Bengaluru Police have transferred 31 Bangladeshi nationals detained during a citywide verification drive to a holding centre in Malda, West Bengal, where further formalities for their deportation will be completed.

 Bengaluru Police have sent 31 Bangladeshi nationals to Malda in West Bengal as part of ongoing deportation proceedings against foreign nationals allegedly staying in India without valid documents.

The group was detained from areas falling under 10 police stations across Bengaluru during the city's ongoing verification drive, known as Operation Mukta. The individuals were transported by train from Sir M Visvesvaraya Terminal (SMVT) and escorted by a team of 20 police personnel. 

The group reached Malda and was handed over to authorities at the Karma Tirtha Holding Centre for further procedures related to deportation, Bengaluru Police said. The individuals will be processed in coordination with West Bengal authorities before the next stage of repatriation to Bangladesh. 

31 people moved to Malda holding centre

The transfer is part of the administrative and legal process preceding deportation. The move to Malda does not itself mean that the individuals have already been returned to Bangladesh.

Authorities are expected to complete the required verification and other formalities before the group is handed over through the prescribed mechanism for repatriation.

West Bengal authorities received the group after it arrived at Malda Town railway station and subsequently took them to the designated holding facility in English Bazar. Officials are expected to verify identities and complete the relevant procedures before any formal deportation. 

Action follows Operation Mukta

The Bengaluru Police action comes amid an intensified drive to identify foreign nationals allegedly residing in the city without valid immigration documents.

Under Operation Mukta, police teams have conducted verification exercises across Bengaluru. Earlier reporting said the operation resulted in 105 Bangladeshi nationals being identified during the wider exercise, with their cases being processed by the competent authorities. 

In the Electronic City division, police had earlier carried out extensive document verification involving 1,909 people. Officials said those requiring further scrutiny were referred to the Foreigners Regional Registration Office (FRRO) for appropriate action. 

Police have maintained that deportation proceedings require verification and coordination with the relevant central and state authorities.

Police appeal against vigilantism

Bengaluru Police Commissioner Seemanth Kumar Singh has appealed to residents to provide information about suspected undocumented foreign nationals to the police.

At the same time, police have cautioned members of the public against taking the law into their own hands or harassing people on the basis of suspicion.

The latest transfer of the 31 individuals is therefore another step in Bengaluru's broader verification and deportation process, while the cases of other people identified during the operation remain subject to individual verification and further legal proceedings.

Delhi Police have detained seven Bangladeshi nationals for allegedly overstaying in India beyond the period permitted under their visas. The action was carried out under Operation Vista, a visa verification drive conducted by the Anti-Auto Theft Squad (AATS) of the Central District.

Police said the seven individuals were identified during checks at hotels and guest houses in Central and South Delhi. According to officials, all seven had entered India on double-entry visas that permitted a maximum stay of 15 days per visit.

First Detention in Nabi Karim

The investigation began after police received information that some Bangladeshi nationals were allegedly staying in Delhi beyond their authorised period.

Police first detained 26-year-old MD Nazrul Islam Foisal from the Nabi Karim area.

According to officials, his passport was issued on February 8, 2026, while immigration records showed that his authorised stay in India was valid until August 7, 2026.

During questioning, police said Foisal provided information about other Bangladeshi nationals who were allegedly staying in Delhi beyond the permitted period.

Six More Held

Acting on the information, police conducted searches at locations in Sarita Vihar and detained six additional Bangladeshi nationals.

Officials said their passports, visas and immigration records were subsequently examined to establish their legal status in India.

Police said the verification found that all seven had entered the country on double-entry visas carrying a maximum permitted stay of 15 days for each visit.

No Criminal Record Found

Delhi Police said no previous criminal involvement was found against any of the seven individuals during the verification process.

The police action was focused on alleged violations of visa conditions rather than any separate criminal case, officials said.

The operation was conducted by the AATS of Central District under the supervision of Inspector Sandeep Dabas.

FRRO Starts Deportation Proceedings

Following the verification, the seven nationals were produced before the Foreigners Regional Registration Office (FRRO).

The FRRO issued restriction orders against them and initiated proceedings for their deportation from India.

The individuals were subsequently shifted to the Detention Centre at Sewa Dham, Shahzada Bagh, Sarai Rohilla, where they will remain pending completion of the deportation process.

Police said the action was taken under the applicable legal provisions governing visa violations and the stay of foreign nationals in India.

Seven Nationals Identified

The seven Bangladeshi nationals detained during the operation were identified as:

• MD Nazrul Islam Foisal, 26

• Mohammad Amjad Hossen, 26

• Moinul Hossain, 24

• Alamin, 25

• MD Kawasae Ali, 25

• Amran Hossain, 29

• Afranul Haque Bhuyan Sami, 23

Visa Verification Drive Continues

Operation Vista is part of Delhi Police's efforts to verify the immigration status of foreign nationals staying in the capital.

