The legal team representing Giribala Singh, one of the accused in the high-profile Twisha Sharma death case, has publicly responded for the first time, asserting that the accused never refused to provide voice samples to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI).

Speaking to the media in Bhopal, advocate Enosh George Carlo said the defence had consistently cooperated with the investigation and that there was "no objection then or now" to furnishing voice samples. He maintained that the court's official order sheet should be treated as the authoritative record of what transpired during the proceedings.

Legal Concerns Over Transcript

Carlo clarified that the defence's concerns were not about providing voice samples but about the transcript supplied by the CBI for the recording process.

According to him, the accused sought legal clarification regarding the document before reading it aloud, arguing that every accused person has the right to consult legal counsel before participating in such procedures.

He further claimed that Giribala Singh had, in fact, spent nearly three hours providing voice samples during the investigation.

Consent Communicated to CBI

The defence lawyer stated that on July 11, they had formally informed the CBI that their clients had no objection to reading the transcript and providing voice samples.

"We have nothing to hide, and therefore there is no reason to fear. Our clients have cooperated with the investigation at every stage," Carlo said.

Court Recorded No Objection

Referring to the latest court proceedings conducted via video conferencing, Carlo said the judge directly asked both accused whether they had any objection to providing voice samples.

According to the defence, both Giribala Singh and co-accused Samarth Singh clearly stated that they had no objection and were willing to read whatever transcript was provided by the investigating agency.

Carlo claimed that the court's order sheet also records this statement.

No Need for Further CBI Application

The advocate argued that once the accused expressed their willingness before the court, there was no necessity for the CBI to pursue its application under Section 349 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS).

He said the court observed that an earlier order had already addressed the issue, making further proceedings on the application unnecessary.

Reference to Supreme Court Guidelines

Carlo also referred to the Supreme Court's 2016 judgment in Sudhir Kumar vs State (NCT of Delhi), stating that voice sample collection should strictly follow prescribed legal procedures.

He argued that voice samples should correspond to the original recordings intended for forensic comparison and that investigating agencies are responsible for addressing any legitimate legal concerns regarding the transcript before the process is carried out.

Background

The case relates to the suspicious death of actress and model Twisha Sharma, who had married Samarth Singh on December 9, 2025. The investigation is currently being conducted by the CBI, with voice sample collection forming part of the ongoing probe.

The latest statement from the defence comes after reports suggested that the accused had declined to provide voice samples, a claim now disputed by Giribala Singh's legal counsel.

The CBI had approached the top court challenging the High Court's 2019 decision to grant Yadav bail and suspend his sentence in the case, arguing the move was made without any substantial change in circumstances. The agency contended that Yadav was the kingpin and main conspirator behind the scam, accused of fraudulently withdrawing funds from the Deoghar District Treasury between 1991 and 1994 using forged allotment letters, during his tenure as Bihar Chief Minister. A special CBI court in Ranchi had convicted Yadav in December 2017, sentencing him to seven years in prison under multiple sections of the IPC and the Prevention of Corruption Act.

Additional Solicitor General S.V. Raju, representing the CBI, argued that the High Court had erred by granting bail on the grounds that Yadav had completed 50 percent of his sentence, calling that basis factually incorrect since the sentences involved weren't meant to run concurrently. Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for Yadav, countered that the provision governing concurrent versus consecutive sentences applies only at the stage of final adjudication, not while a sentence suspension is being considered on an interim basis, and argued the High Court judge had simply applied a consistent standard within his discretion.

After hearing both sides, a bench of Justices M.M. Sundresh and P.B. Varale declined to interfere with the High Court's order, noting that roughly seven years had passed since the bail was granted and that the CBI's appeal itself dates back to 2018. Rather than revisiting the bail question, the bench indicated it was more inclined to prioritise resolving the underlying appeal itself, directing the Jharkhand High Court to expedite the hearing and requesting that it be completed within six months. The court disposed of the CBI's plea while keeping the underlying legal question open for the High Court to address.

The ruling echoes the same bench's position at an earlier hearing in February, when it had already signalled reluctance to disturb Yadav's bail and a preference for fast-tracking the pending appeal instead.

