The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) is now focusing on the pregnancy-related conflict as a central angle in the case of actress Twisha Sharma’s suspicious death. According to sources, early findings suggest that repeated arguments between Twisha and her husband Samarth were linked to questions around pregnancy and paternity.

In one of the key conversations under review, Samarth allegedly questioned Twisha about how she could be pregnant and asked about the identity of the child’s father. The Twisha Sharma death case pregnancy angle is now being treated as a critical lead by investigators as they examine emotional stress factors and marital conflict.

The couple had married in December last year, and reports indicate that tensions began soon after.

Digital Evidence Review

Investigators are analysing chats between Twisha and her mother, where she reportedly expressed distress over repeated questioning from her husband. In one message, she is said to have mentioned feeling unable to ignore accusations related to pregnancy.

CBI officials are also reviewing Samarth’s statements, in which he acknowledged that the relationship had been strained. He reportedly informed investigators about Twisha’s frequent mood changes and travel history between Delhi and Ajmer.

Officials are cross-checking these digital records with medical and forensic evidence as part of the Twisha Sharma death case pregnancy angle investigation.

Medical and Forensic Probe

Sources indicate that the CBI is awaiting a histopathology report of tissue samples preserved after post-mortem examination. This report is considered crucial for confirming medical details related to the alleged pregnancy termination.

The agency is also reviewing psychiatric treatment records, as Twisha had reportedly been under treatment for depression. Investigators plan to question the treating doctor to understand her mental health condition and possible triggers.

Officials said forensic findings, chat records, and witness statements are being aligned to reconstruct the final timeline.

Family Statements and Claims

Twisha’s mother and family members have provided statements suggesting that she was under emotional stress following pregnancy-related decisions. Her mother reportedly told investigators that while the pregnancy news initially brought happiness, Twisha herself was uncertain about continuing it due to career concerns.

Samarth, on the other hand, has claimed that the relationship dynamics were unstable and that Twisha’s behaviour showed frequent emotional fluctuations.

The CBI is examining all versions of statements as part of the ongoing investigation into the Twisha Sharma death case pregnancy angle.

CCTV and Last Movements

Investigators have also reviewed CCTV footage showing Twisha’s movements on the day of the incident. Reports indicate she visited a beauty parlour in the afternoon, returned home in the evening, and later went for a walk.

Footage reportedly shows her being taken down stairs and receiving CPR, though the exact sequence of events at the critical moment remains unclear.

CBI officials are combining surveillance data with forensic reports to establish a clearer timeline.

Anticipatory bail rejected a day earlier; husband Samarth Singh on CBI remand till May 29

A team of Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) officers on Thursday questioned retired judge Giribala Singh for over six hours at her residence in the Kolar Hills area, as her arrest in the Twisha Sharma death case appeared imminent.

The questioning began around 10:30 am, barely 24 hours after the Madhya Pradesh High Court cancelled her anticipatory bail in a late-night order. Sources familiar with the matter said the former judge was being confronted with digital evidence and forensic reports.

Heavy Security, Barricades Outside Residence

The retired judge’s house has been virtually sealed. Personnel from the Kolar Hills and Bag Sevania police stations have been deployed outside, and barricades have been put up around the property. Officials from both police stations were also seen entering the premises.

According to local authorities, the heavy security is a precautionary measure to manage the growing crowd of onlookers and media personnel that has gathered in the upscale locality.

3D Camera Used to Map Crime Scene

Investigators brought a high-intensity 3D camera inside the house to conduct a 360-degree forensic mapping of the entire premises. The technology is typically used to prepare scientific evidence for court.

Initial reports indicate that the camera was also positioned on the balcony to scan neighbouring rooftops and terraces. The CBI is trying to determine whether the spot where Twisha died was visible from any adjoining property.

What the High Court Said

In a strongly worded 17-page order issued late Wednesday, the High Court noted that the lower court had failed to properly examine the case diary and evidence. The court observed that multiple injury marks were found on the body, which the accused side could not explain satisfactorily.

“The trial court did not consider the seriousness of the case. It was not appropriate to grant relief to the accused,” the order stated, according to legal sources.

The court also took note of WhatsApp chats that allegedly show the mother-in-law and husband pressuring Twisha over her character and demanding an abortion.

Husband on CBI Remand Till May 29

Meanwhile, Twisha’s husband Samarth Singh remains in CBI custody after the agency was granted his remand until May 29. Officials are questioning him about the sequence of events on the night of May 12, when Twisha died under suspicious circumstances at their home.

