Kishor’s strategy sought to transcend entrenched caste loyalties, appealing to voters with a development-focused narrative. He emphasized restoring Bihar’s lost economic and social stature, comparing the state with more advanced regions of India.
However, Jan Suraaj fell short at the ballot box. Analysts cite several factors: lack of a proven track record, limited local party machinery, and voter preference for the established NDA government’s familiarity and governance record. Many voters also viewed supporting a new party as risky, fearing their votes might indirectly aid rival alliances.
Despite the electoral setback, Kishor’s efforts have had a lasting impact. The high voter turnout =66.9% overall, including 71.6% among women indicates a significant engagement with issues beyond traditional caste politics. “The first election is fought to lose, the second to make others lose, and the third to win,” Kishor said in a recent interview, signaling his long-term vision for building a credible political alternative in Bihar.
Experts note that the campaign successfully introduced topics such as migration, education, and employment into mainstream electoral discussions, challenging the dominance of caste-based narratives. Kishor’s focus on nurturing leadership pipelines and credible local figures could influence Bihar’s political landscape in the coming years.
While Jan Suraaj did not secure power, Kishor’s campaign has planted the seeds of development-oriented politics, potentially shaping the state’s electoral dynamics in future elections.
