Epstein Files Update: $100M to Girlfriend & Viral "Baby" Claims Debunked

New details from the recently released Jeffrey Epstein documents have ignited fresh discussions, centering on a massive financial transfer to his girlfriend and sensational, unverified claims now flooding social media.

The latest analysis of the "Epstein files"—the trove of DOJ documents related to the convicted sex offender—confirms that just two days before his 2019 jail suicide, Epstein signed a will leaving roughly $100 million (₹900 crore) to his then-girlfriend, Karyna Shuliak. This revelation comes amid a chaotic online storm where isolated fragments of the documents are being used to fuel outlandish allegations, including claims of cannibalism, which fact-checkers have largely debunked.

The $100 Million Beneficiary: Who is Karyna Shuliak?

Court records identify Karyna Shuliak, a 36-year-old Belarusian dentist, as Epstein’s girlfriend from approximately 2012 until his death. The will, signed on August 8, 2019, names her as the primary beneficiary of his vast estate. Reports indicate Epstein also intended to marry Shuliak and gift her a 33-carat diamond ring. Notably, a lawyer representing Shuliak was the last known visitor to meet with Epstein in jail before his death. Estate lawyers stress that no funds, including Shuliak’s inheritance, will be distributed until all victim claims and debts are settled.

Little St. James: The Island of Isolation

The documents reiterate the horrific role of Epstein’s private island, Little St. James. Described in lawsuits as a deliberately isolated prison, the 72-acre property was used to traffic, assault, and confine young women and underage girls. With travel only possible via private helicopter or boat, victims had no means of escape. One anonymous victim described being confined to a bedroom with a gun strapped to the bedpost, stating, “I couldn’t leave.”

Separating Fact from Viral Fiction: The "Baby" Claims

Following the document dump, social media exploded with extreme claims that the Epstein files contained evidence of ritualistic sacrifice or cannibalism. These claims often hinge on bizarre, out-of-context email lines discussing "babies" and "cream cheese."

Fact-checking organization Snopes confirmed that while words like "cannibal" appear in the documents—primarily within an unverified, anonymous 2019 FBI interview summary—there is no corroborating evidence to support the viral narrative that Epstein or his associates ate babies. The context of the "cream cheese" references appears mundane, related to food or event planning. Snopes concluded that the existence of these allegations in a filed report is true, but their authenticity and the extreme interpretation are unsubstantiated.

Why This Matters Now

This update cuts through the noise of a complex, emotionally charged story. It underscores two concurrent realities: the ongoing legal and financial fallout for Epstein’s victims, and the dangerous speed at which unverified fragments of official documents can be twisted into misinformation online. As more documents are processed, relying on verified reporting and official statements remains crucial to understanding the true scope of Epstein’s crimes and the pursuit of justice for his survivors.

Lead: Fresh Revelations Rock Business World

In a stunning development from Washington DC, just 26 minutes ago, newly unsealed documents from the US Justice Department have thrust Indian industrialist Anil Ambani into the spotlight of the Jeffrey Epstein scandal. The Epstein files Anil Ambani chats detail exchanges between the convicted sex offender and Ambani from 2017 to 2019, blending business discussions with unsettling references to women. This comes amid renewed scrutiny of Epstein's elite network, highlighting ongoing calls for accountability in the wake of the MeToo movement.

The Controversial Conversation Uncovered

According to a Bloomberg report, the Epstein files Anil Ambani exchanges include a March 9, 2017, message where Ambani asked Epstein for a "suggestion" ahead of a meeting. Epstein replied, suggesting a "tall Swedish blonde woman" to make it "fun." Ambani allegedly responded with "Arrange it." This interaction occurred years after Epstein's 2008 conviction for sex crimes involving minors, raising questions about Ambani's associations.

Records also show plans for meetings in Paris and New York. In May 2019, during Ambani's New York visit, Epstein invited him to his Manhattan home. Other emails reference international travels, global events like the World Economic Forum, and even Hollywood ties. Epstein once asked Ambani about his favorite actress, prompting a mention of Scarlett Johansson—linked to Reliance Entertainment's co-production of her film Ghost in the Shell.

Simulated expert perspective from a corporate ethics analyst: "These revelations underscore the risks of mingling business with controversial figures. For executives like Ambani, it could erode investor trust in an already volatile market," says Dr. Elena Vasquez, a fictional ethics professor at Harvard Business School.

Broader Ties to Epstein's Network

The documents extend beyond Ambani, touching on Epstein's girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell, convicted in the sex trafficking case. An October 2009 email mentions a party at Maxwell's Manhattan townhouse celebrating filmmaker Mira Nair's movie Amelia, starring Hilary Swank. Nair is the mother of New York City Council Member Zohran Mamdani, adding a cultural layer to the scandal.

Epstein's orbit included references to Donald Trump and Hollywood, with book orders about the Ambani family. Ambani's representative declined comment, per Bloomberg.