Investigators are also looking into his ten-day disappearance. Police have confirmed that Singh had switched off his mobile phone and hid in Jabalpur while on the run. “He kept changing locations and avoided direct contact with people,” an official said.

The Case So Far

Twisha Sharma, an actress and model who had worked with several multinational brands and appeared in two Telugu films, died on the night of May 12. While her in-laws have maintained it was a suicide, her family has alleged murder.

A second post-mortem was conducted by a team from Delhi AIIMS at the Bhopal AIIMS on May 24. The final report, including histopathology and viscera analysis, is still awaited. Her last rites were performed later that evening at the Bhadbhada crematorium.

What Happens Next

With the CBI team expected to leave the residence at any time, officials said a medical examination will likely precede a formal arrest. The agency is also examining call detail records and CCTV footage from the area.

The Supreme Court had taken suo motu cognisance of the matter on May 25, with the Chief Justice expressing concern over questions being raised about the judiciary’s impartiality. For now, all eyes remain on the Kolar Hills residence, where a former judge’s fate hangs in the balance.

High Court cancels anticipatory bail as CBI records 360-degree visuals of Giribala Singh’s Katara Hills home

The Central Bureau of Investigation on Thursday moved rapidly after the Madhya Pradesh High Court cancelled anticipatory bail for retired judge Giribala Singh in the high-profile death of 22-year-old Twisha Sharma, officials and sources said, with investigators conducting detailed digital mapping of the accused’s house and questioning her at the residence. According to sources familiar with the probe, Giribala could be arrested any time.

Order and timing

The High Court’s 17-page order, issued late on Wednesday, set aside the anticipatory bail granted earlier by a trial court. The bench observed that given the seriousness of the allegations, the evidence on record and the present stage of the investigation, relief was not warranted. The court noted multiple injury marks on Twisha’s body and said the accused had not offered satisfactory explanations, according to a copy of the order made available to reporters.

CBI activity at scene

A CBI team reached Giribala Singh’s home in the Katara Hills area of Bhopal around 10.30 am on Thursday and began questioning her, officials said. Investigators installed a high-intensity 3D camera inside the residence to take precise measurements and record 360-degree visuals of the first floor and other areas, part of a broader effort to recreate the crime scene and preserve digital evidence.

“Teams are recording the internal layout, the heights of walls and vantage points that could help corroborate statements,” an official involved in the probe said on condition of anonymity. The visuals are being added to the case file as scientific evidence, the source added.

Sequence of events

Twisha, who was married in 2023, died on the night of May 12 and was taken to AIIMS Bhopal, where an initial post-mortem recorded hanging marks and other injuries, the court order said. Police seized mobile phones and a DVR from the house the same day. The trial court had earlier granted anticipatory bail after noting certain WhatsApp messages that primarily complained about the husband and financial transfers into Twisha’s account. That order has now been overturned following a deeper review by the High Court.

Allegations and evidence

Prosecutors and investigating agencies contend WhatsApp chats and statements from Twisha’s family indicate alleged mental harassment, pressure to abort a pregnancy and demands for dowry. The High Court flagged inconsistencies in the defence account and raised concerns about potential attempts to influence the probe, noting public statements that could have tarnished the deceased’s image.

The post-mortem, the court said, found injuries that could not be explained simply as marks sustained while cutting down a body, making custodial interrogation of key accused necessary. The CBI has also been examining call detail records, digital backups and CCTV footage, and is probing whether any footage was tampered with, officials said.

Custody and questioning

Twisha’s husband, Samarth Singh, remains in CBI remand until May 29 as investigators try to reconstruct his whereabouts on the night of May 12 and reconcile his statements with technical evidence. Sources said the agency is also tracing contacts he had while allegedly absconding and matching his movements with phone records and digital footprints.

Security and ground reaction

Security around Giribala’s home was tightened on Thursday, with additional police personnel deployed in the neighbourhood. Local residents and journalists gathered outside the house; a reporter from a Bhopal daily filed live updates as the CBI proceeded. In a brief sighting on Thursday morning, Giribala was seen outside feeding street dogs, one source said.

What happens next

With anticipatory bail vacated and the CBI actively recording and analysing scene visuals, officials say an arrest could follow if questioning and evidence review point to custodial needs. The agency is expected to seek formal remand if it decides to take Giribala into custody. Court filings and formal charges, if any, will determine the next legal steps.

