Alleged conman Sukesh Chandrashekhar has once again targeted Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leaders Arvind Kejriwal and Satyendar Jain, making fresh allegations in a letter written from jail.

In the letter, Chandrashekhar reportedly claimed that he would reveal details of “three more scams”, using the phrase “3 more scams in loading” while referring to his allegations against the former Delhi Chief Minister and former Delhi minister.

The allegations are yet to be independently established.

Fresh Letter From Jail

Chandrashekhar has repeatedly made allegations against Kejriwal and Jain through letters and complaints while being incarcerated. His latest communication has once again brought the political controversy surrounding his earlier claims into focus.

His previous allegations against the AAP leaders included claims of financial transactions and alleged extortion while he was lodged in prison. The allegations have been rejected by AAP leaders in the past.

Earlier Allegations Against Jain

Chandrashekhar had earlier alleged that former Delhi minister Satyendar Jain demanded money from him while he was in Tihar Jail.

He had claimed that he was asked to pay money as “protection” in prison and alleged that payments were made through intermediaries. These claims triggered a political confrontation between the AAP and BJP in 2022. (The Economic Times)

Jain and the AAP have denied the allegations.

Claims Involving Kejriwal

Chandrashekhar had also alleged that he paid more than ₹50 crore to the AAP in exchange for an important party position and assistance in securing a Rajya Sabha nomination.

He further alleged that Kejriwal had asked him to arrange financial contributions from other individuals for the party. These allegations were also rejected by AAP leaders, who accused the BJP of using Chandrashekhar's statements for political purposes. (Rediff)

AAP's Response to Allegations

The AAP has consistently dismissed Chandrashekhar's allegations and questioned his credibility. In earlier instances, party leaders described him as a conman and alleged that his claims were politically motivated.

AAP spokesperson Priyanka Kakkar also recently defended Satyendar Jain amid allegations surrounding a separate tender-related case, arguing that Jain was already in jail when the tender at the centre of the allegations was issued. (aam admi party)

‘Three More Scams’

The latest letter is significant because Chandrashekhar has indicated that he intends to make additional allegations.

His “three more scams” claim could lead to another political confrontation if he releases further details or documents supporting his accusations.

However, the claims made by an accused person in a criminal case should be treated as allegations unless independently verified or established through investigation or judicial proceedings.

Political Row May Intensify

The latest development comes as political tensions surrounding allegations of corruption against former AAP leaders remain active.

Chandrashekhar's earlier claims have repeatedly generated political exchanges between the AAP and BJP. His latest communication could revive that confrontation, particularly if further allegations or purported evidence are released.

For now, the details of the three alleged scams referred to in the letter have not been independently established.

Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) national convenor Arvind Kejriwal on Thursday claimed that his Instagram account has been blocked in India, alleging that social media platform Meta was restricting accounts of people raising questions over the Centre's ethanol policy and paper leak issues.

In a post on X, Kejriwal said Meta had failed to provide any clear explanation despite repeated attempts to seek clarification. He also urged users facing similar restrictions to contact him.

Kejriwal Alleges Government Pressure

Kejriwal alleged that the Central Government was pressuring Meta to block the accounts of individuals speaking against the ethanol blending policy and recent examination paper leak controversies.

He appealed to Meta not to succumb to what he described as government pressure and urged the company to operate independently.

The AAP leader also shared a screenshot from his Instagram account status page, which displayed the message "Unavailable in some locations."

Claims Meta Confirmed Restriction

According to Kejriwal, after approaching Meta's India office, he was informed that his Instagram account had been restricted and was currently unavailable for users in India.

He criticised the platform for not offering any detailed explanation regarding the action, describing the company's response as inadequate.

As of Thursday, Meta had not issued an official public statement regarding Kejriwal's claims or clarified the reason behind the reported restriction.

Users Report Similar Issues

Kejriwal said several social media users had informed him that their Instagram accounts had also become inaccessible.

He invited affected users to reach out so that the issue could be documented collectively, suggesting that the reported restrictions were not isolated incidents.

Row Comes Amid Meta-Government Dispute

The development comes amid heightened scrutiny of Meta in India following the temporary removal of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's Facebook video related to examination reforms and paper leaks.

The video, posted on July 23, briefly became unavailable before being restored by Meta.

The incident prompted the government to seek an explanation from the company, with parliamentary leaders questioning the platform's content moderation practices.

Government Engages Meta

According to government sources cited by PTI, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg apologised to the Indian government on Wednesday over the temporary removal of the Prime Minister's video.

