Addressing a press conference and later sharing his remarks on social media, Kejriwal claimed that Amit Shah had not visited the Ram Temple after the consecration ceremony at Ayodhya. He alleged that despite repeatedly referring to Lord Ram and the temple in public speeches, the senior BJP leader had not undertaken a visit to offer prayers at the shrine.

Kejriwal said the issue raised questions about the BJP’s commitment to the values and faith it frequently highlights during elections and political campaigns. According to the AAP chief, religious symbolism should not be used merely as a political tool.

The remarks have added another dimension to the ongoing political contest between the BJP and the AAP, which has intensified ahead of upcoming electoral battles in several states. Religion and faith-based political narratives continue to remain central themes in public discourse, particularly after the construction and inauguration of the Ram Temple in Ayodhya.

During the media interaction, Kejriwal also referred to reports regarding an alleged irregularity involving offerings at the Ram Temple. He said the reports had caused concern among devotees and demanded accountability if any wrongdoing had taken place.

The AAP leader argued that any allegations linked to a major religious institution should be investigated thoroughly and transparently. He maintained that devotees across the country expect complete integrity in the management of religious donations and temple affairs.

Kejriwal further accused the BJP of invoking Lord Ram and Sanatan values during political campaigns while failing to uphold those principles in governance. He alleged that the party’s public messaging and political actions were often disconnected.

In a significant political assertion, Kejriwal described AAP as a party committed to Sanatan values and claimed that his party had worked for religious and cultural causes during its tenure in government. He contrasted this with what he described as the BJP’s “selective use” of religious issues for electoral purposes.

The BJP had not immediately responded to the specific allegations at the time of reporting. The party has consistently maintained that the Ram Temple project reflects the fulfillment of a long-standing cultural and civilizational aspiration of millions of devotees across the country.

The Ram Temple has remained a major political and emotional issue in national politics. Since the consecration ceremony, leaders from different political parties have continued to make visits to Ayodhya, while debates over faith, governance and political messaging have frequently surfaced in public discussions.

Political observers believe that such exchanges are likely to intensify as parties seek to shape narratives around religion, governance and public trust. The latest remarks by Kejriwal indicate that the Ram Temple and related issues may continue to feature prominently in political debates in the months ahead.

With both the BJP and AAP attempting to connect with voters on issues of faith and governance, the controversy has once again brought Ayodhya and the politics surrounding the Ram Temple into the national spotlight.

BJP Rajya Sabha Seats Jump to 113 as Seven AAP MPs Merge with Party

The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has strengthened its position in the Rajya Sabha with its numbers rising to 113 after seven Members of Parliament from the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) merged with it, reducing AAP's strength in the Upper House to just three seats.

The development, reported widely on Tuesday, marks a notable shift in the composition of the Rajya Sabha, where the BJP-led NDA has further consolidated its influence. According to initial reports citing PTI, the move comes amid ongoing political realignments at the national level.

Major Shift in Upper House

The merger has directly added seven seats to the BJP’s tally in the Rajya Sabha. Party officials indicated that the seven AAP MPs formally joined the BJP, triggering an immediate change in the seat matrix of the house.

Prior to this development, the BJP held 106 seats in the Rajya Sabha. With the addition of the seven members, its strength has now gone up to 113. On the other hand, the AAP, which had 10 seats, has seen its numbers drop sharply to three.

This change reflects the fluid nature of alliances and individual political decisions in Indian politics, especially ahead of key legislative sessions and state-level developments.

Background of the Development

The Aam Aadmi Party, which rose to prominence on the back of anti-corruption politics and governance promises in Delhi and Punjab, has been facing internal and external pressures in recent times. Sources familiar with the matter suggested that differences over strategy and future political direction may have prompted some of its Rajya Sabha members to explore options outside the party.

While the exact reasons behind the decision of the seven MPs remain under discussion, such cross-party movements are not uncommon in the Rajya Sabha, where members often serve six-year terms and party loyalties can shift based on larger political calculations.