Investigators stressed that the probe is ongoing and that conclusions will rely on the forensic, digital and circumstantial evidence being assembled. The CBI declined immediate comment; the High Court registry confirmed the order but did not offer further comment beyond the written judgment.

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has taken charge of the probe into the suspicious death of actress Twisha Sharma, re-registering an FIR that names her husband, Samarth Singh, and mother-in-law and retired judge Giribala Singh, officials said on Tuesday. Meanwhile, applications to preserve call detail records (CDR) and CCTV footage are scheduled for hearing in a Bhopal district court today.

CBI re-registers FIR
According to officials, the CBI team that reached Bhopal on Monday evening re-registered the FIR originally filed at Katara Hills police station. The fresh FIR is reportedly framed under sections related to dowry death after preliminary material suggested demands for additional money. Sources familiar with the investigation said the agency has recorded new entries following spot verification and interviews.

Court applications today
Twisha’s family has moved the Bhopal district court seeking preservation of her CDR, filed through their lawyer Ankur Pandey. Separately, Giribala Singh’s side has applied for the preservation of CCTV footage. Both petitions are listed for hearing this morning, court records show. Local police have not yet placed any report before the court; officials said that step was pending because the probe is now with the CBI.

Forensic belt under examination
Police and investigating officers confirmed the gymnastic belt alleged to have been used in the hanging was taken into custody. DCP Vikas Kumar Shahwal told reporters the belt was handed to a medical team after the first post-mortem and later retained by the SIT. The item was despatched to the forensic laboratory in Sagar about a week ago and remains under analysis. The Delhi AIIMS team’s request for further tests prompted additional correspondence between the city police, FSL and the cyber cell, officials added.

SIT searches and questioning
A special investigation team visited Samarth Singh’s home in Bag Mugalia Extension on Monday around 7:30 pm and carried out spot verification. Samarth and Giribala were questioned for roughly two-and-a-half hours. Police sources said Samarth told investigators Twisha had been under stress after a recent abortion and reiterated that he and his family had given her Rs 7 lakh at the time of marriage.

Delay in reporting under scrutiny
Twisha was found hanging on the night of May 12 at the Katara Hills residence; the case was formally registered at AIIMS Bhopal on the morning of May 13. The CBI will probe why the information reached the police late and whether any evidence was tampered with before official reporting. Family members have alleged deliberate delay in informing the police, accusing the in-laws of attempting to influence the crime scene. The new FIR reportedly notes possible interference with evidence and delays in notifying authorities.

Legal developments at higher courts
The case drew national attention this week when the Supreme Court took suo motu notice and heard arguments on Monday. Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud (reported earlier as part of the bench) cautioned media against running after statements from either side and urged the matter be allowed to proceed within legal bounds. Meanwhile, the Madhya Pradesh High Court has issued notice to Giribala Singh following petitions by the state government and Twisha’s father, Navnidhi Sharma, challenging her anticipatory bail and alleging lack of cooperation with investigators.

Second post-mortem, funeral held
A Delhi AIIMS team conducted a second post-mortem at Bhopal AIIMS on May 24, twelve days after the initial autopsy. Twisha’s last rites took place the same evening at Bhadbhada crematorium; her brother, Major Harshit, performed the final rites, family sources said.

What happens next
With the CBI now leading the investigation, the case is likely to be transferred to a special court in due course, officials indicated. Today's district court hearing on preserving digital and CCTV records could determine what evidence remains immediately accessible to investigators. Forensic reports on the belt and other material are awaited and expected to shape the agency’s next steps.

The NEET-UG 2026 paper leak investigation has taken a major turn after the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) presented shocking allegations in court, claiming that a senior botany teacher appointed by the National Testing Agency (NTA) was actively involved in the conspiracy. The accused, Manisha Gurunath Mandhare, has been sent to 14 days of CBI custody by the Rouse Avenue Court in Delhi, marking a significant escalation in one of India’s most sensitive examination fraud cases.

According to the CBI, the accused was not just a passive participant but a key figure in the alleged paper leak network. Investigators claim that Mandhare, who is based in Pune, had professional expertise in biology and was directly involved in translating NEET question papers. This access, combined with her alleged association with other suspects, has raised serious concerns about internal vulnerabilities within the examination system.

The agency informed the court that Mandhare worked closely with other accused individuals, including Professor P.V. Kulkarni and consultant Manisha Waghmare. Together, they are suspected of planning and executing a coordinated strategy to access and distribute confidential examination material. The CBI argued that this was not an isolated incident but part of a structured network designed to compromise the integrity of one of India’s most competitive entrance examinations.