The company also reportedly acknowledged concerns relating to content moderation, deepfake content and child sexual abuse material on its platforms during discussions with government officials.

The controversy has intensified the ongoing debate over the role of social media platforms, intermediary responsibilities and content regulation in India.

No Official Response Yet

While Kejriwal has publicly alleged that his account has been restricted in India, Meta has not officially confirmed whether any action has been taken against his Instagram profile or the reasons behind it.

The matter is expected to draw further political attention as debates over platform accountability, digital regulation and freedom of expression continue.

New Delhi: Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) national convenor Arvind Kejriwal on Thursday claimed that his Instagram account has been restricted for users in India. He said he has repeatedly sought clarification from Meta, but has not received any official explanation so far.

Kejriwal also alleged that several other users had informed him that their Instagram accounts had faced similar restrictions. He appealed to affected users to get in touch with him and share their experiences.

Kejriwal Alleges Government Pressure

In a post on social media platform X, Kejriwal claimed that the government was pressuring Meta to restrict the accounts of people speaking about issues such as the ethanol policy and the paper leak controversy.

He alleged that social media platforms should operate independently and should not come under political influence. According to him, Meta should provide a transparent explanation if any action has been taken against his account.

Screenshot Shared on Social Media

To support his claim, Kejriwal shared a screenshot of his Instagram account status. The screenshot displayed the message "Unavailable in Some Locations," which, according to him, indicates that his account is not accessible in certain regions, including India.

He said officials at Meta's India office informed him that his account was unavailable in the country, but he added that the company had not provided any formal clarification regarding the reason behind the restriction.

Meta Yet to Respond

As of now, Meta has not issued any official statement regarding Kejriwal's claim or the alleged restriction on his Instagram account.

The company has also not commented on the allegations that accounts discussing specific public issues are being selectively limited.

What Does "Unavailable in Some Locations" Mean?

According to Instagram's account status system, the message "Unavailable in Some Locations" generally indicates that certain content—or, in some cases, an account—may not be visible in specific countries or regions because of local legal requirements or platform policies.

It does not necessarily mean that the account has been suspended or permanently removed. In many cases, the account continues to remain active and accessible in other parts of the world, while access is restricted only in selected locations.

Issue Sparks Fresh Debate

Kejriwal's claim has triggered a fresh discussion on the role of social media platforms in content moderation and regional access restrictions. While the AAP leader has questioned the alleged restriction and sought an explanation from Meta, the company's official position on the matter is still awaited.

Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) National Convenor Arvind Kejriwal and senior party leaders staged a sit-in protest in the national capital on Tuesday after Delhi Police stopped their march towards the Prime Minister's residence over the Centre's E20 fuel policy.

The protest, held on Firoz Shah Road, saw Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia and other AAP leaders accusing the Union government of ignoring public concerns over ethanol-blended fuel. The party claimed it was carrying petitions signed by more than two lakh people demanding a review of the policy.

Police Stop March to PM's Residence

AAP leaders had planned to march to the Prime Minister's residence to submit a memorandum against the E20 policy.

However, Delhi Police halted the procession before it reached its destination, following which Kejriwal and several party leaders sat on the road in protest.

The party said it had informed the police in advance about its programme and maintained that the march was intended only to submit public petitions to the Prime Minister.

Kejriwal Seeks Meeting With PM

Addressing supporters before and during the protest, Kejriwal said he had written to Prime Minister Narendra Modiseeking an appointment to discuss concerns over E20 fuel but had not received a response.

He said the AAP wanted to hand over petitions signed by over two lakh citizens and urged the Prime Minister to meet the delegation.

Kejriwal also reiterated the party's demand that fuel stations continue to provide both conventional petrol and E20 fuel, while calling for a reduction in the price of ethanol-blended petrol.

Allegations Over Ethanol Policy

During the protest, Kejriwal alleged that the Centre was importing ethanol from the United States under pressure from US President Donald Trump.

He claimed that ethanol imported from the US was being imposed on Indian consumers and alleged that the policy could adversely affect a large number of existing vehicles.

The AAP chief described the issue as one that could trigger a nationwide public movement and said a campaign "bigger than the NEET protests" would be required to force the government to reconsider its policy.

These allegations have been made by the AAP leadership. The Union government has not accepted these claims.

AAP Says Public Concerns Ignored

AAP leaders accompanying the protest claimed that many vehicle owners had reported problems linked to the use of E20 fuel.

