mechanisms or clearly defined response procedures.

Its significance lies instead in the changing approach to regional security. Saudi Arabia is seeking additional security insurance, Pakistan is gaining strategic relevance, and Turkey is expanding its influence.

The real test of the Mecca agreement will come not when it is signed, but when one of its members faces a crisis and the other two have to decide how far their commitment extends.

 Polish authorities have launched an investigation after an unidentified object crashed in eastern Poland during Russia's large-scale missile and drone assault on Ukraine, raising fresh concerns over regional security near NATO's eastern border.

The object reportedly exploded in an open area near Tarnawa-Kolonia village in Lublin Province, close to the Ukrainian border, leaving behind a crater. Local residents reported hearing a loud blast, prompting an immediate response from police, military personnel and emergency services.

Authorities have not yet confirmed whether the object was a Russian missile, debris from an intercepted projectile or another type of aerial object. Officials stressed that the investigation is ongoing and urged against drawing premature conclusions.

Incident Coincides With Massive Russian Strike

The incident occurred as Russia launched one of its latest large-scale attacks on Ukraine, targeting Kyiv and several other regions with missiles and attack drones.

According to Ukrainian officials, the overnight assault killed at least eight people, including children, while several others were trapped beneath the rubble of damaged buildings. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said Russia launched more than 70 missiles and over 280 drones, adding that Ukrainian air defence systems intercepted more than 260 drones despite shortages of interceptor missiles.

Russia's Defence Ministry stated that its forces carried out precision strikes using long-range missiles launched from land, sea and air platforms, claiming military infrastructure was the intended target.

Poland Activated Air Defence Measures

Before the unidentified object crashed, Poland had already scrambled fighter aircraft after detecting Russian missile activity near its eastern frontier.

The Polish Armed Forces said their air defence systems tracked multiple missiles flying over western Ukraine, with some trajectories considered close enough to pose a potential risk to Polish airspace.

Security agencies have since secured the crash site while military experts and forensic teams examine debris recovered from the area to determine its origin.

No Confirmation of Russian Strike on NATO Territory

Despite widespread speculation on social media, Polish authorities have not stated that Russia intentionally attacked Polish territory.

Officials have emphasised that determining the identity of the object remains the top priority. Investigators are examining whether it was a Russian cruise missile, an intercepted projectile, missile debris or another aerial object that inadvertently crossed the border.

As a member of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), Poland's territorial security carries significant strategic importance. Any confirmed violation involving a Russian military projectile would likely trigger consultations within the alliance, although no such determination has been made.

Border Incidents Remain a Growing Concern

Poland has repeatedly heightened its military readiness during periods of intensified Russian strikes against western Ukraine. Fighter jets are routinely deployed whenever missile activity approaches the Polish border.

In previous incidents, missiles or drone debris linked to the Russia-Ukraine conflict have entered Polish territory, prompting investigations and heightened military coordination between Warsaw and its NATO allies.

The latest incident comes just days after Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy's visit to Washington, where he sought additional air defence support from the United States amid continued Russian attacks.

Investigation Continues

Polish police, military authorities and defence specialists continue to examine the crash site and analyse recovered material.

Officials have said further information will be released only after forensic examinations establish the nature and origin of the object. Until then, Polish authorities have urged the public to rely on official updates and avoid speculation surrounding the incident.

The investigation is expected to determine whether the explosion resulted from a stray missile, intercepted debris or another object linked to the ongoing conflict in neighbouring Ukraine.

The United States has launched a comprehensive review of its military presence across Europe as the Donald Trump administration pushes NATO allies to assume greater responsibility for the continent's conventional defence.

The review marks a significant step in Washington's broader strategy of encouraging European nations to take the lead in regional security while allowing the US to focus more heavily on strategic challenges posed by China.

US officials said the reassessment follows commitments made by US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth during last month's meeting with NATO allies.

Military Posture Under Review

The Pentagon's review will examine the size, deployment and future role of American forces stationed across Europe.

According to US Under Secretary of Defense Elbridge Colby, the assessment is intended to accelerate NATO's transition toward a defence structure in which European allies take primary responsibility for conventional military operations on the continent.

In a statement, Colby said the review is designed to ensure the alliance moves "quickly and irreversibly" toward a more balanced distribution of defence responsibilities.

He added that the objective is to build a stronger, more sustainable and equitable NATO alliance.

Trump Renews Pressure on NATO Members

President Donald Trump has repeatedly urged European allies to increase their defence spending and reduce dependence on the United States for regional security.

