AIADMK Splits as Rebels Back Vijay Govt Ahead of Floor Test

Rebel AIADMK faction led by CV Shanmugam extends support to CM Vijay's TVK government, leaving Edappadi Palaniswami's camp weakened with just 17 MLAs as trust vote looms Wednesday.

Rebel Faction Breaks Ranks

Tamil Nadu's AIADMK faced a dramatic split on Tuesday morning when senior leader CV Shanmugam publicly declared support for Chief Minister Joseph Vijay's Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK) government. Speaking to reporters outside party offices in Chennai, Shanmugam said the move accepts "the mandate of the people," framing it as backing for Vijay personally rather than TVK outright.

Initial reports indicate around 30 AIADMK MLAs have quietly aligned with the rebels, shrinking the official faction's strength. This comes just a day before the Assembly floor test on May 13, called by Governor to prove Vijay's majority after TVK's surprise 2026 poll win.

Party Whip Issued Amid Defiance

In response, AIADMK coordinator Agri S.S. Krishnamurthy fired back, announcing a strict party whip directing all 47 MLAs to vote against TVK. "Action will be taken against those who defy the directive," he warned in a late morning statement from the party headquarters.

Edappadi K. Palaniswami, the party's general secretary, arrived at the Assembly on Monday with loyalists, signaling efforts to hold the line. Sources familiar with the matter said Palaniswami's camp now counts only 17 reliable MLAs, a blow after the party's meager 47-seat haul in the elections.

Shanmugam's Rationale: No DMK Tie-Up

Shanmugam justified the shift by stressing AIADMK's 53-year anti-DMK legacy. "A proposal to form government with DMK support was floated, but most members rejected it outright," he noted. "Had we gone that route, AIADMK's very existence would have ended."

He added that with no alliances in sight, the priority now is rebuilding the party independently. "Our entire focus is strengthening AIADMK again," Shanmugam said, positioning TVK support as a pragmatic stopgap.

Roots of the AIADMK Split

The fracture exposes deeper rifts. Former leader KC Palanisamy called it a "clear split," with many MLAs pushing for leadership change. "If Edappadi stays on, more may shift to TVK," he told reporters.

Key triggers include years of electoral losses— from 2019 Lok Sabha to 2021 Assembly, 2024 polls, and the 2025 Erode bypoll. Rebels also point to Palaniswami's fallout with BJP over 2024 seat-sharing talks, where he allegedly snubbed Delhi leaders. For 2026, allocating 27 "unwinnable" seats to BJP further eroded trust, they claim.

Historic Third Front Takes Power

Vijay, the actor-turned-politician, was sworn in as Tamil Nadu's 9th Chief Minister on May 10, with TVK's M.V. Karuppaiya as Protem Speaker. This marks the first non-DMK-AIADMK government since 1967, when DMK ousted Congress.

For nearly six decades, power alternated between DMK and AIADMK post-MGR's 1972 split. Smaller players like Congress, BJP, PMK and DMDK tried but failed to break the duopoly. TVK's rise ends that era, raising questions on stability amid coalition math.

Floor Test Looms Large

As Wednesday's trust vote nears, Vijay's TVK needs every edge. The AIADMK split could tip the scales, but Palaniswami's whip threatens disciplinary steps. Party insiders say rebels are mulling a formal breakaway to regroup.

Public eyes remain on Chennai's Assembly, where ground mood mixes shock with speculation. Local observers note this could reshape opposition dynamics, forcing AIADMK to confront its worst crisis yet. For now, Vijay's government hangs in a delicate balance.

SC Issues Notice to EC; Mamata Questions "Why No SIR in Assam?", Next Hearing Monday 

In a significant development, the Supreme Court on Wednesday issued a formal notice to the Election Commission of India (ECI) on petitions challenging the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in West Bengal. The bench, led by Chief Justice Surya Kant, will hear the matter next on Monday, setting the stage for a high-stakes legal clash just months before the state’s assembly elections.  

West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee, who was present in court, personally argued that the SIR exercise is being rushed through in three months—a process that normally spans two years—and alleged that her state is being unfairly targeted. In a pointed accusation, she questioned why a similar revision was not being conducted in BJP-ruled Assam, calling the EC’s approach discriminatory.  

Allegations of Large-Scale Voter Disenfranchisement  

The Chief Minister, filing the petition under Article 32, contended that the SIR is arbitrary and could lead to the exclusion of millions of legitimate voters. She cited “logical discrepancies” in names—often due to dialectal variations or marital surname changes—as grounds for wrongful deletions. Her counsel highlighted that over 1.4 crore discrepancy notices have been issued, causing widespread public inconvenience.  

“The fight is for larger public interest,” Banerjee told the bench, claiming she had written six unanswered letters to the EC. She alleged that micro-observers from BJP-ruled states are overriding local Electoral Registration Officers, deleting names without proper verification, and that many living individuals have been erroneously declared dead in the rolls.  

EC’s Defense and Court’s Observations  

Appearing for the Election Commission, Senior Advocate Rakesh Dwivedi defended the process, stating that all notices contain reasons and that agents are permitted to assist voters. However, the bench made strong oral observations, urging EC officials to act “a little sensible” and questioning the need for excessive micro-observers.  

The court also acknowledged practical challenges, noting that completely withdrawing all notices—as sought by the petitioners—might be “impractical.” However, it emphasized that voters must be clearly informed why their names are flagged, especially when discrepancies arise from linguistic nuances.  

Political Ramifications and Next Steps  

The Trinamool Congress hailed the court’s notice as a “big win,” while the legal outcome could directly impact the 2026 West Bengal elections. Banerjee has demanded that polls be conducted using the 2025 electoral rolls, not the revised list.  

With the Supreme Court scheduling a joint hearing of related petitions on Monday, all eyes are now on the Election Commission’s formal response. The case strikes at the heart of electoral integrity and federal fairness, setting a crucial precedent for how voter list revisions are conducted across India ahead of major elections.