Former Pakistan PM was examined by six specialists at Shifa International Hospital; aide signals no confrontation with Army Chief Asim Munir if Khan is released

Imran Khan returns to jail

Former Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan was taken back to Adiala Jail on Friday after undergoing a medical examination at Shifa International Hospital in Islamabad.

Khan had been brought to the hospital from Adiala Jail late Thursday under heavy security. A team of six specialist doctors examined him and concluded that he did not require hospitalisation at present and could receive treatment while remaining in prison.

Following the medical assessment, Khan was taken back to the jail and returned to his cell.

Security was significantly tightened around Shifa International Hospital during his visit. Reports said hospital lights were switched off, staff members’ mobile phones were confiscated and media personnel outside the facility were moved away.

Aide signals softer approach

Meanwhile, one of Khan’s close aides told Reuters that the former Prime Minister would not seek a confrontation with Pakistan’s military or Army Chief Asim Munir if he were released.

The aide suggested that Munir could extend a “healing hand” following a legal development earlier this week. The remarks are being seen as a possible shift in the rhetoric surrounding Khan and his Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party.

Khan has remained in prison since August 2023 and has continued to be at the centre of Pakistan’s political conflict with the military establishment.

Government challenges hospital order

The development came after the Pakistan government filed a fresh review petition in the Supreme Court challenging the decision to move Khan to a private hospital for treatment.

The government had initially indicated that it would comply with the court's order. It later sought reconsideration and withdrawal of the direction.

Reports said an earlier review petition was returned by the court registrar's office because the required set of documents, including paper books, was incomplete.

Lawyer alleges access was blocked

Khan's lawyer, Khalid Yusuf Chaudhry, also alleged that jail authorities prevented him from meeting the former Prime Minister.

According to Chaudhry, he had gone to Adiala Jail to obtain Khan's signature on a contempt petition and power of attorney but was not allowed to meet him.

The lawyer alleged that the restriction was intended to prevent Khan from taking further legal action concerning his medical treatment. He said he would still pursue a contempt petition before the Supreme Court.

Medical concerns raised in court

A medical report placed before the court had raised concerns about Khan's health. The report referred to fluctuations in his blood pressure, a rapid heartbeat and significant mental stress.

His reported blood pressure was 140/80, compared with 120/80 in February. His pulse was recorded at 54 beats per minute.

The Supreme Court has also ordered the formation of a medical board to conduct a detailed assessment of Khan's condition. The panel is expected to include specialist doctors, along with Khan's sister Dr Uzma Khan and his personal physician.

The board will examine his previous medical records and assess the cause of his condition, including concerns related to blood clots, before determining the appropriate course of treatment.

Khan remains behind bars

Khan, 73, has been in jail since August 2023 after his conviction in the Toshakhana case. He subsequently faced several other cases, including those linked to the cipher, Al-Qadir Trust and the Iddat-Nikah matter.

He received relief in some of those cases, while a sentence in the Toshakhana matter was also stayed. However, he continues to remain imprisoned in connection with other legal proceedings.

Khan and PTI have repeatedly alleged that the cases against him are politically motivated and intended to keep him away from politics and elections. Pakistan's government and investigating agencies have rejected those allegations, maintaining that the cases are proceeding through the country's legal system.

For now, Khan's return to Adiala Jail means his treatment will continue under prison arrangements unless the medical board or the courts decide that hospitalisation is necessary.

Fresh allegations have emerged regarding Pakistan’s security establishment and its alleged links with extremist networks. According to a report, efforts are underway to politically contain Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam-Fazl (JUI-F) chief Maulana Fazlur Rehman after he publicly criticised Pakistan Army Chief General Asim Munir and questioned his security policies.

The claims, reported by CNN-News18, centre on a meeting between Pakistan Ulema Council Chairman Hafiz Tahir Mahmood Ashrafi and Hafiz Talha Saeed, the son of UN-designated terrorist Hafiz Saeed. Intelligence sources quoted in the report described the meeting as a strategic discussion aimed at formulating a coordinated response to Fazlur Rehman’s recent remarks against the military leadership.

According to the report, the meeting took place at Markaz Quba and involved discussions on managing the political fallout from Rehman’s criticism. Sources indicated that participants explored ways to reduce his growing influence without triggering a direct confrontation with one of Pakistan’s most prominent religious and political figures.

Strategy to Manage Dissent

Fazlur Rehman has in recent months emerged as one of the most vocal critics of General Asim Munir’s leadership, questioning both security policies and governance decisions. His statements have attracted attention across Pakistan’s political landscape and have added pressure on an establishment that traditionally wields significant influence over national affairs.

Sources cited in the report claimed that the gathering focused on adopting a calibrated approach toward Rehman. Rather than openly confronting him, those involved reportedly discussed highlighting positive aspects of his political career while simultaneously discouraging further criticism of the military.

The report alleged that Lashkar-e-Taiba-linked figures advised clerics to maintain a softer public tone while conveying a clear warning against continued attacks on the army leadership. Observers view such an approach as an attempt to manage dissent through informal networks rather than through conventional political channels.