Delhi AAP president Saurabh Bhardwaj said the party had repeatedly appealed for dialogue with the Centre and accused the government of refusing to engage with citizens on the issue.

AAP leader Anurag Dhanda also alleged that crores of vehicles could be affected by the policy and urged the Centre to reconsider its implementation.

BJP Rejects Allegations

The Bharatiya Janata Party dismissed the AAP's campaign, calling it politically motivated.

BJP MP Tarun Chugh described the protest as "absurd" and said the ethanol blending programme had been introduced after scientific evaluation.

He argued that ethanol blending benefits farmers by increasing demand for agricultural produce used in ethanol production and accused the AAP of spreading misinformation.

Debate Over E20 Policy Continues

The protest comes amid growing political debate over the rollout of E20 petrol, following recent government acknowledgements that prolonged use of E20 fuel may require replacement of certain rubber components in older BS-III vehicles, though authorities have clarified that engine replacement is not required.

With the AAP stepping up its campaign and the BJP defending the policy, the issue is expected to remain a key political flashpoint in the coming weeks.

The Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) is set to organize a National Town Hall on Saturday to raise concerns over the implementation of E20 fuel, with party chief Arvind Kejriwal demanding that the Centre withdraw the policy and initiate a broader public discussion.

The event is expected to bring together automobile experts, vehicle owners and industry stakeholders to discuss the impact of E20 petrol, particularly on vehicles manufactured before 2023. According to the party, the programme will begin at 12 noon at Delhi's Constitution Club, while participants from outside the capital can join virtually.

Kejriwal Alleges Vehicle Owners Are Facing Losses

Addressing a press conference earlier this week, Kejriwal claimed that the introduction of E20 fuel has created difficulties for millions of motorists. He alleged that vehicle owners are reporting reduced mileage, higher maintenance costs and engine-related issues after using the fuel blend.

He urged the Central Government to intervene before the issue escalates into a larger public movement, stating that concerns raised by consumers should be addressed through dialogue.

What Is E20 Fuel?

E20 fuel is a blend comprising 20% ethanol and 80% petrol. The policy is part of India's strategy to reduce dependence on imported crude oil, cut carbon emissions and increase the use of domestically produced biofuels.

However, opposition to the fuel has grown, particularly among owners of petrol vehicles manufactured before 2023. Many consumers have claimed that their vehicles experience lower fuel efficiency and increased wear and tear after using the higher ethanol blend.

Town Hall to Include Experts and Vehicle Owners

AAP said the Town Hall will provide a platform for technical experts, automobile users and those who claim to have been affected by E20 fuel. According to the party, every participant will have an opportunity to present their views before a future course of action is decided.

The party has also announced that people from outside Delhi can participate online after registering through a WhatsApp link shared by the organisers.

Online Petition Crosses Two Lakh Signatures

Ahead of the Town Hall, AAP launched an online petition addressed to the Prime Minister seeking a rollback of the E20 fuel policy. The party claims that the petition has received more than two lakh signatures.

AAP leaders have said the memorandum, along with the petition, will be submitted to the Prime Minister after the Town Hall concludes.

Government Yet to Respond

The Central Government has consistently promoted ethanol blending as an important step towards energy security, reducing fuel imports and supporting farmers through increased demand for ethanol production. While the government maintains that newer vehicles are being designed to support higher ethanol blends, concerns regarding compatibility with older vehicles continue to be debated.

The outcome of Saturday's Town Hall is expected to add momentum to the ongoing discussion over India's transition towards cleaner and alternative fuels.

A fresh political confrontation has emerged over the Centre's E20 ethanol-blended fuel policy, with Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) national convener Arvind Kejriwal announcing a nationwide campaign against the move while Union Road Transport and Highways Minister Nitin Gadkari prepares legal action over deepfake videos circulating on social media. The developments come just days after former Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan resigned amid the NEET-UG controversy, with opposition parties attempting to build momentum around another public issue. According to reports, Gadkari has secured the court's permission to initiate legal proceedings against major social media platforms over AI-generated deepfake videos that allegedly link him to profiteering from the ethanol-blended fuel policy. The minister has not publicly commented on the legal strategy, but the move signals a tougher response to online misinformation.

The controversy has also taken a political turn after Arvind Kejriwal announced a "National Town Hall" scheduled for the coming weekend to rally public support against the E20 policy. Addressing a press conference, the former Delhi Chief Minister said his party plans to collect more than 200,000 petitions from across the country and submit them to Prime Minister Narendra Modi next week. Kejriwal argued that concerns surrounding E20 should be addressed before they escalate into a larger public movement. Referring to the recent resignation of Dharmendra Pradhan, he claimed that public pressure had forced the government to act in the education sector and urged the Centre to respond similarly on the ethanol issue. The AAP has indicated that it will continue its outreach campaign in multiple states over the next few days.

