<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>        <rss version="2.0"
            xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
            xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
            xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
            <channel>
                <atom:link href="https://english.dainikjagranmpcg.com/khade-hanuman-ujjain/tag-39543" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
                <generator>Dainik Jagran English RSS Feed Generator</generator>
                <title>Khade Hanuman Ujjain - Dainik Jagran English</title>
                <link>https://english.dainikjagranmpcg.com/tag/39543/rss</link>
                <description>Khade Hanuman Ujjain RSS Feed</description>
                
                            <item>
                <title>Ujjain Hanuman Idol Row: Administration Denies Removal Attempt</title>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>A Hanuman idol near Sati Gate in Ujjain has sparked controversy amid road widening work, with devotees protesting and the administration denying any removal attempt.</strong></p>]]></description>
                
                                    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="https://english.dainikjagranmpcg.com/states/madhya-pradesh/ujjain-hanuman-idol-row-administration-denies-removal-attempt/article-29926"><img src="https://english.dainikjagranmpcg.com/media/400/2026-09/m-(12)1.jpg" alt=""></a><br /><p class="isSelectedEnd">A Hanuman idol located in the middle of a road near <strong>Sati Gate in Ujjain</strong> has become the centre of growing public attention after attempts linked to road widening triggered controversy. The idol has remained at the site for nearly a week, while the administration says no attempt has actually been made to relocate it.</p>
<p class="isSelectedEnd">The issue has attracted devotees from Madhya Pradesh and neighbouring states, with videos and reels of the idol circulating widely on social media. The controversy has also drawn reactions from former Madhya Pradesh Chief Minister <strong>Uma Bharti</strong>, religious figures and opposition leaders.</p>
<h4><strong>Road Widening Brings Idol Into Focus</strong></h4>
<p class="isSelectedEnd">The controversy began after civic authorities started work around the temple on September 4 in connection with road-widening plans.</p>
<p class="isSelectedEnd">Most of the surrounding structure has reportedly been removed, while the Hanuman idol remains at the site under a temporary tent. The unusual location of the standing idol has since become a major attraction for visitors.</p>
<p class="isSelectedEnd">With videos of the site spreading online, devotees have increasingly started including the temple in their Ujjain visits.</p>
<h4><strong>Administration Denies Removal Attempt</strong></h4>
<p class="isSelectedEnd">The Ujjain district administration issued a statement amid reports that repeated attempts had been made to remove the idol.</p>
<p class="isSelectedEnd">According to the administration, the matter concerns the religious sentiments of Ujjain residents and devotees. It said the safety of the idol, public sentiment and the city's religious and cultural heritage remain priorities.</p>
<p class="isSelectedEnd">The administration also described reports claiming that several attempts had already been made to relocate the idol as misleading. It maintained that <strong>no mechanical or manual attempt has so far been made to remove or shift the idol</strong>.</p>
<h4><strong>Temple Side Cites Earlier Work</strong></h4>
<p class="isSelectedEnd">Temple priest Mahesh Bairagi presented a different account of the developments.</p>
<p class="isSelectedEnd">According to him, the temple side had initially given conditional consent for the idol to be shifted safely. Civic workers subsequently removed debris and plaster around the structure, but the process was stopped over concerns about possible damage.</p>
<p class="isSelectedEnd">Experts from Indore were later called to assess the structure. The priest said specialists suggested further examination using modern equipment and scanning techniques before any decision on relocation.</p>
<h4><strong>IIT Indore Team Conducts Inspection</strong></h4>
<p class="isSelectedEnd">The controversy has also led to technical examination of the site.</p>
<p class="isSelectedEnd">A team from <strong>IIT Indore</strong> visited the temple earlier in the week and inspected the structure. The team reportedly returned on Thursday for another assessment.</p>
<p class="isSelectedEnd">The technical evaluation is significant because any decision concerning the idol would need to consider the structure's stability and the feasibility of moving it without causing damage.</p>
<h4><strong>New Land Offered for Temple</strong></h4>
<p class="isSelectedEnd">Ujjain Municipal Corporation has already offered an alternative site for reconstruction of the temple.</p>
<p class="isSelectedEnd">In a letter dated September 2, the civic body informed the temple priests that <strong>20.90 square metres of land in Ward 20</strong> had been made available for the temple's relocation. The land had been cleared after the removal of a water tank, according to the letter cited in the report.</p>
<p class="isSelectedEnd">However, the question of whether the existing idol should actually be moved remains at the centre of the dispute.</p>
<h4><strong>Uma Bharti Seeks Alternative Road Plan</strong></h4>
<p class="isSelectedEnd">Former Madhya Pradesh Chief Minister Uma Bharti has written to Chief Minister <strong>Mohan Yadav</strong>, urging authorities to consider changing the road plan instead of relocating the Hanuman idol.</p>
<p class="isSelectedEnd">Bharti cited the example of road widening near Bhopal's Kamalapati area, arguing that development projects can be planned in ways that protect religious structures.</p>
<p class="isSelectedEnd">Her intervention has added a political dimension to an issue that has primarily revolved around road development, religious sentiment and the safety of the idol.</p>
<h4><strong>Devotee Rush Grows Amid Social Media Buzz</strong></h4>
<p class="isSelectedEnd">The controversy has triggered a noticeable increase in visitors. Devotees from Delhi, Nagpur, Rajasthan, Maharashtra and other places have reportedly arrived to see the standing Hanuman idol.</p>
<p class="isSelectedEnd">Religious leaders have also visited the temple and called for an alternative solution that allows road development without disturbing the idol.</p>
<p class="isSelectedEnd">Sadhvi Harshanand Giri, also known as Harsha Richariya, visited the temple and opposed the relocation efforts. She demanded that the administration visit the temple, offer prayers and commit to rebuilding the shrine. She also warned of a protest and fast if her demands were not addressed.</p>
<p class="isSelectedEnd">Congress leaders and workers have also visited the site and participated in Hanuman Chalisa recitations.</p>
<p>The growing crowds and competing claims have made the issue increasingly sensitive. For now, the technical assessment and the administration's next decision are likely to determine whether the road project can proceed without shifting the idol or whether another solution will be required.</p>]]></content:encoded>
                