Questions Over Military Links

The allegations have once again raised concerns about the relationship between Pakistan’s military establishment and extremist organisations. Security analysts have long argued that some groups originally cultivated for strategic purposes have gradually become part of broader political calculations within the country.

According to the report, Pakistan’s military establishment views certain religious and militant-linked networks as a mechanism to shield itself from rising political criticism. The alleged use of such actors as a “domestic firewall” reflects concerns about the growing challenge posed by political dissent.

If proven, the claims would further intensify international scrutiny of Pakistan’s handling of organisations that remain linked to designated terrorist entities.

Echoes of Balochistan

The latest controversy also recalls previous allegations involving Balochistan, where activists and rights groups have accused state agencies of using proxy networks to intimidate critics and suppress dissent.

In 2025, reports alleged that Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) was using Islamic State-linked cells to threaten Baloch activists. Rights campaigners claimed that extremist propaganda circulating at the time closely mirrored narratives promoted by sections of Pakistan’s security establishment.

A Baloch activist, speaking anonymously in those reports, argued that both ISIS-linked groups and state agencies sought to portray peaceful rights campaigners as supporters of militancy. According to activists, such efforts were aimed at undermining growing international awareness of alleged human rights violations and resource exploitation in the province.

Pakistan’s authorities have consistently denied allegations linking state institutions to extremist organisations. However, concerns surrounding civil-military relations and the influence of militant networks continue to attract attention from international observers and policy experts.

A high-profile criminal case in Pakistan has triggered a major political controversy after police arrested a close relative of Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar in connection with the alleged abduction and gang rape of two foreign women in Lahore. The case has intensified scrutiny of the government, with opposition leaders demanding Ishaq Dar’s resignation while the investigation continues.

According to Pakistani police, four suspects have been taken into custody, while another accused remains absconding. The prime suspect, identified as Muhammad Raza Dar, has been described by police sources as Ishaq Dar’s grandson. A Lahore court has remanded the arrested suspects to police custody for further investigation.

The alleged victims are foreign nationals from the Netherlands and Venezuela. Investigators said the women had reportedly travelled to Pakistan after being invited by the prime suspect, whom they had allegedly met during a cryptocurrency-related business venture in Singapore. Authorities are also examining whether the case has links to financial disputes connected to cryptocurrency investments.

Police documents indicate that shortly after arriving in Lahore on June 29, the women were allegedly abducted, confined at a private location and sexually assaulted. Investigators further allege that ransom money was demanded from the victims before they were rescued following information received from family members and diplomatic channels. The investigation remains ongoing, and authorities have said all aspects of the case are being examined.

The case has quickly moved beyond a criminal investigation into a political flashpoint. Pakistani Senator Faisal Vawda has publicly called for Ishaq Dar to step down from his posts as Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister, arguing that the seriousness of the allegations involving a close family member has damaged Pakistan’s international reputation. He also accused authorities of attempting to shield influential individuals, allegations that have not been officially substantiated.

Vawda further questioned why senior political leaders had remained largely silent on the issue and urged a transparent investigation. His remarks have intensified debate across Pakistan's political landscape, particularly because the accused is allegedly related to one of the country's most senior government leaders.

Pakistani investigators have not announced any conclusions regarding the allegations, and no court has determined the guilt of the accused. Under Pakistan's legal system, all suspects remain presumed innocent until proven guilty in court.

The case has also reignited concerns over the safety of foreign nationals visiting Pakistan and the handling of high-profile criminal investigations involving politically connected individuals. Human rights advocates and legal observers are closely watching the investigation, which is expected to face intense public and media scrutiny in the coming days.

Meanwhile, reports indicate that the two foreign women may have already left Pakistan after recording their statements before investigators. Officials have not released additional details regarding their current location or future participation in legal proceedings.

With the investigation continuing and political pressure mounting, the Lahore case has become one of Pakistan's most closely watched developments, raising questions about accountability, judicial transparency and the government's response to allegations involving members of politically influential families.

Tensions have escalated across Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK) following days of protests against reserved legislative seats allocated to refugees from Jammu and Kashmir living in other parts of Pakistan. According to reports and protest organizers, at least 46 people have died and more than 1,100 individuals have been detained during the ongoing agitation, which has entered its fourth consecutive day.

The movement, led by the Joint Awami Action Committee (JAAC), has emerged as one of the most significant political confrontations in the region in recent years. Protesters are demanding the abolition of 12 reserved seats in the Legislative Assembly, arguing that representation should be determined by residents currently living in the territory. The unrest has disrupted normal life in several major towns, including Muzaffarabad, Mirpur, and Poonch, where markets, educational institutions, and government offices remain closed.

Authorities have imposed security restrictions and internet services have reportedly been suspended in parts of the region as the administration attempts to contain the situation. The developments come just weeks before assembly elections scheduled for July 27.