During the court hearing, the CBI made another startling claim: Mandhare allegedly handed over parts of the question paper to another accused named Shubham. Investigators believe this transfer played a crucial role in spreading the leaked content further through unauthorized channels. The agency has stated that the investigation is still ongoing across multiple states, and custodial interrogation is necessary to uncover the full extent of the network.

The role of the National Testing Agency (NTA), which is responsible for conducting major entrance exams in India, has also come under scrutiny. Officials appointed Mandhare as a senior subject expert in botany, which allegedly gave her access to sensitive materials. This has raised serious questions about the vetting process and internal security protocols used by exam authorities.

CBI officials emphasized in court that the accused’s specialization in translation work was a critical factor in the case. Since NEET question papers often undergo linguistic and technical processing, experts like Mandhare are given access under strict confidentiality agreements. However, investigators believe this trust may have been misused to facilitate the leak.

The Rouse Avenue Court, after hearing arguments from both sides, agreed with the CBI’s request for custody. The court stated that the seriousness of the allegations and the need for deeper investigation justified granting 14 days of remand. The accused will now be interrogated further to determine her exact role and connections within the alleged network.

Sources from the investigation suggest that the CBI is examining digital evidence, financial transactions, and communication records linked to multiple suspects. The agency is also tracking whether the leaked material was distributed through coaching networks, private tutoring groups, or online platforms.

The NEET paper leak case has once again brought attention to the recurring issue of examination security in India. Over the past few years, several high-profile exam leaks have raised concerns among students and parents about fairness and transparency in competitive testing systems. The latest allegations have intensified demands for stronger safeguards and technological upgrades.

Education experts say that if internal experts involved in exam preparation are found guilty, it could point to systemic weaknesses rather than isolated wrongdoing. The alleged involvement of a subject specialist in such a sensitive role highlights the need for stricter background verification and monitoring mechanisms.

Meanwhile, student communities across the country have expressed frustration and anxiety over the ongoing investigation. For many aspirants, NEET represents a critical gateway to medical education, and any compromise in its integrity directly affects thousands of futures.

As the investigation continues, the CBI is expected to expand its probe into multiple states and examine whether a larger syndicate is involved. Officials have indicated that more arrests could follow as digital and financial trails are analyzed in detail.

---------------

NEET-UG 2026 Cancelled After Rajasthan Paper Leak, CBI Takes Over; 23 Lakh Students Affected

CBI to investigate nationwide cheating network as handwritten 'question bank' with 150 matching questions surfaces days before the 3 May exam

The National Testing Agency (NTA) on Tuesday cancelled the NEET-UG 2026 examination held on 3 May, citing a serious breach of credibility following a paper leak traced to Rajasthan. The decision, approved by the Government of India, affects nearly 23 lakh students who appeared for the medical entrance test.

The cancellation came after investigators uncovered a handwritten "guess paper" that reportedly reached students in Sikar and Jaipur as early as 1 May — two full days before the exam was conducted.

CBI Brings In

The Ministry of Education has handed over the case to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), which will now probe the alleged cheating network across multiple states. NTA officials confirmed full cooperation, adding that all records, response sheets, and digital trail logs will be shared with the central agency.

Sources familiar with the probe said the CBI is likely to summon at least 15 detained suspects currently in custody of Rajasthan's Special Operations Group (SOG). Among them is Manish from Jaipur, described by officials as the alleged mastermind.

150 Questions Matched Word for Word

Investigators have recovered a handwritten "question bank" containing over 300 questions from Physics, Chemistry, and Biology — all in the same handwriting. Of these, 150 questions matched the actual NEET paper verbatim, according to preliminary findings shared by state police.

Questions worth nearly 600 out of the total 720 marks had allegedly reached some students in Sikar before the examination, sources said.

The alleged trail begins with an MBBS student from Kerala who reportedly sent the material to a friend in Sikar on 1 May. From there, it reached a PG accommodation operator, who shared it with students staying at his facility.

Students Questioned, Money Trail Being Tracked

Several students have been detained for questioning. Some have reportedly admitted to financial transactions linked to the leak, officials said. Investigators are now tracking bank transfers and digital payment records.

No official estimate has been released on how many students may have accessed the leaked material. However, the NTA stated that the breach was widespread enough to undermine the examination's integrity nationwide.