The Narendra Modi government has consistently defended the E20 ethanol-blended petrol policy, rejecting allegations that the fuel causes engine failures. Officials have maintained that while there may be a marginal reduction in fuel economy in some vehicles, the policy is intended to reduce India's dependence on imported crude oil, support domestic ethanol production, and lower emissions. The government has repeatedly said that compatible vehicles are designed to operate safely on E20 fuel. However, the issue has gained traction online in recent weeks, with viral memes, criticism from political opponents, and misleading content circulating across social media platforms. As legal proceedings over the deepfake videos move forward and political campaigning intensifies, the E20 policy is expected to remain a key point of debate in the coming days, both inside and outside the political arena.

Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) national convener Arvind Kejriwal on Tuesday met people injured during the police action against the Cockroach Janata Party (CJP) protest and announced legal assistance for those detained. Addressing a press conference, Kejriwal sharply criticised the Centre over the police crackdown, alleging excessive use of force against protesters and demanding transparency regarding those taken into custody.

Kejriwal later visited Parliament Street Police Station in Delhi, where several protesters were reportedly being held, and sought details from senior police officials about the cases registered following the demonstration. He also said he would visit Ram Manohar Lohia (RML) Hospital to meet those injured during the police action.

AAP Announces Legal Assistance

To support those affected by the police action, the AAP chief announced a legal assistance helpline and appealed to protesters and their families to contact the party if they required legal support.

According to Kejriwal, individuals arrested in connection with the CJP protest could seek assistance through the helpline, where a dedicated legal team would provide guidance and representation if required.

Demands Transparency on Detentions

Kejriwal urged the Delhi Police to publicly release the complete list of First Information Reports (FIRs) registered in connection with the protest. He also demanded details of those allegedly detained without formal FIRs, including the locations where they were being held.

He said such information was essential so that families searching for missing relatives could know their whereabouts.

Criticises Police Action

During the press conference, Kejriwal alleged that videos circulating on social media showed excessive force being used against protesters. Referring to these videos, he claimed that peaceful demonstrators, including young participants, had been subjected to unnecessary force.

He further criticised the government's handling of the protest and accused the authorities of attempting to intimidate citizens participating in demonstrations.

Visit to Police Stations

The AAP chief stated that after meeting injured protesters at the hospital, he would also visit Parliament Street and Mandir Marg Police Stations, where, according to the party, several protesters had been detained.

Kejriwal said he intended to seek official information regarding those arrested and the legal proceedings initiated after the protest.

Political Reactions Continue

The police action on CJP protesters has triggered a political confrontation, with opposition parties questioning the government's response to the demonstration, while authorities have maintained that law enforcement acted to maintain public order.

The incident has also intensified the ongoing political debate over the handling of protests and public demonstrations, with opposition leaders demanding accountability and greater transparency from the administration.

The Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) will organise a collective Hanuman Chalisa recitation across all 90 Assembly constituencies of Chhattisgarh on Tuesday. In Raipur, the main programme is scheduled to take place at Budha Talab at 4 pm, where party workers, students, youth and local residents have been invited to participate in large numbers.

According to AAP, the event is not merely a religious gathering but a collective expression of support for social harmony, ethical values, public service and democratic rights. The party said the programme is also being organised to express solidarity with environmental activist Sonam Wangchuk and raise concerns over the action taken against him.

Support for Sonam Wangchuk

AAP leaders alleged that the action against Sonam Wangchuk is contrary to democratic principles and claimed that peaceful voices are being suppressed. The party said the Hanuman Chalisa recitation is intended to convey a message of peace while highlighting the importance of protecting democratic freedoms.

The party has appealed to citizens across the state to join the programmes being held in their respective Assembly constituencies.

Exam Irregularities Also on Agenda

Apart from expressing support for Wangchuk, AAP said it would also raise concerns over alleged irregularities in competitive examinations, including NEET and other recruitment tests.

The party alleged that repeated paper leak incidents have adversely affected the future of millions of students and job aspirants across the country. It argued that accountability should be fixed for such incidents and called for reforms to ensure a transparent examination system.

Demand for Dharmendra Pradhan's Resignation

AAP has demanded that Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan take moral responsibility for the alleged examination irregularities and resign from his post.