The BJP, which already enjoys a dominant position in the Lok Sabha, has been steadily expanding its footprint in the Upper House through a combination of electoral successes in various states and strategic adjustments.

Impact on Rajya Sabha Functioning

With its strength now at 113, the BJP is better positioned to navigate legislative business in the Rajya Sabha, where it previously relied more heavily on support from allies and nominated members. The increase brings it closer to a more comfortable majority threshold on critical bills.

For the AAP, the loss of seven seats represents a significant setback in its national parliamentary presence. The party, which had used the Rajya Sabha platform to raise issues related to governance in Delhi and Punjab, will now have limited numbers to push its agenda independently.

Political observers noted that such mergers often signal broader trends in opposition unity or fragmentation, depending on the prevailing political climate.

Reactions and Political Context

Though official statements from top leaders of both parties were still awaited at the time of filing this report, the visual representation shared across social media platforms highlighted the numerical shift clearly — with the BJP side showing a green upward arrow for an increase of seven seats and the AAP side reflecting a red downward arrow indicating the corresponding decline.

The development comes at a time when several state assemblies are witnessing political churn, and parties are recalibrating their strategies for upcoming electoral battles and legislative priorities.

In the national capital, where AAP continues to govern Delhi, the implications of this parliamentary shift may also be watched closely by local political circles.

What Lies Ahead

The changed composition of the Rajya Sabha is likely to influence the pace and direction of legislative debates in the coming sessions. Analysts suggest that the BJP may find it easier to build consensus on key reform-oriented bills, while smaller parties and the remaining opposition will need to explore fresh alliances to make their voices heard.

Further clarity is expected once the Rajya Sabha Secretariat formally notifies the change in party affiliations. Party sources indicated that the process of merger is being completed as per established parliamentary procedures.

This latest development underscores the dynamic character of Indian parliamentary politics, where numerical strengths in both Houses continue to evolve through elections, bypolls, and occasional realignments.

As the dust settles on this merger, attention will now shift to how both the BJP and the AAP reposition themselves in the national political landscape in the months ahead.

Raghav Chadha Quits AAP, Joins BJP

Big Resignation Announcement

Rajya Sabha MP Raghav Chadha on Friday, April 24, announced his resignation from the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP). Addressing a press conference in Delhi, he confirmed he was joining the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). The move comes barely three weeks after AAP removed him as deputy leader of the party’s Rajya Sabha MPs.

Two-Thirds MPs Merging

Chadha claimed that AAP had moved away from its founding principles. “The party now works for personal interests, not national welfare,” he said. He further stated that two-thirds of AAP’s 10 Rajya Sabha MPs — seven in total — were merging with him. The names he listed included Sandeep Pathak, Rajendra Gupta, Vikram Sahni, Swati Maliwal, Harbhajan Singh, Ashok Mittal, and himself.

Ashok Mittal Quits After ED Raids

Sources indicated that Ashok Mittal, the newly appointed deputy leader of AAP in Rajya Sabha, walked out of the party on the 10th day after the Enforcement Directorate conducted raids linked to a funding matter. Mittal, also Vice-Chancellor of Lovely Professional University, could not be reached for an immediate comment.

Praise for PM Modi

Chadha praised Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s leadership. He said the central government had taken strong decisions on terrorism and the economy, which earlier leaders hesitated to make. “I feel privileged to work under PM Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah,” Chadha added. He assured that he would continue raising public issues with the same energy as before.

Kejriwal Reacts

Delhi’s former chief minister and AAP national convener Arvind Kejriwal has not yet issued a formal statement. However, party insiders said Kejriwal was assessing the damage. AAP Rajya Sabha MP Sanjay Singh alleged an “Operation Lotus” against the Bhagwant Mann government in Punjab. “Dirty games will not be forgiven by the people of Punjab,” Singh said.