The latest action highlights the scrutiny being applied to visa validity and authorised periods of stay, particularly during checks at hotels, guest houses and other accommodation facilities.

The seven individuals will remain at the detention facility until the relevant authorities complete the required formalities for their deportation.

Europe is facing a demographic shift that is increasingly affecting its economy, welfare systems and political landscape. Birth rates across much of the continent have fallen sharply, while the proportion of elderly people continues to increase, leaving governments with a shrinking workforce and growing pressure on pensions and healthcare.

The change is already visible in several European communities. In Vilardevos, a village in Spain, a primary school originally designed to accommodate hundreds of children now has only 31 pupils. Classes have had to be combined because there are too few students to maintain separate grades.

Many houses in the surrounding area have been abandoned or placed on the market, while the population that remains is largely elderly. Although Vilardevos represents an extreme case, similar trends are emerging across Europe.

Fertility falls below replacement level

A fertility rate of around 2.1 children per woman is generally considered necessary to maintain a population without migration. The European Union, however, recorded a fertility rate of just 1.34 in 2024, according to Eurostat.

Spain's rate was even lower at 1.1. The United States is also experiencing a sustained decline, with its fertility rate falling to 1.6 in 2024, according to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The reasons behind the decline are complex. Rising housing costs, job insecurity and longer periods spent in education have made starting a family more difficult for many young adults.

Social attitudes have also changed. People are marrying and having children later, while many couples wait until they feel financially secure before becoming parents. Delaying parenthood can eventually mean having fewer children than originally planned.

Why family policies struggle

European governments have introduced childcare programmes, tax benefits and financial incentives in an effort to encourage higher birth rates. However, the results have generally been limited.

Germany expanded childcare facilities for young children over the past two decades. Its fertility rate initially rose from around 1.4 to approximately 1.6 before falling again. By 2025, the country's fertility rate had reached a record low of 1.32.

Hungary has similarly used tax concessions and financial support to encourage larger families. While fertility improved temporarily, the increase was not sustained.

These experiences suggest that government assistance can reduce some of the financial burden associated with raising children, but reversing a long-term demographic decline is considerably more difficult.

Immigration fills the workforce gap

As domestic birth rates remain low, immigration has become an increasingly important part of Europe's response.

Spain offers a prominent example. Despite its low fertility rate, the country's population has continued to increase, rising from roughly 46.5 million a decade ago to nearly 50 million today.

Foreign-born workers accounted for more than 70 per cent of employment growth in Spain between 2019 and 2024, according to an analysis cited by Politico.

The government under Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez has consequently treated immigration as an important economic tool. It has also introduced a major programme aimed at regularising undocumented migrants. By early July, around 1.2 million applications had reportedly been submitted.

Immigration sparks political debate

Immigration, however, is far from an uncomplicated solution.

Large inflows of migrants can increase demand for housing, schools and public services. Questions surrounding integration and employment have also become increasingly important.

Far-right political parties across Europe have made immigration a major part of their campaigns, tapping into concerns among sections of the public about the scale and pace of migration.

This has created a difficult policy dilemma. Governments need younger workers to support ageing populations, but policies designed to attract migrants can themselves become politically divisive.

A changing demographic map

The demographic transformation is not happening uniformly across Europe.

Luton in England illustrates a contrasting pattern. The city's fertility rate is around 2.0, significantly higher than England's national rate of approximately 1.4. Women in Luton also tend to have children at younger ages.

Migration is a major factor behind the difference. Around two-thirds of babies born in the city in 2025 had mothers who were born outside Britain.

The result is a younger and more diverse population, particularly because of migration from South Asia and other regions. At the same time, Luton has also witnessed political tensions over immigration, reflecting the broader debate taking place across Europe.

The difficult choices ahead

Europe's demographic challenge is ultimately about more than declining population numbers. Fewer workers mean a smaller tax base at a time when governments face rising expenditure on pensions, healthcare and elderly care.

Family-friendly policies can make parenthood more affordable, but evidence so far suggests they cannot easily reverse deeply rooted demographic trends. Immigration can provide workers and slow population ageing, but it brings political and social challenges of its own.

For European governments, the task ahead will therefore involve balancing economic needs with public concerns while preparing welfare systems for a future in which older people make up an increasingly large share of the population.

The emptying classrooms of communities such as Vilardevos offer a glimpse of what that future could look like. Europe's demographic transformation is already underway, and the choices made today will determine how successfully the continent adapts to it.