The administration has argued that many NATO members have relied disproportionately on American military resources despite longstanding defence spending commitments.

Washington has also expressed dissatisfaction with the response of several European allies during recent geopolitical crises, including disagreements over military cooperation during the conflict involving Iran.

Warning Over Defence Spending

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has warned that the United States could reconsider the level of funding and military resources it contributes to NATO if member nations fail to meet agreed defence spending targets.

The administration maintains that greater financial contributions from European countries are necessary to strengthen the alliance and ensure long-term regional stability.

Strategic Focus Shifting Toward China

The review also reflects Washington's broader strategic objective of reallocating military resources to address growing challenges in the Indo-Pacific region.

US officials have consistently stated that China remains the country's primary long-term strategic competitor, requiring increased military attention and resource allocation.

As part of this transition, the Pentagon has already informed allies that it plans to reduce some of the military assets currently assigned to NATO operations worldwide.

Future of US Role in Europe

While American officials have reaffirmed their commitment to NATO, they have also stressed that European allies must gradually assume greater responsibility for their own conventional defence capabilities.

The outcome of the review is expected to influence future US troop deployments, defence planning and military cooperation with NATO partners.

The reassessment comes amid continued geopolitical tensions in Europe and ongoing discussions within the alliance over burden-sharing and long-term security priorities.

US President Donald Trump has issued a strong warning to Russia and China, saying there would be "dire consequences" if either country intervenes in support of Iran amid the escalating conflict in the Middle East. Trump said he believes both Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping have assured him that their countries will not provide weapons to Tehran.

In a post shared on social media on Friday, Trump dismissed speculation that Moscow or Beijing were actively supporting Iran in the ongoing conflict. However, he made it clear that any change in that position would trigger a serious response from the United States.

"I don't believe China or Russia are involved in the Iran war. But if they are, it won't end well for them," Trump said.

The US President revealed that during his recent meeting with Xi Jinping in Beijing, the Chinese leader assured him that China would not send weapons to Iran "under any circumstances." Trump also claimed Xi confirmed that Chinese companies would follow the same policy.

"I believe Xi Jinping," Trump wrote, expressing confidence that Beijing would keep its commitment.

Trump also said Russian President Vladimir Putin had given him a similar assurance that Russia would not supply military equipment to Iran despite Moscow's close ties with Tehran.

Trump Says He Is Still in Contact With Putin

Despite the continuing war in Ukraine, Trump said he remains in regular contact with Putin.

He also addressed US military assistance to Ukraine, clarifying that Washington does not directly provide weapons to Kyiv. Instead, he said, the United States supplies arms to NATO allies, which purchase the equipment and decide how to use it.

"We sell weapons to NATO countries. They pay the full cost, and what they do with those weapons afterward is their decision," Trump said.

Netanyahu to Meet Trump in Washington

As tensions continue to rise in the Middle East, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is scheduled to visit Washington on Monday for talks with President Trump.

The meeting will mark the first face-to-face discussion between the two leaders since the Iran conflict intensified. The agenda is expected to focus on regional security, military coordination, and diplomatic efforts to prevent further escalation.

Oil Prices Cross $100 a Barrel

The ongoing conflict has begun affecting global energy markets.

Brent crude oil prices climbed above $100 per barrel for the first time since May as fears of supply disruptions in the Gulf intensified. Analysts say continued instability near the Strait of Hormuz could push energy prices even higher in the coming weeks.

Iran Launches Drone Strikes on US Bases in Kuwait

Iran reportedly carried out drone attacks on three American military installations in Kuwait on Friday.

The targeted bases included:

• Camp Arifjan
• Camp Doha
• Camp Adairi

The attacks underscore the widening regional dimensions of the conflict and have heightened concerns over the safety of US military personnel stationed across the Gulf.

Iran Rejects US Pressure

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi reiterated that Tehran would not surrender to US pressure or threats.

Speaking at the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) Foreign Ministers' Meeting in Kyrgyzstan, Araghchi said Iran would continue defending its sovereignty despite mounting international pressure.

Indian Crew Safe After Tanker Attack

In another development, an LPG tanker sailing under the Mozambique flag came under attack in Iranian waters near the Strait of Hormuz.

The Indian Embassy confirmed that all 28 Indian crew members aboard the vessel are safe, providing relief amid growing concerns over maritime security in one of the world's busiest shipping routes.

A Russian Navy warship conducted a live-fire military exercise approximately 46 miles off the southern coast of the United Kingdom, prompting close monitoring by the Royal Navy and renewed attention to growing military activity in European waters.

