Yogi Adityanath Targets Opposition Over Ayodhya Temple Row, Revives Hanumangarhi Controversy
Digital desk
Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath on Friday launched a sharp attack on opposition parties while addressing a programme in Ayodhya, linking the ongoing debate surrounding temple offerings and religious matters to past political decisions in the state.
Speaking at the event, the Chief Minister accused the Congress and the Samajwadi Party (SP) of pursuing what he described as policies that hurt religious sentiments. Referring to a past controversy associated with Hanumangarhi, Yogi Adityanath alleged that opposition parties had committed a “mistake” by allowing actions that, according to him, were inappropriate for a major Hindu religious site.
During his address, the Chief Minister questioned what he called the selective approach of some political parties on religious issues. He asked whether practices associated with one faith would be accepted inside places of worship belonging to another religion, arguing that the same standards should apply in all cases.
The remarks came amid continuing political debate over religious sites, temple administration and issues connected to Ayodhya. The city has remained at the centre of national political discourse since the inauguration of the Ram Temple and continues to witness frequent exchanges between ruling and opposition parties over matters related to faith, heritage and governance.
Without naming specific leaders, Yogi Adityanath said certain political groups had historically engaged in what he described as appeasement politics. He asserted that his government was committed to protecting religious traditions while ensuring development and infrastructure growth in major pilgrimage centres across Uttar Pradesh.
The Chief Minister also highlighted the transformation of Ayodhya in recent years, pointing to investments in roads, tourism facilities, transportation networks and public infrastructure. According to him, the city's development reflects a broader effort to promote religious tourism and strengthen cultural heritage.
Opposition parties have repeatedly rejected similar allegations in the past, accusing the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) of raising religious issues for political purposes. Leaders from Congress and the Samajwadi Party have maintained that they respect all faiths and have accused the ruling party of attempting to polarise public debate.
Political observers note that religious and cultural issues are likely to remain prominent in Uttar Pradesh politics, particularly as parties continue to position themselves ahead of future electoral contests. Statements relating to Ayodhya, temples and religious identity often attract significant public and political attention due to their wider symbolic importance.
The latest remarks by the Chief Minister are expected to trigger fresh reactions from opposition leaders, adding another chapter to the ongoing political contest over religion, governance and public perception in the state.
--------
🚨 Beat the News Rush – Join Now!
Get breaking alerts, hot exclusives, and game-changing stories instantly on your phone. No delays, no fluff – just the edge you need. ⚡
Tap to join:
🟢 WhatsApp Channel: Dainik Jagran MP CG
Crave more?
🅕 Facebook: Dainik Jagran MP CG English
🅧 Twitter (X): Dainik Jagran MP CG
🅘 Instagram: Dainik Jagran MP CG
Share the fire – keep your crew ahead! 🗞️🔥
Yogi Adityanath Targets Opposition Over Ayodhya Temple Row, Revives Hanumangarhi Controversy
Digital desk
Speaking at the event, the Chief Minister accused the Congress and the Samajwadi Party (SP) of pursuing what he described as policies that hurt religious sentiments. Referring to a past controversy associated with Hanumangarhi, Yogi Adityanath alleged that opposition parties had committed a “mistake” by allowing actions that, according to him, were inappropriate for a major Hindu religious site.
During his address, the Chief Minister questioned what he called the selective approach of some political parties on religious issues. He asked whether practices associated with one faith would be accepted inside places of worship belonging to another religion, arguing that the same standards should apply in all cases.
The remarks came amid continuing political debate over religious sites, temple administration and issues connected to Ayodhya. The city has remained at the centre of national political discourse since the inauguration of the Ram Temple and continues to witness frequent exchanges between ruling and opposition parties over matters related to faith, heritage and governance.
Without naming specific leaders, Yogi Adityanath said certain political groups had historically engaged in what he described as appeasement politics. He asserted that his government was committed to protecting religious traditions while ensuring development and infrastructure growth in major pilgrimage centres across Uttar Pradesh.
The Chief Minister also highlighted the transformation of Ayodhya in recent years, pointing to investments in roads, tourism facilities, transportation networks and public infrastructure. According to him, the city's development reflects a broader effort to promote religious tourism and strengthen cultural heritage.
Opposition parties have repeatedly rejected similar allegations in the past, accusing the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) of raising religious issues for political purposes. Leaders from Congress and the Samajwadi Party have maintained that they respect all faiths and have accused the ruling party of attempting to polarise public debate.
Political observers note that religious and cultural issues are likely to remain prominent in Uttar Pradesh politics, particularly as parties continue to position themselves ahead of future electoral contests. Statements relating to Ayodhya, temples and religious identity often attract significant public and political attention due to their wider symbolic importance.
The latest remarks by the Chief Minister are expected to trigger fresh reactions from opposition leaders, adding another chapter to the ongoing political contest over religion, governance and public perception in the state.