US President Donald Trump has signed two new executive orders aimed at restricting birthright citizenship and curbing so-called "birth tourism", renewing one of the most contentious immigration debates in the United States. The move comes weeks after the US Supreme Court blocked an earlier attempt by the Trump administration to limit automatic citizenship for children born on American soil.

The latest executive actions seek to broaden the categories of children who would be denied automatic US citizenship and tighten scrutiny of foreign nationals travelling to the United States to give birth.

New Restrictions on Birthright Citizenship

The first executive order expands the list of people whose US-born children may not automatically qualify for citizenship.

According to the White House, the order includes children born to individuals identified as members of foreign terrorist organisations, certain foreign government representatives, "alien enemies" of the United States, and individuals accused of obtaining immigration benefits through fraud.

The administration has argued that the existing interpretation of birthright citizenship is being misused and requires stricter enforcement.

Crackdown on Birth Tourism

The second executive order targets birth tourism—the practice of travelling to the United States primarily to give birth so that the child automatically acquires American citizenship.

The order directs federal agencies to identify and take action against organisers facilitating such travel. It also instructs US visa officials to increase scrutiny of visitor visa applicants where birth tourism is suspected.

Officials have indicated that visa officers may reject applications if they believe the primary purpose of travel is childbirth, even without formal evidence.

Legal Challenges Expected

The executive orders are already facing criticism from immigration experts and civil rights organisations.

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) said the orders are unconstitutional, arguing that the 14th Amendment guarantees citizenship to nearly everyone born in the United States regardless of their parents' immigration status.

Legal experts expect multiple lawsuits to be filed immediately, similar to the legal challenges that blocked Trump's previous executive order on birthright citizenship earlier this year.

Impact on Indians

The latest executive orders are not expected to directly affect Indian professionals living in the United States on H-1B, L-1, student or other long-term visas.

However, Indian nationals applying for short-term visitor visas could face increased questioning if authorities suspect travel is intended for childbirth.

Immigration lawyers say the policy could result in longer visa processing times and greater uncertainty for pregnant applicants seeking tourist visas.

Why the Issue Matters

Trump has repeatedly argued that birthright citizenship, guaranteed under the 14th Amendment since 1868, was originally intended to protect the rights of formerly enslaved people and is now being exploited through birth tourism.

Supporters of the administration say the measures are necessary to strengthen immigration enforcement and prevent abuse of the system.

Opponents, however, contend that executive orders cannot override constitutional protections and maintain that any fundamental change to birthright citizenship would require either a constitutional amendment or a definitive ruling by the US Supreme Court.

With fresh legal battles expected, the future of Trump's latest birthright citizenship orders is likely to be decided in the courts before any major policy changes take effect.

British right-wing political party Reform UK has unveiled a hardline immigration proposal, pledging to launch what it describes as the "largest military operation since the Second World War" to stop illegal migrants from crossing the English Channel in small boats.

The announcement comes amid growing political debate over illegal migration and border security in the United Kingdom, with the party promising an aggressive military-led strategy if it comes to power.

'Operation Fortress' Unveiled

Reform UK's Home Affairs spokesperson Zia Yusuf said the proposed plan, named Operation Fortress, would combine military assets and intelligence capabilities to make Britain's maritime border "the most surveilled in the world."

Under the proposal, the Royal Navy would intercept all boats attempting to enter the UK illegally through the English Channel. Migrants would be provided food, water and medical assistance before being escorted back to France or Belgium.

Yusuf claimed the party's objective was to ensure that no illegal migrant attempting to reach Britain would be allowed to land on UK shores.

Commandos Could Be Deployed

One of the most controversial aspects of the proposal is the suggestion that Royal Marines could be deployed to French beaches if cooperation from the French government is not forthcoming.

Yusuf said Reform UK would prefer to work with France but insisted the party would not hesitate to act if required.

He stated that migrants intercepted while attempting the crossing would be returned immediately, adding that the party would adopt what he described as an uncompromising approach to border enforcement.

France Rejects Proposal

French authorities have rejected the proposal, saying any attempt by British forces to operate on French territory would violate French sovereignty, international maritime law and international legal norms.

The proposal has also sparked debate over whether such a policy would be legally enforceable under existing international agreements governing migration and territorial jurisdiction.

Political Context

The announcement comes at a time when illegal migration remains one of the UK's most politically sensitive issues.

Reform UK is attempting to consolidate support as it faces competition from both the governing Labour Party and other right-wing political groups. Recent opinion polls have shown Labour and Reform UK running neck and neck on several national voting indicators.

Political analysts believe the party is seeking to strengthen its appeal among voters who favour stricter immigration controls.

Questions Over Feasibility

Legal experts have pointed out that implementing the proposal would face significant diplomatic and legal hurdles.