Yadav, the RJD supremo and a central figure in Bihar politics for decades, has remained on bail through multiple fodder scam cases for several years now, with this latest order removing the immediate prospect of his return to custody while the underlying appeal continues.

The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear a batch of petitions on Monday seeking an independent, court-monitored investigation into the alleged embezzlement of donations collected at the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Temple in Ayodhya.

The petitions seek the transfer of the investigation to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and request a time-bound probe along with a forensic audit of the temple's donation records to examine the alleged financial irregularities.

The matter comes before the apex court at a time when an investigation by the Special Investigation Team (SIT) is already underway into the alleged misappropriation of temple funds.

Petitions Seek Court-Monitored Probe

According to the petitions, the Supreme Court has been urged to direct an independent investigation under judicial supervision to ensure transparency and public confidence in the handling of devotees' donations.

The petitioners have also sought a forensic examination of donation records to verify allegations of financial irregularities and identify any misuse of funds.

The court is expected to consider whether the ongoing investigation is sufficient or whether an independent agency should take over the probe.

Investigation Already Underway

Law enforcement agencies have been investigating the alleged theft and misuse of donations collected by the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra Trust.

So far, eight people have been arrested in connection with the case. Authorities are continuing to investigate the alleged diversion and misappropriation of temple funds, while collecting financial and documentary evidence.

The ongoing SIT inquiry remains active as investigators examine the flow of donations and related financial transactions.

Administrative Changes in Temple Trust

The controversy has also led to significant organisational changes within the temple trust.

The trust recently accepted the resignations of General Secretary Champat Rai and trustee Anil Mishra. An interim secretary has been appointed, while the process to select a new Chief Executive Officer (CEO) has also been initiated.

These changes come amid efforts to strengthen administrative oversight as the investigation continues.

Political and Religious Reactions

The allegations have triggered widespread political debate and attracted attention from religious organisations across the country.

Several opposition leaders have demanded an independent investigation into the alleged financial irregularities, arguing that the matter requires complete transparency due to the public nature of the donations.

The Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), however, has expressed confidence in the ongoing SIT investigation while stressing the need for accountability in managing funds contributed by devotees.

Court's Decision Awaited

The Supreme Court's hearing is expected to determine whether the existing SIT investigation should continue independently or whether additional judicial oversight or a CBI-led probe is warranted.

The outcome could influence the future course of the investigation and clarify the extent of judicial supervision over the alleged financial irregularities involving one of the country's most prominent religious institutions.

A significant development has emerged in the investigation into the death of model and actress Twisha Sharma, with the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, submitting an 11-page forensic report to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). The report, handed over in a sealed cover, is expected to play a crucial role in determining the circumstances surrounding her death.

According to sources familiar with the investigation, the AIIMS forensic panel has concluded that skin tissue recovered from the alleged ligature material—a gymnastics belt—matches the injury and ligature marks found on Twisha Sharma's body. Investigators believe the findings could help reconstruct the sequence of events leading to her death.

AIIMS Report Submitted to CBI

The forensic report was prepared after the Madhya Pradesh High Court directed a second post-mortem examination following concerns raised by Twisha Sharma's family over the initial autopsy.

CBI officials have confirmed that the report is being examined in detail. Investigators are analysing the medical findings alongside other evidence already collected during the probe.

The AIIMS medical board reportedly documented its observations across 11 pages, which have now been formally submitted to the investigating agency.

Key Findings on Ligature Material

According to sources, forensic experts identified skin tissue on the gymnastics belt believed to have been used as the ligature material. The report states that the recovered tissue corresponds with the ligature marks and other injuries found on Twisha Sharma's body.

Officials also noted that the belt contained a metal ring, which is being examined as part of the forensic assessment. Investigators believe these findings could provide important physical evidence in understanding how the injuries were sustained.

The CBI has not officially commented on the conclusions of the report, stating only that the forensic findings are under examination as part of the ongoing investigation.

Case Under CBI Investigation

Twisha Sharma, the daughter-in-law of retired judge Giribala Singh, was found hanging at her in-laws' residence in Bhopal on May 12. The circumstances surrounding her death sparked widespread attention after family members questioned the findings of the initial post-mortem examination.