Dispute Over Reserved Seats

The controversy centers on 12 assembly seats reserved for refugees who migrated from Jammu and Kashmir and later settled in various regions of Pakistan. Protest groups argue that these seats distort local political representation and should be abolished.

The issue gained momentum after the PoK Supreme Court on June 7 rejected petitions seeking to end the reservation arrangement. The court reportedly held that the constitutional provision could not be withdrawn through the demands presented before it, triggering fresh demonstrations across the region.

Following the verdict, JAAC intensified its campaign, calling for mass protests and sit-ins.

Security Crackdown and Arrests

Administrative sources and protest organizers claim that security forces have launched a large-scale crackdown on demonstrators. Reports indicate that sedition cases have been filed against several JAAC leaders, including prominent figures associated with the movement.

The government had earlier imposed restrictions on JAAC under anti-terrorism provisions, a move that critics say further intensified public anger. Additional paramilitary personnel, including Rangers and Frontier Constabulary units, have reportedly been deployed in sensitive districts to maintain law and order.

Despite these measures, protest gatherings have continued, with demonstrations being reported in both urban and rural areas.

Internet Shutdown Raises Concerns

Communication restrictions have emerged as another major issue during the crisis. Internet services have reportedly been suspended in several locations, limiting access to information and affecting daily life.

However, speeches and messages from protest leaders have continued to circulate through alternative channels. Reports suggest that some broadcasts reached audiences despite connectivity restrictions, drawing attention to the challenges authorities face in controlling information flow during the unrest.

Humanitarian Concerns Grow

As protests continue, residents have reported shortages of essential goods, including medicines and food supplies. The closure of markets and transportation disruptions have affected normal economic activity across several districts.

Local observers say prolonged restrictions could further impact healthcare services, education, and small businesses if the situation remains unresolved. Authorities have not issued detailed statements regarding the supply situation, but concerns among residents continue to grow.

International Attention and Political Reactions

The unrest has attracted attention beyond the region. Demonstrations highlighting the situation have reportedly been organized by activists in cities including London and New York.

Political leaders and civil society groups have also voiced concern over reports of casualties and detentions. Calls for an independent investigation into the incidents have emerged from multiple quarters, with demands for greater transparency regarding the events unfolding in the territory.

Imran Khan’s Former Aide Attacked in UK: What Happened

Mirza Shahzad Akbar, former Special Assistant to ex-Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan, has been seriously injured in a violent attack at his residence in Cambridge, United Kingdom. The incident, reported by PTI and police sources, has once again brought global attention to the safety of Pakistani political exiles living abroad.

According to initial information, an unidentified assailant entered Akbar’s home and repeatedly punched him in the face, leaving him with fractures to his nose and jaw. He was rushed to a hospital and is currently undergoing treatment. British police have confirmed that an investigation is underway and forensic evidence from the scene is being examined.

Akbar Accuses Pakistan Army Chief Asim Munir

Following the attack, Akbar publicly blamed Pakistan Army Chief General Asim Munir, alleging that the assault was part of a sustained campaign to intimidate and silence him while he is living in exile in the UK. The Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party also confirmed the incident, stating that Akbar sustained serious injuries during the early-morning attack.

While no official link has yet been established by British authorities, Akbar’s allegations have intensified political tensions and renewed debate over cross-border intimidation of dissidents.

A Pattern of Threats and Past Attacks

This is not the first time Akbar has faced danger in Britain. He has been living in the UK since April 2022, claiming he fled Pakistan due to threats to his life. In November 2023, a masked attacker allegedly threw acid at his Cambridge home. Although Akbar escaped unhurt, he described the incident as an attempt to silence him.

Akbar has repeatedly linked these attacks to the Al-Qadir Trust case involving Imran Khan. He claims Pakistani security agencies pressured him to testify against the former prime minister and that threats escalated after he refused.

Key allegations by Akbar include:

 Repeated threatening messages warning him to “mend his ways”

 Attempts to intimidate him into becoming a prosecution witness

 A coordinated effort to silence dissent abroad

Legal Battle and Extradition Efforts

After the acid attack, Akbar initiated legal proceedings in a British court in April 2024, alleging possible involvement of Pakistani officials. Pakistan’s Foreign Ministry dismissed these claims as baseless.

Meanwhile, Akbar faces legal trouble back home. An Islamabad court has declared him a proclaimed offender in a case linked to controversial social media posts. Pakistan’s Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi has also sought his extradition, submitting documents to the British High Commissioner. Although there is no formal extradition treaty between the UK and Pakistan, a limited agreement exists for specific cases.

Why This Matters Now

The latest assault on Imran Khan’s former aide attacked in the UK has raised serious concerns about the safety of Pakistani political exiles and dissidents in Britain. Experts warn that such incidents, if politically motivated, could strain diplomatic relations and challenge the UK’s responsibility to protect asylum seekers and exiles.

As British police continue their investigation, the case is being closely watched by human rights groups and political observers, who see it as a test of accountability and protection for those living in exile.