Aditya Dhar's ambitious film "Dhurandhar" has landed in hot water following its Netflix release, with viewers expressing fury over significant cuts, muted dialogues, and what many are calling unnecessary censorship. The same movie that received standing ovations during its theatrical run has now become the center of a heated debate about creative freedom on OTT platforms.
The Missing Minutes Mystery
The controversy erupted when eagle-eyed viewers noticed substantial differences between the theatrical and Netflix versions. The original theatrical cut ran for 3 hours, 34 minutes, and 1 second. However, the Netflix version clocks in at just 3 hours and 25 minutes—nearly 9 minutes shorter.
This discrepancy has left audiences questioning what happened to the missing footage and why an adult-rated film on an OTT platform requires such extensive censorship.
A Timeline of Cuts
Understanding the Dhurandhar Netflix controversy requires examining the film's editing history:
Pre-January 1st: The complete theatrical version ran for 3 hours, 34 minutes, and 1 second
Post-January 1st: Following objections from the Baloch community, certain words and dialogues were muted, reducing runtime to 3 hours, 28 minutes, and 56 seconds
Netflix Release: Further cuts brought the runtime down to 3 hours and 25 minutes
Even viewers who watched the edited theatrical version post-January 1st are finding additional cuts on Netflix, raising serious questions about platform censorship policies.
The Censorship Double Standard
The most significant viewer complaint centers on muted dialogues and removed profanity. Despite carrying an A certificate—indicating adult-only content—the Netflix version has undergone heavy censorship.
One glaring example involves Sanjay Dutt's dialogue containing the word "Baloch," which has been completely muted in the streaming version. This creates awkward pauses and disrupts the film's natural flow, pulling viewers out of the narrative.
Social media has erupted with comparisons to other films. "If movies like 'Kabir Singh' and 'Animal' can stream uncut on OTT platforms, why is 'Dhurandhar' being treated differently?" asked one frustrated viewer on Twitter.
Technical Quality Concerns
Beyond censorship issues, viewers have raised concerns about the technical quality of the Netflix release:
Color Grading: The vibrant colors that enhanced the theatrical experience appear noticeably duller on Netflix
Sound Quality: Multiple users report that audio quality seems compressed compared to theater sound systems
Playback Speed: Some viewers feel the film plays slightly faster on Netflix, possibly due to frame rate differences (24fps theatrical vs. 25fps streaming)
The quality degradation is particularly noticeable for subscribers on HD plans, with only 4K plan users reporting satisfactory visual quality.
Why This Matters Now
The Dhurandhar Netflix controversy highlights a growing concern about OTT censorship in India. As streaming platforms become the primary mode of content consumption, questions about creative freedom and censorship standards have taken center stage.
Industry observers note that this incident could set a concerning precedent. If filmmakers cannot present their complete vision even on adult-rated OTT platforms, where can artistic expression find its full form?
The Audience Backlash
Viewers who paid premium ticket prices for the theatrical experience feel particularly cheated. Many had hoped that the OTT release would offer the uncut version they couldn't access in theaters after January 1st. Instead, they received an even more heavily censored product.
"What's the point of going to theaters and buying tickets if OTT platforms are also going to show censored versions?" wrote one angry viewer, capturing the sentiment of thousands.
What Happens Next?
Neither Aditya Dhar nor Netflix has officially commented on the controversy. The silence from both parties has only fueled speculation and frustration among the film's fanbase.
The Dhurandhar Netflix controversy raises fundamental questions about content delivery, censorship standards, and viewer expectations in India's rapidly evolving digital entertainment landscape. As audiences become more discerning and vocal, platforms and filmmakers may need to reconsider their approach to content presentation.
For now, fans of "Dhurandhar" are left wondering if they'll ever see the complete, unfiltered version of the film as Aditya Dhar originally intended.
.jpg)