Deploying British military personnel onto French territory without Paris' approval would likely breach international law and trigger a major diplomatic dispute between the two countries.

While Reform UK maintains that national border security should take precedence, the proposal is expected to face close scrutiny over its legality and practicality if it becomes part of the party's election platform.

 Italy has temporarily suspended the Schengen border-free travel arrangement with Spain, introducing stricter air and sea border checks following a sharp surge in migrant arrivals in the Spanish North African enclave of Ceuta. The move marks one of the most significant intra-European border restrictions in recent years and comes amid growing political tensions over migration management within the European Union.

The Italian government announced on Friday that enhanced border controls with Spain will remain in effect throughout August. The decision follows warnings issued a day earlier by Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, who has consistently advocated tougher measures against irregular migration.

Temporary Border Controls Introduced

Italian Interior Minister Matteo Piantedosi said the government would enforce temporary air and maritime border checks with Spain as an "extraordinary measure" aimed at safeguarding national security while minimizing disruption to summer tourism.

In a statement, Meloni described the move as a necessary response to the unfolding migration crisis.

"Italy is ready to support every European initiative to assist Spanish institutions in restoring full control of the European Union's external borders," she said, adding that combating human trafficking networks and illegal immigration remains a top priority.

Ceuta Faces Unprecedented Migrant Influx

The border measures follow the arrival of tens of thousands of migrants into Ceuta after a ruling by Supreme Court of Spain that migrants intercepted at sea while attempting to reach Ceuta or Melilla cannot automatically be returned to Morocco.

Spanish authorities said that more than 48,000 migrants have voluntarily returned to Morocco, although the situation continues to place significant pressure on local administration and border management.

European Union Calls Situation 'Unacceptable'

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen described developments in Ceuta as "unacceptable" and announced that two European commissioners have been assigned to coordinate the EU's response.

She stressed that the bloc would not allow unauthorized entry into the European Union and called for stronger action against migrant smuggling networks, alongside faster return procedures in accordance with EU regulations.

Spain Defends Its Response

Spanish Foreign Minister José Manuel Albares maintained that authorities have the situation under control, stating that nearly all migrants who crossed into Ceuta have already returned to Morocco.

He also cited EU Commissioner Magnus Brunner, who reportedly said that no migrants had crossed from Ceuta into mainland European Union territory and that the Schengen area's security remained intact.

Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez criticized Italy's decision, urging European unity instead of unilateral measures.

In a statement, Sánchez said that solidarity among EU member states was essential during crises and stressed that respect for European treaties and cooperation should guide the bloc's response rather than actions that could create divisions.

Impact on Travel

The temporary suspension of Spain's Schengen privileges by Italy is expected to affect cross-border travel, particularly flights and maritime transport between the two countries. Italian authorities have indicated that the controls are temporary and will be reviewed as the migration situation evolves.

The development underscores growing tensions within the European Union over migration policy, with member states balancing humanitarian obligations against domestic political pressure to strengthen border security.

Spain is grappling with a major migration emergency after thousands of migrants attempted to enter the Spanish enclave of Ceuta from neighbouring Morocco, with at least 18 people reported dead during the dangerous crossing. The unprecedented surge has prompted Spain to deploy additional military personnel, intensified political tensions within the European Union, and reignited debate over migration management along Europe's southern border.

The dramatic scenes unfolded on July 30 as large groups of migrants swam across the sea, climbed border barriers and entered the North African enclave, overwhelming Spanish security forces stationed in the territory.

What is Ceuta?

Ceuta is a Spanish autonomous city located on the northern coast of Africa, sharing an eight-kilometre land border with Morocco. Although geographically situated on the African continent, Ceuta is legally part of Spain and, by extension, the European Union.

The territory has remained under Spanish administration for centuries, a status Morocco does not officially recognise. Along with Melilla, another Spanish enclave in North Africa, Ceuta has long been a key gateway for migrants seeking entry into Europe.

Thousands Attempt Dangerous Crossing

According to Spanish authorities, thousands of migrants gathered near the Moroccan town of Fnideq before attempting to reach Ceuta by swimming across the coastline or scaling border fences.

Videos circulating on social media showed hundreds entering the water simultaneously, while others climbed the heavily fortified barriers separating Morocco from Spanish territory.

Spanish officials said border security was overwhelmed by the sudden influx. Emergency teams, the Guardia Civil and later military personnel were deployed to restore control as rescue operations continued along the coastline.

Authorities confirmed that at least 18 people lost their lives, while many others required medical treatment after the hazardous sea crossing.

Why Did the Migration Surge Happen?

Officials are examining multiple factors behind the sudden increase in crossings.