No Fresh Registration, Fees to Be Refunded

In a statement issued late Tuesday evening, the NTA clarified that students do not need to register again for the re-examination. Candidature, registration details, and allotted exam centres will remain valid.

"No additional fee will be charged. The fees already paid by candidates will be refunded," the agency said. Fresh exam dates and admit cards will be announced through official channels in the coming days. Parents have been advised to ignore unverified claims circulating on social media.

2024 Haunts Again

The controversy echoes the NEET-UG 2024 paper leak, which surfaced in Patna and Hazaribagh. While the Supreme Court refused to cancel the entire exam that year, it ordered a re-test for 1,539 candidates. The 2024 cycle was also marked by 67 students scoring a perfect 720 — an unusually high number — and multiple toppers emerging from a single centre, raising further questions.

Between 2019 and 2024, the NTA has faced repeated allegations of mismanagement, from multiple correct answers in answer keys to impersonation cases in JEE Mains and discrepancies in OMR sheet scoring.

What Next for Aspirants?

For the 23 lakh students who had prepared for months, the cancellation is a gut punch. Many had already begun counselling processes based on their response sheets.

"We understand the disappointment, but the decision was necessary to protect the credibility of the national examination system," the NTA said. Fresh dates are expected within two weeks.

Nitin Sandesara repays ₹9,800 crore; Supreme Court closes all proceedings

In a rare NPA resolution, Nitin Sandesara settles dues at 180% of the original reference amount to ensure "complete quietus."

In a landmark development for India’s corporate legal landscape, the Supreme Court has formally closed all proceedings against businessman Nitin J. Sandesara after the total repayment of ₹9,800 crore to creditor banks. The move marks the end of a high-profile pursuit, concluding with a recovery that significantly exceeds the original claims made by financial institutions.

The Bench, comprising Justices J.K. Maheshwari and Vijay Bishnoi, moved to shut the files on cases spearheaded by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), the Enforcement Directorate (ED), and the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO). The court’s decision follows the successful verification of payments that effectively made every secured lender whole.

Beyond the original debt

The closure of the matter is anchored in a repayment figure that has surprised market observers. While the original reference amount in the case stood at ₹5,383 crore, the final realization for the banking system reached ₹9,800 crore.

This represents nearly 180% of the initial alleged default. Unlike typical Non-Performing Asset (NPA) resolutions where lenders often accept "haircuts" ranging from 50 to 70 percent, this case resulted in banks receiving substantially more than the principal amount contested.

Breakdown of the recovery

According to court filings and compliance reports, the recovery was structured through multiple channels to ensure full transparency. A sum of ₹3,507 crore was paid directly to the consortium of lender banks through various tranches.

An additional ₹1,192 crore was realized through liquidation processes. The single largest component, amounting to ₹5,111 crore, was deposited directly with the Supreme Court registry, as confirmed in a compliance order dated December 17, 2025.

Supreme Court sets precedent

Legal experts tracking the case noted that the Supreme Court described the resolution as a "new and positive standard" for corporate dispute settlements in India. The finality of the order ensures a "complete quietus" to the litigation.

The court's insistence on total accountability was evident during the final stages of the hearing. On April 2, when the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) sought a ten-day window to finalize its regulatory obligations, the Bench restricted the extension to just seven days.

Closing the final gap

The discipline of the repayment process was highlighted by the precision of the final settlement. By April 10, 2026, the balance remaining was reported as just ₹45,70,522—a marginal figure compared to the thousands of crores already cleared.

This final amount was deposited via a demand draft on April 13, 2026. This meticulous follow-through to the last rupee was a critical factor in the court’s decision to quash all outstanding FIRs and investigative proceedings.

Impact on corporate India

This resolution is expected to have a significant impact on how large-scale corporate defaults are viewed. By choosing to meet the full weight of the financial obligation rather than seeking protracted legal exits, the case offers a template for constructive resolution.

The outcome provides a clean slate for Nitin Sandesara, as the highest judicial authority in the land has now declared the matter settled. For the Indian banking sector, it represents a rare instance where the recovery far outpaced the initial stress on the books.

Future of NPA settlements

As the Indian business world observes this development, the focus shifts to how other stressed assets might be handled. The Sandesara case proves that complex disputes can end with the satisfaction of all stakeholders, including regulators and the judiciary.

With the Supreme Court’s final seal of approval, this chapter in India’s corporate history concludes as a benchmark for accountability. This latest news today serves as a reminder of the potential for the legal system to facilitate total recovery for public interest and national and international news coverage of Indian enterprise.