Alleging procedural lapses and inconsistencies in the first autopsy, the family approached the Madhya Pradesh High Court seeking an independent investigation.

Taking note of the concerns, the High Court directed that a second post-mortem be conducted by AIIMS, New Delhi. Subsequently, the investigation into the case was transferred to the Central Bureau of Investigation.

Investigation Continues

Officials said the AIIMS forensic report will be assessed along with witness statements, forensic evidence and other materials collected during the investigation before any conclusions are reached.

The CBI has not announced any fresh action following the submission of the report. Investigators are expected to continue examining all available evidence to establish the exact circumstances of Twisha Sharma's death.

The case remains under active investigation, and authorities have not ruled out any possibility. Further developments are expected after the CBI completes its analysis of the forensic findings and other evidence gathered during the course of the probe.

The two accused were produced before the court after the expiry of their earlier judicial custody period. Special CBI Judge Ajay Gupta passed the order on an application moved by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), which sought an extension of their custody as the investigation continues.

Representing the agency, Public Prosecutor Neetu Singh argued for the extension before the court. The matter remains under active investigation by the CBI, which is probing an alleged network involved in obtaining and distributing leaked examination papers ahead of the national-level medical entrance test.

According to investigators, the case has so far led to the arrest of 12 individuals. Those arrested include Mangi Lal Bival, Vikas Bival, Dinesh Bival, Yash Yadav, Shubham Khairnar, Manisha Waghmare, Prahlad Kulkarni, Dhananjay Lokhande, Manisha Mandhare, Shivraj Raghunath Motegaonkar, Manisha Sanjay Havaldar and Dr Manoj Shirure. All the accused are currently lodged in judicial custody.

The case has attracted significant attention due to the seriousness of the allegations and the scale of the examination involved. NEET-UG is one of India’s largest entrance examinations, conducted annually for admission to undergraduate medical courses across the country.

The court has also passed several interim orders in the matter over the past few weeks. Earlier, accused Yash Yadav was permitted to appear in the re-conducted NEET-UG examination held on June 21 and was also allowed to attend his sister’s wedding on June 22. In a separate order, the court rejected the regular bail application filed by accused Manisha Waghmare.

The investigation stems from a complaint filed by a government official on May 12, 2026. Based on the complaint, an FIR was registered under relevant provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), the Prevention of Corruption Act and laws related to the use of unfair means in public examinations.

According to the CBI, Mangi Lal Bival allegedly approached Shubham Khairnar to obtain the NEET-UG question paper for his son, Vikas Bival. Investigators claim that leaked examination material was recovered from Mangi Lal Bival’s mobile phone during the probe.

The agency has further alleged that Mangi Lal Bival procured the leaked paper from Yash Yadav for ₹10 lakh and subsequently facilitated its circulation to other candidates. During questioning, Vikas Bival reportedly admitted that he came in contact with Yash Yadav while attending coaching classes in Rajasthan’s Sikar district.

CBI officials believe the accused were part of a larger conspiracy involving the procurement and sale of confidential examination material. The agency has alleged that leaked papers were sold to candidates for amounts reaching up to ₹12 lakh.

The developments come amid continued scrutiny of examination security mechanisms and concerns over malpractice in competitive recruitment and admission tests. Investigators are examining financial transactions, digital evidence and communication records to establish the extent of the alleged network.

With the court extending the judicial custody of two key accused, the investigation is expected to continue in the coming days. The next hearing in the matter is scheduled for July 11.

Saurabh Chandrakar, one of the key accused in the alleged Mahadev Online Betting App case, has reportedly been arrested in Oman on charges of entering the country using a forged Indonesian passport. Indian authorities have initiated the process to bring him back to India, where he is wanted in connection with a multi-crore illegal betting and money laundering investigation.

According to media reports, Chandrakar was apprehended by the Royal Oman Police based on an Interpol Red Notice issued at the request of Indian investigating agencies. He is currently being held at the high-security Al Khoud Detention Centre in Muscat while legal proceedings continue.