The party also urged the government to strengthen safeguards against paper leaks and implement a fair and transparent examination process for students and candidates.

Key Demands Raised by AAP

• Withdrawal of action taken against Sonam Wangchuk and an end to his police detention.
• Resignation of Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan, citing moral responsibility for alleged examination irregularities.
• Implementation of a transparent and fair examination system for students and job aspirants.
• Concrete measures to generate greater employment opportunities for the youth.

AAP said the statewide programme aims to combine public participation with awareness on issues related to democracy, education and employment while encouraging citizens to take part peacefully in the initiative.

Modi inaugurated and laid the foundation stone for rail and road infrastructure projects worth ₹5,470 crore, including the redevelopment of 75 railway stations across 20 states under the Amrit Bharat Station Scheme, and flagged off the Amritsar (Chheharta)-Varanasi Sant Ravidas Express — a new direct rail link between two significant spiritual centres. He greeted the gathering in Punjabi, arrived wearing a green turban as a symbolic gesture toward the state's farming community, and interacted with Dera Sachkhand Ballan chief Sant Niranjan Dass and schoolchildren before the train's flag-off.

The bulk of his speech, however, was aimed squarely at the AAP state government, which Modi accused of corruption, mounting debt, poor governance and deteriorating law and order, going as far as calling the party "kattar beiman" — staunchly dishonest — a pointed jab at AAP's own long-running "kattar imaandar" (staunchly honest) branding. He accused party leaders of facing corruption allegations themselves while lecturing citizens not to pay bribes, and argued that only a "double-engine" government, with the same party in power at the Centre and the state, could deliver the security and development Punjab needed.

Modi didn't stop at AAP. He also criticised the Congress for being consumed by internal infighting rather than governance — a reference that lands squarely amid the party's ongoing Punjab leadership standoff between Charanjit Singh Channi's camp and PCC chief Raja Warring — and said the Shiromani Akali Dal had lost sight of the state's future while trapped in its own internal crisis.

The visit carried clear electoral signalling beyond the speech itself. It marked the first major BJP platform appearance for former AAP Rajya Sabha members Vikramjit Singh Sahney, Harbhajan Singh and Ashok Mittal since crossing over to the party, while former two-time Chief Minister Captain Amarinder Singh skipped the event. Modi's repeated engagement with Sant Ravidas and Dera Sachkhand Ballan — whose followers make up a significant share of the electorate in Punjab's Doaba region, home to the state's large Dalit population — was widely read as a deliberate outreach ahead of Sant Ravidas' 650th birth anniversary, which falls close to the 2027 election.

Taken together, political observers noted, the visit strongly suggested the BJP is preparing to contest all 117 Punjab Assembly seats independently in 2027, rather than through a traditional alliance arrangement. Union Minister of State Ravneet Singh Bittu, addressing the gathering ahead of Modi, said the Jalandhar station's redevelopment had finally become reality after decades of neglect, and took his own swipe at Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann for skipping the event in favour of political engagements with AAP national convenor Arvind Kejriwal.

Neither AAP, Congress nor the Akali Dal had issued detailed rebuttals to Modi's specific charges at the time of publishing, though the speech's framing — Modi positioning BJP as the only credible alternative to three parties he cast as compromised in different ways — is likely to dominate Punjab's political conversation heading into election season.

Kejriwal visited Wangchuk at Jantar Mantar, where the activist has been observing an indefinite hunger strike over issues linked to the NEET examination controversy and broader concerns about India's education system. During his visit, the former Delhi Chief Minister praised Wangchuk's commitment to students and called for immediate action from the Centre.

Addressing supporters at the protest site, Kejriwal said the country needs an education system that restores public confidence and protects students' interests. He urged the Union government to remove Dharmendra Pradhan from the Education Ministry and appoint Sonam Wangchuk in his place, arguing that the noted education reformer has consistently worked for meaningful change in the sector.

The AAP leader said repeated examination controversies have shaken the confidence of students and parents across the country. According to him, the government must engage in dialogue with those raising concerns instead of ignoring their demands.

Wangchuk has been on an indefinite fast since late June in support of students protesting alleged examination irregularities. The movement has attracted growing public attention, with several political leaders, activists and members of the film industry extending support over the past few days.

The Delhi High Court has also taken note of Wangchuk's deteriorating health during the prolonged fast. The court directed authorities to monitor his medical condition regularly and intervene if doctors consider it necessary, while allowing the protest to continue within legal and medical safeguards.

