BJP scripts history in Bengal, TVK stuns Tamil Nadu as Left’s last bastion falls

In a seismic shift for Indian politics, the BJP has secured a landmark victory in West Bengal while actor Vijay’s TVK ended the decades-long DMK-AIADMK duopoly in Tamil Nadu; meanwhile, the Congress-led UDF reclaimed Kerala, effectively wiping the Left off India’s administrative map.

The political landscape of India underwent a radical transformation on Monday as assembly election results for five states delivered a series of historic firsts and stunning upsets. The most significant headline emerged from West Bengal, where the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) breached the "fortress of the East," ending Mamata Banerjee’s 15-year reign. In the South, actor Thalapathy Vijay’s debutant Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK) emerged as the single largest party, while the Left Democratic Front (LDF) was ousted from its final stronghold in Kerala.

Saffron surge in West Bengal

The BJP’s rise in West Bengal is being viewed as one of the most dramatic electoral climbs in recent history, jumping from just 3 seats a decade ago to a commanding 206 seats in the 293-member house. The Trinamool Congress (TMC), led by Mamata Banerjee, saw its strike rate plummet to 27.6%, managing only 81 seats.

The defeat was personal for the Chief Minister, as Banerjee herself lost her seat along with 12 senior cabinet ministers. "I was pushed and beaten," Banerjee told reporters at the Bhowanipore counting center, reflecting the bitter nature of the contest. This victory marks the first time since 1972 that the same party will hold power both in Kolkata and at the Centre.

The Vijay factor in Tamil Nadu

Tamil Nadu witnessed a political earthquake of a different kind. Two-year-old TVK, led by actor Vijay, secured 108 seats, more than the combined tally of the DMK (59) and AIADMK (47). This result shatters a 59-year-old tradition where power only alternated between the two Dravidian giants.

While Chief Minister M.K. Stalin’s son, Udhayanidhi, managed to retain his seat, the DMK saw 15 ministers lose their mandates. Vijay, appearing on his balcony to a sea of supporters, thanked the electorate for a "new era" in Tamil politics. The BJP, despite an aggressive campaign, remained a marginal player in the state, winning only one seat.

End of Left rule in India

In Kerala, the "God’s Own Country" followed its tradition of rotating power, but with a more permanent consequence this time. The Congress-led UDF returned to power after 10 years, defeating Pinarayi Vijayan’s LDF. With this loss, the Left has no government left in any Indian state, a historic low for the movement that once dominated several regions.

The UDF’s victory has triggered a race for the Chief Minister’s chair, with names like V.D. Satheesan and K.C. Venugopal doing the rounds. The LDF’s defeat was comprehensive, with 13 out of 21 ministers failing to hold their constituencies.

Assam’s hat-trick and Puducherry’s return

Assam provided a stable contrast to the upheavals elsewhere. The Himanta Biswa Sarma-led BJP government secured a third consecutive term, winning 82 seats. In a rare feat, not a single sitting minister of the BJP government lost their election. The party’s strategy in Upper Assam and the Barak Valley resulted in a near-clean sweep, leaving the Congress confined largely to Lower Assam.

In the Union Territory of Puducherry, N. Rangasamy is set to become Chief Minister for the fifth time. His party, the AINRC, maintained its dominance in Central and South Puducherry, securing a 75% strike rate in the seats it contested.

Strategic shifts and voter dynamics

The BJP’s Bengal victory is being attributed to a massive grassroots operation. Home Minister Amit Shah reportedly camped in the state for 15 days, overseeing the 'Panna Pramukh' strategy. Data also suggests a significant impact from the Special Information Report (SIR) process, which saw the removal of approximately 91 lakh voters from the lists.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who addressed workers at the Delhi headquarters wearing a traditional Bengali kurta-dhoti, had a strike rate of 76% in the seats where he held rallies. The party’s promise to implement the 7th Pay Commission and increase welfare benefits proved to be a decisive factor in swaying the electorate.

The road ahead for new governments

As the dust settles, the focus shifts to government formation. In Bengal, the BJP faces the "problem of plenty" regarding its CM face, with names like Suvendu Adhikari and Sukanta Majumdar under discussion. There is also strong speculation that the party might appoint its first woman Chief Minister in the state.

In Tamil Nadu, Vijay’s TVK will now have to transition from a fan-led movement to a governing body, facing a depleted but experienced opposition. For the Congress in Kerala, the challenge will be to manage internal coalition dynamics while navigating the state's fiscal hurdles.

SC Issues Notice to EC; Mamata Questions "Why No SIR in Assam?", Next Hearing Monday 

In a significant development, the Supreme Court on Wednesday issued a formal notice to the Election Commission of India (ECI) on petitions challenging the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in West Bengal. The bench, led by Chief Justice Surya Kant, will hear the matter next on Monday, setting the stage for a high-stakes legal clash just months before the state’s assembly elections.  

West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee, who was present in court, personally argued that the SIR exercise is being rushed through in three months—a process that normally spans two years—and alleged that her state is being unfairly targeted. In a pointed accusation, she questioned why a similar revision was not being conducted in BJP-ruled Assam, calling the EC’s approach discriminatory.  

Allegations of Large-Scale Voter Disenfranchisement  

The Chief Minister, filing the petition under Article 32, contended that the SIR is arbitrary and could lead to the exclusion of millions of legitimate voters. She cited “logical discrepancies” in names—often due to dialectal variations or marital surname changes—as grounds for wrongful deletions. Her counsel highlighted that over 1.4 crore discrepancy notices have been issued, causing widespread public inconvenience.  

“The fight is for larger public interest,” Banerjee told the bench, claiming she had written six unanswered letters to the EC. She alleged that micro-observers from BJP-ruled states are overriding local Electoral Registration Officers, deleting names without proper verification, and that many living individuals have been erroneously declared dead in the rolls.  

EC’s Defense and Court’s Observations  

Appearing for the Election Commission, Senior Advocate Rakesh Dwivedi defended the process, stating that all notices contain reasons and that agents are permitted to assist voters. However, the bench made strong oral observations, urging EC officials to act “a little sensible” and questioning the need for excessive micro-observers.  

The court also acknowledged practical challenges, noting that completely withdrawing all notices—as sought by the petitioners—might be “impractical.” However, it emphasized that voters must be clearly informed why their names are flagged, especially when discrepancies arise from linguistic nuances.  

Political Ramifications and Next Steps  

The Trinamool Congress hailed the court’s notice as a “big win,” while the legal outcome could directly impact the 2026 West Bengal elections. Banerjee has demanded that polls be conducted using the 2025 electoral rolls, not the revised list.  

With the Supreme Court scheduling a joint hearing of related petitions on Monday, all eyes are now on the Election Commission’s formal response. The case strikes at the heart of electoral integrity and federal fairness, setting a crucial precedent for how voter list revisions are conducted across India ahead of major elections.