Stars or Statistics? Scientific Study Challenges the Basis of Astrological Belief

Research published in the Journal of Individual Differences suggests that cognitive ability and educational background are the strongest predictors of whether someone considers astrology scientific .

The study, led by Tobias Edwards, analyzed data from over 8,500 Americans. It tested several hypotheses, including whether disbelief in astrology stemmed from general skepticism of science, religious beliefs, or political views. The results were clear: individuals with higher scores on a cognitive ability test and more years of formal education were significantly less likely to believe astrology is scientific.

Surprising Findings and Limitations

Contrary to popular assumptions, the study found that religiosity and spirituality had no significant association with astrological beliefs. Trust in science showed only a minimal relationship, and political orientation demonstrated no meaningful correlation. This challenges the notion that astrology primarily serves as a substitute for religious faith or is tied to a particular worldview .

A key limitation of the study is its specific phrasing. By asking participants if they believed astrology was "scientific," the research may have missed individuals who find personal meaning in astrology without subscribing to its scientific validity . This distinction is crucial, as many enthusiasts engage with astrology as a tool for introspection and metaphor rather than a predictive science.

For the significant portion of the population that does find legitimacy in astrology, this research highlights a pathway for broader understanding. The findings suggest that educational initiatives focused on enhancing critical thinking skills and scientific literacy could be the most effective approach for addressing not just astrological beliefs, but pseudoscientific thinking in general .