Kunal Kemmu Said "You Can't Plan Your Baby to Affect How the World Works." The Internet Had Thoughts.

Digital Desk

Kunal Kemmu Said

Kunal Kemmu's remarks on Deepika Padukone's 8-hour shift demand — including a pregnancy planning comment — have divided Bollywood. Here's every side of the debate, fully explained.

One Sentence. One Podcast. One Firestorm.

Kunal Kemmu did not intend to start a war. He sat down for a relaxed podcast conversation with his wife Soha Ali Khan, said some things he clearly believed were reasonable and even generous, and then walked straight into one of the most heated gender debates Bollywood has seen in years.

The sentence that broke the internet was this one — delivered while discussing the industry's ongoing conversation about working hours and Deepika Padukone's demand for an eight-hour shift as a new mother:

"But motherhood is usually something you plan. It doesn't happen accidentally. You don't become an accidental mother. You have to plan it right; your plan can't affect the way the world is working." Bloomberg

By the time that clip had finished circulating on X, Instagram, and WhatsApp, the word "misogynist" was trending. Kemmu's mentions were on fire. And a debate that had already been simmering around Deepika Padukone's working hours demand had officially become a full-scale cultural explosion.

Here is everything that happened — and why it matters.


First, the Context: What Deepika Actually Asked For

Before judging anyone's response, you need to understand what started this.

Deepika Padukone welcomed her daughter Dua with Ranveer Singh on September 8, 2024. Returning to work as a new mother, she made a request that, stated plainly, sounds entirely reasonable: she wanted to work eight-hour shifts.

Film shoots in India have historically run for long stretches depending on production demands. While many male actors have managed to establish an 8-hour shift for themselves, women in the business have had to fight harder to set the same boundaries. NPR

Deepika was not asking for something new. She was asking for what her male counterparts already had. She told CNBC TV18 directly: "By virtue of being a woman, if that's coming across as pushy or whatever, then so be it. But it is no secret that a lot of superstars, male superstars, in the Indian film industry, have been working for eight hours for years and it's never made headlines." NBC News

She also added something even more pointed — that she found the industry's celebrated "chalta hai" culture, built on 15-hour shoot days and chaotic scheduling, neither romantic nor professional. It was, she said, simply bad management dressed up as passion.

The demand led directly to her reported exit from two major projects — Sandeep Reddy Vanga's Spirit and the Kalki 2898 AD sequel — when production teams were reportedly unable or unwilling to accommodate her request. Bloomberg

That is the backdrop. Now enter Kunal Kemmu.


What Kemmu Actually Said — All of It, Fairly

It is important to reproduce Kemmu's full argument rather than just the clip that went viral — because his position is more nuanced than the single sentence that caused the most damage.

On Soha Ali Khan's podcast, Kemmu said: "Sometimes we say now I want to do this much work and spend time here. Then you leave the job. Then don't say I want to be the bigger superstar. I want to be working on 10 films a year. You choose what you want to do. Know that it will come with its pros and cons and that you signed up for it." NBC News

He added: "You can't say in the middle of it that you want to get paid more and work less because now you feel like doing something else. If you want to be a bigger superstar and work in many films a year, you have to accept the effort that comes with it." NBC News

He also addressed the financial reality of filmmaking directly: "It is very easy to make these choices with someone else's money. If you want to work for four hours or eight hours, then become the producer." Zee News

Taken together, Kemmu's argument is essentially a market-logic one: the entertainment industry has certain demands baked into it, stars are compensated handsomely to meet those demands, and if you want to reshape those demands, you need the financial leverage to do so — become a producer.

It is not an unreasonable argument. It is also not a new one. And for most of it, the internet was mildly annoyed but not enraged.

Then came the pregnancy line.


The Line That Changed Everything

"But motherhood is usually something you plan. It doesn't happen accidentally. You don't become an accidental mother. You have to plan it right; your plan can't affect the way the world is working." Bloomberg

Kemmu clarified that this was not gender-specific — that the same logic applied to men making life choices that affected their professional availability. But the clarification arrived too late and landed too softly to contain the response.

The internet's objection was immediate and came from multiple directions simultaneously.

First: the assumption that pregnancy and motherhood can simply be "planned" to fit professional schedules ignores the reality of fertility challenges, pregnancy complications, postpartum recovery, and infant care demands — none of which operate on a film production timeline. Telling a woman that her "plan" should not affect how the world works is, critics argued, telling her that her body and her child should be invisible to her professional obligations.