Spanish authorities believe human trafficking networks may have encouraged migrants to attempt the journey after a recent ruling by Spain's Supreme Court strengthened legal protections for migrants intercepted while attempting to reach Ceuta or Melilla. The judgment reportedly limits immediate returns without following legal procedures.

However, migration experts and rights groups argue that legal developments alone cannot explain the scale of the movement.

Analysts have also linked the timing to broader diplomatic tensions between Spain and Morocco. Recent high-level engagements between Spain and Algeria, Morocco's regional rival over Western Sahara, have fuelled speculation that deteriorating diplomatic relations may have indirectly influenced border management, although no official evidence has confirmed such claims.

Economic hardship, unemployment and aspirations for better opportunities in Europe also remain longstanding drivers of migration from North Africa.

Political Reactions Across Europe

Spain has moved quickly to reinforce security around Ceuta.

Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez said the government was mobilising all available resources and coordinating with Moroccan authorities to restore order.

Meanwhile, the crisis has triggered political reactions across Europe. Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni described the situation as deeply concerning and called for stronger European measures to address irregular migration. Some Italian leaders even suggested reviewing Spain's position within the Schengen travel framework, highlighting growing divisions over migration policy inside the European Union.

The images from Ceuta have also been widely shared in political debates across Europe and the United States, where immigration continues to be a major electoral issue.

A Longstanding Migration Flashpoint

Ceuta has experienced similar migration waves before. One of the largest occurred in May 2021, when more than 10,000 migrants entered the enclave within two days after Morocco eased border controls during a diplomatic dispute with Spain.

The latest incident once again underlines the strategic importance of Ceuta as one of Europe's most sensitive external borders.

What Happens Next?

Spanish authorities are expected to continue security operations while processing migrants who entered the territory. Many may face deportation proceedings, while others could seek asylum under European and international refugee laws.

The incident is also likely to intensify discussions within the European Union over border security, migration policy and cooperation with North African countries.

For now, Ceuta remains at the centre of one of Europe's most significant migration crises in recent years, with humanitarian concerns, political tensions and diplomatic questions continuing to unfold.

The UK government's decision to approve £153 million (around ₹1,770 crore) in development assistance for Pakistan has sparked a sharp political debate after Islamabad reportedly refused to accept Shabir Ahmed, a convicted grooming gang leader stripped of his British citizenship.

The controversy has intensified tensions between Britain's ruling Labour government and the opposition Conservative Party, with critics questioning whether financial assistance should continue while deportation efforts remain unresolved.

Aid Package Faces Political Scrutiny

The British government recently approved a three-year aid package worth £153 million for Pakistan, continuing London's long-standing development partnership with the South Asian nation.

However, the announcement quickly drew criticism after reports emerged that Pakistan declined to accept the return of Shabir Ahmed, who lost his British citizenship following his conviction for multiple child sexual abuse offences.

Former UK Home Secretary Priti Patel accused the Labour government of sending aid to Pakistan despite its refusal to cooperate on the deportation of convicted criminals.

She argued that British taxpayers would question why development assistance was being approved while Pakistan allegedly declined to accept an individual stripped of UK nationality.

Labour Defends Development Assistance

The Labour government rejected the criticism, insisting that the aid package supports development projects rather than providing direct financial assistance to Pakistan's government.

Minister Jenny Chapman said opposition claims were misleading and pointed out that previous Conservative governments had allocated significantly larger aid budgets to Pakistan.

She noted that in 2017, when the Conservatives were in power, the UK provided £402 million in aid to Pakistan—substantially higher than the current package.

Labour also maintained that British development assistance is channelled through programmes focused on poverty reduction, education, healthcare and humanitarian support.

Pakistan Rejects Responsibility for Ahmed

Pakistan has denied any obligation to accept Ahmed, arguing that he is effectively Britain's responsibility.

Foreign Ministry spokesperson Tahir Andrabi said Ahmed spent virtually his entire adult life in the United Kingdom, committed his crimes there and was prosecuted under British law.

According to Islamabad, the matter is an internal issue for the UK rather than Pakistan.

The dispute has highlighted the legal complexities surrounding citizenship revocation and deportation involving dual nationals.

Who Is Shabir Ahmed?

According to British media reports, 73-year-old Shabir Ahmed was identified as the leader of a grooming gang that sexually exploited vulnerable girls in Greater Manchester.

He was convicted in 2012 on multiple charges, including rape, child sexual abuse and human trafficking.

British courts sentenced him to 22 years in prison for child rape offences, along with an additional 19-year sentence relating to trafficking and other child sexual offences.

Investigators said Ahmed led a criminal network that groomed underage girls by supplying alcohol and drugs before sexually exploiting them.

Born in Pakistan, Ahmed reportedly moved to the United Kingdom during his teenage years and later obtained British citizenship before it was revoked following his conviction.