Arrest Linked to Alleged Fake Passport

Reports indicate that Chandrakar is facing charges of using forged travel documents and illegally entering Oman. Authorities believe he travelled to the country after leaving the United Arab Emirates (UAE), where he had been residing for some time.

He has reportedly engaged a team of lawyers in Muscat to contest the proceedings. However, officials familiar with the matter believe obtaining bail may prove difficult because the use of forged passports is treated as a serious criminal offence under Omani law.

Extradition Process Expected

Following his arrest, Indian authorities have begun preparing formal extradition documents to seek Chandrakar's return.

Officials believe the move to travel to Oman using an alleged forged passport may have been an attempt to complicate or delay the extradition process. Under Omani law, the use of forged travel documents can attract imprisonment of three to five years along with financial penalties if the allegations are proven.

Interpol Red Notice Remains Valid

Chandrakar had earlier approached the Commission for the Control of INTERPOL's Files (CCF), seeking the withdrawal of the Red Notice issued against him.

He argued that the criminal proceedings initiated in India were politically motivated and that he would not receive a fair trial. However, the Commission rejected his plea, observing that the investigation primarily concerns financial crimes, including alleged money laundering and illegal betting operations, and does not fall within the category of political persecution.

As a result, the Interpol Red Notice against him continues to remain in force.

Multi-Crore Betting Investigation

Saurabh Chandrakar is among the principal accused in the Mahadev Online Betting App case, which is being investigated by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) and the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI).

Investigators are probing allegations of illegal online betting, money laundering and large-scale financial transactions involving thousands of crores of rupees.

According to the Enforcement Directorate, more than 175 search operations have been conducted in connection with the case so far. The agency has arrested 13 accused persons, named 74 individuals in the investigation and filed five prosecution complaints before the Special PMLA Court in Raipur.

The ED has further stated that movable and immovable assets worth approximately ₹4,336 crore have been attached, frozen or seized during the course of the investigation.

Previous Attempts to Secure Custody

Indian agencies had earlier attempted to bring Chandrakar back from the UAE. In 2024, he was briefly detained in Dubai following the Interpol Red Notice but was later released, and extradition could not be completed.

His latest arrest in Oman is expected to revive India's efforts to secure his custody through formal legal channels.

Fugitive diamond businessman Nirav Modi is a step closer to being extradited to India after reportedly losing his final legal challenge before the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR). With the ruling, the last remaining legal hurdle in his extradition process has been removed, paving the way for UK authorities to hand him over to Indian agencies.

According to documents accessed by News18, Modi approached the European Court of Human Rights in April 2026 after exhausting all avenues of appeal before courts in the United Kingdom. However, the Strasbourg-based court declined to grant him relief, effectively ending his legal battle against extradition.

The latest development means there are no further legal remedies available to challenge his transfer to India. Following the completion of judicial proceedings, the UK government has reportedly initiated the formal process required to extradite him. Officials familiar with the matter indicated that the procedural formalities are now in their final stages and Modi could be transferred to India once the process is completed.

Final Legal Barrier Removed

Nirav Modi has been lodged in HMP Wandsworth Prison in London since March 2019, where he has continued to contest India's extradition request through various legal proceedings. His appeal before the European Court of Human Rights was viewed as the final international legal option available to him after repeated setbacks in UK courts.

With the European court refusing to intervene, his legal resistance to extradition has effectively come to an end.

Wanted in PNB Fraud and Money Laundering Cases

Indian investigative agencies, including the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and the Enforcement Directorate (ED), have been pursuing Modi's extradition for several years.

He is accused of orchestrating the multi-billion-rupee Punjab National Bank (PNB) fraud and is also facing allegations of money laundering. Investigators have maintained that his presence in India is essential for trial and further investigation into the financial crimes linked to the case.

The alleged banking fraud, one of India's largest financial scams, involved fraudulent Letters of Undertaking (LoUs) that caused massive losses to Punjab National Bank.

UK Government Begins Extradition Process

Following the conclusion of all legal proceedings, British authorities have reportedly begun administrative formalities for handing over Nirav Modi to Indian authorities.

Sources familiar with the process said the extradition paperwork is being completed, after which the UK government can formally transfer him to India under the bilateral extradition framework.

