The analysis traced over $500 million to these high-dollar contributors. At least 197 donors, or those in related industries, received advantages like pardons, dropped cases, government contracts, regulatory relief, or White House access.
The Times stressed no direct proof links donations to specific favors, but patterns raise ethical concerns in an unprecedented fundraising scale.
Channels include MAGA Inc. super PAC ($200 million post-election), a record $240 million inaugural fund, and opaque groups for a White House ballroom, America's 250th anniversary, and nonprofits with limited disclosure.
Fossil fuel firms donated $41 million amid drilling expansions and repealed regulations. Defense contractors like Lockheed Martin and Boeing contributed millions, aligning with favorable policies.
Palantir secured hundreds of millions in contracts after $15 million in gifts. Crypto donors saw probes halted and pro-industry shifts.
Pardons went to relatives of contributors; one family donated heavily before a son's ambassador post.
Tech giants, including those led by Indian-origin CEOs, donated to inaugural and other funds while engaging on AI and regulatory issues.
The White House dismissed suspicions, insisting Trump's focus remains national improvement.
Lobbyists note donors seek access, some viewing contributions as protection.
Ongoing efforts target more for a presidential library and events.
Critics decry blurred lines between influence and governance in Trump's second term.
.jpg)