Aid Policy Under Fresh Spotlight

The dispute has reignited broader discussions in Britain over the relationship between foreign aid, immigration policy and international cooperation.

Critics argue that countries refusing to cooperate on deportations should face greater diplomatic pressure, while supporters of development assistance maintain that humanitarian aid should not be linked to individual legal cases.

Pakistan has remained one of the largest recipients of UK development assistance over the past two decades, although aid levels have declined considerably in recent years.

The latest controversy is expected to fuel further debate in Parliament over Britain's foreign aid priorities, immigration enforcement and bilateral relations with Pakistan.

France has approved a major defence cooperation initiative that will allow Ukraine to manufacture advanced missiles and precision-guided munitions on its own soil, marking a significant expansion of military support for Kyiv. The announcement came as other global developments unfolded, including a criminal probe recommendation against billionaire Elon Musk over alleged election-related payments and a renewed push in the United States to restrict birthright citizenship.

France Approves Local Missile Production in Ukraine

French President Emmanuel Macron announced at the Coalition of the Willing summit in Paris that Ukraine will receive licences to manufacture advanced Western weapons domestically, aiming to strengthen the country's defence production capabilities amid its ongoing war with Russia.

Under the new licensing agreements, Ukraine will be authorised to produce Aster-30 air defence interceptors, AASM precision-guided glide bombs, and SCALP-EG cruise missiles within its territory.

Macron also said France and Italy would supply additional air defence batteries and interceptor missiles to Ukraine in the coming weeks. He added that 16 Rafale fighter aircraft are expected to be delivered to Ukraine between 2028 and 2029.

The Coalition of the Willing, led by France and the United Kingdom, focuses on providing long-term security guarantees for Ukraine.

Russia criticised the initiative, with Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov describing it as a coalition seeking to prolong the conflict. Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova alleged that NATO members were turning Ukraine into a testing ground for Western military technologies.

Bulgaria Distances Itself from Military Coalition

Meanwhile, Bulgarian Prime Minister Rumen Radev reiterated that Bulgaria is not part of the Western coalition providing continuous military assistance to Ukraine.

Speaking in Paris, Radev argued that the conflict should be resolved through diplomacy rather than increased weapons supplies, warning that further military assistance could prolong the war.

He noted that Bulgaria has already delivered 13 military aid packages to Ukraine and currently has no additional military equipment available for transfer.

According to reports, several countries—including Slovakia, Hungary and the Czech Republic—have declined to participate in a proposed €70 billion US-backed military assistance package discussed during the recent NATO summit.

Elon Musk Faces Possible Criminal Investigation

In the United States, the Wisconsin Elections Commission has recommended a criminal investigation into billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk over allegations that he may have violated state election laws during the 2025 Wisconsin Supreme Court election.

The commission voted 5-1 to refer the matter to the Brown County District Attorney, who will decide within 40 days whether criminal charges should be pursued.

The complaints allege that Musk offered $1 million cheques to encourage voter participation through social media posts.

Musk reportedly spent at least $20 million supporting Republican-backed candidate Brad Schimel, who ultimately lost the election to Democratic-backed Susan Crawford. The contest became the most expensive judicial election in US history, with spending exceeding $100 million.

Musk is already facing a separate civil lawsuit alleging illegal voter incentives and violations of election laws.

Republicans Revive Birthright Citizenship Bill

Republican Senator Jim Banks has introduced legislation aimed at restricting automatic birthright citizenship in the United States.

The proposed bill seeks to deny automatic citizenship to children born in the US to individuals residing in the country illegally, aligning with President Donald Trump's immigration agenda.

The move follows the US Supreme Court's decision earlier this year to block Trump's executive order seeking similar restrictions, ruling that the measure was unconstitutional.

Banks argued that legislative action is necessary to address what he described as misuse of the immigration system. Other Republican lawmakers have also introduced related proposals, including measures targeting so-called "birth tourism."

The renewed debate is expected to become a significant issue in upcoming discussions on US immigration policy.

The administration of US President Donald Trump has launched its first large-scale investigation into alleged fraud involving the H-1B visa and PERM labour certification programmes, marking a significant escalation in scrutiny of employment-based immigration.

The investigation, led by the US Department of Labor's Office of Inspector General, is examining allegations of fraudulent visa applications, misuse of labour certification procedures and other potential violations linked to foreign worker recruitment.

US Labor Department Inspector General Anthony D'Esposito said investigators have already issued dozens of summons as part of the ongoing inquiry. During a television interview, he identified US-based IT services company Cognizant as one of the firms mentioned by whistleblowers. However, he emphasized that the company has not been charged with any wrongdoing, and its mention does not imply guilt.

