SC grants anticipatory bail to Pawan Khera, cites political rivalry in Assam defamation case 

Congress leader faces charges over remarks against CM’s wife; top court says liberty must be protected in politically charged complaints

Supreme Court intervenes

The Supreme Court on Wednesday granted anticipatory bail to Congress spokesperson Pawan Khera in a criminal defamation and forgery case registered by Assam Police. A bench of Justices JK Maheshwari and AS Chandurkar set aside the Gauhati High Court’s earlier order that had refused pre-arrest protection to the leader.

The court observed that the circumstances surrounding the case indicated an element of political rivalry, adding that personal liberty cannot be compromised in disputes that appear to stem from electoral or ideological conflict.

Case filed after press conference remarks

The legal trouble for Khera began after he alleged at a recent press conference that Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma’s wife, Riniki Bhuyan, held multiple foreign passports and had undisclosed assets abroad. The complaint, filed by Bhuyan, triggered an FIR that included charges of defamation, forgery, and criminal conspiracy.

Assam Police officials travelled to Khera’s Delhi residence on 7 April, but he was not present at the time. Khera then sought legal recourse through the Telangana High Court, which granted him transit anticipatory bail for one week on 10 April.

Timeline of legal moves

That relief was short-lived. On 15 April, the Supreme Court stayed the Telangana High Court’s order following an appeal from the Assam government. Two days later, the top court refused to extend the transit bail period and directed Khera to approach the Gauhati High Court instead.

Khera complied, arguing in his petition before the Gauhati bench that his statements were made in a political and public context during a press conference. He claimed the FIR was nothing more than an act of political vendetta, especially since the complainant was the Chief Minister’s wife.

High Court had sought custodial interrogation

On 24 April, the Gauhati High Court rejected his plea. In its order, the bench said custodial interrogation was necessary to identify the sources who provided Khera with the documents he had cited. The court also observed that while political criticism of a sitting chief minister might be excusable as political rhetoric, dragging an “innocent woman” into the matter changed the nature of the case.

It clarified that this was not a simple defamation case and noted that Khera had not yet substantiated his claims with evidence.

What the Supreme Court said

After the high court’s refusal, Khera moved the Supreme Court again. The bench on Wednesday said liberty must be protected, especially when the alleged offence is rooted in political rivalry. While the court did not comment on the truth of Khera’s original claims, it made it clear that anticipatory bail should not be denied lightly when personal liberty is at stake.

Amit Shah Vows BJP Rule in Assam and Bengal to Curb Infiltrators

Union Home Minister targets Congress over alleged failure to check illegal immigration, sharpens attack on Rahul Gandhi amid Assam poll heat

Amit Shah on Infiltrators  

Union Home Minister Amit Shah on Tuesday asserted that a BJP government in Assam and West Bengal would effectively curb and remove illegal infiltrators, protecting local livelihoods and the state's demographic identity. Addressing a rally in Patharkandi, Sribhumi district of Assam, Shah accused the Congress of sheltering infiltrators in the past and turning parts of the region into a haven for them.

Poll Campaign Enters Final Phase  

With public campaigning for the April 9 Assembly polls in Assam, Kerala, and Puducherry scheduled to end later on Tuesday, followed by a 48-hour silence period, Shah's remarks carried added weight. The Election Commission has imposed restrictions under Section 126 of the Representation of the People Act, banning rallies, processions, and public meetings from 5 pm Tuesday until polling concludes. Similar curbs apply to other poll-bound states.Sharp Attack on Congress  

Shah directly targeted Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, claiming the party's standards had declined under his leadership. He criticised recent statements by Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge, who had reportedly called BJP-supporting states "illiterate." Shah defended Assam's legacy, citing leaders like Mahatma Gandhi, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, Vikram Sarabhai, and Prime Minister Narendra Modi. "Congress should be ashamed," he said, according to reports from the rally.

The Home Minister claimed that infiltrators had already been identified in Assam and vowed systematic action to weed them out. "We will not let Assam become an infiltrator-dominated region," Shah declared, adding that infiltration would stop completely if BJP-led governments were in power in Assam, West Bengal, and Tripura. He linked the issue to local concerns over jobs, rations, and land.

Parallel Row Involving Himanta Sarma  

The day's developments in Assam were dominated by a separate but intense political row. Assam Police conducted searches at the Delhi residence of Congress leader Pawan Khera on Tuesday morning in connection with an FIR filed by the wife of Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma. Khera had alleged on Sunday that Riniki Bhuyan Sarma held passports of three countries — Egypt, Antigua and Barbuda, and the UAE. He also raised questions over alleged overseas assets.

Sarma dismissed the claims as baseless and politically motivated. He warned of defamation proceedings and suggested the case could extend to Rahul Gandhi, whom he accused of backing Khera. In strong remarks, Sarma said Assam Police could "hunt down" Khera even from "pataal" and referred to historical resistance against "Islamic invasion." Congress leaders, including Ashok Gehlot, hit back, alleging the BJP was misusing police machinery out of panic ahead of the polls. Khera was reportedly not present at his Nizamuddin residence during the search, with some reports indicating he had moved to Hyderabad.

Border Restrictions for Polling  

In a related development, authorities closed movement along parts of the India-Bhutan border in Tamulpur district to ensure free and fair polling on April 9. Only essential travel, medical emergencies, and registered voters in specific constituencies were exempted. Markets like Dadgiri-Hatisar were also shut as a precautionary measure.