Amit Jogi Gets Life Term In Jaggi Murder Case After 20 Years

Chhattisgarh High Court says discrimination among accused with similar evidence not permissible; Amit Jogi, son of former CM Ajit Jogi, convicted in 2003 murder of NCP leader Ramavatar Jaggi

Life Term For Amit Jogi

In a significant development in Chhattisgarh’s high-profile Ramavatar Jaggi murder case, the state High Court on Wednesday sentenced Amit Jogi – son of former chief minister Ajit Jogi – to life imprisonment. A special division bench of Chief Justice Ramesh Sinha and Justice Arvind Verma delivered the verdict, overturning the 2007 trial court order that had acquitted him.

The court observed that when all accused face similar charges and evidence, no single accused can be deliberately treated differently. “Discrimination among accused on identical evidence is not permissible unless a concrete and separate reason for acquittal is proven,” the bench noted.

Court’s Strong Observation

The division bench made it clear that acquitting one accused while convicting others on the same set of evidence is legally untenable. Sources indicated that the judges found no exceptional ground to spare Amit Jogi when 28 other accused had already been held guilty. The ruling effectively closes a legal loophole that had kept the former CM’s son out of prison for nearly two decades.

The 2003 Murder Case

Ramavatar Jaggi, a Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) leader and close associate of former Union minister Vidyacharan Shukla, was shot dead in Raipur on June 4, 2003. The murder sent shockwaves through Chhattisgarh’s political circles. Following allegations of bias and dissatisfaction with the initial police probe, the state government handed over the investigation to the CBI.

The central agency subsequently charged 31 accused, including Amit Jogi, with murder and criminal conspiracy. Two accused – Baltu Pathak and Surendra Singh – turned government witnesses during the trial.

Previous Acquittal Overturned

On May 31, 2007, a special court in Raipur had granted Amit Jogi the benefit of doubt and acquitted him. The victim’s son, Satish Jaggi, challenged this acquittal before the Supreme Court. The apex court stayed the trial court’s order and later transferred the case back to the Chhattisgarh High Court for a fresh, detailed hearing.

Two years ago, the division bench had already dismissed appeals filed by other convicts in the case, upholding their life sentences. The Supreme Court then accepted a CBI appeal and directed the High Court to re-examine Amit Jogi’s role comprehensively.

Conspiracy Allegations

Appearing before the High Court, Satish Jaggi’s counsel B.P. Sharma argued that the murder conspiracy was “sponsored by the then state government.” He alleged that critical evidence was destroyed under government influence once the CBI probe began. “In such a case, evidence alone is not decisive – the conspiracy must be uncovered,” Sharma had submitted.

According to officials familiar with the proceedings, the bench found merit in the argument that all accused operated with a common intention, making selective acquittal unjustified.

Other Convicts Named

Among the 28 individuals earlier convicted in the Jaggi murder case are two former CSPs (superintendents of police), a former police station in-charge, Yaaya Dheber – brother of former Raipur mayor Ejaz Dheber – and shooter Chiman Singh. The High Court has now added Amit Jogi to the list of those serving life terms.

What Lies Ahead

Legal experts tracking the case say Amit Jogi is likely to appeal the verdict before the Supreme Court. His legal team had earlier maintained that the CBI’s chargesheet lacked direct evidence against him. However, with the High Court’s categorical ruling on discrimination in evidence, any further appeal faces an uphill climb.

The Jaggi murder case remains one of Chhattisgarh’s most politically sensitive trials. For now, the family of Ramavatar Jaggi has welcomed the verdict, calling it “justice after 20 years of waiting.” This latest news today underscores how courts are scrutinising selective acquittals in high-profile murder cases. As an India news update, the ruling reinforces the principle that identical evidence must lead to identical outcomes – regardless of the accused’s political background. For readers of any English news portal India, this verdict stands as a landmark on evidentiary fairness in criminal law.

Jaggi Murder Case Reopens After 20 Years — Amit Jogi Back in the Dock as High Court Begins Fresh Hearing

A political murder from 2003 is refusing to rest. With the Supreme Court stepping in and the Chhattisgarh High Court resuming hearings, the Jaggi murder case is once again at the centre of Chhattisgarh's legal and political landscape.

