SC Slams Kapil Sibal in Justice Verma Case: 'CJI is Not a Post Office'

The Supreme Court on Wednesday reserved its verdict on a petition filed by Justice Yashwant Verma, who is facing the threat of impeachment after the cash recovery controversy.

Justice Verma has challenged the findings of the three-member internal inquiry committee, which recommended his removal under Article 124 (4) of the Constitution.

In his writ petition, Justice Verma, a sitting judge of the Allahabad High Court, had sought quashing of the letter sent by then Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna to the President and the Prime Minister, recommending action based on the findings of the internal committee.

Senior advocate Kapil Sibal presented strong arguments on behalf of Justice Verma. He said that it is illegal for the in-house committee to recommend the dismissal of the judge.

Sibal said that the process of impeachment can be done only under Article 124 of the Constitution and the Judges (Inquiry) Act. He warned that such a recommendation can set a dangerous precedent.

Why did you not approach the court: SC

The bench of Justice Dipankar Dutta and Justice A.G. Masih questioned the attitude of Justice Verma. The court said, "You participated in the proceedings of the committee, then why are you challenging its recommendation now? Why did you not approach the court earlier?"

The court also said that the work of the Chief Justice of India (CJI) is not just to send letters. If he has evidence of misconduct of any judge, then it is his duty to inform the President and the Prime Minister.

The court also clarified that the investigation of the in-house committee is preliminary and non-punitive. It does not require cross-examination or strict evidence.

The court told Justice Verma, "You participated in the proceedings of the committee but you came to court only when the verdict came against you. Your attitude is unbelievable."