While no official date has been announced, officials indicated that the extradition could take place once all procedural requirements are fulfilled.

What Is the European Court of Human Rights?

The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) is an international court based in Strasbourg, France, responsible for hearing cases related to alleged violations of the European Convention on Human Rights.

Individuals facing extradition from European jurisdictions often approach the court, arguing that their fundamental rights may be violated if they are transferred to another country. In Nirav Modi's case, the ECHR represented the final judicial forum available after unsuccessful appeals in UK courts.

With the dismissal of his application, the legal process surrounding his extradition has effectively concluded.

The development marks a significant milestone in India's long-running efforts to bring the fugitive businessman back to face trial in connection with the alleged PNB fraud and related money laundering investigations.

The Delhi High Court has set aside the Economic Offences Wing FIR and the Enforcement Directorate's money laundering investigation against NewsClick and its founder-editor Prabir Purkayastha, holding that the case lacked the ingredients of fraud or criminal breach of trust.

Court Grants Relief to NewsClick

The Delhi High Court has quashed the FIR filed by the Economic Offences Wing (EOW) and the Enforcement Directorate's (ED) money laundering investigation in the foreign funding case involving NewsClick and its founder-editor Prabir Purkayastha.

Justice Neena Bansal Krishna, in her order, observed that the agencies had carried out extensive investigations without producing concrete evidence of fraud. The court said that even if the allegations in the FIR were accepted at face value, they did not establish offences such as cheating or criminal breach of trust.

Why the court intervened

The High Court said the EOW FIR and the ED's money laundering case did not disclose the essential ingredients of fraud or breach of trust, and that continuing the proceedings would amount to a misuse of the legal process.

The judgment described the continuation of the proceedings as a misuse of the legal process and noted that fraud requires a deceived party, which was absent in the present case.

Origin of the Foreign Funding Case

The case originated from an FIR registered by the Delhi Police in August 2020. Investigators alleged that NewsClick received foreign direct investment (FDI) worth ₹9.59 crore from an American company, Worldwide Media Holdings LLC.

Authorities questioned the valuation of shares, claiming that shares with a face value of ₹10 were issued at a premium of ₹11,510 per share despite the company not being profitable. Investigators alleged that the structure was designed to bypass the 26% FDI cap applicable to Indian media organisations.

Following the FIR, the ED conducted searches at the offices of NewsClick, as well as at premises linked to directors and shareholders under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). Officials seized foreign currency, documents and digital devices during the raids.

The ED later stated that NewsClick had received ₹38.05 crore in foreign funds over three years, including ₹9.59 crore through FDI and ₹28.46 crore classified as export of services revenue.

Parallel Investigations and UAPA Case

The controversy widened in 2023 after BJP MP Nishikant Dubey referred to a New York Times report in Parliament and alleged that some journalists were involved in spreading Chinese propaganda. Union Minister Anurag Thakur also publicly alleged links between businessman Neville Roy Singham and entities associated with NewsClick.

On August 17, 2023, the Delhi Police Special Cell registered a separate case against NewsClick under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) and sections of the Indian Penal Code relating to promoting enmity and criminal conspiracy.

Purkayastha was arrested on October 3, 2023, in connection with that case. The Special Cell questioned 46 individuals and conducted searches at 31 locations linked to NewsClick and journalists associated with the platform. An 8,000-page chargesheet was filed in March 2024.

Multiple Agencies Involved

NewsClick is operated by PPK NewsClick Studio Private Limited and was founded by Purkayastha in 2009.

Over the course of the investigation, multiple agencies became involved, including the Delhi Police Special Cell, the EOW, the Income Tax Department, the ED and the CBI, each examining different aspects of the allegations related to foreign funding and compliance.

Implications of the High Court Order

The Delhi High Court's decision effectively ends the EOW FIR and the ED's related money laundering proceedings against NewsClick and Purkayastha. The court's observations on arbitrary action and the absence of evidence of fraud are likely to be closely examined in future disputes involving financial investigations and media organisations.

The order does not automatically dispose of other proceedings, including the separate UAPA case being pursued by the Delhi Police Special Cell.