The announcement comes ahead of Vice President JD Vance's anti-fraud initiative in Milwaukee, where the administration is expected to outline broader efforts targeting fraud, illegal immigration and organised crime.

Whistleblower Information Under Review

Speaking to Fox Business, D'Esposito said investigators had received information involving several major corporations operating in the United States.

He noted that whistleblower complaints had prompted investigators to examine whether companies or individuals misused employment-based visa programmes through false documentation or other fraudulent practices.

At the same time, he clarified that mentioning Cognizant was part of the investigative process and should not be interpreted as an allegation of misconduct.

Authorities said every lead provided by whistleblowers would be thoroughly examined before any conclusions are drawn.

Dozens of Summons Already Issued

According to investigators, federal authorities have already served dozens of summons while collecting documents and evidence related to the H-1B visa programme and the PERM labour certification system.

The H-1B visa allows US employers to recruit highly skilled foreign professionals for specialised occupations, particularly in technology, engineering, healthcare and scientific research. The visa is generally issued for three years and can be extended for a maximum of six years.

The PERM programme is a mandatory labour certification process through which employers demonstrate that qualified American workers are unavailable before sponsoring many foreign employees for permanent residency.

Officials said the probe will focus on potential misuse of these programmes, including fraudulent applications, false employment records and violations of immigration or labour regulations.

Administration Links Visa Fraud to Broader Crime

Inspector General D'Esposito argued that immigration-related fraud should also be viewed through the lens of organised crime.

He claimed certain forms of labour exploitation and human trafficking connected to foreign workers have links to transnational criminal organisations and drug cartels.

According to the administration, strengthening oversight of employment-based visa programmes is part of a wider strategy aimed at improving national security, protecting American workers and preventing abuse of immigration systems.

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt also confirmed that the Trump administration has initiated a major investigation into alleged H-1B visa fraud.

Technology Sector Faces Closest Scrutiny

The technology industry remains the largest beneficiary of the H-1B visa programme, accounting for an estimated 60–70% of newly approved visas in recent years.

Apart from technology companies, engineering firms, consulting companies, healthcare organisations, universities and research institutions also rely heavily on skilled foreign professionals recruited through the programme.

Indian professionals continue to dominate H-1B approvals. According to US government data, around 71% of approved H-1B beneficiaries during fiscal year 2024 were Indian citizens, making India by far the largest source of skilled workers under the programme.

As a result, the investigation is expected to attract significant attention in India, where thousands of engineers, software developers, researchers and healthcare professionals depend on the H-1B programme for employment opportunities in the United States.

Legal Debate Continues

The investigation follows a recent federal court ruling that blocked a Trump administration proposal requiring employers to pay a USD 100,000 application fee for H-1B visas.

The court held that the executive branch lacked the authority to impose such a fee without congressional approval.

While the visa programme remains operational, the latest investigation signals a tougher enforcement approach toward alleged abuse of employment-based immigration systems. Authorities have indicated that the inquiry remains ongoing and that no conclusions regarding individual companies or organisations have been reached.

Trump Gold Card visa fails to take off: Only one approval so far

Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick reveals massive gap between application sales and actual visa grants as hundreds remain under vetting.

 In a development that has raised eyebrows across the global diplomatic and tech corridors, President Donald Trump’s highly publicized "Gold Card" visa program has hit a significant roadblock. Despite earlier claims of a massive surge in interest, official testimony has revealed that only a single individual has been granted the prestigious residency permit so far.

The disclosure came during a high-stakes congressional committee hearing where Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick was questioned on the progress of the initiative. The "Gold Card" program, designed to bypass traditional immigration hurdles for a $1 million fee, was touted as a cornerstone of the "America First" agenda to attract high-net-worth individuals and global talent.

Discrepancy in application figures

The current status of the program marks a sharp departure from the initial narrative presented by the administration. Earlier this year, Lutnick had indicated that approximately 1,300 applications—representing a staggering ₹10,800 crore in potential revenue—had been "sold" within days of the program’s rollout.

However, addressing the committee, Lutnick clarified that while hundreds of applications are currently in the pipeline, they remain trapped in a rigorous review process. This India News Update highlights the administrative bottleneck currently stalling a program meant to fast-track residency for wealthy foreigners.

Shift in visa pricing

The Gold Card initiative has seen several iterations since its first announcement in February 2025. Initially positioned at a premium price tag of $5 million, the administration slashed the entry cost to $1 million in September to broaden its appeal.

The program aims to offer "unlimited residency" to those who can afford it, providing almost all the benefits of American citizenship, excluding a passport and the right to vote. According to sources indicated in the hearing, the vetting process remains the primary hurdle for the 1,300 hopefuls currently awaiting approval.

