Karnataka Monsoon Session Ends Early Amid Valmiki Scam Row
Digital Desk
Karnataka’s Monsoon Session ended three days early after BJP protests over the Valmiki Corporation case and demands for B Nagendra’s resignation.
Session curtailed by three days
The Karnataka legislature’s Monsoon Session ended three days ahead of schedule on Monday after repeated disruptions by the Opposition BJP over allegations linked to the Karnataka Maharshi Valmiki Scheduled Tribes Development Corporation (KMVSTDC) case. The BJP had been demanding the resignation of Congress leader B Nagendra after the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) filed a chargesheet in the case.
Both Houses were eventually adjourned sine die after the government passed the Supplementary Finance Bill. The early conclusion meant that several legislative proposals and public issues listed for discussion could not be taken up.
BJP targets B Nagendra
The BJP intensified its campaign against Nagendra during the session, arguing that his continuation in the government was inappropriate while allegations connected with the corporation case remained under investigation.
Nagendra, who had resigned as minister in 2024 after the alleged irregularities came to light, has denied wrongdoing. He has accused central investigative agencies of politically targeting him.
Speaking in the Legislative Council before the session was adjourned, Deputy Chief Minister D K Shivakumar defended the government’s position. He said the Opposition was free to seek Nagendra’s resignation but should have followed legislative procedure and allowed the issue to be debated on the floor of the House.
Shivakumar also argued that issues concerning farmers, employment, land, water and the state’s language deserved legislative attention rather than repeated disruptions.
Key issues miss debate
The shortened session left several important matters without detailed discussion. Among them was the Karnataka Regulation of Use of Government Premises and Public Property Bill, 2026, which seeks to regulate the use of government spaces and public property by private organisations and groups.
Other issues that were expected to come up included drought conditions, land acquisition for the proposed Bidadi township, Karnataka Public Service Commission recruitment, the absence of women ministers in the state Cabinet, the Cauvery water-sharing issue with Tamil Nadu and the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls.
The government did, however, secure approval for supplementary budget estimates of ₹7,042.69 crore through the Karnataka Appropriation Bill for 2026-27.
BJP approaches Governor
Following the early adjournment, BJP leaders took their protest to Governor Thawar Chand Gehlot. Leader of Opposition R Ashoka led a delegation seeking intervention over Nagendra’s continuation as a minister.
The BJP argued that the filing of a CBI chargesheet had increased the need for the government to address questions surrounding Nagendra’s position. Ashoka maintained that legal eligibility and political or constitutional propriety were separate issues.
The BJP also alleged that the government had deliberately curtailed the session to prevent the Opposition from escalating its protests.
Nagendra rejects allegations
Nagendra has consistently rejected accusations of involvement in the alleged diversion of funds. He has said he is prepared to face questions in the legislature and has questioned why the Opposition has singled him out while similar cases involving political leaders remain pending.
The Congress government has also maintained that the investigation has not established Nagendra’s direct involvement in the alleged diversion of funds.
The controversy centres on allegations that ₹94.73 crore deposited with Union Bank of India’s Bengaluru branch was diverted to accounts connected with private entities. Investigating agencies have made allegations concerning the movement of funds and alleged payments linked to contracts awarded through the corporation. Nagendra has denied the allegations against him.
Legislative business takes a hit
The premature conclusion of the Monsoon Session has once again highlighted the impact that political confrontations can have on legislative business. While the government maintained that the Opposition should use established procedures to raise allegations, the BJP argued that the seriousness of the corruption allegations justified sustained protests.
With several policy and public-interest matters left without debate, the session’s early closure has added another political flashpoint between the ruling Congress and the BJP in Karnataka.
Recommended For You
--------
🚨 Beat the News Rush – Join Now!
Get breaking alerts, hot exclusives, and game-changing stories instantly on your phone. No delays, no fluff – just the edge you need. ⚡
Tap to join:
🟢 WhatsApp Channel: Dainik Jagran MP CG
Crave more?
🅕 Facebook: Dainik Jagran MP CG English
🅧 Twitter (X): Dainik Jagran MP CG
🅘 Instagram: Dainik Jagran MP CG
Share the fire – keep your crew ahead! 🗞️🔥

