BJP Releases ‘Luxury’ Bungalow Photos of Kejriwal, AAP Dismisses Images as Fake

Fresh Political Fire Over Residence

The political battle in Delhi intensified on Saturday after the Bharatiya Janata Party released multiple photographs of former Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal’s new government bungalow at 95 Lodhi Estate. The BJP called the accommodation a “Sheesh Mahal 2.0”, while the Aam Aadmi Party swiftly rejected the visuals as fabricated and misleading.

‘Sheesh Mahal 2.0’ Allegations Surface

Delhi Minister Pravesh Verma, addressing reporters, alleged that Kejriwal’s “palace of mirrors” mindset had not changed. He claimed that crores of rupees had been spent to turn the state-provided residence into a lavish retreat. “The person who preached simplicity is now indulging in luxury,” Verma said. He added that Kejriwal had long pursued court cases to secure a bungalow, finally moving in on 24 April.

AAP Calls Photos Fake and Malicious

AAP leader Atishi dismissed all six images circulated by the BJP. “These photos are not of Kejriwal’s home. If Rekha Gupta and the LG wish to compare luxury, they should open their residences first. Kejriwal ji will open his home. Then the public will decide,” she said. Atishi accused the BJP of running a disinformation campaign weeks before local body polls.

 Pravesh Verma Targets Covid Period Renovations

Verma further alleged that construction at Kejriwal’s previous residence continued even during the Covid crisis. “When Delhi struggled for oxygen and medicines, work on the earlier Sheesh Mahal did not stop for a single day on Kejriwal’s orders,” he claimed. He also alleged that similar luxury accommodations were used by AAP leaders near Punjab Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann’s official residence.

 Kejriwal’s Official Allotment Explained

The 95 Lodhi Estate bungalow was allotted to Kejriwal in October last year in his capacity as national president of a recognised political party. Before this, he lived in accommodation assigned to AAP Rajya Sabha member Ashok Mittal. The Delhi High Court had earlier directed the Centre to provide him official housing, following which the Lodhi Estate property was assigned.

 A Type-VII Bungalow With Amenities

Spread across approximately 5,000 square feet, the Type-VII bungalow is among the second-highest categories of government housing in Lutyens’ Delhi. Sources indicate the property includes four bedrooms, a hall, dining area, waiting room, office space, two lawns, a garage, and three servant quarters. The central government has not officially commented on the renovation costs.

 What Happens Next

AAP has announced it will issue a formal statement with video proof of Kejriwal’s actual residence. The party also threatened legal action against BJP leaders for circulating what it calls “digitally altered images”. Political analysts see the row as a fresh flashpoint ahead of municipal elections, with both sides keen to shape the narrative on ethical governance and public accountability. As per latest news today, the Lieutenant Governor’s office has not intervened in the matter so far.

Kejriwal Argues Recusal Plea in Delhi HC in Excise Policy Case AAP chief appears in person before Justice Sharma's bench, demands judge step aside from liquor scam hearing

Kejriwal Reaches High Court

AAP national convenor and former Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal arrived at the Delhi High Court on Monday morning, accompanied by his wife Sunita Kejriwal, to personally argue a recusal application against Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma in the excise policy case. Kejriwal filed an application calling for the recusal of Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma, requesting her not to hear the matter.

The development marks a rare instance of a former chief minister choosing to argue his own case in court.

What the Recusal Plea Says

The application has been filed by Kejriwal in person, and he argued the same himself before Justice Sharma. The petition contended that the refusal to transfer the case gives rise to a "grave, bona fide and reasonable apprehension" regarding the fairness and impartiality of the proceedings.

Kejriwal claimed that his apprehension was based on Justice Sharma's past conduct, saying that on the very first day of the CBI's revision petition against his discharge, she proceeded to record a prima facie view that the trial court's detailed order was "erroneous", even without hearing the other side.