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) is now focusing on the pregnancy-related conflict as a central angle in the case of actress Twisha Sharma’s suspicious death. According to sources, early findings suggest that repeated arguments between Twisha and her husband Samarth were linked to questions around pregnancy and paternity.

In one of the key conversations under review, Samarth allegedly questioned Twisha about how she could be pregnant and asked about the identity of the child’s father. The Twisha Sharma death case pregnancy angle is now being treated as a critical lead by investigators as they examine emotional stress factors and marital conflict.

The couple had married in December last year, and reports indicate that tensions began soon after.

Digital Evidence Review

Investigators are analysing chats between Twisha and her mother, where she reportedly expressed distress over repeated questioning from her husband. In one message, she is said to have mentioned feeling unable to ignore accusations related to pregnancy.

CBI officials are also reviewing Samarth’s statements, in which he acknowledged that the relationship had been strained. He reportedly informed investigators about Twisha’s frequent mood changes and travel history between Delhi and Ajmer.

Officials are cross-checking these digital records with medical and forensic evidence as part of the Twisha Sharma death case pregnancy angle investigation.

Medical and Forensic Probe

Sources indicate that the CBI is awaiting a histopathology report of tissue samples preserved after post-mortem examination. This report is considered crucial for confirming medical details related to the alleged pregnancy termination.

The agency is also reviewing psychiatric treatment records, as Twisha had reportedly been under treatment for depression. Investigators plan to question the treating doctor to understand her mental health condition and possible triggers.

Officials said forensic findings, chat records, and witness statements are being aligned to reconstruct the final timeline.

Family Statements and Claims

Twisha’s mother and family members have provided statements suggesting that she was under emotional stress following pregnancy-related decisions. Her mother reportedly told investigators that while the pregnancy news initially brought happiness, Twisha herself was uncertain about continuing it due to career concerns.

Samarth, on the other hand, has claimed that the relationship dynamics were unstable and that Twisha’s behaviour showed frequent emotional fluctuations.

The CBI is examining all versions of statements as part of the ongoing investigation into the Twisha Sharma death case pregnancy angle.

CCTV and Last Movements

Investigators have also reviewed CCTV footage showing Twisha’s movements on the day of the incident. Reports indicate she visited a beauty parlour in the afternoon, returned home in the evening, and later went for a walk.

Footage reportedly shows her being taken down stairs and receiving CPR, though the exact sequence of events at the critical moment remains unclear.

CBI officials are combining surveillance data with forensic reports to establish a clearer timeline.

Anticipatory bail rejected a day earlier; husband Samarth Singh on CBI remand till May 29

A team of Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) officers on Thursday questioned retired judge Giribala Singh for over six hours at her residence in the Kolar Hills area, as her arrest in the Twisha Sharma death case appeared imminent.

The questioning began around 10:30 am, barely 24 hours after the Madhya Pradesh High Court cancelled her anticipatory bail in a late-night order. Sources familiar with the matter said the former judge was being confronted with digital evidence and forensic reports.

Heavy Security, Barricades Outside Residence

The retired judge’s house has been virtually sealed. Personnel from the Kolar Hills and Bag Sevania police stations have been deployed outside, and barricades have been put up around the property. Officials from both police stations were also seen entering the premises.

According to local authorities, the heavy security is a precautionary measure to manage the growing crowd of onlookers and media personnel that has gathered in the upscale locality.

3D Camera Used to Map Crime Scene

Investigators brought a high-intensity 3D camera inside the house to conduct a 360-degree forensic mapping of the entire premises. The technology is typically used to prepare scientific evidence for court.

Initial reports indicate that the camera was also positioned on the balcony to scan neighbouring rooftops and terraces. The CBI is trying to determine whether the spot where Twisha died was visible from any adjoining property.

What the High Court Said

In a strongly worded 17-page order issued late Wednesday, the High Court noted that the lower court had failed to properly examine the case diary and evidence. The court observed that multiple injury marks were found on the body, which the accused side could not explain satisfactorily.

“The trial court did not consider the seriousness of the case. It was not appropriate to grant relief to the accused,” the order stated, according to legal sources.