Focus on global talent

Under the "America First" framework, President Trump has maintained that the US will prioritize "talented people" over those who might compete for domestic jobs. The program specifically targets wealthy investors and top-tier professionals, particularly students and entrepreneurs from nations like India and China.

"America will give visas only to talented people," the President had stated during the launch. The revenue generated from these $1 million fees is earmarked for a specific fiscal purpose: reducing the national debt and facilitating domestic tax cuts.

Replacing traditional visa categories

A significant long-term impact of the Gold Card is its intended role in restructuring the US immigration hierarchy. According to Lutnick, the Gold Card is positioned to eventually replace the EB-1 and EB-2 visa categories, which currently serve high-ability professionals and those with advanced degrees.

This shift suggests a move toward a more transactional immigration model. While the EB-1 and EB-2 routes rely on merit and employment sponsorship, the Gold Card prioritizes immediate capital investment, effectively merging the concepts of a Green Card and an investment visa.

Tiered visa card system

The Gold Card is part of a broader "Trump Card" ecosystem that includes the Trump Platinum Card and the Corporate Gold Card. While the Gold version offers permanent stay, the Platinum variant—slated for a future release—will allow individuals to reside in the US for up to 270 days a year without a travel visa.

Notably, the Platinum Card offers a unique tax incentive: holders will not be required to pay US taxes on income earned abroad. The Corporate Gold Card, meanwhile, allows companies to sponsor employees for a $2 million fee, following a non-refundable $15,000 background check.

Future of US residency

As the administration grapples with the slow approval rate, the international community is watching closely to see if the program can scale. For many Indian professionals who face decades-long waits for traditional Green Cards, the $1 million entry fee represents a prohibitively expensive but potentially faster alternative.

Whether the program will live up to its "1,300 applications" promise or remain a boutique offering for a select few remains to be seen. As of now, the "Gold Card" remains an exclusive club with only one member, keeping the Latest News Today focused on the future of US immigration reform.

Pressure Mounts on Starmer: Could Shabana Mahmood Become the UK’s First Muslim Prime Minister?

Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s leadership is under severe strain amid a growing scandal tied to the appointment of a former envoy linked to Jeffrey Epstein. With senior aides resigning and internal dissent rising, speculation is mounting about a potential successor—with Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood now prominently discussed as a candidate who could become the UK’s first Muslim prime minister.

The crisis erupted after Starmer appointed—and then removed—Peter Mandelson, a Labour veteran whose past association with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein triggered a political firestorm. The Prime Minister’s judgment has been sharply questioned, leading to the resignation of his chief of staff and communications director. As calls for his resignation grow, attention is shifting to who might steer the Labour government forward.

Who Is Shabana Mahmood?

Shabana Mahmood, the MP for Birmingham Ladywood since 2010, has risen swiftly through Labour’s ranks. A trained barrister and one of the party’s first Muslim women MPs, she has held several shadow cabinet roles and was appointed Home Secretary after Labour’s 2024 election victory. Known as a disciplined and sharp political operator, Mahmood now oversees one of the most challenging briefs: immigration, security, and policing.

Mahmood’s Background and Immigration Stance

Born in Birmingham to Pakistani immigrant parents, Mahmood often highlights her working-class roots and British Muslim identity. Recently, however, she has adopted a firmer line on immigration, aligning with the government’s push for stricter rules.

Last week, she defended proposed changes to settlement regulations, stating that permanent residency in the UK is a “privilege, not a right.” Mahmood argued it would be “odd” for the country not to prioritize attracting the “brightest and best” talent—a stance that positions her as a pragmatist on one of the nation’s most divisive issues.

Other Contenders in the Labour Leadership Frame

While Mahmood is a strong candidate, she is not the only one being discussed. Angela Rayner, the former deputy prime minister, remains a favorite among the party’s left wing and is currently leading in bookmakers’ odds. Wes Streeting, the Health Secretary, is seen as ambitious but has faced criticism for his ties to Mandelson and support for private sector involvement in the NHS. Ed Miliband, the Energy Secretary, enjoys soft-left support, though his past electoral defeat lingers. Andy Burnham, Mayor of Greater Manchester, is widely popular but lacks a parliamentary seat—a hurdle under Labour’s rules.

Why This Matters Now

The uncertainty over Keir Starmer’s leadership comes at a critical time for the Labour government, which is grappling with internal unity and public trust. The Epstein-linked scandal has amplified doubts about Starmer’s decision-making, making the question of succession urgent. Should Mahmood rise to the top, it would mark a historic moment for British politics, while also signaling a continued tough stance on immigration and national security.

As the situation develops, all eyes are on Westminster to see whether Starmer can weather the storm—or if the Labour Party will soon witness a seismic shift in power.