The CBI's Position

Appearing for the CBI, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta submitted that all respondents had been duly served and argued that the case did not require detailed replies or rejoinders, stating that the High Court only needed to examine the trial court record and the discharge order.

The CBI has contended before the Delhi High Court that the discharge order was "perverse" and tantamount to an acquittal without trial, alleging that the policy was manipulated to benefit certain private liquor entities in exchange for alleged bribes.

Background of the Case

The trial court's order on February 27, 2026, discharged Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia, and 21 others, concluding that the CBI's material did not disclose even a prima facie case. The court had also severely criticised the agency's investigation.

On March 9, 2026, Justice Sharma issued notice in the CBI's appeal and observed that the trial court's order was "prima facie erroneous." She also stayed the trial court's directive for departmental action against the investigating officer.

Failed Bid for Bench Transfer

Kejriwal and others had written to Delhi High Court Chief Justice Devendra Upadhyaya requesting that the matter be transferred to another bench rather than the single bench of Justice Swarna Kanta Sharma. The HC declined the request.

The Chief Justice clarified that the matter had been assigned as per the roster and observed that any recusal decision must be taken by the concerned judge herself.

Supreme Court Also Approached

Kejriwal, Sisodia, and other accused have also approached the Supreme Court seeking transfer of the proceedings from Justice Sharma's bench. The petitions, filed under Article 32 of the Constitution, raise concerns over certain observations allegedly made by the judge during earlier hearings, particularly while dealing with bail applications in the same case.

Kejriwal also stated that Justice Sharma had earlier refused bail to many accused in the liquor policy case, and the Supreme Court had later granted them relief.

Political Stakes and What Comes Next

The case had become politically controversial, as Kejriwal was arrested and remanded to custody amid the 2024 Lok Sabha elections. He was later granted bail by the Supreme Court after 156 days of custody. AAP leader Manish Sisodia also spent 530 days in custody in the case.

The Delhi High Court has also issued notice to Kejriwal on a separate ED plea challenging his acquittal in cases concerning alleged non-compliance with PMLA summons, with further hearings scheduled for April 29. Whether Justice Sharma decides to recuse herself or continues to preside over the matter will now set the course for all pending hearings in the excise policy case, which remains one of the most closely watched legal battles in Indian politics today.

Senior Congress leader Sonia Gandhi remains admitted at a Delhi hospital after being diagnosed with a stomach and urinary infection, prompting her son and Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi to stay overnight at her bedside.

According to officials, she was admitted to Sir Ganga Ram Hospital late Tuesday night. Doctors have been closely monitoring her condition, which is reported to be stable.

Rahul Gandhi’s Vigil

Rahul Gandhi has been personally attending to his mother during her hospital stay. In a video message shared on social media, he said he spent the night sleeping on a small sofa inside her hospital room.

He described his concern as “natural for any son” but added that the attentive care provided by a nurse from Kerala brought him reassurance during the night.

Praise for Nurse

Highlighting the role of healthcare workers, Rahul Gandhi spoke about the dedication of the Kerala nurse who checked on Sonia Gandhi every hour through the night.

He noted that her presence and compassion reflected the broader contribution of nurses from Kerala, not only in India but globally. “When the world sleeps, they continue working and comforting patients,” he said, calling it part of Kerala’s identity.

Political Schedule Impact

Sonia Gandhi’s hospitalisation has also affected Rahul Gandhi’s political engagements. He skipped an all-party meeting held at Parliament on Wednesday to remain at the hospital.

His planned visit to Kerala for election campaigning was cancelled. Instead, Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge represented the party at the meeting, while Rahul addressed supporters virtually.

Kerala Campaign Remarks

Despite the disruption, Rahul Gandhi continued his outreach to voters in Kerala through a virtual address. He criticised both the BJP-led Centre and the ruling Left Democratic Front (LDF) in the state over employment issues.

He alleged that promises of job creation had not been fulfilled and questioned the accountability of both governments. He also raised concerns over selective action by central agencies against opposition leaders.