The court also took note of WhatsApp chats that allegedly show the mother-in-law and husband pressuring Twisha over her character and demanding an abortion.

Husband on CBI Remand Till May 29

Meanwhile, Twisha’s husband Samarth Singh remains in CBI custody after the agency was granted his remand until May 29. Officials are questioning him about the sequence of events on the night of May 12, when Twisha died under suspicious circumstances at their home.

Investigators are also looking into his ten-day disappearance. Police have confirmed that Singh had switched off his mobile phone and hid in Jabalpur while on the run. “He kept changing locations and avoided direct contact with people,” an official said.

The Case So Far

Twisha Sharma, an actress and model who had worked with several multinational brands and appeared in two Telugu films, died on the night of May 12. While her in-laws have maintained it was a suicide, her family has alleged murder.

A second post-mortem was conducted by a team from Delhi AIIMS at the Bhopal AIIMS on May 24. The final report, including histopathology and viscera analysis, is still awaited. Her last rites were performed later that evening at the Bhadbhada crematorium.

What Happens Next

With the CBI team expected to leave the residence at any time, officials said a medical examination will likely precede a formal arrest. The agency is also examining call detail records and CCTV footage from the area.

The Supreme Court had taken suo motu cognisance of the matter on May 25, with the Chief Justice expressing concern over questions being raised about the judiciary’s impartiality. For now, all eyes remain on the Kolar Hills residence, where a former judge’s fate hangs in the balance.

High Court cancels anticipatory bail as CBI records 360-degree visuals of Giribala Singh’s Katara Hills home

The Central Bureau of Investigation on Thursday moved rapidly after the Madhya Pradesh High Court cancelled anticipatory bail for retired judge Giribala Singh in the high-profile death of 22-year-old Twisha Sharma, officials and sources said, with investigators conducting detailed digital mapping of the accused’s house and questioning her at the residence. According to sources familiar with the probe, Giribala could be arrested any time.

Order and timing

The High Court’s 17-page order, issued late on Wednesday, set aside the anticipatory bail granted earlier by a trial court. The bench observed that given the seriousness of the allegations, the evidence on record and the present stage of the investigation, relief was not warranted. The court noted multiple injury marks on Twisha’s body and said the accused had not offered satisfactory explanations, according to a copy of the order made available to reporters.

CBI activity at scene

A CBI team reached Giribala Singh’s home in the Katara Hills area of Bhopal around 10.30 am on Thursday and began questioning her, officials said. Investigators installed a high-intensity 3D camera inside the residence to take precise measurements and record 360-degree visuals of the first floor and other areas, part of a broader effort to recreate the crime scene and preserve digital evidence.

“Teams are recording the internal layout, the heights of walls and vantage points that could help corroborate statements,” an official involved in the probe said on condition of anonymity. The visuals are being added to the case file as scientific evidence, the source added.

Sequence of events

Twisha, who was married in 2023, died on the night of May 12 and was taken to AIIMS Bhopal, where an initial post-mortem recorded hanging marks and other injuries, the court order said. Police seized mobile phones and a DVR from the house the same day. The trial court had earlier granted anticipatory bail after noting certain WhatsApp messages that primarily complained about the husband and financial transfers into Twisha’s account. That order has now been overturned following a deeper review by the High Court.

Allegations and evidence

Prosecutors and investigating agencies contend WhatsApp chats and statements from Twisha’s family indicate alleged mental harassment, pressure to abort a pregnancy and demands for dowry. The High Court flagged inconsistencies in the defence account and raised concerns about potential attempts to influence the probe, noting public statements that could have tarnished the deceased’s image.

The post-mortem, the court said, found injuries that could not be explained simply as marks sustained while cutting down a body, making custodial interrogation of key accused necessary. The CBI has also been examining call detail records, digital backups and CCTV footage, and is probing whether any footage was tampered with, officials said.

Custody and questioning

Twisha’s husband, Samarth Singh, remains in CBI remand until May 29 as investigators try to reconstruct his whereabouts on the night of May 12 and reconcile his statements with technical evidence. Sources said the agency is also tracing contacts he had while allegedly absconding and matching his movements with phone records and digital footprints.