Political reactions to Kejriwal's remarks have intensified the debate over the ongoing protest. While the AAP has reiterated its demand for accountability in the education system, the Centre has not officially responded to Kejriwal's proposal regarding the Education Ministry.

The hunger strike has become one of the most closely watched public protests in recent weeks, drawing support from students, education activists and several public personalities. The protesters continue to demand greater transparency in competitive examinations and systemic reforms aimed at preventing paper leaks and restoring trust in recruitment and admission processes.

With Wangchuk's health remaining a matter of concern and political support continuing to grow, attention is now focused on whether the government initiates talks with the protesters or responds to the demands being raised at Jantar Mantar.

According to opposition leaders, Congress intends to raise issues including alleged examination paper leaks, inflation, unemployment and what it describes as irregularities in political funding. However, the proposed delimitation exercise is emerging as the principal constitutional issue around which the INDIA bloc is attempting to build unity.

The Congress has reached out to its alliance partners, including the DMK, Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) and other regional parties, seeking a common floor strategy before the session begins. Party leaders believe a united opposition would be better placed to challenge the government's legislative agenda and force detailed discussions on contentious Bills.

The delimitation issue has remained politically sensitive since the Centre's earlier attempt to introduce legislation linked to expanding Lok Sabha seats and implementing women's reservation. Opposition parties, particularly those from southern India, have argued that any exercise based primarily on population could reduce their relative representation despite their success in population control measures.

The DMK has consistently maintained that any delimitation exercise must not disadvantage states that have effectively implemented family planning policies. The party is expected to reiterate that position during the Monsoon Session and coordinate closely with other INDIA bloc members on the issue.

While the Congress is attempting to project opposition unity, recent political developments have created fresh challenges within the alliance. Differences between some regional parties and changing political equations have prompted questions about whether the INDIA bloc can maintain a common stand throughout the session. Despite those concerns, party leaders insist that constitutional matters such as delimitation require a collective response.

The government, meanwhile, is expected to push its legislative agenda while relying on its numerical strength in Parliament. Political observers believe the NDA enters the Monsoon Session in a stronger position than during the special session held earlier this year, when opposition parties had successfully stalled key constitutional proposals.

Ahead of the session, the Centre has convened an all-party meeting on July 19 to discuss legislative business and seek cooperation from political parties. At the same time, the Lok Sabha Secretariat has issued an advisory asking MPs to maintain parliamentary decorum and avoid protests or demonstrations inside the Parliament complex.

As Parliament prepares to reconvene, the Monsoon Session is expected to witness sharp exchanges between the treasury benches and the opposition over constitutional reforms, governance issues and economic concerns. The debate over delimitation is likely to remain at the centre of the political confrontation, with both sides preparing for one of the session's most significant legislative battles.

In his letter, the AAP national convenor and former Delhi Chief Minister argued that E20 petrol has caused problems for vehicles manufactured before 2023 that weren't originally designed to run on the blend, citing reduced mileage, faster engine wear and added financial strain on owners of older cars and two-wheelers. His central demand is straightforward: that petrol stations offer consumers a genuine choice between pure petrol and E20-blended fuel, rather than E20 being the only option available at the pump. He's also asked for E20 to be priced lower than regular petrol, arguing that its lower calorific value already means reduced mileage for users, and that the pricing should reflect that shortfall.

Speaking to reporters ahead of the letter becoming public, Kejriwal pushed back against how the government has characterised critics of the E20 rollout, saying people raising concerns about the fuel are simply citizens voicing genuine grievances rather than acting against the country's interest, and that they deserve to be heard rather than dismissed. He said democratic government requires listening to public concerns and acting on them, not brushing them aside.

Kejriwal said the party has launched an online petition asking citizens to share their direct experiences with E20 petrol, particularly around mileage, and that he intends to present the collected responses to the Prime Minister once a meeting is granted. He has also asked AAP workers and volunteers to visit petrol pumps and service stations directly, talk to consumers about their experiences, and document those conversations on social media.

E20 petrol — a blend containing 20 percent ethanol — has been rolled out nationally as part of the government's ethanol-blending programme, aimed at cutting fuel import costs and vehicular emissions. The programme has drawn periodic criticism from vehicle owners and some opposition leaders over compatibility concerns with older engines, though the Centre has maintained that BS-VI-compliant vehicles from recent years are built to handle the blend without issues.

As of Tuesday, neither the Prime Minister's Office nor the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas had responded publicly to Kejriwal's letter or confirmed whether the requested meeting would take place.