Second: the phrasing "your plan can't affect the way the world is working" drew sharp criticism because it frames a systemic industry problem — the lack of accommodation for new mothers — as a personal planning failure. The world, by this logic, is a fixed and neutral thing. Women who struggle within it simply did not plan correctly.

Third: the framing of eight-hour shifts as a personal indulgence rather than a basic professional boundary — one that male stars have quietly enjoyed for years without a word of criticism — struck many as a double standard so deeply embedded in Bollywood that even thoughtful people like Kemmu were reproducing it without noticing.


Bollywood Responds: The Industry Splits Down the Middle

The reaction from within Bollywood was swift, revealing, and divided in ways that mapped onto generational and gender lines with almost perfect clarity.

Kareena Kapoor Khan, Kalyani Priyadarshan, and Ananya Panday all addressed the debate in an exclusive conversation with The Hollywood Reporter India, sharing their perspectives on how working hours are negotiated in the industry. Kareena — who navigated two pregnancies while remaining one of Bollywood's most commercially active stars — offered support for clearer boundaries while acknowledging the complexity of production realities. NPR

Priyanka Chopra Jonas became a flashpoint when she liked a reel on social media comparing her work ethic favourably to Deepika's — with the reel's creator praising Priyanka as a "true global star" while subtly criticising Deepika's working hour demands. The like was interpreted by many as a tacit endorsement of the critique, drawing its own wave of criticism toward Priyanka. Windward

The Priyanka episode underlined something important: this debate is not simply about working hours. It has activated every fault line in Bollywood's gender landscape — who gets celebrated for pushing through versus who gets celebrated for pushing back, who is called "professional" and who is called "difficult."


What Deepika's Position Actually Represents

Strip away the celebrity gossip layer and what Deepika Padukone is doing is structurally significant.

She is the biggest female star in India by most commercial measures. She commands some of the highest fees in the industry. She has the leverage — if anyone does — to demand what she is demanding without career consequence. And what she is demanding is not special treatment. It is parity.

She told Brut India simply: "I don't think what I am asking for is ridiculously unfair." Bloomberg

She is right. Eight hours is a standard working day in virtually every industry on earth. The fact that Bollywood has built an entire mythology around 15-hour shoots as evidence of passion and commitment is a cultural choice, not a physical necessity. Schedules can be designed differently. Productions can be planned more efficiently. The "chalta hai" culture Deepika criticised exists because nobody powerful enough has challenged it consistently enough — until now.

The irony is that if Kemmu's argument holds — that you need to own the money to change the rules — then Deepika Padukone, one of the most bankable stars in Hindi cinema with her own production ambitions, is probably as close to that position as any woman in Bollywood has ever been.


The Real Question Nobody Is Asking

Here is the conversation that the Kemmu controversy has accidentally started — and that Bollywood has been avoiding for decades.

Why is it that male superstars who work eight-hour days are called "professional" and "disciplined," while a female superstar who makes the same demand is called "difficult" and triggers a national debate?

The answer to that question is not about Kunal Kemmu, or Deepika Padukone, or any individual. It is about a system that was designed — implicitly, through decades of practice — around the assumption that the people with the most power to set conditions would be men. And that when women with equivalent power make equivalent demands, it feels like disruption because it is disruption: of an arrangement that was never equitable to begin with.

Kemmu's "plan your pregnancy better" remark was tone-deaf. His broader argument about professional expectations has genuine merit. Both things are true — which is why this debate has been so combustible. It is not a simple story of a villain and a hero. It is a story about an industry in the middle of an overdue reckoning with how it treats the people who make it money.


The Bottom Line

Kunal Kemmu went on a podcast and said things he believed were rational. Some of them were. One of them — the pregnancy planning remark — landed with the sensitivity of a wrecking ball and rightly drew criticism.

Deepika Padukone lost two major films because she asked to work the same hours that her male co-stars have quietly insisted upon for years. She has not backed down. She has, if anything, gotten louder.

Her position, stated plainly, is this: "I don't think what I am asking for is ridiculously unfair." NBC News

The industry's response — the exits, the debates, the trending hashtags, the viral reel Priyanka liked — is telling you something important about how far Bollywood still has to travel before that unremarkable statement stops being controversial.

Eight hours. It should not be this complicated.

Related Posts

Advertisement

Latest News