                                                            <category>Madhya Pradesh</category>
                                    

                <link>https://english.dainikjagranmpcg.com/states/madhya-pradesh/ujjain-hanuman-idol-row-administration-denies-removal-attempt/article-29926</link>
                <guid>https://english.dainikjagranmpcg.com/states/madhya-pradesh/ujjain-hanuman-idol-row-administration-denies-removal-attempt/article-29926</guid>
                <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 10:51:58 +0530</pubDate>
                                    <enclosure
                        url="https://english.dainikjagranmpcg.com/media/2026-09/m-%2812%291.jpg"                         length="253209"                         type="image/jpeg"  />
                
                                    <dc:creator><![CDATA[Sandeep.P]]></dc:creator>
                            </item>
            <item>
                <title>Ujjain Hanuman Idol Remains Unmoved Amid Temple Demolition</title>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Ujjain's ancient standing Hanuman idol reportedly remained unmoved during road-widening work, prompting devotees to call the incident a divine sign.</strong></p>]]></description>
                
                                    <content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="https://english.dainikjagranmpcg.com/states/madhya-pradesh/ujjain-hanuman-idol-remains-unmoved-amid-temple-demolition/article-29542"><img src="https://english.dainikjagranmpcg.com/media/400/2026-09/k-(61).jpg" alt=""></a><br /><p class="isSelectedEnd">An ancient Hanuman idol at Ujjain’s Sati Gate has reportedly remained in place despite repeated attempts to shift it during road-widening work, prompting religious groups to call it a divine sign.</p>
<h4><strong>Road Widening Work Underway</strong></h4>
<p class="isSelectedEnd">Ujjain’s preparations for the 2028 Simhastha Kumbh have brought an old religious structure at Sati Gate into focus after efforts to relocate a standing Hanuman idol reportedly failed repeatedly.</p>
<p class="isSelectedEnd">The idol is located along the route between Kanthal Square and Chhatri Chowk, where road-widening and related development work are underway. According to local reports, the administration planned to shift the temple and relocate the idol as part of the project.</p>
<p class="isSelectedEnd">The episode has since attracted the attention of devotees, saints and Hindu organisations, many of whom have opposed the relocation.</p>
<h4><strong>Four Attempts Reportedly Fail</strong></h4>
<p class="isSelectedEnd">Reports said municipal teams began demolition-related work around September 4 and 5. While the temple structure was removed, efforts to move the standing Hanuman idol reportedly did not succeed.</p>
<p class="isSelectedEnd">Local reporting said attempts were made several times over a period of days, but the approximately eight-foot idol remained at its original location. A hydraulic machine was reportedly used during the effort.</p>
<p class="isSelectedEnd">The failure has generated considerable discussion among devotees, with some describing the incident as a miracle or divine indication.</p>
<p class="isSelectedEnd">There is, however, no independent evidence establishing a supernatural explanation for why the idol could not be moved.</p>
<h4><strong>Administration Faces Practical Challenge</strong></h4>
<p class="isSelectedEnd">Reports indicate that officials believe the difficulty could be linked to the structure beneath the idol. The visible portion of the idol may be only part of a larger foundation or stone structure extending below ground level.</p>
