The contentious decision, after Sanju Samson’s diving catch off Hardik Pandya’s slower delivery, has reignited debate over umpiring standards and video review protocols in high-stakes cricket.
Former Pakistan captain Shahid Afridi criticised the third umpire live on Samaa TV, quipping, “Unhone IPL me bhi toh umpiring karni hai” (“He has to umpire in the IPL too”), suggesting a bias toward high-profile leagues over crucial Asia Cup fixtures. Afridi added that only a couple of camera angles were reviewed, questioning the thoroughness of the decision.
Legendary pacer Shoaib Akhtar further fuelled controversy on PTV, accusing match officials of neglecting key mid-wicket footage. “With 26 cameras available, why did they check only two angles? Fakhar wasn’t out. He should have got benefit of the doubt,” Akhtar argued, emphasising that the ball appeared to bounce before reaching Samson’s gloves.
Pakistan skipper Salman Ali Agha lodged an official protest with match referee Andy Pycroft, highlighting the significance of Zaman’s wicket at 21/1. Agha noted that the decision “did look like it bounced before the keeper,” admitting the fine margin for error on both sides.
Cricket analysts on social media have echoed these concerns, debating whether the DRS system truly offers conclusive evidence or merely prolongs on-field uncertainties. Fans worldwide continue to scrutinise broadcast replays, with many calling for broader angle reviews and clearer guidelines for third umpires in Asia Cup 2025 fixtures.
As host nation India cruised to a six-wicket victory, the larger question remains: will the ICC refine its review protocols to eliminate such disputes? With the Asia Cup’s knockout stages looming, teams and supporters alike are demanding greater transparency and accuracy in umpiring decisions to preserve cricket’s competitive integrity.
.jpg)
1.jpg)
.jpg)