A Case That Refused to Die

The long-running Ramavatar Jaggi murder case has been officially reopened in the Chhattisgarh High Court, following firm directions from the Supreme Court of India. On Wednesday, March 25, 2026, a Division Bench of Chief Justice Ramesh Sinha and Justice Arvind Kumar Verma issued notices to Satish Jaggi and Amit Jogi, directing both to appear before the court along with their legal counsel.

The development follows the Supreme Court's landmark ruling in November 2025, which allowed the Central Bureau of Investigation's appeal, condoned a significant procedural delay, and directed the High Court to re-examine the plea against Amit Jogi's acquittal purely on its merits. The next crucial hearing has been scheduled for April 1, 2026.

What Is the Jaggi Murder Case?

The case stems from the brutal murder of National Congress Party leader Ramavatar Jaggi in Raipur, Chhattisgarh, in 2003. Initially investigated by state police, the case was subsequently handed to the CBI following complaints that the local investigation was compromised due to political influence. The CBI filed a detailed chargesheet alleging that Amit Aishwarya Jogi — son of then Chief Minister Ajit Jogi — had conspired with others to eliminate Jaggi, a prominent rival political figure.

While 28 co-accused were convicted following trial, the trial court acquitted Amit Jogi, citing insufficient evidence against him. Three separate appeals were then filed in the Chhattisgarh High Court — by the state government, by the victim's son Satish Jaggi, and by the CBI itself. The High Court dismissed all three appeals. The matter appeared closed — until the Supreme Court stepped in with a decisive intervention.

How the Supreme Court Changed Everything

In its November 2025 ruling, the Supreme Court made a pointed and significant observation. It noted that a case involving such grave allegations — specifically, a conspiracy to murder a rival political leader — should not be thrown out on the basis of mere technicalities or procedural delays. The court adopted a liberal approach and condoned the CBI's delay of over 1,373 days in filing its appeal, remitting the matter back to the Chhattisgarh High Court for fresh consideration on merits.

This is a landmark judicial position. Indian courts have frequently dismissed delayed appeals on procedural grounds alone. In this instance, the Supreme Court sent a clear and unambiguous message: where the crime is grave, the door to justice must not be shut by paperwork.

Legal observers across the country have taken note. The ruling reinforces the principle that courts must look beyond technicalities when the allegations at the heart of a case involve political violence, conspiracy, and the misuse of power.

What Amit Jogi Said

Following Wednesday's court proceedings, Amit Jogi addressed the development publicly through social media with characteristic composure. He acknowledged that the High Court would take up the matter on April 1 in a case where he had already been acquitted over two decades ago, and expressed his confidence that justice would continue to favour him. He referred to the matter as one of faith and divine grace.

His calm, however, does not diminish the legal gravity of the situation. With the case now formally reopened on merits, Amit Jogi — who was previously arrested, spent time in custody, and was later acquitted — may be required to seek fresh bail arrangements. Satish Jaggi, the deceased's son, made the position clear: Amit Jogi has once again become an active accused in this matter.

Why This Case Matters Beyond Chhattisgarh

The Jaggi murder case is far more than a regional crime story. It sits at the intersection of political power, criminal conspiracy, institutional accountability, and judicial perseverance. The charges involve an alleged plot to murder a member of an opposing political party at a time when the accused's father was the sitting Chief Minister of the state — making it one of the most politically sensitive criminal cases in Chhattisgarh's history.

The case also raises a deeper constitutional question that the Supreme Court itself has flagged: in matters involving both state police and CBI investigations, does the state government retain the independent right to file an appeal against an acquittal? This question may ultimately require examination by a larger constitutional bench.

For ordinary citizens watching from the outside, the issue is simpler — and more moral. Can the powerful truly be held accountable, even two decades after the crime? The courts appear to be answering: they must at least face the trial.

The Road Ahead: April 1 Hearing

The Chhattisgarh High Court has assigned the responsibility of serving notices to the Raipur SP, who will be required to present a compliance affidavit confirming service to all parties. The stage is now formally set for what promises to be a critical legal proceeding on April 1.

The CBI must argue before the High Court why it should be granted leave to challenge the trial court's acquittal of Amit Jogi. All parties — Amit Jogi, the state government, and the victim's family — will be represented. Legal analysts expect the hearing to set the tone for what could be a prolonged and closely watched appellate process.

Justice Moves Slowly, But It Moves

The Jaggi murder case is a powerful reminder that in India's judicial system, the word "closed" is rarely the final word in matters of grave consequence. Twenty-three years after NCP leader Ramavatar Jaggi was shot dead in Raipur, his family continues to seek justice in courtrooms. The accused's son continues to defend his acquittal. And India's highest court has firmly declared that crimes of this magnitude deserve examination on their merits — not burial in bureaucratic delay.