<p class="isSelectedEnd">The exact depth and construction of the foundation have reportedly not yet been established. This has made mechanical removal more complicated than initially expected.</p>
<p class="isSelectedEnd">The incident therefore has both religious and engineering dimensions, with further assessment required before a definitive explanation can be given.</p>
<h4><strong>Idol Kept Under Protection</strong></h4>
<p class="isSelectedEnd">With the temple structure reportedly demolished, arrangements have been made to protect the idol from exposure. A canopy has been placed over the area, according to local reports.</p>
<p class="isSelectedEnd">Devotees have continued visiting the site and offering prayers. The issue has also attracted the involvement of the Archaeological Survey of India, according to reports, amid questions about the history and age of the idol.</p>
<h4><strong>History Of The Temple Under Review</strong></h4>
<p class="isSelectedEnd">Local accounts describe the temple as roughly 170 years old, dating to around the 19th century. There have also been claims linking the idol to a much earlier period, including the Paramara era and the reign of King Bhoj.</p>
<p class="isSelectedEnd">Those older-origin claims have <strong>not been conclusively established</strong>. Historical dating would require proper archaeological and material examination.</p>
<p class="isSelectedEnd">The distinction is important because devotional traditions and historical evidence do not necessarily establish the same date or origin.</p>
<h4><strong>Saints Call It Divine Sign</strong></h4>
<p class="isSelectedEnd">The failed relocation has prompted saints and devotees to interpret the development through a religious lens. Some have argued that the idol's refusal to move despite machinery being used is evidence of divine intervention.</p>
<p class="isSelectedEnd">Officials, however, must deal with the issue through administrative, structural and heritage considerations.</p>
<p class="isSelectedEnd">The episode has therefore become a sensitive issue as Ujjain prepares for the 2028 Simhastha, when the city is expected to witness a major increase in pilgrims and infrastructure activity.</p>
<h4><strong>What Happens Next</strong></h4>
<p class="isSelectedEnd">The immediate challenge is to determine whether the idol can be safely relocated, preserved at its existing position or incorporated into the redesigned road corridor.</p>
<p>Further technical and historical assessment is expected to play a role in deciding the next course of action. Until such findings are available, claims that the incident proves a miracle remain matters of faith rather than established fact.</p>]]></content:encoded>
                
                                                            <category>Madhya Pradesh</category>
                                    

                <link>https://english.dainikjagranmpcg.com/states/madhya-pradesh/ujjain-hanuman-idol-remains-unmoved-amid-temple-demolition/article-29542</link>
                <guid>https://english.dainikjagranmpcg.com/states/madhya-pradesh/ujjain-hanuman-idol-remains-unmoved-amid-temple-demolition/article-29542</guid>
                <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 07:16:24 +0530</pubDate>
                                    <enclosure
                        url="https://english.dainikjagranmpcg.com/media/2026-09/k-%2861%29.jpg"                         length="264030"                         type="image/jpeg"  />
                
                                    <dc:creator><![CDATA[Sandeep.P]]></dc:creator>
                            </item>

            </channel>
        </rss>
        