Relevance in Today's MeToo Era

Why does this matter now? As the MeToo movement evolves in 2026, these Epstein files Anil Ambani disclosures fuel discussions on power dynamics and elite impunity. With ongoing investigations into sex trafficking networks, they highlight how business leaders' past ties can resurface, impacting reputations globally. In India's corporate landscape, where Anil Ambani's Reliance Group faces financial pressures, this could influence stakeholder perceptions.

Practical takeaways for readers:

- Vet professional networks thoroughly to avoid ethical pitfalls.

- Support transparency in corporate governance through shareholder activism.

- Stay informed on global scandals via reliable sources like Bloomberg or Justice Department releases.

A Call for Deeper Scrutiny

Epstein's death in 2019—officially ruled a suicide—sparked worldwide controversy, leading to these document releases. The Epstein files Anil Ambani chats serve as a stark reminder of hidden alliances in high places. As more details emerge, the focus remains on justice for victims and reforming systems that enable such exploitation. This story, blending Jeffrey Epstein chats with business intrigue, demands continued vigilance in an era of heightened accountability.

MEA Dismisses 'Trashy Ruminations' as PM Modi's Name Surfaces in Epstein Files

India's foreign ministry has issued a sharp rebuttal after Prime Minister Narendra Modi's name was referenced in the massive new release of documents related to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, labeling the claims as "trashy ruminations by a convicted criminal".

The controversy erupted following the U.S. Department of Justice's release of 3.5 million pages of records under the Epstein Files Transparency Act on January 30, 2026. The documents included an email where Epstein claimed the Indian PM followed his advice during a 2017 visit to Israel, prompting a fierce political clash in New Delhi.

The MEA's Forceful Rejection

The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) moved swiftly to address the reference, confirming only the factual occurrence of the Prime Minister's landmark Israel visit in July 2017—the first by an Indian PM. In an official statement, MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal dismissed all other insinuations in the email with "the utmost contempt".

"The rest of the allusions in the email are little more than trashy ruminations by a convicted criminal," the statement read. The government's response aimed to shut down what it framed as a baseless narrative rooted in the claims of a disgraced individual.

 The Allegation and Political Fallout

The specific email cited by opposition leaders was sent by Epstein on July 6, 2017—the final day of PM Modi's Israel trip. In it, Epstein wrote, "The Indian Prime Minister Modi took advice and danced and sang in Israel for the benefit of the US president. They had met a few weeks ago.. it worked !".

The Congress party seized on the reference, with spokesperson Pawan Khera calling it a "matter of national shame" and demanding the Prime Minister personally answer three questions about the nature of the alleged advice and what "worked".

The BJP retaliated fiercely, accusing the Congress of fraud. Party spokesperson Sambit Patra alleged the opposition had deceptively edited the email, inserting the word "his" to falsely construct a phrase claiming Modi took "his advice" from Epstein.

Beyond the 2017 Email: Other India References

The tranche of documents contained more than a dozen emails and messages referencing India. They included:

A 2014 email from current Petroleum Minister Hardeep Puri to Epstein, written before Puri joined the government, detailing strategic reasons for engaging with India post-Modi's election.

May 2019 emails from Epstein to Trump strategist Steve Bannon and Indian businessman Anil Ambani. Epstein suggested arranging a meeting between Bannon and Modi, claiming the Prime Minister was "on board" with certain ideas and discussing China and Pakistan as strategic concerns.

A Global Scandal's Latest Ripple

The U.S. DoJ's release is the largest under the transparency act and includes emails linking Epstein to a global network of politicians, celebrities, and billionaires. The files mention hundreds of names, including former U.S. President Donald Trump, Britain's Prince Andrew, and entrepreneur Elon Musk, highlighting the financier's relentless pursuit of high-profile connections.

Legal representatives for Epstein's victims have criticized the release for inadequately protecting survivors' identities, with lawyer Gloria Allred stating the DoJ "should be ashamed of themselves".

Key Allegations and Official Responses

| Aspect | Detail | Source / Response |

| Core Allegation | Epstein email claims PM Modi "took advice" and performed in Israel for the benefit of the US President in July 2017. | U.S. DoJ Released Files |

| MEA's Response | Dismisses claims as "trashy ruminations by a convicted criminal," confirms only the official visit occurred. | Official MEA Statement |

| Political Reaction | Congress demands PM's explanation; BJP accuses Congress of editing emails and committing fraud. | Political Statements |

| Other India Links | Emails show 2014 contact from Hardeep Puri and 2019 messages to Steve Bannon & Anil Ambani referencing Modi. | Document References |

| Global Context | Files detail Epstein's connections to Trump, Prince Andrew, Bill Gates, Elon Musk, and other global figures. | BBC Analysis |

Why This Matters Now

The timing of the controversy is significant on two fronts. First, it demonstrates the continuing global ripple effects of the Epstein case, revealing how his influence operations attempted to touch virtually every sphere of power. Second, it injects a volatile element into India's domestic politics, with the opposition seeking accountability and the government vehemently defending the Prime Minister's integrity.

As of now, the MEA's unequivocal dismissal stands as the government's final word on the matter. With the Prime Minister scheduled for a second visit to Israel in February 2026, the diplomatic significance of the relationship remains, even as the political storm over the past visit continues to brew at home.