April 1 will be watched closely — not just in Chhattisgarh, but by every observer who believes that justice, however slow its pace, must eventually arrive.

In a dramatic turn of events that sent shockwaves through the political landscape of the national capital, a Delhi court on Friday acquitted former Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal and his former deputy Manish Sisodia in the high-profile corruption case linked to the now-defunct Delhi excise policy. The Rouse Avenue Court discharged all 23 accused in the case, handing the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) a massive legal and political victory while triggering an immediate promise of appeal from the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI).

As the verdict was pronounced, the courtroom atmosphere shifted from tense anticipation to jubilation for AAP supporters. But it was the sight of a visibly emotional Arvind Kejriwal outside the courtroom that became the defining image of the day.

'I am Kattar Imaandar': Kejriwal Breaks Down

Fighting back tears while addressing the media huddle outside the court, a choked-up Arvind Kejriwal struggled to maintain his composure as he hit out at the central government. "For the past few years, the BJP has been levelling accusations against us. Today, the court dismissed all charges. I am deeply grateful to the judge who gave us justice. Truth has prevailed," he said, his voice cracking with emotion.

In a moment that resonated with party workers, Kejriwal declared his integrity in no uncertain terms. "I am kattar imaandar (extremely honest). Modi and Amit Shah together hatched the biggest political conspiracy in independent India. Five of AAP's most prominent leaders were jailed to destroy the party. A sitting Chief Minister was dragged from his home and imprisoned for six months," he added as tears streamed down his face.

Manish Sisodia, who spent nearly two years in judicial custody, echoed the sentiment. "The country has seen how central agencies were misused. We knocked on the doors of the court, and the court has protected us," Sisodia said after the verdict.

 'No Overarching Conspiracy': What the Court Said

Special Judge Jitendra Singh, while passing the order closing the case initiated by the CBI, made observations that pulled up the investigating agency. The court ruled that there was "no overarching conspiracy or criminal intent in the excise policy."

In a sharp rebuke to the probe agency, the court directed a departmental inquiry against specific CBI officials. The judge criticized the agency for building its case primarily through approver statements, calling the practice a "grave violation of Constitutional principles."

"The conduct where an accused is granted pardon and then made an approver, his statements used to fill the gaps in the investigation and make additional people accused, is wrong," the court observed, effectively dismantling the core of the prosecution's case.

The Political Fallout: Celebrations and Challenges

As news of the acquittal spread, celebrations erupted outside Kejriwal's residence and at AAP offices across the country. Party workers burst crackers, distributed sweets, and chanted slogans hailing the "victory of truth."

Sunita Kejriwal, the former CM's wife, posted on X: "In this world, no matter how powerful one becomes, one cannot rise above Shiva Shakti. Truth always prevails." Former Delhi CM Atishi added, "No matter how many false accusations are made, no matter how much oppression is carried out, in the end, truth prevails."

However, the legal battle is far from over. CBI sources confirmed that the agency will immediately move the Delhi High Court challenging the trial court's order. A CBI spokesperson stated that key aspects of the investigation were not adequately considered and that the evidence collected during the probe had established key elements of the alleged irregularities.

BJP IT cell chief Amit Malviya was quick to point out that the verdict came from a lower court on technical grounds. "The legal process is not over yet. If Kejriwal was honest, why was the policy withdrawn after signs of irregularities?" he questioned.

What Was the Liquor Policy Case?

The case dates back to 2022 when the CBI filed an FIR based on a complaint by then Delhi Lieutenant Governor VK Saxena. The probe alleged that the 2021-22 Excise Policy was manipulated to enable liquor trade monopolization and cartelization, with AAP leaders allegedly receiving kickbacks.

Kejriwal was arrested by the Enforcement Directorate on March 21, 2024, and later by the CBI on June 26. The Supreme Court granted him bail in July 2024 after he spent five months in jail. Friday's verdict now acquits him and 22 others of all charges in the CBI case, though the agency's impending appeal in the High Court means the legal saga continues.

For now, AAP is savoring what it calls a "historic victory," with party MP Sanjay Singh demanding an apology from Prime Minister Modi. As the dust settles on one of the most politically charged cases in recent history, the verdict has reignited debates on the misuse of investigative agencies—a conversation that is far from over.