Rahman, in an interview with BBC Network, said, “I don’t look for work. Work comes to me on its own, through my honesty.” He added that while he does not believe anyone has explicitly denied him work in front of him, there are whispers of a communal bias affecting opportunities. Rahman emphasised that this perceived slowdown has not impacted his self-respect.

In response, Kangana expressed strong disagreement, writing, “Dear AR Rahman ji, in the film industry, I have to face a lot of discrimination and partiality, just because I support a saffron party. But I have never seen a more prejudiced and hateful person than you.” She recalled approaching Rahman for her directorial film Emergency, but he reportedly refused, citing that he did not want to be part of any “propaganda film.” Kangana noted that Emergency was later praised for its balanced perspective by critics and opposition leaders alike.

Kangana further connected Rahman’s claims to broader industry prejudice, citing instances of professional bias and humiliation. She mentioned how prominent designers, once seeking her endorsement, later refused to provide wardrobe support. She also referenced the earlier controversy with designer Masaba Gupta, alleging the designer prohibited her saree from being worn during a Ram Janmabhoomi visit, causing her emotional distress. Kangana wrote, “Today AR Rahman ji is shedding crocodile tears, but what about his own hatred and prejudice?”

The comments have sparked wider discussion among industry insiders. Veteran lyricist Javed Akhtar rejected Rahman’s claims, suggesting that the slowdown in Bollywood work could be due to Rahman’s commitments overseas rather than any communal bias. He noted, “Small producers might feel hesitant approaching a great personality like an Oscar winner. There is no communal angle to this.”

This exchange highlights ongoing tensions around perception, communal identity, and professional relationships within Bollywood. Kangana’s response underscores the emotional and professional challenges faced by artists in navigating industry politics, while Rahman maintains that his reputation and body of work speak for themselves.