What Led to the Split

On April 2, AAP removed Chadha as deputy leader of the party’s Rajya Sabha MPs. A letter to the Rajya Sabha Secretariat said Chadha should no longer get speaking time under the party quota. The next day, Chadha released a video saying, “I have been silenced, not defeated.” He compared himself to a river turning into a flood when the time comes.

What Next for AAP

With seven MPs reportedly leaving, AAP’s strength in the upper house could shrink drastically. The BJP leadership has not officially confirmed the merger. Political analysts tracking this India News Update say the development could impact AAP’s national expansion plans. The party currently governs Punjab and holds significant presence in Delhi. All eyes are now on the Rajya Sabha Chairman’s office for any formal communication on the change in party affiliations.

Uday Bhanu Chib Arrested After 20-Hour Interrogation in AI Impact Summit Protest Case

In a major political development in the national capital, Uday Bhanu Chib arrested by the Delhi Police in connection with the protest and alleged commotion during the AI Impact Summit held at Bharat Mandapam. The Indian Youth Congress (IYC) National President was interrogated for nearly 20 hours on February 23 before being formally taken into custody.

So far, eight individuals have been arrested in the case, including Youth Congress leader Jitendra Yadav from Gwalior. The incident has sparked sharp political reactions, intensifying the debate over protest rights and political dissent in India.

What Happened Inside Bharat Mandapam?

The incident dates back to February 20, when 11 Youth Congress members allegedly entered Bharat Mandapam after registering online and scanning QR codes for entry into the AI Impact Summit.

According to police officials:

 Protesters removed their jackets inside the venue.

 They waved white T-shirts displaying photos of Prime Minister Narendra Modi and US President Donald Trump.

 Slogans reading “PM is compromised” were displayed.

 Anti-government slogans were raised during the summit proceedings.

Investigators claim that protest materials were concealed under clothing to bypass security checks. Additional T-shirts and posters were later recovered from a vehicle allegedly linked to one of the accused.

An FIR has been registered at Tilak Nagar Police Station under non-bailable sections. Earlier, Patiala House Court sent four of the accused to five days of police remand.

Congress Calls It Suppression of Democratic Rights

Following the arrest, Youth Congress National General Secretary Shesh Narayan Ojha accused the government of curbing democratic dissent.

He stated that peaceful protest cannot be termed anti-national and compared the action to “British-era rule.” According to him, protest is a democratic right guaranteed under the Constitution.

Ojha further alleged that:

 Police used lathi-charge and water cannons in multiple states.

 Youth Congress workers were detained at Jantar Mantar.

 Leaders were targeted to silence opposition voices.

The arrest of Uday Bhanu Chib has therefore become more than a law-and-order issue—it has turned into a political flashpoint between Congress and the ruling party.

BJP Reacts, Investigation Continues

The Bharatiya Janata Party staged protests across Delhi, Maharashtra, and Gujarat, accusing Congress leaders of insulting the Prime Minister and disrupting an international-level summit focused on artificial intelligence.

BJP leaders described the act as an embarrassment on a global platform, especially at a time when India is positioning itself as a global AI hub.

Meanwhile, Delhi Police confirmed that investigations are ongoing. Authorities are working to:

 Identify additional participants.

 Trace the printing source of protest materials.

 Examine security lapses at the venue.

Why This Matters Now

The AI Impact Summit comes at a crucial time when India is strengthening its digital and AI ecosystem. Disruptions at such events raise questions about security protocols, political tensions, and the boundaries of democratic protest.

With national elections and political polarization shaping the public discourse, the Uday Bhanu Chib arrested case is likely to remain in headlines in the coming days.

The arrest of Uday Bhanu Chib has added a new chapter to the ongoing political confrontation between Congress and the BJP. While police maintain that the action was necessary under the law, the Youth Congress calls it suppression of dissent.

As investigations proceed, the case underscores a larger national debate: Where should the line be drawn between protest and disruption?

The coming days will determine whether this remains a legal matter—or evolves into a broader political storm.