Security and ground reaction

Security around Giribala’s home was tightened on Thursday, with additional police personnel deployed in the neighbourhood. Local residents and journalists gathered outside the house; a reporter from a Bhopal daily filed live updates as the CBI proceeded. In a brief sighting on Thursday morning, Giribala was seen outside feeding street dogs, one source said.

What happens next

With anticipatory bail vacated and the CBI actively recording and analysing scene visuals, officials say an arrest could follow if questioning and evidence review point to custodial needs. The agency is expected to seek formal remand if it decides to take Giribala into custody. Court filings and formal charges, if any, will determine the next legal steps.

Investigators stressed that the probe is ongoing and that conclusions will rely on the forensic, digital and circumstantial evidence being assembled. The CBI declined immediate comment; the High Court registry confirmed the order but did not offer further comment beyond the written judgment.

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has taken charge of the probe into the suspicious death of actress Twisha Sharma, re-registering an FIR that names her husband, Samarth Singh, and mother-in-law and retired judge Giribala Singh, officials said on Tuesday. Meanwhile, applications to preserve call detail records (CDR) and CCTV footage are scheduled for hearing in a Bhopal district court today.

CBI re-registers FIR
According to officials, the CBI team that reached Bhopal on Monday evening re-registered the FIR originally filed at Katara Hills police station. The fresh FIR is reportedly framed under sections related to dowry death after preliminary material suggested demands for additional money. Sources familiar with the investigation said the agency has recorded new entries following spot verification and interviews.

Court applications today
Twisha’s family has moved the Bhopal district court seeking preservation of her CDR, filed through their lawyer Ankur Pandey. Separately, Giribala Singh’s side has applied for the preservation of CCTV footage. Both petitions are listed for hearing this morning, court records show. Local police have not yet placed any report before the court; officials said that step was pending because the probe is now with the CBI.

Forensic belt under examination
Police and investigating officers confirmed the gymnastic belt alleged to have been used in the hanging was taken into custody. DCP Vikas Kumar Shahwal told reporters the belt was handed to a medical team after the first post-mortem and later retained by the SIT. The item was despatched to the forensic laboratory in Sagar about a week ago and remains under analysis. The Delhi AIIMS team’s request for further tests prompted additional correspondence between the city police, FSL and the cyber cell, officials added.

SIT searches and questioning
A special investigation team visited Samarth Singh’s home in Bag Mugalia Extension on Monday around 7:30 pm and carried out spot verification. Samarth and Giribala were questioned for roughly two-and-a-half hours. Police sources said Samarth told investigators Twisha had been under stress after a recent abortion and reiterated that he and his family had given her Rs 7 lakh at the time of marriage.

Delay in reporting under scrutiny
Twisha was found hanging on the night of May 12 at the Katara Hills residence; the case was formally registered at AIIMS Bhopal on the morning of May 13. The CBI will probe why the information reached the police late and whether any evidence was tampered with before official reporting. Family members have alleged deliberate delay in informing the police, accusing the in-laws of attempting to influence the crime scene. The new FIR reportedly notes possible interference with evidence and delays in notifying authorities.

Legal developments at higher courts
The case drew national attention this week when the Supreme Court took suo motu notice and heard arguments on Monday. Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud (reported earlier as part of the bench) cautioned media against running after statements from either side and urged the matter be allowed to proceed within legal bounds. Meanwhile, the Madhya Pradesh High Court has issued notice to Giribala Singh following petitions by the state government and Twisha’s father, Navnidhi Sharma, challenging her anticipatory bail and alleging lack of cooperation with investigators.

Second post-mortem, funeral held
A Delhi AIIMS team conducted a second post-mortem at Bhopal AIIMS on May 24, twelve days after the initial autopsy. Twisha’s last rites took place the same evening at Bhadbhada crematorium; her brother, Major Harshit, performed the final rites, family sources said.

What happens next
With the CBI now leading the investigation, the case is likely to be transferred to a special court in due course, officials indicated. Today's district court hearing on preserving digital and CCTV records could determine what evidence remains immediately accessible to investigators. Forensic reports on the belt and other material are awaited and expected to shape the agency’s next steps.