Background of Infiltration Debate  

Illegal immigration from Bangladesh has long been a contentious issue in Assam, shaping politics for decades. The BJP has positioned itself as the party that ended fresh infiltration through measures like the National Register of Citizens and peace accords with insurgent groups. Shah highlighted the Centre's efforts, including mainstreaming over 11,000 youth who surrendered arms via agreements with Bodoland and ULFA factions. Critics from the Congress side have accused the BJP of selective enforcement and polarisation.Impact on Assam Voters  

The twin narratives — Shah's focus on national security and the local passport controversy — have intensified campaigning in the final hours. Assam goes to polls in a single phase on April 9 across 126 constituencies, with results expected on May 4. Issues of identity, development, and governance are dominating discourse. Migrant workers returning home ahead of polls signal high voter turnout expectations.

Opposition parties, including Congress and regional outfits like AJP, have raised concerns over alleged misuse of agencies and demanded a level playing field. BJP leaders, meanwhile, project confidence, with Chief Minister Sarma claiming the party was headed for a comfortable victory.

What Lies Ahead  

As the silence period begins, all eyes will be on polling day arrangements and voter turnout. The infiltration debate is likely to echo in post-poll analysis, especially if results in Assam and later phases in West Bengal reflect shifting public priorities. Political observers note that the BJP is banking on its record of border management and development initiatives, while the Congress is attempting to frame the election around governance and personal allegations.

The coming days will test how these issues translate into votes in a state where demographic concerns have historically influenced electoral outcomes.

MEA Dismisses 'Trashy Ruminations' as PM Modi's Name Surfaces in Epstein Files

India's foreign ministry has issued a sharp rebuttal after Prime Minister Narendra Modi's name was referenced in the massive new release of documents related to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, labeling the claims as "trashy ruminations by a convicted criminal".

The controversy erupted following the U.S. Department of Justice's release of 3.5 million pages of records under the Epstein Files Transparency Act on January 30, 2026. The documents included an email where Epstein claimed the Indian PM followed his advice during a 2017 visit to Israel, prompting a fierce political clash in New Delhi.

The MEA's Forceful Rejection

The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) moved swiftly to address the reference, confirming only the factual occurrence of the Prime Minister's landmark Israel visit in July 2017—the first by an Indian PM. In an official statement, MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal dismissed all other insinuations in the email with "the utmost contempt".

"The rest of the allusions in the email are little more than trashy ruminations by a convicted criminal," the statement read. The government's response aimed to shut down what it framed as a baseless narrative rooted in the claims of a disgraced individual.

 The Allegation and Political Fallout

The specific email cited by opposition leaders was sent by Epstein on July 6, 2017—the final day of PM Modi's Israel trip. In it, Epstein wrote, "The Indian Prime Minister Modi took advice and danced and sang in Israel for the benefit of the US president. They had met a few weeks ago.. it worked !".

The Congress party seized on the reference, with spokesperson Pawan Khera calling it a "matter of national shame" and demanding the Prime Minister personally answer three questions about the nature of the alleged advice and what "worked".

The BJP retaliated fiercely, accusing the Congress of fraud. Party spokesperson Sambit Patra alleged the opposition had deceptively edited the email, inserting the word "his" to falsely construct a phrase claiming Modi took "his advice" from Epstein.

Beyond the 2017 Email: Other India References

The tranche of documents contained more than a dozen emails and messages referencing India. They included:

A 2014 email from current Petroleum Minister Hardeep Puri to Epstein, written before Puri joined the government, detailing strategic reasons for engaging with India post-Modi's election.

May 2019 emails from Epstein to Trump strategist Steve Bannon and Indian businessman Anil Ambani. Epstein suggested arranging a meeting between Bannon and Modi, claiming the Prime Minister was "on board" with certain ideas and discussing China and Pakistan as strategic concerns.

A Global Scandal's Latest Ripple

The U.S. DoJ's release is the largest under the transparency act and includes emails linking Epstein to a global network of politicians, celebrities, and billionaires. The files mention hundreds of names, including former U.S. President Donald Trump, Britain's Prince Andrew, and entrepreneur Elon Musk, highlighting the financier's relentless pursuit of high-profile connections.

Legal representatives for Epstein's victims have criticized the release for inadequately protecting survivors' identities, with lawyer Gloria Allred stating the DoJ "should be ashamed of themselves".

Key Allegations and Official Responses

| Aspect | Detail | Source / Response |

| Core Allegation | Epstein email claims PM Modi "took advice" and performed in Israel for the benefit of the US President in July 2017. | U.S. DoJ Released Files |

| MEA's Response | Dismisses claims as "trashy ruminations by a convicted criminal," confirms only the official visit occurred. | Official MEA Statement |

| Political Reaction | Congress demands PM's explanation; BJP accuses Congress of editing emails and committing fraud. | Political Statements |

| Other India Links | Emails show 2014 contact from Hardeep Puri and 2019 messages to Steve Bannon & Anil Ambani referencing Modi. | Document References |

| Global Context | Files detail Epstein's connections to Trump, Prince Andrew, Bill Gates, Elon Musk, and other global figures. | BBC Analysis |

Why This Matters Now

The timing of the controversy is significant on two fronts. First, it demonstrates the continuing global ripple effects of the Epstein case, revealing how his influence operations attempted to touch virtually every sphere of power. Second, it injects a volatile element into India's domestic politics, with the opposition seeking accountability and the government vehemently defending the Prime Minister's integrity.

As of now, the MEA's unequivocal dismissal stands as the government's final word on the matter. With the Prime Minister scheduled for a second visit to Israel in February 2026, the diplomatic significance of the relationship remains, even as the political storm over the past visit continues to brew at home.