Supreme Court Warns Heavy Compensation in Stray Dog Bite Cases: Adopt or Face Liability

Digital Desk

Supreme Court Warns Heavy Compensation in Stray Dog Bite Cases: Adopt or Face Liability

Supreme Court slams stray dog bites, warns states of heavy compensation & urges feeders to adopt pets at home. Latest updates from Jan 13 hearing on child, elderly attacks.

Supreme Court Issues Stern Warning on Stray Dog Bite Cases: Time for Accountability

In a fiery hearing today, January 13, 2026, the Supreme Court of India cracked down on the growing menace of stray dog bite cases, especially targeting children and the elderly. A bench led by Justices Vikram Nath, Sandeep Mehta, and NV Anjaria didn't mince words: dog lovers feeding strays must take them home, or face heavy compensation liabilities. This comes amid rising attacks, with the court monitoring compliance to its November 2025 order removing dogs from public spots like schools, hospitals, and railway stations.

The ruling highlights a public safety crisis turning urgent in urban India, where stray populations explode due to poor Animal Birth Control (ABC) implementation.

Court's Blunt Remarks on Responsibility

Justice Sandeep Mehta posed a piercing question: "When dogs attack a nine-year-old child, who should be held responsible? Should it be the organisation feeding them?" The bench emphasized that strays carry incurable viruses, citing Ranthambore National Park where tigers got infected from dog bites.

Justice Vikram Nath added, "For every dog bite, death or injury to children or elderly, we are likely going to fix heavy compensation by the state." States face the heat for five years of inaction on norms, with the court planning to mandate victim compensation.

Feeders aren't off the hook either. "Liability on those who say we are feeding dogs. Take them to your house. Why should dogs loiter, biting people?" the court demanded. Pet owners must now get licenses, ending the free-for-all custody of strays.

Heated Arguments from Both Sides

Animal welfare advocates pushed back. Senior counsel Vikas Singh argued dogs control rats and maintain ecosystem balance, noting 50,000+ snakebite deaths in 2025 dwarf dog issues. Advocate Guruswamy decried cruelty, saying neither killing nor sterilization alone works—compassion can't be abandoned.

A dog bite victim, Kamna Pandey, shared her story: bitten 20 years ago, she blamed human cruelty for the dog's fear-driven attack. An 80-year-old "Dog Amma" caring for 200 strays suggested incentives like free sterilization for adoptions. Singer Mika Singh's 10-acre donation for shelters got a nod, but Justice Mehta retorted sharply to lengthy defenses, comparing them unfavorably to arguments for orphaned children.

Critics like Advocate Percival Billimoria blamed failed ABC programs, per a 2025 PIB report. Advocate Arvind Datar urged extending removals to airports, citing court premises attacks.

Why This Matters Now: Public Safety vs. Compassion

Stray dog bite cases have surged, harming India's image and daily life. The court's timeline shows evolution—from August 2025 shelter mandates to today's adoption push—reflecting frustration with states. Previous hearings rebuked Bihar's chief secretary and actress Sharmila Tagore's lawyer for downplaying aggressive strays.

Practical Takeaways for Readers:

  • Report bites immediately: Demand action from local authorities.

  • Support ABC drives: Push for better sterilization in your area.

  • Adopt responsibly: Get licensed, vaccinate Indies—consider incentives.

 

Related Posts

Advertisement

Latest News