According to the UK Ministry of Defence (MoD), the Russian frigate Neustrashimy carried out the exercise in international waters about 40 nautical miles (46 miles) south of Plymouth. The live-fire drill reportedly lasted for around 30 minutes, with British naval forces tracking the vessel throughout the operation.

While the exercise was legally conducted in international waters, British defence officials said they remained vigilant and ready to safeguard the country's national security amid increasing Russian naval activity near UK waters.

Royal Navy Closely Monitored the Exercise

The Royal Navy deployed HMS Tyne to shadow the Russian warship during its passage through the English Channel.

According to the Ministry of Defence, the Russian vessel notified British authorities before beginning the exercise and requested HMS Tyne to reposition to a safer distance during the live-fire operation. The British patrol ship complied and continued observing the drills from a secure location.

A UK MoD spokesperson said the Royal Navy monitored the exercise throughout and continues to closely track the vessel's movements while remaining prepared to respond to any potential security concerns.

Although the incident has attracted significant attention, international maritime law permits military exercises in international waters provided they comply with established navigation and safety regulations.

Russian Warship Linked to Shadow Fleet Operations

Reports indicate that Neustrashimy is among the Russian naval vessels escorting so-called "shadow fleet" tankers, which transport Russian oil through European waters despite Western sanctions imposed following the Ukraine conflict.

The escort missions are believed to provide protection to oil tankers operating under complex ownership structures designed to evade sanctions.

Despite these naval escorts, European authorities have continued enforcement efforts against suspected sanctions violations.

Last month, Royal Marines reportedly boarded a Russian tanker in the English Channel as part of operations aimed at monitoring maritime activities linked to sanctioned Russian oil shipments.

Growing Maritime Tensions

The latest exercise comes amid a series of incidents involving Russian naval vessels operating close to European coastlines.

Reports also noted that another Russian warship, Admiral Grigorovich, was involved in a confrontation near the Isle of Wight last month after firing warning shots toward a British sailing yacht.

Russian authorities claimed the civilian vessel was approaching dangerously, while the British couple aboard the yacht rejected the allegation, stating they were not on a collision course.

Such incidents have heightened concerns among NATO members about increased Russian military activity around strategic maritime routes, particularly in the North Atlantic and the English Channel.

Part of a Wider Pattern

Military analysts say Russia and China have increasingly used naval deployments, military aircraft patrols, and live-fire exercises to demonstrate strategic presence in contested or strategically important regions.

Similar activities have frequently occurred in the South China Sea, the Indo-Pacific, the Baltic Sea, and waters surrounding Europe.

While these operations generally remain within international legal frameworks, defence experts warn they can increase the risk of miscalculation, especially when military vessels from rival nations operate in close proximity.

The UK Ministry of Defence has emphasized that the Royal Navy will continue monitoring Russian naval movements and maintain readiness to protect British territorial interests and maritime security.

With tensions between Russia and Western nations remaining high over the ongoing conflict in Ukraine and sanctions enforcement, military activity in European waters is expected to remain under close international scrutiny.

Around 30 European leaders reportedly held a confidential late-night meeting earlier this year to discuss the future of transatlantic relations under US President Donald Trump, with participants describing the closed-door gathering as a "therapy night" because of the unusually candid exchanges, according to a report by The Wall Street Journal.

The meeting, held at European Union headquarters during the third week of January, was conducted under extraordinary secrecy. According to the report, leaders were required to leave behind their mobile phones, no aides were allowed inside, and no official recordings were made to encourage open discussion about Europe's security challenges and its relationship with Washington.

The discussions reportedly extended well past midnight as heads of state and government assessed what they viewed as growing uncertainty surrounding US policy toward Europe.

Greenland Crisis Dominated Talks

The meeting reportedly took place during a period of heightened concern over repeated statements by President Trump regarding Greenland.

According to the report, European leaders feared that tensions surrounding the strategically located Arctic island could escalate further. Denmark had reportedly strengthened defensive preparations, while France had deployed military personnel to support Danish forces. Emergency medical supplies and contingency plans were also said to have been prepared amid concerns over a possible crisis.

Although no military confrontation ultimately occurred, the developments prompted European leaders to reassess their long-term security dependence on the United States.

Macron Calls for Strategic Independence

French President Emmanuel Macron reportedly used the meeting to renew his long-standing appeal for greater European strategic autonomy.

According to The Wall Street Journal, Macron told fellow leaders that Europe needed to draw a clear line and reduce its reliance on American security guarantees.

The report said the discussions reflected a growing consensus that Europe should be capable of defending its own interests regardless of future political developments in Washington.