Welfare Promises Outlined

During his address, Rahul Gandhi outlined several welfare measures promised by the Congress for Kerala. These included free bus travel for women, financial assistance for college-going girls, and an increase in welfare pensions.

He also mentioned plans for expanded health insurance coverage, interest-free loans for youth, and the creation of a dedicated department for senior citizens.

What Lies Ahead

Meanwhile, Sonia Gandhi’s health remains under observation, with doctors expected to decide on her discharge based on her recovery. Congress leaders have not indicated any immediate changes to her public schedule.

The development comes at a crucial time as political activity intensifies ahead of Assembly elections in multiple states, with results expected in early May.

Rahul Gandhi’s continued presence at the hospital underscores the personal nature of the situation even as political responsibilities remain pressing, making the Sonia Gandhi hospitalisation a closely watched development in both political and public spheres.

In a disturbing incident highlighting ongoing Northeast women discrimination, three women from Arunachal Pradesh faced racist slurs in Delhi on February 20, 2026. The altercation in Malviya Nagar escalated from a minor dispute over debris, leading to an FIR against neighbors Harsh Singh and Ruby Jain. A viral video has now brought the case to light, underscoring why racist slurs in Delhi remain a pressing issue in India's cultural landscape.

The women, renting a fourth-floor flat, called an electrician for AC installation around 3:30 PM. Drilling caused dust to fall onto the first-floor balcony of Singh and Jain, igniting the argument. What began as a complaint about littering quickly turned ugly, with the accused hurling ethnic insults.

The Viral Video and Allegations

In the surfaced footage, Ruby Jain is seen confronting the victims aggressively. She allegedly called them "momo" – a racist slur targeting Northeast features – and accused them of being "prostitutes" running a massage parlor for ₹500. Jain even made lewd remarks, saying, "If you want to know how young my husband is, then go into the bedroom with him."

Harsh Singh reportedly joined in with abusive language. When one victim referred to him as an "old man," Jain retorted by claiming he was the son of a "big politician" and escalated with more derogatory comments. A police officer present tried to intervene, but the damage was done.

The victims described the slurs as not just personal but an attack on the Northeast community's dignity. "Such incidents make us feel like outsiders in our own country," one shared anonymously.

Police Action and Legal Ramifications

Delhi Police registered an FIR at Malviya Nagar station under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) sections: 79 (insulting a woman), 351(2) (criminal intimidation), 3(5) (common intention), and 196 (promoting enmity based on race or place of birth). No arrests have occurred yet, as no physical injuries were reported, but mental harassment is alleged.

A senior officer confirmed the investigation is ongoing. The women demand a formal apology, emphasizing accountability to curb Malviya Nagar incidents like this.

Broader Implications for Northeast Discrimination

This case echoes a troubling trend of racist slurs in Delhi against Northeast residents, often fueled by stereotypes. Meghalaya Chief Minister Conrad Sangma condemned it on social media, urging an end to such bias. "Discrimination against our Northeast brothers and sisters must stop," he posted.

Expert perspectives highlight systemic issues. Dr. Priya Sharma, a sociologist at Jawaharlal Nehru University, notes, "These incidents stem from cultural ignorance and urban migration pressures. Education on diversity is key to prevention."

Why now? Amid India's push for unity under initiatives like 'Ek Bharat Shreshtha Bharat,' this event exposes gaps in cultural integration. It aligns with recent reports of rising hate crimes, making it timely for public discourse.

Practical Takeaways for Readers

To combat Northeast women discrimination:

- Report incidents promptly to police or helplines like 1091 for women.

- Educate communities through workshops on cultural sensitivity.

- Support Northeast-led organizations advocating for equality.

This Malviya Nagar incident serves as a wake-up call. As Delhi evolves into a multicultural hub, fostering respect is essential to prevent future racist slurs in Delhi. Until then, victims' voices remind us: Unity demands action.