Belgian Prime Minister Alexander De Croo reportedly warned that Europe risked becoming overly dependent on the United States if it failed to strengthen its own capabilities.

Europe Accelerates Defence Push

The confidential discussions reportedly reinforced Europe's ongoing efforts to expand defence cooperation, modernise military capabilities and strengthen its defence industrial base.

According to the report, leaders concluded that Europe must prepare for scenarios in which American political or military support may not be guaranteed.

The reassessment also extends beyond defence.

Several European governments are reportedly working to reduce dependence on American technology companies by adopting European alternatives in areas including government software, digital infrastructure and cloud services. Investments in artificial intelligence, space technology and advanced manufacturing have also gained momentum as part of broader efforts to improve technological self-reliance.

Broader Strategic Shift

The reported meeting underscores the broader transformation taking place within Europe as geopolitical uncertainty reshapes security and economic priorities.

Analysts have noted that Russia's war in Ukraine, tensions in the Indo-Pacific and evolving US foreign policy have collectively accelerated Europe's push for greater strategic independence.

While European governments continue to regard the transatlantic partnership as important, the reported discussions suggest policymakers are increasingly planning for a future in which Europe assumes greater responsibility for its own security, technology and economic resilience.

Neither the European Union nor participating leaders have officially commented on the details of the reported closed-door meeting.

Trump Tells Putin US Ready to Help End Ukraine War During 90-Minute Phone Conversation

US President Donald Trump has offered American assistance in finding a political solution to the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war during a 90-minute telephone conversation with Russian President Vladimir Putin, according to the Kremlin.

The call, which took place on Saturday as Putin extended Independence Day greetings to Trump, also included discussions on the upcoming NATO summit scheduled to be held in Ankara, Turkey, Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov said while briefing reporters on Sunday.

According to Ushakov, Trump reiterated his willingness to work towards bringing an end to the conflict in Ukraine and expressed readiness to support efforts aimed at achieving a negotiated settlement.

"The American president once again confirmed his readiness to work towards a rapid end to the fighting and find solutions to overcome the crisis," Ushakov said, describing the conversation as "business-like and quite constructive."

He added that Russia continued to favour what it called a "political-diplomatic resolution" of the conflict, provided any settlement takes into account Moscow's core strategic interests.

The latest conversation comes amid renewed diplomatic activity surrounding the Ukraine conflict and ahead of the NATO summit, where the war is expected to remain one of the alliance's principal agenda items.

Ushakov said the two leaders also exchanged views regarding Trump's expected participation in the summit in Ankara next week, though no additional details of those discussions were disclosed.

Meanwhile, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy confirmed that he had also spoken with Trump, although the Ukrainian presidency did not immediately provide details of their conversation.

The Kremlin briefing also included fresh accusations against Ukraine and its European partners. Ushakov alleged that Kyiv and its Western allies were seeking to prolong and escalate the conflict through continued military operations.

He specifically referred to Ukraine's long-range drone strikes targeting Russian oil infrastructure, which Moscow claims have disrupted fuel supplies in several regions.

According to Ushakov, Putin used the conversation to present what he described as the "real situation" on the battlefield, asserting that Russian forces were continuing to make territorial gains in eastern Ukraine.

Russian military commanders had informed Putin on Friday that Russian troops had captured the strategically significant city of Kostiantynivka in Ukraine's Donetsk region.

However, Ukraine has rejected that claim. On Saturday, both President Zelenskyy and Ukraine's General Staff stated that Ukrainian forces remained in control of the city and continued to defend their positions.

The differing battlefield narratives underscore the continuing information war accompanying the military conflict, with both Moscow and Kyiv issuing conflicting accounts of developments on the ground.

Russia has consistently maintained that any future peace agreement must recognise its control over the Donbas region, including territories currently occupied by Russian forces. Ukraine has firmly rejected those demands, insisting that its internationally recognised borders remain non-negotiable.

Last month, Zelenskyy publicly invited Putin to hold direct face-to-face talks in an effort to explore possible avenues for ending the conflict. The Kremlin, however, declined the proposal, indicating that such a meeting was not under consideration.

Trump has repeatedly stated that he wants to see the war brought to an end through negotiations and has emphasised the need for renewed diplomatic engagement between the two sides.

The latest phone call signals continued high-level contacts between Washington and Moscow even as fighting persists on the battlefield. Whether Trump's latest outreach results in renewed peace efforts remains uncertain, with both Russia and Ukraine continuing to maintain sharply different positions on the conditions required for a negotiated settlement.